What happened to Joes dementia?

[j-mac]

There are 24 pages in this thread. Where did you post it?

And why are you being so evasive?

Not going to do your work for you…it’s simple, go find the damned article, and read it…gheeze.

 

[Skylar]

Not going to do your work for you…it’s simple, go find the damned article, and read it…gheeze.

So you have no article. And you have no source.

Well that was easy.

 

[j-mac]

So you have no article. And you have no source.

Well that was easy.

Jesus you’re stupid….

Top Dems threatened to forcibly remove Biden from office, set him up to fail at Trump debate: Sources

The Democratic Party reportedly orchestrated a plan to remove President Joe Biden from office, pushing him to step down as he faced difficulties in his re-election bid.

www.foxnews.com

Exclusive | Top Dems threatened to forcibly remove Biden from office unless he dropped out, set him up to fail at Trump debate: sources

Joe Biden was forced out of the race by Democratic party operatives, threatened with 25th amendment

nypost.com

 

[Skylar]

Jesus you’re stupid….

Top Dems threatened to forcibly remove Biden from office, set him up to fail at Trump debate: Sources

The Democratic Party reportedly orchestrated a plan to remove President Joe Biden from office, pushing him to step down as he faced difficulties in his re-election bid.

www.foxnews.com

So the Post. And an anonymous source.

Who supposedly threatened Biden to be 'forcibly removed from office'? 'Party Big Wigs' is kinda vague.

Joe has never claimed this happened. Nor has any party leader. Every account with an actual source has cited folks trying to convince Biden to step aside. With the most 'forceful' being Pelosi who indicated she would go public with her concerns that he couldn't win the election.

That's hardly threatening to invoke the 25th amendment. So who is the anonymous source referring to?

That's double vague. Both the source and the folks the source were talking about are anonymous. That's hard to take seriously. Even more so when the 'source' indicated that the 'party big wigs' were pushing for Mark Kelly. Who didn't get the VP nod.

So the 'source' is objectively inaccurate.