What exactly did they do?

[Hutch Starskey]

It is indeed a criminal indictment, dope.

The govt agencies work together in counterintelligence matters. Mueller "stole" nothing.

It is NOT a "criminal" indictment. Counter Intel cases are handled in the Judiciary. It was referred back to the Counter Intel group.. Will NEVER see a judge. It was total show-boating on Muellers part.

It is a criminal indictment, dope. It's on the very first page. Why you dopes argue from a position of ignorance is beyond me.
Perhaps the trolling mod should be reported.

Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

You can indict a ham sandwich. True story. He can write legal US jurisdiction indictments all he wants.. They will NEVER see a judge unless those Russians RESPOND to the indictment willingly. Stop watching CNN/MSNBC. Hire some better morons to be your brain.

They will be handled by Intel cooperation with other govt agencies to squeeze these guys WITHOUT justice or a verdict. They'll end up being travel banned. Which they will LAUGH their asses off at. Because their jobs don't permit them to travel to the West anyway...

Lets just put this to bed with the facts and analysis that your media morons did not tell you.. OK??


Mueller’s Latest Indictments of Russians: Politicized, Pointless | National Review

So, is Russia now presumed innocent of hacking the 2016 election?

If not, it is difficult to understand any proper purpose served by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of twelve military officers in the Kremlin’s intelligence services for doing what everybody in America already knew that they did, and has known since before Donald Trump took office — indeed, since before the 2016 election.

Make no mistake: This is nakedly politicized law enforcement. There is absolutely no chance any of the Russian officials charged will ever see the inside of an American courtroom. The indictment is a strictly political document by which the special counsel seeks to justify the existence of his superfluous investigation.

Oh, and by the way, the answer to the question posed above is, “Yes, it is now the official position of the United States that Russia gets our Constitution’s benefit of the doubt.” Here is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announcing the Friday the 13th indictment: “In our justice system, everyone who is charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.”

Of course, the indicted Russians are never going to be proven guilty — not in the courtroom sense Rosenstein was invoking.Rosenstein made another telling remark at his big press conference. The Justice Department, he explained, will now “transition responsibility for this case to our Department’s National Security Division while we await the apprehension of the defendants.”

Now, stop giggling over that last part — the bit where we hold our breath until Russian dictator Vladimir Putin extradites his spies into the FBI’s waiting arms. I’m talking about the first part: Mueller’s case, the definitive case about what Russia did to interfere in the 2016 election, is no longer Mueller’s case. It is being “transitioned” — i.e., buried — in the Justice Department unit that deals with counterintelligence matters that do not result in public trials.

Great. Wonderful.

When it comes to the question of the thread,
"What exactly did they do?", the indictments explain it in great detail.

no they don't. not one of them does. again for your education a tenth time, the DNC server was never ever looked at by a US intelligence agency. not one of em. So that isn't evidence in the indictment that is wishful ploy to get an indictment. If they actually came to america they would be entitled to the evidence and we already know, it doesn't exist because one Russia company did come here. dude you need new material. that shits been debunked in here at least ten times.

Look, dope. The server would only give clues to the origins of the hackers IP address and their methods of gaining access. It would not tell them any of the detailed information contained in the indictment. That came from our intelligence agencies.

You're arguing a point that is irrelevant to the information we now have.

It's like arguing your apendicitis is not cured after surgery because they didn't give you tylenol before.

Truly stupid.

 

[Redfish]

Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

 

[jc456]

It is NOT a "criminal" indictment. Counter Intel cases are handled in the Judiciary. It was referred back to the Counter Intel group.. Will NEVER see a judge. It was total show-boating on Muellers part.

It is a criminal indictment, dope. It's on the very first page. Why you dopes argue from a position of ignorance is beyond me.
Perhaps the trolling mod should be reported.

Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

You can indict a ham sandwich. True story. He can write legal US jurisdiction indictments all he wants.. They will NEVER see a judge unless those Russians RESPOND to the indictment willingly. Stop watching CNN/MSNBC. Hire some better morons to be your brain.

They will be handled by Intel cooperation with other govt agencies to squeeze these guys WITHOUT justice or a verdict. They'll end up being travel banned. Which they will LAUGH their asses off at. Because their jobs don't permit them to travel to the West anyway...

Lets just put this to bed with the facts and analysis that your media morons did not tell you.. OK??


Mueller’s Latest Indictments of Russians: Politicized, Pointless | National Review

So, is Russia now presumed innocent of hacking the 2016 election?

If not, it is difficult to understand any proper purpose served by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of twelve military officers in the Kremlin’s intelligence services for doing what everybody in America already knew that they did, and has known since before Donald Trump took office — indeed, since before the 2016 election.

Make no mistake: This is nakedly politicized law enforcement. There is absolutely no chance any of the Russian officials charged will ever see the inside of an American courtroom. The indictment is a strictly political document by which the special counsel seeks to justify the existence of his superfluous investigation.

Oh, and by the way, the answer to the question posed above is, “Yes, it is now the official position of the United States that Russia gets our Constitution’s benefit of the doubt.” Here is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announcing the Friday the 13th indictment: “In our justice system, everyone who is charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.”

Of course, the indicted Russians are never going to be proven guilty — not in the courtroom sense Rosenstein was invoking.Rosenstein made another telling remark at his big press conference. The Justice Department, he explained, will now “transition responsibility for this case to our Department’s National Security Division while we await the apprehension of the defendants.”

Now, stop giggling over that last part — the bit where we hold our breath until Russian dictator Vladimir Putin extradites his spies into the FBI’s waiting arms. I’m talking about the first part: Mueller’s case, the definitive case about what Russia did to interfere in the 2016 election, is no longer Mueller’s case. It is being “transitioned” — i.e., buried — in the Justice Department unit that deals with counterintelligence matters that do not result in public trials.

Great. Wonderful.

When it comes to the question of the thread,
"What exactly did they do?", the indictments explain it in great detail.

no they don't. not one of them does. again for your education a tenth time, the DNC server was never ever looked at by a US intelligence agency. not one of em. So that isn't evidence in the indictment that is wishful ploy to get an indictment. If they actually came to america they would be entitled to the evidence and we already know, it doesn't exist because one Russia company did come here. dude you need new material. that shits been debunked in here at least ten times.

Look, dope. The server would only give clues to the origins of the hackers IP address and their methods of gaining access. It would not tell them any of the detailed information contained in the indictment. That came from our intelligence agencies.

You're arguing a point that is irrelevant to the information we now have.

It's like arguing your apendicitis is not cured after surgery because they didn't give you tylenol before.

Truly stupid.

look, there is no information that was retrieved by a US intelligence agency. none. No matter how fking bad you wish that were true, it isn't. so you're flat out lying. sorry!!!

 

[jc456]

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock
Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

all old news and the owners of our country's soul won't even consider looking at it. sad fks all of them. FK THEM ALL

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock
Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

I'm done, dope. I've explained it and now you're just spamming garbage.


Fusion GPS is still in business, dope. There is no pending criminal matters related to their work with the dossier. Ask yourself why that is, loser.

 

[Faun]

Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.

It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.

Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

Holy shit, you’re lying again??

No, liar, payment is not necessary to violate the law. Merely getting something of value, or even trying to get something of value, is sufficient to have committed a crime if it’s from a foreign national.

(a) ProhibitionIt shall be unlawful for—
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
(b) “Foreign national” definedAs used in this section, the term “foreign national” means—​

 

[jc456]

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

I'm done, dope. I've explained it and now you're just spamming garbage.


Fusion GPS is still in business, dope. There is no pending criminal matters related to their work with the dossier. Ask yourself why that is, loser.

I do ask myself that. why is that? what special privilege did they have to interfere in an election or spy on americans? I'd say my government let the people down. pitty, we can't even be a country anymore. I'm happy to take any of you fking leftists on. I blame Peter Strzok Robert Mueller and any other fk within that gang of ten.

 

[Faun]

So, when Comey announced he was reopening the e0mail investigation, you think that was done to help Hillary.

how did it hurt her?

your leftist view on americans is really quite sad. you're just a fking punk that knows nothing.

Really, do I have a dim view of Russia loving assholes like you & Trump? You betcha.

Gee, let me think, Announcing a candidate is back under scrutiny days before the election by the FBI isn't harmful? You can't be that fucking stupid, can you.

Call me a punk all you want. You are just pissed off that I have debunked your posts & pointed out what a dumbass you are. Go fuck yourself you Commie loving, anti-American piece of shit.

It's less harmful to Comey that having it discovered he sat on evidence before the election. It's also less harmful to Hillary than going to jail, which is where she belongs.

He could have reopened the investigation, and cleared the file without making that information public.

Hillary hasn’t done anything illegal. Every investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing. Yet you continue the lie that she’s a criminal.

Trump is a criminal. His record of “settlements” is Trump settling his way out of going to jail. Fraud, human rights violations, illegal fundraising, “illegal campaign contributions” (bribes), the list is endless.

Comey laid out her guilt in detail while under oath, then he exonerated her because she was only "extremely careless" and was too stupid to release that what she was doing was illegal.

Soooooooooooo, next time you get stopped for speeding use the Hillary defense, I was only careless and didn't know that I was going 80 in a 45 zone. See if it works for you.

Or try your lame excuse.... bu... bu... but Hillary was speeding too!! Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!!!!

 

[Cellblock2429]

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

What does that have to do with the question of what the Russians did, dope?

The indictment answers the question in great detail.

I didn't see anything in the indictments that said how many votes were affected and in which states and how the Russian activities changed the outcome of the election, or why they wanted to do it. Except to get us screaming at each other, and it that they succeeded.

You don't ever see anything. You're admitting you're too dumb to figure it out.

Obviously there is no way to quantify those who were influenced. What you can't do is say it had no affect at all. What you can do is recognize just how small the margin of victory for Trump was and consider that at least some of those voters could have been influenced.

/——/ Could have been? That’s the reason to remove a sitting president, could have been? Besides Trumps victory was a landslide. 304 vs 227. And yours will be the new excuse every time a democRAT loses Russian interference.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It is a criminal indictment, dope. It's on the very first page. Why you dopes argue from a position of ignorance is beyond me.
Perhaps the trolling mod should be reported.

Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

You can indict a ham sandwich. True story. He can write legal US jurisdiction indictments all he wants.. They will NEVER see a judge unless those Russians RESPOND to the indictment willingly. Stop watching CNN/MSNBC. Hire some better morons to be your brain.

They will be handled by Intel cooperation with other govt agencies to squeeze these guys WITHOUT justice or a verdict. They'll end up being travel banned. Which they will LAUGH their asses off at. Because their jobs don't permit them to travel to the West anyway...

Lets just put this to bed with the facts and analysis that your media morons did not tell you.. OK??


Mueller’s Latest Indictments of Russians: Politicized, Pointless | National Review

So, is Russia now presumed innocent of hacking the 2016 election?

If not, it is difficult to understand any proper purpose served by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of twelve military officers in the Kremlin’s intelligence services for doing what everybody in America already knew that they did, and has known since before Donald Trump took office — indeed, since before the 2016 election.

Make no mistake: This is nakedly politicized law enforcement. There is absolutely no chance any of the Russian officials charged will ever see the inside of an American courtroom. The indictment is a strictly political document by which the special counsel seeks to justify the existence of his superfluous investigation.

Oh, and by the way, the answer to the question posed above is, “Yes, it is now the official position of the United States that Russia gets our Constitution’s benefit of the doubt.” Here is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announcing the Friday the 13th indictment: “In our justice system, everyone who is charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.”

Of course, the indicted Russians are never going to be proven guilty — not in the courtroom sense Rosenstein was invoking.Rosenstein made another telling remark at his big press conference. The Justice Department, he explained, will now “transition responsibility for this case to our Department’s National Security Division while we await the apprehension of the defendants.”

Now, stop giggling over that last part — the bit where we hold our breath until Russian dictator Vladimir Putin extradites his spies into the FBI’s waiting arms. I’m talking about the first part: Mueller’s case, the definitive case about what Russia did to interfere in the 2016 election, is no longer Mueller’s case. It is being “transitioned” — i.e., buried — in the Justice Department unit that deals with counterintelligence matters that do not result in public trials.

Great. Wonderful.

When it comes to the question of the thread,
"What exactly did they do?", the indictments explain it in great detail.

no they don't. not one of them does. again for your education a tenth time, the DNC server was never ever looked at by a US intelligence agency. not one of em. So that isn't evidence in the indictment that is wishful ploy to get an indictment. If they actually came to america they would be entitled to the evidence and we already know, it doesn't exist because one Russia company did come here. dude you need new material. that shits been debunked in here at least ten times.

Look, dope. The server would only give clues to the origins of the hackers IP address and their methods of gaining access. It would not tell them any of the detailed information contained in the indictment. That came from our intelligence agencies.

You're arguing a point that is irrelevant to the information we now have.

It's like arguing your apendicitis is not cured after surgery because they didn't give you tylenol before.

Truly stupid.

look, there is no information that was retrieved by a US intelligence agency. none. No matter how fking bad you wish that were true, it isn't. so you're flat out lying. sorry!!!

look, there is no information that was retrieved by a US intelligence agency. none

Where did it come from, dope?

 

[jc456]

You can indict a ham sandwich. True story. He can write legal US jurisdiction indictments all he wants.. They will NEVER see a judge unless those Russians RESPOND to the indictment willingly. Stop watching CNN/MSNBC. Hire some better morons to be your brain.

They will be handled by Intel cooperation with other govt agencies to squeeze these guys WITHOUT justice or a verdict. They'll end up being travel banned. Which they will LAUGH their asses off at. Because their jobs don't permit them to travel to the West anyway...

Lets just put this to bed with the facts and analysis that your media morons did not tell you.. OK??


Mueller’s Latest Indictments of Russians: Politicized, Pointless | National Review

So, is Russia now presumed innocent of hacking the 2016 election?

If not, it is difficult to understand any proper purpose served by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of twelve military officers in the Kremlin’s intelligence services for doing what everybody in America already knew that they did, and has known since before Donald Trump took office — indeed, since before the 2016 election.

Make no mistake: This is nakedly politicized law enforcement. There is absolutely no chance any of the Russian officials charged will ever see the inside of an American courtroom. The indictment is a strictly political document by which the special counsel seeks to justify the existence of his superfluous investigation.

Oh, and by the way, the answer to the question posed above is, “Yes, it is now the official position of the United States that Russia gets our Constitution’s benefit of the doubt.” Here is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announcing the Friday the 13th indictment: “In our justice system, everyone who is charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.”

Of course, the indicted Russians are never going to be proven guilty — not in the courtroom sense Rosenstein was invoking.Rosenstein made another telling remark at his big press conference. The Justice Department, he explained, will now “transition responsibility for this case to our Department’s National Security Division while we await the apprehension of the defendants.”

Now, stop giggling over that last part — the bit where we hold our breath until Russian dictator Vladimir Putin extradites his spies into the FBI’s waiting arms. I’m talking about the first part: Mueller’s case, the definitive case about what Russia did to interfere in the 2016 election, is no longer Mueller’s case. It is being “transitioned” — i.e., buried — in the Justice Department unit that deals with counterintelligence matters that do not result in public trials.

Great. Wonderful.

When it comes to the question of the thread,
"What exactly did they do?", the indictments explain it in great detail.

no they don't. not one of them does. again for your education a tenth time, the DNC server was never ever looked at by a US intelligence agency. not one of em. So that isn't evidence in the indictment that is wishful ploy to get an indictment. If they actually came to america they would be entitled to the evidence and we already know, it doesn't exist because one Russia company did come here. dude you need new material. that shits been debunked in here at least ten times.

Look, dope. The server would only give clues to the origins of the hackers IP address and their methods of gaining access. It would not tell them any of the detailed information contained in the indictment. That came from our intelligence agencies.

You're arguing a point that is irrelevant to the information we now have.

It's like arguing your apendicitis is not cured after surgery because they didn't give you tylenol before.

Truly stupid.

look, there is no information that was retrieved by a US intelligence agency. none. No matter how fking bad you wish that were true, it isn't. so you're flat out lying. sorry!!!

look, there is no information that was retrieved by a US intelligence agency. none

Where did it come from, dope?

scripted from the demoloser party that's where. see how easy that is?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Once again, you lazy right wing shits want others to do YOUR research for you.

If you want something proven, do it yourself.

/——/ You want us to research something that never happened? Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha

 

[Hutch Starskey]

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

all old news and the owners of our country's soul won't even consider looking at it. sad fks all of them. FK THEM ALL

all old news and the owners of our country's soul won't even consider looking at it. sad fks all of them. FK THEM ALL

^QTARD fail.
This is what happens when a QTARD hits brick logic wall. Truly stupid yet fascinating.

 

[jc456]

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

all old news and the owners of our country's soul won't even consider looking at it. sad fks all of them. FK THEM ALL

all old news and the owners of our country's soul won't even consider looking at it. sad fks all of them. FK THEM ALL

^QTARD fail.
This is what happens when a QTARD hits brick logic wall. Truly stupid yet fascinating.

well since our intelligence didn't have any information, where do you think it came from?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

I'm done, dope. I've explained it and now you're just spamming garbage.


Fusion GPS is still in business, dope. There is no pending criminal matters related to their work with the dossier. Ask yourself why that is, loser.

I do ask myself that. why is that? what special privilege did they have to interfere in an election or spy on americans? I'd say my government let the people down. pitty, we can't even be a country anymore. I'm happy to take any of you fking leftists on. I blame Peter Strzok Robert Mueller and any other fk within that gang of ten.

I do ask myself that.

Great. Now ask yourself why Trump is letting you down. Why isn't he nailing them?

 

[jc456]

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

I'm done, dope. I've explained it and now you're just spamming garbage.


Fusion GPS is still in business, dope. There is no pending criminal matters related to their work with the dossier. Ask yourself why that is, loser.

I do ask myself that. why is that? what special privilege did they have to interfere in an election or spy on americans? I'd say my government let the people down. pitty, we can't even be a country anymore. I'm happy to take any of you fking leftists on. I blame Peter Strzok Robert Mueller and any other fk within that gang of ten.

I do ask myself that.

Great. Now ask yourself why Trump is letting you down. Why isn't he nailing them?

huh?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

What does that have to do with the question of what the Russians did, dope?

The indictment answers the question in great detail.

I didn't see anything in the indictments that said how many votes were affected and in which states and how the Russian activities changed the outcome of the election, or why they wanted to do it. Except to get us screaming at each other, and it that they succeeded.

You don't ever see anything. You're admitting you're too dumb to figure it out.

Obviously there is no way to quantify those who were influenced. What you can't do is say it had no affect at all. What you can do is recognize just how small the margin of victory for Trump was and consider that at least some of those voters could have been influenced.

/——/ Could have been? That’s the reason to remove a sitting president, could have been? Besides Trumps victory was a landslide. 304 vs 227. And yours will be the new excuse every time a democRAT loses Russian interference.

It wasn't a landslide by any measure. Trump won the three of the largest electoral states and their electors by only 77k votes. That is roughly one district in each of those three states. It is not a stretch in any way to believe that is within the margin of Russian cuntery.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

I'm done, dope. I've explained it and now you're just spamming garbage.


Fusion GPS is still in business, dope. There is no pending criminal matters related to their work with the dossier. Ask yourself why that is, loser.

I do ask myself that. why is that? what special privilege did they have to interfere in an election or spy on americans? I'd say my government let the people down. pitty, we can't even be a country anymore. I'm happy to take any of you fking leftists on. I blame Peter Strzok Robert Mueller and any other fk within that gang of ten.

I do ask myself that.

Great. Now ask yourself why Trump is letting you down. Why isn't he nailing them?

huh?

huh?

Exactly.

 

[Faun]

Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
   
   
2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
   
   
3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
   
   
4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
   
   
5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
   
   
6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
   
   
7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);
   
   
8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
   
   
9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
   
   
10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);
    
    
11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
    
    
12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
    
    
13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).

Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees

Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.

Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?

"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.

his wife signed the uranium one deal. tit for tat. Do you really think the foundation is not the Clinton family bank account?

You’re still lying. In case you forgot, you were challenged to prove she signed off on that deal and you couldn’t do that. You ran away like a sissy instead.

Furthermore, you idiotically claimed the Clinton’s were given $145 million for her to sign off on that deal..... forget that you could ln’t prove that number — but the millions the Clinton Foundation did collect from Giustra, came years before Hillary was even Secretary of State.

Which only serves to prove what a lying imbecile you are. According to you..........

...... a Canadian transferred $145 million on behalf of Russians to Hillary, who was a U.S. Senator in a state where Uranium One was not in; with the hopes she would one day become the Secretary of State; so she could sign off on a deal you can’t prove she signed off on; and with the hopes that all 8 other departments would also sign off on the deal since it required unanimous support from all 9 departments.

If that doesn’t bitch-slap you into reality, you’re too far gone to ever visit reality again.

 

[jc456]

her campaign PAID for the Russian lying dossier, then the DOJ used those lies as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on American citizens.

she transmitted classified data on an unsecure private server to people who did not hold security clearances------those are felonies.

it she had put under oath as she should have been, she would have committed perjury when she denied those things.

there is absolutely no proof that the Trump campaign had any illegal dealings with Russia or any other government. There is proof however, the employees of the FBI used their positions to try to influence the election.

Internal corruption is as bad, if not worse, than foreign corruption,.

I'm done, dope. I've explained it and now you're just spamming garbage.


Fusion GPS is still in business, dope. There is no pending criminal matters related to their work with the dossier. Ask yourself why that is, loser.

I do ask myself that. why is that? what special privilege did they have to interfere in an election or spy on americans? I'd say my government let the people down. pitty, we can't even be a country anymore. I'm happy to take any of you fking leftists on. I blame Peter Strzok Robert Mueller and any other fk within that gang of ten.

I do ask myself that.

Great. Now ask yourself why Trump is letting you down. Why isn't he nailing them?

huh?

huh?

Exactly.

huh?