What exactly did they do?

[Slade3200]

You gotta step outside the bubble for a minute and just listen to yourself. This deep state conspiracy stuff is just plain silly. If they had legal and solid ground to go after Clinton then they would and they would receive the support of Trump and his base and the entire right wing media institution. They aren’t scared, they just don’t have the evidence and legal standing behind them. Trumps tactic is to point the finger the other direction every time he is accused of something. He finds a narrative and then drills it in until his puppets start to follow. Don’t be a puppet, you’re just embarassing yourself.

Just because you wanted a factual answer and I know that "in YOUR BUBBLE" these facts would never be shown to you --- here's some REAL news on prosecuting the guilty.

Jeff Sessions: Senior federal prosecutor already investigating DOJ/FBI abuse, no Special Counsel needed yet

The breaking news last night was that the DOJ Office of Inspector General announced it was launching an investigation of possible Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court abuse.

The presumption, though not literally in the OIG announcement, was that it concerned the FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page based on the Steele dossier.


I wrote that an OIG investigation was “investigation is fine, we need to have a person empowered to empanel a grand jury and with the full force of criminal investigatory tools. Because if the scandal is as many people suspect, we need to be talking about locking people up, not just issuing a report.”

Tonight it was confirmed what Jeff Sessions had previously intimated, that there already is a criminal investigation of possible DOJ/FBI misconduct.

Fox News reports:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed Thursday a federal prosecutor was evaluating certain issues involving the FBI, the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One, but said he would not appoint a second special counsel at this point.

In a letter directed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, Sessions revealed that he asked U.S. Attorney John Huber to lead the evaluation into issues raised by the committees in recent months.

“I write in response to recent letters requesting the appointment of a Special Counsel to review certain prosecutorial and investigative determinations made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017. I take the concerns you raise seriously,” Sessions wrote, noting how important it was that the American people and Congress had “confidence” in the Justice Department….

“Mr. Huber is conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and in cooperation with the Inspector General,” Sessions said, noting that Huber’s review would “include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and facts.” …

John Huber, U.S. attorney leading FBI investigation, a special counsel in every way but name

Attorney General Jeff Sessions may have declined calls to appoint a second special counsel to investigate the FBI’s behavior during the 2016 campaign, but the man he has picked to lead an internal Justice Department review is a special counsel in every way but name.

John W. Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, can convene a grand jury, issue subpoenas, collect evidence and order witnesses to testify — all the usual powers a federal prosecutor has — as he delves into whether the FBI abused its powers when it sought permission and then carried out wiretapping of a Trump campaign figure, or whether it trod too lightly in pursuing questions about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Sessions said the facts of the FBI situation don’t yet rise to the level of demanding a special counsel, but Mr. Huber is as close as can be.

“He will have the full authority of a federal prosecutor,” said Richard Painter, former chief ethics attorney for President George W. Bush. “If he looks at this and finds someone in the DOJ lied to a government official, he would be able to convene a grand jury, compel testimony and even prosecute them.”

By appointing an active federal prosecutor — in this case one first nominated by President Obama and kept on by President Trump — Mr. Sessions also may deflect criticism that the review is a partisan attempt to undermine the other special counsel, Robert Mueller, who is investigating the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia in 2016.

Paul G. Cassell, a former federal judge who has known Mr. Huber since law school, said asking an acting U.S. attorney to lead the investigation is a good move because it may tamp down on excesses.

“When you have a special counsel, you always have to wonder if there is overzealousness in their prosecution because they only have one case,” he said. “Huber is going to be less inclined to move forward with prosecution unless it’s warranted because if he moves one case forward, others will be left behind.”

Ofcourse when 30% of the country believes garbage, you have to investigate it...

Only 30% of the country KNOWS these FACTS -- because YOUR 30% are kept in the dark and fed shit like mushrooms from the WaPo/CNN/MSNBC/DemUnderground. And the other 40% just does not care.

Did you KNOW about Huber being appointed to do a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of all those stinky scandals? Of course you didn't.... You're bubble is still on dial-up to Don Lemon..

Sorry that is fake news, never retracted.

Seriously, you are like a snot-nosed brat that bravely declares that there IS a "Santa Claus" when told the contrary. You ignore the incriminating evidence of how absolutely corrupt the commie DNC is....just pretend like it never happened....the ends justifies the means, eh? That is also the credo of the communist manifesto.

"OP- As if all this 24/7 Pub infotainment/propaganda means anything in the real world...Hillary will win the WH in 2016. We'll all enjoy your ridiculous Pub carnival..."

Your post in August of 2015.....LMAO!!!!!!

Leave it to Good ol Dale to pull a post from 2015 out of his ass. Haha. Nice to see you my friend

 

[Dale Smith]

Just because you wanted a factual answer and I know that "in YOUR BUBBLE" these facts would never be shown to you --- here's some REAL news on prosecuting the guilty.

Jeff Sessions: Senior federal prosecutor already investigating DOJ/FBI abuse, no Special Counsel needed yet

The breaking news last night was that the DOJ Office of Inspector General announced it was launching an investigation of possible Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court abuse.

The presumption, though not literally in the OIG announcement, was that it concerned the FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page based on the Steele dossier.


I wrote that an OIG investigation was “investigation is fine, we need to have a person empowered to empanel a grand jury and with the full force of criminal investigatory tools. Because if the scandal is as many people suspect, we need to be talking about locking people up, not just issuing a report.”

Tonight it was confirmed what Jeff Sessions had previously intimated, that there already is a criminal investigation of possible DOJ/FBI misconduct.

Fox News reports:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed Thursday a federal prosecutor was evaluating certain issues involving the FBI, the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One, but said he would not appoint a second special counsel at this point.

In a letter directed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, Sessions revealed that he asked U.S. Attorney John Huber to lead the evaluation into issues raised by the committees in recent months.

“I write in response to recent letters requesting the appointment of a Special Counsel to review certain prosecutorial and investigative determinations made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017. I take the concerns you raise seriously,” Sessions wrote, noting how important it was that the American people and Congress had “confidence” in the Justice Department….

“Mr. Huber is conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and in cooperation with the Inspector General,” Sessions said, noting that Huber’s review would “include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and facts.” …

John Huber, U.S. attorney leading FBI investigation, a special counsel in every way but name

Attorney General Jeff Sessions may have declined calls to appoint a second special counsel to investigate the FBI’s behavior during the 2016 campaign, but the man he has picked to lead an internal Justice Department review is a special counsel in every way but name.

John W. Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, can convene a grand jury, issue subpoenas, collect evidence and order witnesses to testify — all the usual powers a federal prosecutor has — as he delves into whether the FBI abused its powers when it sought permission and then carried out wiretapping of a Trump campaign figure, or whether it trod too lightly in pursuing questions about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Sessions said the facts of the FBI situation don’t yet rise to the level of demanding a special counsel, but Mr. Huber is as close as can be.

“He will have the full authority of a federal prosecutor,” said Richard Painter, former chief ethics attorney for President George W. Bush. “If he looks at this and finds someone in the DOJ lied to a government official, he would be able to convene a grand jury, compel testimony and even prosecute them.”

By appointing an active federal prosecutor — in this case one first nominated by President Obama and kept on by President Trump — Mr. Sessions also may deflect criticism that the review is a partisan attempt to undermine the other special counsel, Robert Mueller, who is investigating the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia in 2016.

Paul G. Cassell, a former federal judge who has known Mr. Huber since law school, said asking an acting U.S. attorney to lead the investigation is a good move because it may tamp down on excesses.

“When you have a special counsel, you always have to wonder if there is overzealousness in their prosecution because they only have one case,” he said. “Huber is going to be less inclined to move forward with prosecution unless it’s warranted because if he moves one case forward, others will be left behind.”

Ofcourse when 30% of the country believes garbage, you have to investigate it...

Only 30% of the country KNOWS these FACTS -- because YOUR 30% are kept in the dark and fed shit like mushrooms from the WaPo/CNN/MSNBC/DemUnderground. And the other 40% just does not care.

Did you KNOW about Huber being appointed to do a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of all those stinky scandals? Of course you didn't.... You're bubble is still on dial-up to Don Lemon..

Sorry that is fake news, never retracted.

Seriously, you are like a snot-nosed brat that bravely declares that there IS a "Santa Claus" when told the contrary. You ignore the incriminating evidence of how absolutely corrupt the commie DNC is....just pretend like it never happened....the ends justifies the means, eh? That is also the credo of the communist manifesto.

"OP- As if all this 24/7 Pub infotainment/propaganda means anything in the real world...Hillary will win the WH in 2016. We'll all enjoy your ridiculous Pub carnival..."

Your post in August of 2015.....LMAO!!!!!!

Leave it to Good ol Dale to pull a post from 2015 out of his ass. Haha. Nice to see you my friend

Just needling ol Franco..LOL! Hope all is well in your world!

 

[francoHFW]

Ofcourse when 30% of the country believes garbage, you have to investigate it...

Only 30% of the country KNOWS these FACTS -- because YOUR 30% are kept in the dark and fed shit like mushrooms from the WaPo/CNN/MSNBC/DemUnderground. And the other 40% just does not care.

Did you KNOW about Huber being appointed to do a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of all those stinky scandals? Of course you didn't.... You're bubble is still on dial-up to Don Lemon..

Sorry that is fake news, never retracted.

Seriously, you are like a snot-nosed brat that bravely declares that there IS a "Santa Claus" when told the contrary. You ignore the incriminating evidence of how absolutely corrupt the commie DNC is....just pretend like it never happened....the ends justifies the means, eh? That is also the credo of the communist manifesto.

"OP- As if all this 24/7 Pub infotainment/propaganda means anything in the real world...Hillary will win the WH in 2016. We'll all enjoy your ridiculous Pub carnival..."

Your post in August of 2015.....LMAO!!!!!!

Leave it to Good ol Dale to pull a post from 2015 out of his ass. Haha. Nice to see you my friend

Just needling ol Franco..LOL! Hope all is well in your world!

Comes in handy when you have no actual arguments....

 

[francoHFW]

Ofcourse when 30% of the country believes garbage, you have to investigate it...

Only 30% of the country KNOWS these FACTS -- because YOUR 30% are kept in the dark and fed shit like mushrooms from the WaPo/CNN/MSNBC/DemUnderground. And the other 40% just does not care.

Did you KNOW about Huber being appointed to do a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of all those stinky scandals? Of course you didn't.... You're bubble is still on dial-up to Don Lemon..

Sorry that is fake news, never retracted.

Seriously, you are like a snot-nosed brat that bravely declares that there IS a "Santa Claus" when told the contrary. You ignore the incriminating evidence of how absolutely corrupt the commie DNC is....just pretend like it never happened....the ends justifies the means, eh? That is also the credo of the communist manifesto.

"OP- As if all this 24/7 Pub infotainment/propaganda means anything in the real world...Hillary will win the WH in 2016. We'll all enjoy your ridiculous Pub carnival..."

Your post in August of 2015.....LMAO!!!!!!

Leave it to Good ol Dale to pull a post from 2015 out of his ass. Haha. Nice to see you my friend

Just needling ol Franco..LOL! Hope all is well in your world!

I'll believe it your ridiculous propaganda when our police take an interest. D u h

 

[francoHFW]

Just because you wanted a factual answer and I know that "in YOUR BUBBLE" these facts would never be shown to you --- here's some REAL news on prosecuting the guilty.

Jeff Sessions: Senior federal prosecutor already investigating DOJ/FBI abuse, no Special Counsel needed yet

The breaking news last night was that the DOJ Office of Inspector General announced it was launching an investigation of possible Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court abuse.

The presumption, though not literally in the OIG announcement, was that it concerned the FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page based on the Steele dossier.


I wrote that an OIG investigation was “investigation is fine, we need to have a person empowered to empanel a grand jury and with the full force of criminal investigatory tools. Because if the scandal is as many people suspect, we need to be talking about locking people up, not just issuing a report.”

Tonight it was confirmed what Jeff Sessions had previously intimated, that there already is a criminal investigation of possible DOJ/FBI misconduct.

Fox News reports:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed Thursday a federal prosecutor was evaluating certain issues involving the FBI, the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One, but said he would not appoint a second special counsel at this point.

In a letter directed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, Sessions revealed that he asked U.S. Attorney John Huber to lead the evaluation into issues raised by the committees in recent months.

“I write in response to recent letters requesting the appointment of a Special Counsel to review certain prosecutorial and investigative determinations made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017. I take the concerns you raise seriously,” Sessions wrote, noting how important it was that the American people and Congress had “confidence” in the Justice Department….

“Mr. Huber is conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and in cooperation with the Inspector General,” Sessions said, noting that Huber’s review would “include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and facts.” …

John Huber, U.S. attorney leading FBI investigation, a special counsel in every way but name

Attorney General Jeff Sessions may have declined calls to appoint a second special counsel to investigate the FBI’s behavior during the 2016 campaign, but the man he has picked to lead an internal Justice Department review is a special counsel in every way but name.

John W. Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, can convene a grand jury, issue subpoenas, collect evidence and order witnesses to testify — all the usual powers a federal prosecutor has — as he delves into whether the FBI abused its powers when it sought permission and then carried out wiretapping of a Trump campaign figure, or whether it trod too lightly in pursuing questions about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Sessions said the facts of the FBI situation don’t yet rise to the level of demanding a special counsel, but Mr. Huber is as close as can be.

“He will have the full authority of a federal prosecutor,” said Richard Painter, former chief ethics attorney for President George W. Bush. “If he looks at this and finds someone in the DOJ lied to a government official, he would be able to convene a grand jury, compel testimony and even prosecute them.”

By appointing an active federal prosecutor — in this case one first nominated by President Obama and kept on by President Trump — Mr. Sessions also may deflect criticism that the review is a partisan attempt to undermine the other special counsel, Robert Mueller, who is investigating the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia in 2016.

Paul G. Cassell, a former federal judge who has known Mr. Huber since law school, said asking an acting U.S. attorney to lead the investigation is a good move because it may tamp down on excesses.

“When you have a special counsel, you always have to wonder if there is overzealousness in their prosecution because they only have one case,” he said. “Huber is going to be less inclined to move forward with prosecution unless it’s warranted because if he moves one case forward, others will be left behind.”

Ofcourse when 30% of the country believes garbage, you have to investigate it...

Only 30% of the country KNOWS these FACTS -- because YOUR 30% are kept in the dark and fed shit like mushrooms from the WaPo/CNN/MSNBC/DemUnderground. And the other 40% just does not care.

Did you KNOW about Huber being appointed to do a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of all those stinky scandals? Of course you didn't.... You're bubble is still on dial-up to Don Lemon..

Sorry that is fake news, never retracted.

Seriously, you are like a snot-nosed brat that bravely declares that there IS a "Santa Claus" when told the contrary. You ignore the incriminating evidence of how absolutely corrupt the commie DNC is....just pretend like it never happened....the ends justifies the means, eh? That is also the credo of the communist manifesto.

"OP- As if all this 24/7 Pub infotainment/propaganda means anything in the real world...Hillary will win the WH in 2016. We'll all enjoy your ridiculous Pub carnival..."

Your post in August of 2015.....LMAO!!!!!!

Leave it to Good ol Dale to pull a post from 2015 out of his ass. Haha. Nice to see you my friend

Shows you how powerful a real propaganda machine can be super dupe. When do you people get off the meaningless emails super dupers? NOBODY CARES IN THE REAL WORLD ANYMORE...

 

[Kondor3]

The answer of course is “nothing”. The left just can’t except the fact that they lost. Ironic since they spent so much time pissing their panties because they though Trump wouldn’t except the results if he lost.

The scary thing is to look at HRC... she is such a sore loser now but imagine how sore of a winner she would be! Anyone who didn’t vote for her would face serious retaliation!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Nation did, indeed, dodge a bullet, when Hillary lost.

Trouble is, the Nation took a bullet from the other direction, when The Creature was crowned.

Nope. Trump is doing a great job. That fact that you are so triggered is the proof.

I'm not triggered.

I'm an Equal Opportunity Snake-Oil-Salesman basher; regardless of party.

But I don't expect Snake-Oil (Kool-Aid) Drinkers to understand that... the concept is unknown in their universe.

You drink snake oil by the gallon, douchebag. You voted for Hillary, didn't you?

"Drinking snake oil" or "drinking kool-aid" in this context means that you're stupid enough to believe what your candidate and party are telling you.

I am an independent... a centrist... leaning left on some issues... leaning right on others.... straight down the middle on yet others.

That means that I have no party... and no real candidate loyalty... I save my loyalty for God, Family and Country, not these passing farts-in-the-wind.

I did, indeed, vote for Shrillary... but struggled with the choice for weeks beforehand... and felt like taking a shower immediately afterwards...

I did, indeed, want several things that your Creature promised.

It's just that I thought your Creature (an uncouth boor channeling the ghost of Benito Mussolini) was far too high a price to pay for what I wanted.

The difference being, that I never believe most of what either candidate says... I don't drink the snake-oil, or the kool-aid...

Unlike you, child.

But thank you for playing.

================================================================

Next batter, please.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

 

[Seawytch]

a deal like that requires the approval (signature) of the secretary of state. Who was SecState when the uranium deal was made? any idea?

No, dope.

It required the approval of the State Dept. Not the SoS.

Uh, duh, the secretary of state is head of the state department. So you are now saying that a deal like this could be made without the approval of the secretary of state?

LOLOL

Well since you failed so miserably to prove she signed it, seems her signature was not required.

talking to you is like talking to a dead frog that was smashed flat in the street. Are you a human being, or a parrot, or a computer program?

I know, it’s so pesky challenging you to prove the bullshit you post.

He's going to pretend to "ignore" you....

 

[Seawytch]

LOLOL

Well since you failed so miserably to prove she signed it, seems her signature was not required.

talking to you is like talking to a dead frog that was smashed flat in the street. Are you a human being, or a parrot, or a computer program?

I know, it’s so pesky challenging you to prove the bullshit you post.

you made the claim that she did not and need not sign off on the deal. its your claim, not mine.

I made the claim after you failed to prove your claim she was required to signing off on it. I based that off of your inability to prove what you said.

you are a waste of my time, welcome to my ignore list.

See, I should have kept reading. Called it!

 

[Seawytch]

Faun is the latest ad to my ignore list. I don't waste my time with partisan idiots who cannot carry on a civil adult discussion.

No Fishy, you pretend to ignore anyone providing you facts you can't counter.

 

[Seawytch]

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

Do you believe the indictment is empty? That it has no effect whatsoever? Does it, perhaps, effect their ability to travel to certain countries? Put restrictions on where they can put money?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

Do you believe the indictment is empty? That it has no effect whatsoever? Does it, perhaps, effect their ability to travel to certain countries? Put restrictions on where they can put money?

/——/ By empty , if you mean a dog and pony show, a publicity stunt, Mueller needing something to justify the millions he has squandered by indicting Russians who will never see the inside of our courtroom then yes. I believe the indictments are empty.

 

[Seawytch]

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

Do you believe the indictment is empty? That it has no effect whatsoever? Does it, perhaps, effect their ability to travel to certain countries? Put restrictions on where they can put money?

/——/ By empty , if you mean a dog and pony show, a publicity stunt, Mueller needing something to justify the millions he has squandered by indicting Russians who will never see the inside of our courtroom then yes. I believe the indictments are empty.

So, you didn't understand the question. I forgot I was speaking to a Trump cultist.

The indictment establishes the crime and lays out, in great detail, what the Russians did when they attacked us. I realize you're not interested in finding out because their assistance helped elect your cult leader, but those of us on Earth One do want to know.

Now these indicted Russians may never be convicted of the crimes they committed, but their travel will be curtailed as will where they can put their money. Of course, as long as there are useful idiots like Trump and Co. to launder money for them...

 

[Faun]

Actually, you were the one who first claimed she signed off on it. I was the one who challenged you to prove she did. You failed miserably:

As far as Clinton’s 500K speaking engagement, he often earned that for speeches. Getting as much as 700K for a single speech. 500K was a bargain where the organizers who paid it could easily make a profit.

Please show us where former President Bill Clinton was being paid $700,000 for a single speech. His going rate at most was $250,000 which is still outrageous.

Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
   
   
2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
   
   
3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
   
   
4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
   
   
5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
   
   
6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
   
   
7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);
   
   
8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
   
   
9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
   
   
10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);
    
    
11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
    
    
12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
    
    
13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).

Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees

Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.

Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?

"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Just as I figured, you couldn't name one.

Speaking fees are not bribes, they’re money makers. Not just for the speaker, but also for the organizers. Calling them bribes when you can’t actually cite a single bribe is like idiotically claiming my employer bribes me to work for them.

 

[Faun]

Actually, you were the one who first claimed she signed off on it. I was the one who challenged you to prove she did. You failed miserably:

As far as Clinton’s 500K speaking engagement, he often earned that for speeches. Getting as much as 700K for a single speech. 500K was a bargain where the organizers who paid it could easily make a profit.

Please show us where former President Bill Clinton was being paid $700,000 for a single speech. His going rate at most was $250,000 which is still outrageous.

Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
   
   
2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
   
   
3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
   
   
4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
   
   
5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
   
   
6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
   
   
7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);
   
   
8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
   
   
9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
   
   
10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);
    
    
11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
    
    
12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
    
    
13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).

Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees

WOW, more power to them! I hope they got the influence they paid for! Given that it is the Clinton's, there is no question. Just as they were caught with the Chinese during his administration.

The point of this being.... Bill Clinton getting a speaking engagement for $500,000 is not evidence it was a bribe for his wife to sign off on that Uranium One deal.

 

[Redfish]

bullshit. If he released his returns (which are hundreds of pages) you assholes on the left would pull out one page, make up lies about it, and it would waste hundreds of hours refuting your lies.

How about the returns from the "tax-exempt" Clinton foundation? Would you be interested in knowing what happened to the millions they collected for Haiti relief after the hurricane? That money never got to Haiti. Do you care about that corruption?

I am merely pointing out the disingenuousness of you liberals.

No, dope. Tax document are just data entered on a form. There is nothing to spin. It's either true and accurate or it's not.

Thirty years of Clinton tax returns are publicly available. Their foundation financials are publicly available. Trump's are not.

Whos hiding what?

I don't think anyone is hiding anything about Trump's taxes. As I said, he gets audited every year, the Obama IRS audited him for 8 years, the same IRS that targeted conservative groups and conservative individuals. If Trump was doing anything illegal it would be public by now.

and you are very naïve if you think that Trump haters could not pull out one page and make up lies about it.

Yes, the Clinton foundation records are available, but they don't show where all the millions collected for Haiti went, we know they didn't go to Haiti, so where do you think they are?

The Clinton foundation financials do show where the money went, dope. Perhaps you should post the portion that you are questioning.

yes, they do show where it went. 10% to Haiti and 90% to salaries and expenses.

Really? That’s not what I read. I read that it went to relief agencies and governments which provided troops and equipment to assist in the relief efforts.

Either you didn’t read it or you don’t have a clue how to read a balance sheet.

correct, the 10% did go to those places.

 

[Redfish]

how did it hurt her?

your leftist view on americans is really quite sad. you're just a fking punk that knows nothing.

Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.

It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.

Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

 

[Redfish]

FBI and DOJ corruption is apparently nothing new. But it is very clear that Strzok, Page, McCabe, Comey, and others were trying to rig the election by exonerating Hillary and attacking Trump with false documents paid for by the Clinton campaign.

So, when Comey announced he was reopening the e0mail investigation, you think that was done to help Hillary.

how did it hurt her?

your leftist view on americans is really quite sad. you're just a fking punk that knows nothing.

Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.

It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.

Comey laid out her guilt in detail while under oath, then he exonerated her because she was only "extremely careless" and was too stupid to release that what she was doing was illegal.

Soooooooooooo, next time you get stopped for speeding use the Hillary defense, I was only careless and didn't know that I was going 80 in a 45 zone. See if it works for you.

 

[Cellblock2429]

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

Do you believe the indictment is empty? That it has no effect whatsoever? Does it, perhaps, effect their ability to travel to certain countries? Put restrictions on where they can put money?

/——/ By empty , if you mean a dog and pony show, a publicity stunt, Mueller needing something to justify the millions he has squandered by indicting Russians who will never see the inside of our courtroom then yes. I believe the indictments are empty.

So, you didn't understand the question. I forgot I was speaking to a Trump cultist.

The indictment establishes the crime and lays out, in great detail, what the Russians did when they attacked us. I realize you're not interested in finding out because their assistance helped elect your cult leader, but those of us on Earth One do want to know.

Now these indicted Russians may never be convicted of the crimes they committed, but their travel will be curtailed as will where they can put their money. Of course, as long as there are useful idiots like Trump and Co. to launder money for them...

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

 

[Cellblock2429]

So, when Comey announced he was reopening the e0mail investigation, you think that was done to help Hillary.

how did it hurt her?

your leftist view on americans is really quite sad. you're just a fking punk that knows nothing.

Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.

It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.

Comey laid out her guilt in detail while under oath, then he exonerated her because she was only "extremely careless" and was too stupid to release that what she was doing was illegal.

Soooooooooooo, next time you get stopped for speeding use the Hillary defense, I was only careless and didn't know that I was going 80 in a 45 zone. See if it works for you.

/----/ Can Trump Jr. campaign say he was just careless in meeting with the Russians?