- Thread starter
- #161
Well, they are forced to join Obama's administration. Is that good enough?Yes THOSE leechesdo you mean the leaches like the ones obama gave money to for green energy that paid off their CEOs and then closed up shop?how about all the welfare leaches join the Peace Corps for their pay then? thats a good idea right? lowers unemployment, gives them real life training and since they are out of the country it lowers our crime rate.if he were alive to day the liberals and the inner city blacks would have him on a hit list.
he made that one little statement that goes against everything the liberals today stand for.
Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.
kinda reverse of what todays democrat thinks.
I can't believe that conservatives today believe the "Ask not" statement was somehow a confirmation of their hatred of social programs. Kennedy, in that same speech spoke in favor of social programs
"Ask not" was a call for volunteerism in anticipation of JFKs Peace Corps, that Republucans also hated
I kinda like that idea
It should apply to corporate leeches too
or do you mean the ones that actually employ people and are given a tax break, that still pay a good amount of tax, just not what you think would be fair.
because the second of the two are not leaches, they produce, they contribute. and even if those corporations paid no tax at all, they do employ thousands that do pay tax so they are still creating a tax base from their payroll.
just trying to wrap my head around this corporate leach/corporate welfare thing that the left keeps bringing up.
Kinda like the rich guy that pays a couple million in tax being told by someone that pays nothing that he is not doing his fair share.
Every corporation we bailed out should have to have their executives join the Peace Corps
It would teach them corporate responsibility