what crime - wheres the evidence

[Siete]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

McConnell is digging his own political grave and he knows it for a fact. Why?

AP FACT CHECK: Trump's flawed 'read the transcript' defense

So, we are to trust the strung-together accounts of people who listened to the call and are now trying to remember the content, verse the actual transcript?

It's like telling me to not trust my eyes and believe that the sky is pink.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Why can't they just review the testimony already presented to the house?

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

It's not the Senate's job to investigate, but only to judge what the House sends over.

Period.

The witnesses testifying under oath would be an awesome way for such an innocent president to clear his name.

Didn't they testify before the house? Let's just review their testimony, right?

.

 

[lantern2814]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Your own rules come back to bite you on the ass. Proof? That would be what YOU need idiot. Burden of proof is on you. Trump does not have to prove innocence. Not interested in education are you?

 

[Nostra]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jurors don't call witnesses, Dummy.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If the senate reviews the evidence presented during the house's inquiry and finds it factually insufficient, the senate has no duty to proceed. Maybe the house should do a better job of making the case for removal BEFORE voting to impeach and sending it to the senate.

What a concept, right?

.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

It's not the Senate's responsibility to finish an investigation the House started. Schiff could have gone to court to force testimony, but did not because of his self-imposed timeline. Now he wants the Senate to do what he did not.

The Senate should tell Shiffforbrains to pound sand and dismiss the whole shit show.

That's a good possibility.

 

[Siete]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Why can't they just review the testimony already presented to the house?

.

they cant lie about it - spin and twist it

they're under oath

if they do lie, they break the law

if they break the law they join their pals in prison

Turtleboi dont need no stinkin witnisses -

proof comes from witness testimony

after months of demanding proof republcans are making excuses because Turtleboi F'D em real good.

 

[lantern2814]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Why can't they just review the testimony already presented to the house?

.

they cant lie about it - spin and twist it

they're under oath

if they do lie, they break the law

if they break the law they join their pals in prison

Turtleboi dont need no stinkin witnisses -

proof comes from witness testimony

after months of demanding proof republcans are making excuses because Turtleboi F'D em real good.

Sigh. Again moron, burden of proof is on YOU. Trump needs no defense because you have no case. As you keep running away from that FACT. Then again, facts hurt your pea brain.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Why can't they just review the testimony already presented to the house?

.

they cant lie about it - spin and twist it

they're under oath

if they do lie, they break the law

if they break the law they join their pals in prison

Turtleboi dont need no stinkin witnisses -

proof comes from witness testimony

after months of demanding proof republcans are making excuses because Turtleboi F'D em real good.

Why is the house not taking testimony and challenging privilege assertions?

It's not the Senate's job. The House needs to make the case WITH SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE.

.

 

[Siete]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jurors don't call witnesses, Dummy.

WHAT JURY ?

these stupid sob's hevent got a damn clue - you cant make that shit up.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jurors don't call witnesses, Dummy.

WHAT JURY ?

these stupid sob's hevent got a damn clue - you cant make that shit up.

For some reason, the house wants the senate to call witnesses that did not testify before the house, because the house was too lazy to do the work.

The only evidence the senate needs is that which the house present. Nothing more.

.

 

[Siete]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jurors don't call witnesses, Dummy.

WHAT JURY ?

these stupid sob's hevent got a damn clue - you cant make that shit up.

For some reason, the house wants the senate to call witnesses that did not testify before the house, because the house was too lazy to do the work.

The only evidence the senate needs is that which the house present. Nothing more.

.

KEEP TRYING -

 

[iamwhatiseem]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jesus Christ the hypocrisy and irony of this post.
"Cover up"???
You do realize that Democrats held private interviews behind closed, and even locked doors???
Blows ones mind at the outright blind stupidity of some people.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

It's not up too the jury to search for more evidence

 

[jc456]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

why didn't the whistle blower testify?

 

[jc456]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jurors don't call witnesses, Dummy.

WHAT JURY ?

these stupid sob's hevent got a damn clue - you cant make that shit up.

 

[jc456]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jesus Christ the hypocrisy and irony of this post.
"Cover up"???
You do realize that Democrats held private interviews behind closed, and even locked doors???
Blows ones mind at the outright blind stupidity of some people.

it's really a good thing they are anonymous. They'd be out of work with the stupid they promote.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jurors don't call witnesses, Dummy.

WHAT JURY ?

these stupid sob's hevent got a damn clue - you cant make that shit up.

For some reason, the house wants the senate to call witnesses that did not testify before the house, because the house was too lazy to do the work.

The only evidence the senate needs is that which the house present. Nothing more.

.

KEEP TRYING -

Is that the rallying cry? Keep trying?



Why can't the house call witnesses? They have subpoena power.

.