Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, every major dictator in history was a liberal. How very revisionist of you.
Today's 'Liberal' is more in line with the 20th century progressive totalitarians.
And that always ends ugly.
[/IMG]
this is going to be fun-----hitler, marx, and obama. liberal heads are imploding.
right, you get the gold star..
liberal leaders from history: lets see-------
marx, lenin, mao, castro, chavez, for sure
hitler---more of an angry racist dictator but liberal in wanting to destroy wealth
You are wrong on all counts but keep trying. Maybe you'll get one eventually. How are these people ALL Liberals again?
Hitler built the Autobahn.
In my deranged and wandering mind, a modern liberal (as opposed to the classical liberal) is someone who believes in government growth and an increasing intrusion and widening scope of government power into our lives. A liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
So, for example, when some madmen kill some people, a liberal will demand the government immediately expand and more closely monitor and control the group of people to which they can pigeonhole the madmen. That could be the "Muslim" pigeonhole, or it could be the "gun owner" pigeonhole, doesn't matter.
Or, for another example, when there is some kind of crisis, the liberal will demand the government create a whole new cabinet department with overreaching powers, or assign some kind of "czar" to the problem, but most especially the liberal will scream for as many dollars to be borrowed to throw at the problem as possible. That could be the "cancer lady health care" problem, or it could be the "Muslim terrorist under my bed" problem.
If there is one characteristic which is a critical ingredient of the liberal recipe, it is the idea that an emergency measure which was created to address a crisis must be made permanent after the crisis is past. That could be a tax increase or it could be defense spending at a level not seen since WWII.
So that's my idea of the totalitarian wannabes affectionately known as "liberals". Believe it or not, some liberals walking around today are suffering from the delusion they are conservatives!
Today's 'Liberal' is more in line with the 20th century progressive totalitarians.
And that always ends ugly.
[/IMG]
this is going to be fun-----hitler, marx, and obama. liberal heads are imploding.
Maybe from laughter; posts which need props are usually ridiculous. Sniper Fire is always ridiculous.
You are wrong on all counts but keep trying. Maybe you'll get one eventually. How are these people ALL Liberals again?
Hitler built the Autobahn.
Hitler destoyed a culture, murdered millions and left Germany in ruins.
These threads are hilarious because they show just how stupid the liberal/conservative paradigm is. No one has a clear definition of what a liberal or conservative is.
I would like to hear from both sides on this.
My definition of a modern day liberal is someone that wants a big intrusive controlling government, someone who wants wealth and income redistribution, someone who wants abortion on demand but does not want the 2nd amendment upheld, someone who wants to punish success and reward failure, someone who is comfortable being a slave to the government and wants an active thought and speech police.
In my deranged and wandering mind, a modern liberal (as opposed to the classical liberal) is someone who believes in government growth and an increasing intrusion and widening scope of government power into our lives. A liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
So, for example, when some madmen kill some people, a liberal will demand the government immediately expand and more closely monitor and control the group of people to which they can pigeonhole the madmen. That could be the "Muslim" pigeonhole, or it could be the "gun owner" pigeonhole, doesn't matter.
Or, for another example, when there is some kind of crisis, the liberal will demand the government create a whole new cabinet department with overreaching powers, or assign some kind of "czar" to the problem, but most especially the liberal will scream for as many dollars to be borrowed to throw at the problem as possible. That could be the "cancer lady health care" problem, or it could be the "Muslim terrorist under my bed" problem.
If there is one characteristic which is a critical ingredient of the liberal recipe, it is the idea that an emergency measure which was created to address a crisis must be made permanent after the crisis is past. That could be a tax increase or it could be defense spending at a level not seen since WWII.
So that's my idea of the totalitarian wannabes affectionately known as "liberals". Believe it or not, some liberals walking around today are suffering from the delusion they are conservatives!
In my deranged and wandering mind, a modern liberal (as opposed to the classical liberal) is someone who believes in government growth and an increasing intrusion and widening scope of government power into our lives. A liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
Well, it seems this paragraph is evidence of the truth of your first phrase, only a deranged and wandering mind would believe the modern liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
So, for example, when some madmen kill some people, a liberal will demand the government more closely monitor and control the group of people to which they can pigeonhole the madmen. That could be the "Muslim" pigeonhole, or it could be the "gun owner" pigeonhole, doesn't matter.
Better to default to the, "so what, kids got killed, let's not make a big deal out of it"?
Or, for another example, when there is some kind of crisis, the liberal will demand the government create a whole new cabinet department with overreaching powers, or assign some kind of "czar" to the problem, but most especially the liberal will scream for as many dollars to be borrowed to throw at the problem as possible. I wonder, was it better that the neo conservatives invaded and occupied Iraq on funds off budget and borrowed? That could be the "health care" problem, or it could be the "terrorist" problem.
Problems need solutions. It seems the conservatives of today simply define the problem as someone else's failure to be responsible and thus redefine the issue - hence the problem goes away.
If there is one characteristic which is a critical ingredient of the liberal recipe, it is the idea that an emergency measure which was created to address a crisis must be made permanent after the crisis is past. That could be a tax increase or it could be defense spending at a level not seen since WWII.
(l)libeals didn't seem too interested in keeping troops in Germany for the past 75 years or invading Vietnam. Unless you are making the argument all those hippies marching in the streets in '60's had a big government agenda. The same can be said for the marchers protesting the Iraq war and the Cccupy Wall Street Movement.
I think your thinking is muddled; the R's who today are either RINO or conservative don't want to cut defense - do they? (provide proof if you say they do).
So that's my idea of the totalitarian wannabes affectionately known as "liberals". Believe it or not, some liberals walking around today are suffering from the delusion they are conservatives!
In my deranged and wandering mind, a modern liberal (as opposed to the classical liberal) is someone who believes in government growth and an increasing intrusion and widening scope of government power into our lives. A liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
So, for example, when some madmen kill some people, a liberal will demand the government immediately expand and more closely monitor and control the group of people to which they can pigeonhole the madmen. That could be the "Muslim" pigeonhole, or it could be the "gun owner" pigeonhole, doesn't matter.
Or, for another example, when there is some kind of crisis, the liberal will demand the government create a whole new cabinet department with overreaching powers, or assign some kind of "czar" to the problem, but most especially the liberal will scream for as many dollars to be borrowed to throw at the problem as possible. That could be the "cancer lady health care" problem, or it could be the "Muslim terrorist under my bed" problem.
If there is one characteristic which is a critical ingredient of the liberal recipe, it is the idea that an emergency measure which was created to address a crisis must be made permanent after the crisis is past. That could be a tax increase or it could be defense spending at a level not seen since WWII.
So that's my idea of the totalitarian wannabes affectionately known as "liberals". Believe it or not, some liberals walking around today are suffering from the delusion they are conservatives!
Geez, I must be a conservative that has been walking around suffering from the delusion that I am liberal because I think the DHS, TSA, Patriot Act, extraordinary rendition, and torture are bad things. All the while the "Conservative" party puts these things forward as good and proper governance. Who would have thought this could be?
Geez, I must be a conservative that has been walking around suffering from the delusion that I am liberal because I think the DHS, TSA, Patriot Act, extraordinary rendition, and torture are bad things.
All the while the "Conservative" party puts these things forward as good and proper governance. Who would have thought this could be?
In my deranged and wandering mind, a modern liberal (as opposed to the classical liberal) is someone who believes in government growth and an increasing intrusion and widening scope of government power into our lives. A liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
Well, it seems this paragraph is evidence of the truth of your first phrase, only a deranged and wandering mind would believe the modern liberal is a nascent totalitarian.
So, for example, when some madmen kill some people, a liberal will demand the government more closely monitor and control the group of people to which they can pigeonhole the madmen. That could be the "Muslim" pigeonhole, or it could be the "gun owner" pigeonhole, doesn't matter.
Better to default to the, "so what, kids got killed, let's not make a big deal out of it"?
Or, for another example, when there is some kind of crisis, the liberal will demand the government create a whole new cabinet department with overreaching powers, or assign some kind of "czar" to the problem, but most especially the liberal will scream for as many dollars to be borrowed to throw at the problem as possible. I wonder, was it better that the neo conservatives invaded and occupied Iraq on funds off budget and borrowed? That could be the "health care" problem, or it could be the "terrorist" problem.
Problems need solutions. It seems the conservatives of today simply define the problem as someone else's failure to be responsible and thus redefine the issue - hence the problem goes away.
If there is one characteristic which is a critical ingredient of the liberal recipe, it is the idea that an emergency measure which was created to address a crisis must be made permanent after the crisis is past. That could be a tax increase or it could be defense spending at a level not seen since WWII.
(l)libeals didn't seem too interested in keeping troops in Germany for the past 75 years or invading Vietnam. Unless you are making the argument all those hippies marching in the streets in '60's had a big government agenda. The same can be said for the marchers protesting the Iraq war and the Cccupy Wall Street Movement.
I think your thinking is muddled; the R's who today are either RINO or conservative don't want to cut defense - do they? (provide proof if you say they do).
