What do the left consider the greatest threat to America?

[kaz]

There is zero reason for me to demonstrate that I am not a communist.

There is zero way you can.

Just so you know, not liking the word doesn't make you not one. Believing the planks of the Communist manifesto does. If you read them unbiasedly, you would realize that is exactly what you support like the rest of the Democratic party.

Again you are the guy who says I'm a conservative not a libertarian and you can't produce a single example to support that as well. You're dearth support both ways

I said you were a libertopian. I'm not a Democrat. I am registered as an Independent. I am a chic.

Doesn't matter how you register if you always vote Democrat

 

[Seawytch]

So what does "the Kaz" think is the greatest threat to America?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

The yutzes in DC are the greatest threat to America.

 

[danielpalos]

some on the left are considering a Cause that may involve the equity of "harassing the Right" with changing the name of any given State Capital to New Carthage, if they best promote the general welfare in the Most Carthaginian of manners and fashions in modern times.

merely to "divert and harass the Right" for political fun and political practice.

 

[kaz]

I wonder if Kaz knows that you're more likely to be shot by a toddler than a terrorist in the United States...

Oh, OK, terrorists aren't a threat then, thanks for clearing that up

The irony of you continually accusing others of having reading comprehension problems is astounding.

I never said terrorists aren't a threat at all...just not much of one here in the United States and certainly not the biggest threat facing the U.S. There are all kinds of things you're more likely to be "struck down" by than a terrorist...lighting, your own furniture, a toddler with an unsecured weapon...

Your issue isn't just reading comprehension, it's writing comprehension as well

Awwww, more typical Kaz deflection....totes adorbs

You're going to burn in hell for your deviant behavior, so your opinion doesn't matter anyway. Go kill an Arab, maybe you'll get some points back in the win column

 

[kaz]

There is zero reason for me to demonstrate that I am not a communist.

There is zero way you can.

Just so you know, not liking the word doesn't make you not one. Believing the planks of the Communist manifesto does. If you read them unbiasedly, you would realize that is exactly what you support like the rest of the Democratic party.

Again you are the guy who says I'm a conservative not a libertarian and you can't produce a single example to support that as well. You're dearth support both ways

The communist manifesto relates to what the democratic party is doing? Please, enlighten me, I'm sure you've read it with an unbiased perspective..

Here's an easy question if you know the Democratic party and the Communist manifesto. How does the Democratic party not support it?

 

[Seawytch]

I wonder if Kaz knows that you're more likely to be shot by a toddler than a terrorist in the United States...

Oh, OK, terrorists aren't a threat then, thanks for clearing that up

The irony of you continually accusing others of having reading comprehension problems is astounding.

I never said terrorists aren't a threat at all...just not much of one here in the United States and certainly not the biggest threat facing the U.S. There are all kinds of things you're more likely to be "struck down" by than a terrorist...lighting, your own furniture, a toddler with an unsecured weapon...

Your issue isn't just reading comprehension, it's writing comprehension as well

Awwww, more typical Kaz deflection....totes adorbs

You're going to burn in hell for your deviant behavior, so your opinion doesn't matter anyway. Go kill an Arab, maybe you'll get some points back in the win column

Come on Kaz, what's the greatest threat in your opinion? Are you really scared of Islamic terrorists attacking you here?

 

[Marxist]

There is zero reason for me to demonstrate that I am not a communist.

There is zero way you can.

Just so you know, not liking the word doesn't make you not one. Believing the planks of the Communist manifesto does. If you read them unbiasedly, you would realize that is exactly what you support like the rest of the Democratic party.

Again you are the guy who says I'm a conservative not a libertarian and you can't produce a single example to support that as well. You're dearth support both ways

The communist manifesto relates to what the democratic party is doing? Please, enlighten me, I'm sure you've read it with an unbiased perspective..

Here's an easy question if you know the Democratic party and the Communist manifesto. How does the Democratic party not support it?

- The democrats don't want to abolish private property in regards to production
- The democrats don't advocate collective ownership of production
- The democrats don't anything laid out in the manifesto, at all.
- The democrats aren't encouraging a proletariat revolution..
THEY'RE NOT ENCOURAGING A STATELESS, CLASSLESS, MONEYLESS SOCIETY.

 

[danielpalos]

protestants and renegades becoming more literate before they learn to "harass a Judge" for their Cause.

 

[boilermaker55]

But the pure capitalists have no worry about this happening in this country, which proves how naive they are about what is happening to them.
Marco Rubio takes lead in Sheldon Adelson primary

Before Iowa and New Hampshire, GOP candidates are competing in the Sheldon Adelson primary, and some will travel to his posh Venetian hotel in Las Vegas this weekend in hopes of winning it. But one candidate — Marco Rubio — has emerged as the clear front-runner, according to nearly a half-dozen sources close to the multibillionaire casino mogul.

Read more: Marco Rubio takes lead in Sheldon Adelson primary - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO


Read more: Marco Rubio takes lead in Sheldon Adelson primary - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO

There is zero reason for me to demonstrate that I am not a communist.

There is zero way you can.

Just so you know, not liking the word doesn't make you not one. Believing the planks of the Communist manifesto does. If you read them unbiasedly, you would realize that is exactly what you support like the rest of the Democratic party.

Again you are the guy who says I'm a conservative not a libertarian and you can't produce a single example to support that as well. You're dearth support both ways

The communist manifesto relates to what the democratic party is doing? Please, enlighten me, I'm sure you've read it with an unbiased perspective..

Here's an easy question if you know the Democratic party and the Communist manifesto. How does the Democratic party not support it?

- The democrats don't want to abolish private property in regards to production
- The democrats don't advocate collective ownership of production
- The democrats don't anything laid out in the manifesto, at all.
- The democrats aren't encouraging a proletariat revolution..
THEY'RE NOT ENCOURAGING A STATELESS, CLASSLESS, MONEYLESS SOCIETY.

 

[kaz]

Oh, OK, terrorists aren't a threat then, thanks for clearing that up

The irony of you continually accusing others of having reading comprehension problems is astounding.

I never said terrorists aren't a threat at all...just not much of one here in the United States and certainly not the biggest threat facing the U.S. There are all kinds of things you're more likely to be "struck down" by than a terrorist...lighting, your own furniture, a toddler with an unsecured weapon...

Your issue isn't just reading comprehension, it's writing comprehension as well

Awwww, more typical Kaz deflection....totes adorbs

You're going to burn in hell for your deviant behavior, so your opinion doesn't matter anyway. Go kill an Arab, maybe you'll get some points back in the win column

Come on Kaz, what's the greatest threat in your opinion? Are you really scared of Islamic terrorists attacking you here?

More afraid of that then the toddlers you say are worse, yes

 

[kaz]

- The democrats don't want to abolish private property in regards to production
- The democrats don't advocate collective ownership of production

Are you serious? They are all about that. Obamacare and they say they want single payer. The government already has a stranglehold on medical, energy and financial services. They have never stopped and said enough, they take as much government as they can get. If you believe they would stop if they could just take it you are delusional

- The democrats don't anything laid out in the manifesto, at all.

Begging the question

- The democrats aren't encouraging a proletariat revolution..

Of course they are, do you not see the continual anti-wealth anti-capitalist rhetoric? The obsession with the "income gap" and demands the government redistribute further. What do you think they are talking about?

THEY'RE NOT ENCOURAGING A STATELESS, CLASSLESS, MONEYLESS SOCIETY.

Curious on this one how you say this and you didn't get my point in our initial discussion which specifically addressed this. But just so you know, Marxists don't want this either, it's a way to delude the workers into following them. No absolute State would ever give up the power

 

[Disir]

There is zero reason for me to demonstrate that I am not a communist.

There is zero way you can.

Just so you know, not liking the word doesn't make you not one. Believing the planks of the Communist manifesto does. If you read them unbiasedly, you would realize that is exactly what you support like the rest of the Democratic party.

Again you are the guy who says I'm a conservative not a libertarian and you can't produce a single example to support that as well. You're dearth support both ways

I said you were a libertopian. I'm not a Democrat. I am registered as an Independent. I am a chic.

Doesn't matter how you register if you always vote Democrat

You have no idea how I vote or when I vote or whom I vote for. You got nothing. Again.

 

[Seawytch]

The irony of you continually accusing others of having reading comprehension problems is astounding.

I never said terrorists aren't a threat at all...just not much of one here in the United States and certainly not the biggest threat facing the U.S. There are all kinds of things you're more likely to be "struck down" by than a terrorist...lighting, your own furniture, a toddler with an unsecured weapon...

Your issue isn't just reading comprehension, it's writing comprehension as well

Awwww, more typical Kaz deflection....totes adorbs

You're going to burn in hell for your deviant behavior, so your opinion doesn't matter anyway. Go kill an Arab, maybe you'll get some points back in the win column

Come on Kaz, what's the greatest threat in your opinion? Are you really scared of Islamic terrorists attacking you here?

More afraid of that then the toddlers you say are worse, yes

That's not an answer Kaz, old boy. Are they "the GREATEST threat"?

You are still more likely to be killed by a toddler...or furniture...than you are an Islamic terrorist.

 

[Marxist]

- The democrats don't want to abolish private property in regards to production
- The democrats don't advocate collective ownership of production

Are you serious? They are all about that. Obamacare and they say they want single payer. The government already has a stranglehold on medical, energy and financial services. They have never stopped and said enough, they take as much government as they can get. If you believe they would stop if they could just take it you are delusional

- The democrats don't anything laid out in the manifesto, at all.

Begging the question

- The democrats aren't encouraging a proletariat revolution..

Of course they are, do you not see the continual anti-wealth anti-capitalist rhetoric? The obsession with the "income gap" and demands the government redistribute further. What do you think they are talking about?

THEY'RE NOT ENCOURAGING A STATELESS, CLASSLESS, MONEYLESS SOCIETY.

Curious on this one how you say this and you didn't get my point in our initial discussion which specifically addressed this. But just so you know, Marxists don't want this either, it's a way to delude the workers into following them. No absolute State would ever give up the power

Talk about delusional.. Not even going to bother responding to this nonsense, if it has any bearing, then most of Europe is worshipping the manifesto right now, and they're doing fine. Delude workers.. Yeah, ok, speak for all Marxists and fail to understand historical events, context, the lives of Marxists like Mao, etc.. I don't bother with this shit anymore, the wealth gap is an actual problem, and being anti capitalist doesn't mean you support the thoughts laid out in the manifesto. You've lost any credibility.. LOL OBAMACARE??? Are you fucking kidding me?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Libertopians.

I like that one. The big difference between the liberal delusion expect government to act in other people's interest when even selfish, greedy liberals don't do it on their own dime when they have a choice and the conservative delusion we can be free with government owning our bodies and both who think endlessly meddling in other countrie's shit is that libertopia actually works because it's based on how the actual world works and how people really are. In libertopia, we act in our own interest and respect the right of other's to do the same. That is how people actually work

Is THAT how you justify it?

Justify what?

You're very, very idealistic. Not very practical. When it comes down to it, libertopia is fine ideal but it doesn't work and when it doesn't work then it's One True Scotsman time.
Libertopian think tanks:
Category Libertarian think tanks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

It's not enough to fail in other countries.

I don't think many who label themselves as Libertarian want a full out Libertarian government. It's too extreme and everyone knows that would fail.

 

[Disir]

Libertopians.

I like that one. The big difference between the liberal delusion expect government to act in other people's interest when even selfish, greedy liberals don't do it on their own dime when they have a choice and the conservative delusion we can be free with government owning our bodies and both who think endlessly meddling in other countrie's shit is that libertopia actually works because it's based on how the actual world works and how people really are. In libertopia, we act in our own interest and respect the right of other's to do the same. That is how people actually work

Is THAT how you justify it?

Justify what?

You're very, very idealistic. Not very practical. When it comes down to it, libertopia is fine ideal but it doesn't work and when it doesn't work then it's One True Scotsman time.
Libertopian think tanks:
Category Libertarian think tanks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

It's not enough to fail in other countries.

I don't think many who label themselves as Libertarian want a full out Libertarian government. It's too extreme and everyone knows that would fail.

Sure they do-up until they grow up and realize the world doesn't exactly revolve around them or until they get screwed.

 

[g5000]

So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.

Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind

You asked a question, and then gave us all the answer you wanted.

Neat!

So why is this topic here, exactly?

 

[g5000]

I love these topics.

HACK 1: What do liberals want?

LIBERAL: Peace, love, drugs, waterbeds and vans.

HACK 1: WRONG!

HACK 2: They want to nuke Kansas, rape my son, and kill puppies.

HACK 1: (hits Agree button)

HACK 3: What do conservatives want?

CONSERVATIVE: Flag pins, apple pie, nuke Iran.

HACK 3: WRONG!

HACK 4: Conservatives want to throw old ladies off cliffs, shove the poor into gas ovens, and melt the North Pole.

HACK 3: (hits Thank You button)

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Is THAT how you justify it?

Justify what?

You're very, very idealistic. Not very practical. When it comes down to it, libertopia is fine ideal but it doesn't work and when it doesn't work then it's One True Scotsman time.
Libertopian think tanks:
Category Libertarian think tanks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Right, I think people act in their own interest, so we should design a system for that.

You think that people will act in other people's interest when liberals don't do squat on your own yourself and you're fine with liberals cheating on their taxes while they advocate higher rates, but a system which is designed on people acting in other people's interest will still work.

And I'm the one who's not "practical." And my system doesn't work, but yours does. You're not very observant, are you? You think your system is working? Wow

What system is it that you think that I have?

Most of your alleged liberals are absolutely about the free market bullshit. So are your right wingers. I guess that happens when you turn people into drooling imbeciles that walk around and mumble socialist or communist.

Here's a thought, stop advocating the planks of the communist manifesto and maybe people will stop thinking you're a communist.

I do like how when I advocate libertarian philosophy you call me a conservative while whining that I don't accurately address your views when the only views you advocate are left wing. I advocate fiscal conservatism like conservatives, but I also oppose morality laws and our military involved in foreign wars and want defense slashed and defensive focused. If you read, I advocate those consistently on the board. Whatever non-liberal views you have you are keeping to yourself.

So we have according to you I'm a conservative when I am consistently libertarian and you're not liberal while you're consistently liberal. Take off the blindfold, honey

I like that one. The big difference between the liberal delusion expect government to act in other people's interest when even selfish, greedy liberals don't do it on their own dime when they have a choice and the conservative delusion we can be free with government owning our bodies and both who think endlessly meddling in other countrie's shit is that libertopia actually works because it's based on how the actual world works and how people really are. In libertopia, we act in our own interest and respect the right of other's to do the same. That is how people actually work

Is THAT how you justify it?

Justify what?

You're very, very idealistic. Not very practical. When it comes down to it, libertopia is fine ideal but it doesn't work and when it doesn't work then it's One True Scotsman time.
Libertopian think tanks:
Category Libertarian think tanks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

It's not enough to fail in other countries.

I don't think many who label themselves as Libertarian want a full out Libertarian government. It's too extreme and everyone knows that would fail.

Sure they do-up until they grow up and realize the world doesn't exactly revolve around them or until they get screwed.

Libertarianism is the new modern way in a world that thinks the US owes them for every atrocity committed by humans. We need to start looking out for US interest instead of appeasing everyone else.