What arms do we need to take the government back?

[rightwinger]

Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.

It’s easier to fight with artillery, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, bombers, a Navy, a command and control structure, skilled fighters, logistics

All things our magnificent military has that gun nuts playing Red Dawn fantasies do not

No one questioned that it is easier to fight with those things and many more.

Do you believe people have a better fighting chance with or without guns? Or do only all those things you mentioned matter, just definitely not guns?

History has shown that peaceful resistance is more effective than armed resistance

Yeah it worked great under Stalin. They stood there and took the bullet.

Which is your plan for Americans.

You can't possibly believe people are so dumb that they believe the nonsense.

Ask Gandhi

 

[Norman]

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.

It’s easier to fight with artillery, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, bombers, a Navy, a command and control structure, skilled fighters, logistics

All things our magnificent military has that gun nuts playing Red Dawn fantasies do not

No one questioned that it is easier to fight with those things and many more.

Do you believe people have a better fighting chance with or without guns? Or do only all those things you mentioned matter, just definitely not guns?

As I have pointed out.....
Free Speech, Free Press, Freedom of assembly and a vote make=guns unnecessary

We have NEVER needed a second amendment against government

Lying that you do not understand simple concepts, now that is unnecessary and will only lengthen the discussion.

it is a simple concept that armed attacks against your government is an invitation to slaughter

Accepting tyranny is an invitation to an even bigger slaughter. However, you are diverting from the thread topic again.

 

[ThisIsMe]

"Take the government back" from whom?

From the permanent bureaucratic oligarchs.....But those parasites will always be with us, as long as The State is there to attract them.

You take the government back in the freaking voting booth.

If a government becomes tyrannical, then you can assume martial law has been enacted and elections have been suspended.

 

[Oddball]

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.

It’s easier to fight with artillery, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, bombers, a Navy, a command and control structure, skilled fighters, logistics

All things our magnificent military has that gun nuts playing Red Dawn fantasies do not

No one questioned that it is easier to fight with those things and many more.

Do you believe people have a better fighting chance with or without guns? Or do only all those things you mentioned matter, just definitely not guns?

History has shown that peaceful resistance is more effective than armed resistance

Yeah it worked great under Stalin. They stood there and took the bullet.

Which is your plan for Americans.

You can't possibly believe people are so dumb that they believe the nonsense.

Ask Gandhi

Your side isn't following the teachings of Gandhi....They're taking up the tactics of Che Guevara....You think that the people who've' been clobbered on the head with bicycle locks are going to just sit around and keep taking it?

Dream on, asshole.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

And to have all those rights we need:

- Right to bear arms.

We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote

EVER

You really are stupid.

1776
1812
1942

All fought by the Government not privately held arms

No dumbass. Even in 1942 what kept the japs from attacking the mainland was private gun ownership.

You’re the kind of person that has to read the directions on a roll of toilet paper to wipe your ass. Without government or at least someone telling you how to live you wouldn’t be able to.

Try again...
What kept the Japs from attacking the mainland was the Pacific Ocean

LMAO!

 

[EvMetro]

Here is a reminder of what was in the opening post:

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?

Notice that the opening post was about a hypothetical takeover of a tyrannical government. Commies have difficulty processing hypothetical events, they are more like dogs and cats that can only process the here and now. Commies are only able to respond to this thread subjectively, with a post that supports commie agenda. They cannot step away from their subjective agenda long enough to process a scenario objectively.

 

[Crepitus]

"
What arms do we need to take the government back?

Which one do you use to vote?

That's the only one you need.

View attachment 296829

You republicans are going about it the wrong way.

 

[Norman]

"
What arms do we need to take the government back?

Which one do you use to vote?

That's the only one you need.

View attachment 296829

You republicans are going about it the wrong way.

Yeah, we should be armed with dildos like you guys... because that has a proven track record.

 

[Norman]

Here is a reminder of what was in the opening post:

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?

Notice that the opening post was about a hypothetical takeover of a tyrannical government. Commies have difficulty processing hypothetical events, they are more like dogs and cats that can only process the here and now. Commies are only able to respond to this thread subjectively, with a post that supports commie agenda. They cannot step away from their subjective agenda long enough to process a scenario objectively.

This topic is very important to them. They want to pretend there is no legitimate reason to own guns. This is clearly one of the reasons why guns are absolutely necessary. Plus, it is the real reason they want to ban guns - so they can have their far left tyrannical socialist government.

 

[Crepitus]

"
What arms do we need to take the government back?

Which one do you use to vote?

That's the only one you need.

View attachment 296829

You republicans are going about it the wrong way.

Yeah, we should be armed with dildos like you guys... because that has a proven track record.

Hate to break it to you kid, but you guys are dildos.

 

[Norman]

"
What arms do we need to take the government back?

Which one do you use to vote?

That's the only one you need.

View attachment 296829

You republicans are going about it the wrong way.

Yeah, we should be armed with dildos like you guys... because that has a proven track record.

Hate to break it to you kid, but you guys are dildos.

You are a giant ass, who happens to be full of shit.

We will take the ARs.

 

[XponentialChaos]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?

In the event of this hypothetical scenario, you wouldn't stand a chance against tanks, jets, nuclear weapons, and the greatest military in the world.

You just like to play with guns.

"Pew pew, I'm gonna take down the government."

 

[bodecea]

For the OP:

But you will shoot your eye out.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government

1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech

It has worked for 230 years

when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...

See 1-4 above

it works

ok...when have we had a tyrannical govt?....

The opening post specifies a hypothetical event. What arms do you think we would need for the hypothetical event? Remember, the opening post also specifies temporarily stepping away from subjective ideology long enough to provide an objective answer..

if your O.P. is serious, no amount of guns in private hands will defeat the strongest military in the history of mankind

In reality, push comes to shove, in the long run, it would end up being a draw. No winners only losers. It would end up being the States Organized Militias against the Feds. And given that, the Feds Military would be broken right down the middle.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD

View attachment 296795

Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.

It’s easier to fight with artillery, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, bombers, a Navy, a command and control structure, skilled fighters, logistics

All things our magnificent military has that gun nuts playing Red Dawn fantasies do not

you are so far away from what the premise of this thread was that its a whole different thread...

I think RW fantasizes about an authoritarian govt knocking down doors and confiscating guns from legal abiding citizens.

 

[rightwinger]

If you want to take back government, no amount of guns will help you

Your vote will

 

[Blues Man]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?

The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government

1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech

It has worked for 230 years

Votes do not matter as the government has been bought and paid for

We do not have a free press because it is owned by the same people that own the government

It's only a matter of time before our freedom of speech is eroded completely away

And if the government does not like the people you are assembling it won't be allowed

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?

The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government

1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech

It has worked for 230 years

when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...

See 1-4 above

it works

ok...when have we had a tyrannical govt?....

See 1-4 above
Why we haven’t had a tyrannical govt. Why we don’t need a second amendment

We are still a young country the inevitable slide into oppression has already started

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?

The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government

1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech

It has worked for 230 years

And to have all those rights we need:

- Right to bear arms.

We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote

EVER

Maybe we haven't needed arms because we already have them.

When we don't have them is when we will need them

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

If you want to take back government, no amount of guns will help you

Your vote will

No it won't

Congress does not give a shit what you want

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk