What exactly did they do?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.
It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.


Comey laid out her guilt in detail while under oath, then he exonerated her because she was only "extremely careless" and was too stupid to release that what she was doing was illegal.

Soooooooooooo, next time you get stopped for speeding use the Hillary defense, I was only careless and didn't know that I was going 80 in a 45 zone. See if it works for you.

Where did you go to law school?

Intent is an important factor in law.

If I walk past your house & glace over & your wife is naked that is different that waiting outside your house to see if I could see her naked.
'


Harvard. "but officer I didn't intend to violate the speed limit, you have to let me go"

are you really that stupid?

No but you are. When making a comparison, try to come up with reasonable equivalents. Real Dave did much better than you did and even he missed the mark.

Traffic laws are well defined and you have to pass both written and practical tests to get your license.

Email was relatively new and the rules for it weren’t well defined when Clinton was in office. Added to which, government servers allocated only a small amount of storage for users. Not enough to handle the kind of traffic cabinet members have.

Last but not least, and this can’t be said often enough. EMAIL IS NEVER SECURE. It is the LEAST secure form of communication in the world. No one would ever attach anything they wanted kept secure, to an email. Those of us who work with email regularly, have this drummed into them.

Clinton didn’t have anything compromising on her server. That’s the reality.
 
Coming. Flynn has already been indicted and plead, as have Gates and Papadopolous.

Don't bet the farm. The reason Flynn's sentencing has been delayed 5 times now -- is the new revelations of exculpatory evidence that wasn't provided to the Defense. Uncovered by Congress and other "counter investigations" of the FBI crimes in handling this spying on the campaign. In fact -- there were altered forms that showed that people present at Flynn's interview under oath stated they thought he had told the truth.

For Papadopolous -- similar serious problems for Mueller. Because it appears all the sketchy Russian contacts that POSED as having dirt on Hillary were professional intel folks. Not your run of mill FBI plant. CIA is implicated in supplying some of these sketchy folks to "sting" and "entrap" not only Papa, but also Page and the Texas fundraiser guy for Trump. Their defenses all compared notes, made requests for evidence and SHOWED that it was WORSE than spying on the Trump campaign. BEFORE the acknowledged spying began, these operatives were "dirtying up" all the people I named by posing as folks with access to compromising Russian Intel on Hillary.

This is the largest political scandal of our lifetimes. You'll appreciate this in about a year. When CNN/MSNBC will be dining exclusively on crow for a long time. And Brennan and Clapper and about 6 of the top Obama FBI people will be in court. MAYBE the guy from Fusion and others.

Flynn's sentencing has been delayed because he may need to be called to testify at a future date as his plea deal requires him to do. He won't be sentenced until his obligations under his plea deal are met.
 
Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack
/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

What does that have to do with the question of what the Russians did, dope?

The indictment answers the question in great detail.
 
Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.
It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.
Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock
Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.


its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.
 
It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.
Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock
You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.


its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.


then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.
 
Actually, you were the one who first claimed she signed off on it. I was the one who challenged you to prove she did. You failed miserably:

As far as Clinton’s 500K speaking engagement, he often earned that for speeches. Getting as much as 700K for a single speech. 500K was a bargain where the organizers who paid it could easily make a profit.

Please show us where former President Bill Clinton was being paid $700,000 for a single speech. His going rate at most was $250,000 which is still outrageous.
Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

  1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);

  2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);

  3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);

  4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);

  5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);

  8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);

  9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);

  10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);

  11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).
Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees
Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.
Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?
"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.
 
Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack
/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

What does that have to do with the question of what the Russians did, dope?

The indictment answers the question in great detail.


I didn't see anything in the indictments that said how many votes were affected and in which states and how the Russian activities changed the outcome of the election, or why they wanted to do it. Except to get us screaming at each other, and it that they succeeded.
 
Please show us where former President Bill Clinton was being paid $700,000 for a single speech. His going rate at most was $250,000 which is still outrageous.
Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

  1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);

  2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);

  3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);

  4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);

  5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);

  8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);

  9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);

  10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);

  11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).
Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees
Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.
Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?
"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.


his wife signed the uranium one deal. tit for tat. Do you really think the foundation is not the Clinton family bank account?
 
He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.
Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.


its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.


then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Once again, you lazy right wing shits want others to do YOUR research for you.

If you want something proven, do it yourself.
 
Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock
Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.


its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.


then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Once again, you lazy right wing shits want others to do YOUR research for you.

If you want something proven, do it yourself.


he made a claim, I asked him to support it. simple
 
He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.
Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.


its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.


then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?
 
Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

  1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);

  2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);

  3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);

  4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);

  5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);

  8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);

  9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);

  10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);

  11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).
Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees
Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.
Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?
"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.


his wife signed the uranium one deal. tit for tat. Do you really think the foundation is not the Clinton family bank account?

The Uranium One deal has been debunked so many times one would think you’d be embarrassed to try to use it.

As for the Clinton Foundation, no it’s not the Clinton’s bank account. Not according to the auditors, the IRS, the FBI, or any of the charity watch groups which have reviewed their operations and their work. In fact, the Clintons donate a large portion of their income to the Foundation, mostly foreign speaking fees, so it’s actually the other way around. Contrast this to Trump who has contributed to his Foundation since 2008, using other people’s money and then claiming personal credit for the funds donated by the Foundation.

The Clintons have a modest net worth for their incomes and their work history. Around $5 million. All of their finances are a matter of public record.
 
how did it hurt her?

your leftist view on americans is really quite sad. you're just a fking punk that knows nothing.

Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.
It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.


Comey laid out her guilt in detail while under oath, then he exonerated her because she was only "extremely careless" and was too stupid to release that what she was doing was illegal.

Soooooooooooo, next time you get stopped for speeding use the Hillary defense, I was only careless and didn't know that I was going 80 in a 45 zone. See if it works for you.

Where did you go to law school?

Intent is an important factor in law.

If I walk past your house & glace over & your wife is naked that is different that waiting outside your house to see if I could see her naked.
'
why have a server off government property?
 
Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.
Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?
"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.


his wife signed the uranium one deal. tit for tat. Do you really think the foundation is not the Clinton family bank account?

The Uranium One deal has been debunked so many times one would think you’d be embarrassed to try to use it.

As for the Clinton Foundation, no it’s not the Clinton’s bank account. Not according to the auditors, the IRS, the FBI, or any of the charity watch groups which have reviewed their operations and their work. In fact, the Clintons donate a large portion of their income to the Foundation, mostly foreign speaking fees, so it’s actually the other way around. Contrast this to Trump who has contributed to his Foundation since 2008, using other people’s money and then claiming personal credit for the funds donated by the Foundation.

The Clintons have a modest net worth for their incomes and their work history. Around $5 million. All of their finances are a matter of public record.
debunked? did you write that word? debunked? :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg: that is just your wishful dream.
 
Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack
/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

What does that have to do with the question of what the Russians did, dope?

The indictment answers the question in great detail.


I didn't see anything in the indictments that said how many votes were affected and in which states and how the Russian activities changed the outcome of the election, or why they wanted to do it. Except to get us screaming at each other, and it that they succeeded.

You don't ever see anything. You're admitting you're too dumb to figure it out.

Obviously there is no way to quantify those who were influenced. What you can't do is say it had no affect at all. What you can do is recognize just how small the margin of victory for Trump was and consider that at least some of those voters could have been influenced.
 
What exactly did they do?

990 POSTS LATER, has anyone figured out yet what exactly did the Russians do? And how did Trump know about it?
Change the channel and watch some real some real news super duper...
how does watching people with trump syndrome answer what the russians did? why can't you just tell us? are you sworn to secrecy by muueller?
My God, you still don't know what the Russians did? Pull your head out of Trump's fat ass & become informed.


I keep asking to be informed and all I ever get is a run around. Why don't one of you super-geniuses stop bullshitting and produce a list of SPECIFIC events tied with links documenting clear proof of russian collusion, NOT supposition, not because Trump once visited Russia or had a russian friend, or some business ties, or once ordered a black russian cocktail after dinner, but a list you can point to at a moments notice showing all of the best evidence that he had any more or deeper Russian involvement than is normal for a president-to-be, than Obama or Hillary. When will one of you clowns do that much instead of always deflecting?

Wow, it has become my job to pull your head out of Trump's ass?

Ask your Republican Congressman why they decided they interfered.

Ask the FBI & CIA our intelligence services.

Ask Trump why he felt the need to lie about his campaign's Russian contacts?

I am sorry but I am not in charge of your education. What the Russians did is well documented. Links have been provided.

Quit being such a FUCKING ASSSOLE.
so answer? you got nothing. got it. we knew it, we just wanted you to admit it. thanks for doing that here.
 
Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

  1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);

  2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);

  3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);

  4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);

  5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);

  8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);

  9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);

  10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);

  11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);

  12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);

  13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).
Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees
Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.
Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?
"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.


his wife signed the uranium one deal. tit for tat. Do you really think the foundation is not the Clinton family bank account?

Prove it is their bank account, dope.

All of their taxes as well as the fondation financials are publicly available. Why has no one found this information yet?

Because it's not real.
 
Wasn't really a "criminal" indictment. Turned back over the Intel Groups where the whole thing belonged in the 1st place. Not the job of Special Counsel to do Intel work. In fact, Mueller STOLE all that from outside his group and put his name on it because he's DESPERATE for attention and any hint of his usefulness and self esteem.

It is indeed a criminal indictment, dope.

The govt agencies work together in counterintelligence matters. Mueller "stole" nothing.

It is NOT a "criminal" indictment. Counter Intel cases are handled in the Judiciary. It was referred back to the Counter Intel group.. Will NEVER see a judge. It was total show-boating on Muellers part.

It is a criminal indictment, dope. It's on the very first page. Why you dopes argue from a position of ignorance is beyond me.
Perhaps the trolling mod should be reported.

Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

You can indict a ham sandwich. True story. He can write legal US jurisdiction indictments all he wants.. They will NEVER see a judge unless those Russians RESPOND to the indictment willingly. Stop watching CNN/MSNBC. Hire some better morons to be your brain.

They will be handled by Intel cooperation with other govt agencies to squeeze these guys WITHOUT justice or a verdict. They'll end up being travel banned. Which they will LAUGH their asses off at. Because their jobs don't permit them to travel to the West anyway...

Lets just put this to bed with the facts and analysis that your media morons did not tell you.. OK??


Mueller’s Latest Indictments of Russians: Politicized, Pointless | National Review

So, is Russia now presumed innocent of hacking the 2016 election?

If not, it is difficult to understand any proper purpose served by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of twelve military officers in the Kremlin’s intelligence services for doing what everybody in America already knew that they did, and has known since before Donald Trump took office — indeed, since before the 2016 election.

Make no mistake: This is nakedly politicized law enforcement. There is absolutely no chance any of the Russian officials charged will ever see the inside of an American courtroom. The indictment is a strictly political document by which the special counsel seeks to justify the existence of his superfluous investigation.

Oh, and by the way, the answer to the question posed above is, “Yes, it is now the official position of the United States that Russia gets our Constitution’s benefit of the doubt.” Here is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announcing the Friday the 13th indictment: “In our justice system, everyone who is charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.”

Of course, the indicted Russians are never going to be proven guilty — not in the courtroom sense Rosenstein was invoking.Rosenstein made another telling remark at his big press conference. The Justice Department, he explained, will now “transition responsibility for this case to our Department’s National Security Division while we await the apprehension of the defendants.”

Now, stop giggling over that last part — the bit where we hold our breath until Russian dictator Vladimir Putin extradites his spies into the FBI’s waiting arms.
I’m talking about the first part: Mueller’s case, the definitive case about what Russia did to interfere in the 2016 election, is no longer Mueller’s case. It is being “transitioned” — i.e., buried — in the Justice Department unit that deals with counterintelligence matters that do not result in public trials.

Great. Wonderful.

When it comes to the question of the thread,
"What exactly did they do?", the indictments explain it in great detail.
no they don't. not one of them does. again for your education a tenth time, the DNC server was never ever looked at by a US intelligence agency. not one of em. So that isn't evidence in the indictment that is a wishful ploy to get an indictment. If they actually came to america they would be entitled to the evidence and we already know, it doesn't exist because one Russia company did come here. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:dude you need new material. that shits been debunked in here at least ten times.
 
Last edited:
It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.


Comey laid out her guilt in detail while under oath, then he exonerated her because she was only "extremely careless" and was too stupid to release that what she was doing was illegal.

Soooooooooooo, next time you get stopped for speeding use the Hillary defense, I was only careless and didn't know that I was going 80 in a 45 zone. See if it works for you.

Where did you go to law school?

Intent is an important factor in law.

If I walk past your house & glace over & your wife is naked that is different that waiting outside your house to see if I could see her naked.
'


Harvard. "but officer I didn't intend to violate the speed limit, you have to let me go"

are you really that stupid?

No but you are. When making a comparison, try to come up with reasonable equivalents. Real Dave did much better than you did and even he missed the mark.

Traffic laws are well defined and you have to pass both written and practical tests to get your license.

Email was relatively new and the rules for it weren’t well defined when Clinton was in office. Added to which, government servers allocated only a small amount of storage for users. Not enough to handle the kind of traffic cabinet members have.

Last but not least, and this can’t be said often enough. EMAIL IS NEVER SECURE. It is the LEAST secure form of communication in the world. No one would ever attach anything they wanted kept secure, to an email. Those of us who work with email regularly, have this drummed into them.

Clinton didn’t have anything compromising on her server. That’s the reality.
having a government server off government property is illegal. That is all intent. every fking email was with the intention of not being on government property. INTENTIONAL!!!!
 
Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack
/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

What does that have to do with the question of what the Russians did, dope?

The indictment answers the question in great detail.
nope
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top