What exactly did they do?

[Redfish]

The Clintons have a modest net worth for their incomes and their work history. Around $5 million. All of their finances are a matter of public record.

Why would you be so proud as to brag about your ignorance? Yes, it is all public record and they used their "Foundation" to pay for all their travel, lodging and meals.

$5 Million, you're funny!

How Much Is Hillary Clinton Actually Worth?

Clinton lost her battle for the White House, but she's winning at the book sales game.
by SAM DANGREMOND
OCT 12, 2017

Clinton's tax returns show that she and former President Bill Clinton have made $240 million since leaving the White House, thanks largely to speaking engagements and books. Forbes attributes a large portion of that—$189 million—to Bill Clinton, leaving Hillary with a $51 million profit so far.

Since Clinton herself said she and her husband left the White House "dead broke,"what they've made since then provides a good idea of their net worth today. Wealth-X estimates Hillary Clinton's net worth to be at least $18 million, and her federal financial disclosure filing in 2015 showed that she had between $11.3 million and $52.7 million in the bank.

Not so bad considering she's said she and her husband were $12 million in debt at the end of his presidential administration in 2001.

Hillary Clinton Net Worth 2018 - How Much Is Hillary Clinton Worth?

My apologies. I should have double checked that figure. It is 52 million. Still low given their income, much of which goes to the Foundation.

the foundation has been shut down. the money goes into their personal bank accounts, probably in Switzerland or the Cayman Islands to avoid US taxes

 

[Redfish]

The Clintons have a modest net worth for their incomes and their work history. Around $5 million. All of their finances are a matter of public record.

Why would you be so proud as to brag about your ignorance? Yes, it is all public record and they used their "Foundation" to pay for all their travel, lodging and meals.

$5 Million, you're funny!

How Much Is Hillary Clinton Actually Worth?

Clinton lost her battle for the White House, but she's winning at the book sales game.
by SAM DANGREMOND
OCT 12, 2017

Clinton's tax returns show that she and former President Bill Clinton have made $240 million since leaving the White House, thanks largely to speaking engagements and books. Forbes attributes a large portion of that—$189 million—to Bill Clinton, leaving Hillary with a $51 million profit so far.

Since Clinton herself said she and her husband left the White House "dead broke,"what they've made since then provides a good idea of their net worth today. Wealth-X estimates Hillary Clinton's net worth to be at least $18 million, and her federal financial disclosure filing in 2015 showed that she had between $11.3 million and $52.7 million in the bank.

Not so bad considering she's said she and her husband were $12 million in debt at the end of his presidential administration in 2001.

Hillary Clinton Net Worth 2018 - How Much Is Hillary Clinton Worth?

My apologies. I should have double checked that figure. It is 52 million. Still low given their income, much of which goes to the Foundation.

the foundation has been shut down. the money goes into their personal bank accounts, probably in Switzerland or the Cayman Islands to avoid US taxes

ok hutch, tell us where her book money goes.

 

[Redfish]

back to the OP

since none of you on the left can answer the basic question of what exactly did the Russians do and how did it impact the election.

I am going to answer my own question.

The Russians decided to "disrupt" the election, by creating unrest and distrust between the various factions in this country. They did not take sides, they just wanted to get us hating and yelling at each other, and they succeeded.

Its a standard tactic of socialists, and we are seeing more of it from the liberal democrat party today. Obama started it as instructed by his mentors Alinsky and Ayers, using the guidance of Marx and Lenin.

Study some history and you will understand exactly what is going on. It really has very little to do with Trump or Clinton.

 

[francoHFW]

Experts say$15 minimum wage is a good idea in answer to somebody's question...
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAMegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2PRUHh2OSHmZhKIvS_fMoc

 

[francoHFW]

back to the OP

since none of you on the left can answer the basic question of what exactly did the Russians do and how did it impact the election.

I am going to answer my own question.

The Russians decided to "disrupt" the election, by creating unrest and distrust between the various factions in this country. They did not take sides, they just wanted to get us hating and yelling at each other, and they succeeded.

Its a standard tactic of socialists, and we are seeing more of it from the liberal democrat party today. Obama started it as instructed by his mentors Alinsky and Ayers, using the guidance of Marx and Lenin.

Study some history and you will understand exactly what is going on. It really has very little to do with Trump or Clinton.

95% of their memes on social media or against Hillary, and the hacking of emails was all against the Democrats...

 

[Seawytch]

So, you didn't understand the question. I forgot I was speaking to a Trump cultist.

The indictment establishes the crime and lays out, in great detail, what the Russians did when they attacked us. I realize you're not interested in finding out because their assistance helped elect your cult leader, but those of us on Earth One do want to know.

Now these indicted Russians may never be convicted of the crimes they committed, but their travel will be curtailed as will where they can put their money. Of course, as long as there are useful idiots like Trump and Co. to launder money for them...

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

they are getting documents. many documents, many that will be used in court to defend themselves, so precedence is not to turn over grand jury docs, not any others though and that is being handled. where is an update to this that was back in June?

Go look for it if you care about it. Why cheer Russia over the U.S.?

In a case of the United States vs Russia, shouldn’t you be on the U.S. side?

I want my country to represent themself as honest. And until you or they show me where russia did anything, I back the law. so you want injustice and I don't. who cares about the country now?

Obviously you don't if you're siding with the country that attacked us. Russia did attack us. The only people denying it are Trump and his cult members.

 

[Seawytch]

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

they are getting documents. many documents, many that will be used in court to defend themselves, so precedence is not to turn over grand jury docs, not any others though and that is being handled. where is an update to this that was back in June?

Go look for it if you care about it. Why cheer Russia over the U.S.?

In a case of the United States vs Russia, shouldn’t you be on the U.S. side?

I want my country to represent themself as honest. And until you or they show me where russia did anything, I back the law. so you want injustice and I don't. who cares about the country now?

/——/ If Trump has only hired a Chink spy as a driver for 20 years then libtards would be cool with it.

Nope. We'd expect there to be an investigation.

 

[jc456]

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

they are getting documents. many documents, many that will be used in court to defend themselves, so precedence is not to turn over grand jury docs, not any others though and that is being handled. where is an update to this that was back in June?

Go look for it if you care about it. Why cheer Russia over the U.S.?

In a case of the United States vs Russia, shouldn’t you be on the U.S. side?

I want my country to represent themself as honest. And until you or they show me where russia did anything, I back the law. so you want injustice and I don't. who cares about the country now?

/——/ If Trump has only hired a Chink spy as a driver for 20 years then libtards would be cool with it.

Nope. We'd expect there to be an investigation.

can't have a chinese driver either? wow

 

[jc456]

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

they are getting documents. many documents, many that will be used in court to defend themselves, so precedence is not to turn over grand jury docs, not any others though and that is being handled. where is an update to this that was back in June?

Go look for it if you care about it. Why cheer Russia over the U.S.?

In a case of the United States vs Russia, shouldn’t you be on the U.S. side?

I want my country to represent themself as honest. And until you or they show me where russia did anything, I back the law. so you want injustice and I don't. who cares about the country now?

Obviously you don't if you're siding with the country that attacked us. Russia did attack us. The only people denying it are Trump and his cult members.

never heard of any attack. so not sure what you are referring to. Again, faking a crime is not justice and it is therefore an injustice and I am for law and not injustice. You are for injustice and therefore anti America.

 

[Dragonlady]

/——/ Are those Russians in custody now? No? Maybe next week when Mueller files the extradition papers?

Do you believe the indictment is empty? That it has no effect whatsoever? Does it, perhaps, effect their ability to travel to certain countries? Put restrictions on where they can put money?

/——/ By empty , if you mean a dog and pony show, a publicity stunt, Mueller needing something to justify the millions he has squandered by indicting Russians who will never see the inside of our courtroom then yes. I believe the indictments are empty.

So, you didn't understand the question. I forgot I was speaking to a Trump cultist.

The indictment establishes the crime and lays out, in great detail, what the Russians did when they attacked us. I realize you're not interested in finding out because their assistance helped elect your cult leader, but those of us on Earth One do want to know.

Now these indicted Russians may never be convicted of the crimes they committed, but their travel will be curtailed as will where they can put their money. Of course, as long as there are useful idiots like Trump and Co. to launder money for them...

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

Because he’s a Russian troll, that’s why.

 

[Cellblock2429]

they are getting documents. many documents, many that will be used in court to defend themselves, so precedence is not to turn over grand jury docs, not any others though and that is being handled. where is an update to this that was back in June?

Go look for it if you care about it. Why cheer Russia over the U.S.?

In a case of the United States vs Russia, shouldn’t you be on the U.S. side?

I want my country to represent themself as honest. And until you or they show me where russia did anything, I back the law. so you want injustice and I don't. who cares about the country now?

/——/ If Trump has only hired a Chink spy as a driver for 20 years then libtards would be cool with it.

Nope. We'd expect there to be an investigation.

can't have a chinese driver either? wow

/---/ The Chinese live right next door to the Russians. So they have to be in cahoots. I wonder if Russians on the border send out for Chinese food and do they deliver?

 

[Faun]

Once again, you lazy right wing shits want others to do YOUR research for you.

If you want something proven, do it yourself.

he made a claim, I asked him to support it. simple

No, YOU made the claim that it’s not illegal to get election campaign help from a foreign government.

It’s YOU was needs to support that assertion.

it isn't illegal. post up the statute that says it is illegal? that would be the initial post and then we could debunk that.

It is illegal to get assistance from a foreign government in an election.

Fox News host wrong that no law bans Russia-Trump collusion

then Hillary and the DNC are guilty since they paid for the fake Russian dossier. Agree?

Sure, if you can prove Hillary was aware of the payment to Steele.

 

[jc456]

Do you believe the indictment is empty? That it has no effect whatsoever? Does it, perhaps, effect their ability to travel to certain countries? Put restrictions on where they can put money?

/——/ By empty , if you mean a dog and pony show, a publicity stunt, Mueller needing something to justify the millions he has squandered by indicting Russians who will never see the inside of our courtroom then yes. I believe the indictments are empty.

So, you didn't understand the question. I forgot I was speaking to a Trump cultist.

The indictment establishes the crime and lays out, in great detail, what the Russians did when they attacked us. I realize you're not interested in finding out because their assistance helped elect your cult leader, but those of us on Earth One do want to know.

Now these indicted Russians may never be convicted of the crimes they committed, but their travel will be curtailed as will where they can put their money. Of course, as long as there are useful idiots like Trump and Co. to launder money for them...

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

Because he’s a Russian troll, that’s why.

can you prove russia did anything? if not, you don't know shit.

 

[Faun]

/——/ By empty , if you mean a dog and pony show, a publicity stunt, Mueller needing something to justify the millions he has squandered by indicting Russians who will never see the inside of our courtroom then yes. I believe the indictments are empty.

So, you didn't understand the question. I forgot I was speaking to a Trump cultist.

The indictment establishes the crime and lays out, in great detail, what the Russians did when they attacked us. I realize you're not interested in finding out because their assistance helped elect your cult leader, but those of us on Earth One do want to know.

Now these indicted Russians may never be convicted of the crimes they committed, but their travel will be curtailed as will where they can put their money. Of course, as long as there are useful idiots like Trump and Co. to launder money for them...

Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court Sending Mueller ...
Jun 13, 2018 - As Powerline notes, Mueller probably didn't see that coming – and the indictment itself was perhaps nothing more than a PR stunt to bolster the ...
/----/ Oh you mean the indictments that Mueller backpedaled on as soon as one Russian company showed up and demanded to see the evidence?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ELECTION MEDDLING
Indicted Russians Actually Show Up in Court, Mueller Scrambles
Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence.

by ZeroHedge.com
June 13th, 2018


Special Counsel Robert Mueller is scrambling to limit pretrial evidence handed over to a Russian company he indicted in February over alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, according to Bloomberg.

Mueller asked a Washington federal Judge for a protective order that would prevent the delivery of copious evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, one of three Russian firms and 13 Russian nationals. The indictment accuses the firm of producing propaganda, pretending to be U.S. activists online and posting political content on social media in order to sow discord among American voters.

You mean the ones that lost their demand for Grand Jury documents?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel-russian-company/index.html
Why are you cheering Russia over the United States?

Because he’s a Russian troll, that’s why.

can you prove russia did anything? if not, you don't know shit.

LOLOL

You’re such a fucking rightard.

President Trump Just Acknowledged Russian Meddling in the 2016 Election

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Again, the question was, what did russia do, dope?

You stated that it was spelled out in the indictment. What indictment.

The latest one, dope. Read it!

Read: Mueller indictment against 12 Russian spies for DNC hack

Wasn't really a "criminal" indictment. Turned back over the Intel Groups where the whole thing belonged in the 1st place. Not the job of Special Counsel to do Intel work. In fact, Mueller STOLE all that from outside his group and put his name on it because he's DESPERATE for attention and any hint of his usefulness and self esteem.

You nailed it. he has more cases reversed then the Media report. He has a rep that he likes. He loves to pick the cases he thinks he can win. Mueller copied the style that the KGB used, and that was take a person and start looking for anyone who they could turn on the suspect.

 

[flacaltenn]

he made a claim, I asked him to support it. simple

No, YOU made the claim that it’s not illegal to get election campaign help from a foreign government.

It’s YOU was needs to support that assertion.

it isn't illegal. post up the statute that says it is illegal? that would be the initial post and then we could debunk that.

It is illegal to get assistance from a foreign government in an election.

Fox News host wrong that no law bans Russia-Trump collusion

then Hillary and the DNC are guilty since they paid for the fake Russian dossier. Agree?

Sure, if you can prove Hillary was aware of the payment to Steele.

Probably can be traced. The MONEY came out of her account -- thru HER lawyer. That's an established fact.

You bought that the GOP also funded early Anti-Trump opposition research with the SAME type of intermediaries to hide it --- Didn't you? THAT research money was "laundered" thru a public newspaper.

Explain to me why there is a definite connection to the GOP funders and not to the Hillary/DNC. You can't.

 

[Faun]

No, YOU made the claim that it’s not illegal to get election campaign help from a foreign government.

It’s YOU was needs to support that assertion.

it isn't illegal. post up the statute that says it is illegal? that would be the initial post and then we could debunk that.

It is illegal to get assistance from a foreign government in an election.

Fox News host wrong that no law bans Russia-Trump collusion

then Hillary and the DNC are guilty since they paid for the fake Russian dossier. Agree?

Sure, if you can prove Hillary was aware of the payment to Steele.

Probably can be traced. The MONEY came out of her account -- thru HER lawyer. That's an established fact.

You bought that the GOP also funded early Anti-Trump opposition research with the SAME type of intermediaries to hide it --- Didn't you? THAT research money was "laundered" thru a public newspaper.

Explain to me why there is a definite connection to the GOP funders and not to the Hillary/DNC. You can't.

There’s no evidence the Washington Free Beacon, like Hillary, had any connection with anyone beyond Fusion GPS.

 

[Markle]

My apologies. I should have double checked that figure. It is 52 million. Still low given their income, much of which goes to the Foundation.

The Bill, Hillary, Chelsea Foundation receives nothing from the Clintons and is nothing but a cash cow paying for all their travel, accommodations, food and whatever.

 

[bripat9643]

Please show us where former President Bill Clinton was being paid $700,000 for a single speech. His going rate at most was $250,000 which is still outrageous.

Here’s a list of all the speeches for which Clinton received a fee of $500,000 or higher, including the year, location, host and actual fee:

1. 2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
   
   
2. 2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
   
   
3. 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
   
   
4. 2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
   
   
5. 2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
   
   
6. 2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
   
   
7. 2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea(Dutch finance corporation);
   
   
8. 2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
   
   
9. 2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
   
   
10. 2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson(Swedish multinational communications technology company);
    
    
11. 2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
    
    
12. 2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation(Austrian nongovernmental organization);
    
    
13. 2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym(fitness equipment manufacturer).

Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees

Mostly foreign powers with business before the State Department. They are bribes.

Fucking moron... what were the bribes ... ?

"Speaking fee" is a euphemism meaning "bribe," you dumb fuck.

Every time I think you can’t get any dumber, you do. There really is no bottom to your stupidity.

A bribe is a payment for something of value that the recipient would not have provided if not for the bribe. What exactly could Bill Clinton give these people in return for these “bribes”?

He’s not the President, has no power or influence over the government and can’t change public policy.

Then there the fact that speaking fees from foreign entities were paid to the Clinton Foundation and not to the Clintons personally. And the Clintons take no salaries or compensation from the Foundation.

He gives them access to Hillary, the Secretary of State. Access is a commodity commonly peddled in Washington. There are entire blocks full of people whose only job is peddling access to Washington politicians and bureaucrats.

Clinton's daughter works at the Foundation and "earns" a huge salary from it. The foundation pays for much of Hillary and Bill's travel as the jet around the country. The foundation paid for Chelsea's wedding. Many of Hillary's friends and cronies work at the foundation. It's a great way to pay off political allies. The claim that she gets nothing from the foundation is too absurd for words to describe.

 

[bripat9643]

Hillary obviously has done something illegal. Storing classified documents on a non secure server is a crime, period. It doesn't matter what Comey says. He's a lying douchebag.

Except it wasn’t illegal and nothing you can say or do will change that. You’re not a lawyer, you’re not even particularly bright, and your opinion of her guilt or innocence isn’t material to the discussion.

And wasn’t just Comey, who said it. The Inspector General reviewed the file and said Comey’s conclusion was correct.

Colin Powell used a web-based AOL account for his email. According to you that’s an unsecured server and Powell should be in jail.

Condo Rice used a private email account too maybe she should have been locked up.

And the Trumps have been using a private server for their emails too. Lock

Where are the indictments against anyone in the Trump administration who was cooperating with the Russians?

Papadopolous, Gates and Flynn. And all three plead guilty.

Charges for Stone, Cohen, and Junior are coming.

Speaking of which, what kind of an asshole throws his own kid under the bus to save his own skin. Trump tweeted that Junior met with the Rusdians tonget dirt on Hillaru but he knew nothing about it.

Bullshit. The lying prick knew about it. He even said he was going to have a big press conference and expose the Clintons right after that meeting was scheduled.

Bripat wants to let the criminal Trump’s go free for treason, but he’d lock Hillary up for having a private server that nobody hacked. There truly is no cure for stupid.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source. It is illegal to pay for that information (Hillary paid for the fake dossier). Her server was hacked, its very likely that Russia, Pakistan, the UK, and others have the missing 30,000 emails and were waiting for her to win so they could start blackmailing her.

How do you know what and when Trump knew about the Jr meeting with the Russians? are you clairvoyant?

speaking of no cure for stupid, you are the poster child.

its not illegal to get political information on an opponent from any source.

Liar.

then quote the statute that makes it illegal and then explain why it doesn't apply to Hillary.

Clinton did nothing illegal. Hiring a firm founded by investigative jounalists who specialize in research and intelligence to develop intel on her opponent is not nefarious in any way. Who does anyone hire to do such work?

Trump and co were looking to get information directly from the Russians as a part of the Russian govts efforts to help him get elected using feloniously obtained information.




You honestly don't see the difference?

It is highly nefarious and illegal when that firm pays Russian spies to dig up dirt on the opposition political candidate. Quit playing stupid.

Since the Trump campaign didn't pay anyone for information, it's entirely legal. You fucking dumbasses pretend you don't understand the difference between paying a foreign spy for dirt and having foreigners give you information free of charge.