What arms do we need to take the government back?

So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
 
So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD

False. An armed populace is a huge deterrent. For one, military alone is not much good.
 
So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
VietCongn2.jpg
 
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
The exact same technological equivalency that the founding generation had. There is little need to describe the type when it is sufficient to say that we should have the same state of the art weapons that the government has.

After all, that is what we had in the founding generation.
Let me explain something to you

Gun nuts could have the exact same weapons as our armed forces and they would still have their asses handed to them

Our command structure, training and tactics are just that good
Let me explain something to you, again.

The military will not actively work to overthrow the people. They are loyal to the Constitution and the Constitution places the power in our hands.

Let me explain something to you. You take up arms against our constitutionally elected government ....YOU are the bad guys
Good thing that General Washington ignored that memo.

Washington had a Constitutionally elected Government which formed the Continental Army
The same Army that took the airports from the British
 
So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
you are as good of a dancer as your buddy dean was....
 
So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
View attachment 296795
Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China
 
So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
View attachment 296795
Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China
Has nothing to do with the fact that they withstood the most powerful military machine on the planet with little more than small arms and crude booby traps.
 
The exact same technological equivalency that the founding generation had. There is little need to describe the type when it is sufficient to say that we should have the same state of the art weapons that the government has.

After all, that is what we had in the founding generation.
Let me explain something to you

Gun nuts could have the exact same weapons as our armed forces and they would still have their asses handed to them

Our command structure, training and tactics are just that good
Let me explain something to you, again.

The military will not actively work to overthrow the people. They are loyal to the Constitution and the Constitution places the power in our hands.

Let me explain something to you. You take up arms against our constitutionally elected government ....YOU are the bad guys
Good thing that General Washington ignored that memo.

Washington had a Constitutionally elected Government which formed the Continental Army
The same Army that took the airports from the British
The Constitution wasn't even written until 1786, cement head.
 
So far Rightwinger has not had a single good argument.

Everyone knows arms are beneficial in "taking government back". It's simply not even a debate. To say otherwise is completely retarded. Now can we actually discuss the topic?

Certainly high powered weapons are very handy.

Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
View attachment 296795
Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.
 
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.

Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government

1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech

It has worked for 230 years

And to have all those rights we need:

- Right to bear arms.

We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote

EVER
You really are stupid.

1776
1812
1942

All fought by the Government not privately held arms
No dumbass. Even in 1942 what kept the japs from attacking the mainland was private gun ownership.

You’re the kind of person that has to read the directions on a roll of toilet paper to wipe your ass. Without government or at least someone telling you how to live you wouldn’t be able to.
 
Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
View attachment 296795
Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China
Has nothing to do with the fact that they withstood the most powerful military machine on the planet with little more than small arms and crude booby traps.

Still supported by major world governments just like the Continental Army were supported by the French.....Neither was a citizens army of individual gun owners fighting the Government
 
The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government

1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech

It has worked for 230 years

And to have all those rights we need:

- Right to bear arms.

We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote

EVER
You really are stupid.

1776
1812
1942

All fought by the Government not privately held arms
No dumbass. Even in 1942 what kept the japs from attacking the mainland was private gun ownership.

You’re the kind of person that has to read the directions on a roll of toilet paper to wipe your ass. Without government or at least someone telling you how to live you wouldn’t be able to.

Try again...
What kept the Japs from attacking the mainland was the Pacific Ocean
 
Up next: RightWinger will claim that no war ever was won by guns.

This guy is a total asshat. I am not sure if he is this delusional or if he actually believes people absorb the bullshit. Clearly he comes from an environment where people buy lies no matter how stupid.

experts-gun-control.jpg
 
Everyone knows we have the best government in the world
If we want to “take government back” we do it with a Free Press, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, the vote.......and oh yes, Impeachment

Not an arm to be found
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
View attachment 296795
Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.

It’s easier to fight with artillery, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, bombers, a Navy, a command and control structure, skilled fighters, logistics

All things our magnificent military has that gun nuts playing Red Dawn fantasies do not
 
if the military took control with a dictator,those 4 things would be shut down....now what?....how are you going to get it back?...
If the military took control with a dictator, your private arms would be of no help
Our Military is THAT GOOD
View attachment 296795
Wrong again
Both the NVA and Viet Cong were supported by the North Vietnamese government, Russia and China

So fucking what.

It's clear that you are utterly wrong. It's because of the simple fact that it's for sure easier to fight WITH guns than WITHOUT guns. Your position is a joke, and I do not believe even you yourself seriously entertain it. Leftist deception at its finest.

It’s easier to fight with artillery, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, bombers, a Navy, a command and control structure, skilled fighters, logistics

All things our magnificent military has that gun nuts playing Red Dawn fantasies do not
you are so far away from what the premise of this thread was that its a whole different thread...
 

Forum List

Back
Top