rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,009
- 157,684
- 2,615
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
God did not have his best day when he made the Ten CommandmentsTen Commandments have little to do with our laws
Our laws do a better job at protecting human rights than the Ten Commandments
Atheists are usually wrong.
"Over the last two decades, monuments to the Ten Commandments have been removed, often via court orders – and often under protest – from state capitols, parks, and even public schools in Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, New Mexico, Maryland, and Kentucky."
The Ten Commandments and Natural Law - The Catholic Thing
.As I said before, you can use any tool. My two suggestions were governing laws and Dr. Suess books. Leaving each individual to determine his own moral authority is dysfunctional. This decayed type of society is to be avoided.
It doesn't have to be based on a false messiah. It can be based on anything. It can't be based on an arbitrary concept such as intellect or reason.
Are we seeing your true colors now? Did you miss my post #454 on p.23?
Jesus is the TRUE Messiah. He has fulfilled the prophecies. God provides the objective moral values -- The Bible and
![]()
See how nothing travels faster than the speed of light? Atheists can't do that, but have tried to claim that like their morality based on rationalism and human laws. In fact our laws in the US are based on the above.
Jesus is the TRUE Messiah. He has fulfilled the prophecies. God provides the objective moral values -- The Bible and
I'm afraid you're simply reiterating a lot of slurs that are a staple of the really angry, fundamentalist Christian ministries.Darwin had nothing to do with it
Hatred and persecution of Jews dates back to early Christianity
I doubt your last sentence.
Darwin had everything to do with giving Hitler justification. He and his cousin became Hitler's heroes.
It's really shameful that angry, fundamentalist Christians still promote such falsehoods.
I'm not angry. These are some hard truths that Darwinin's racism influenced socialDarwinism, Herbert Spencer, his cousin Francis Galton and eugenics, Aryan supremacy, and Hitler.
Hitler wrote about evolution in Mein Kampf -- Did Hitler Use the Term "Evolution" in Mein Kampf? | Evolution News.
The Darwin connections to Hitler are serious -- - Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust -
Even the evolution apologists admit racist Darwin influenced Hitler via Ernst Haeckel, another serious racist. Haeckel's the one who read Darwin's book and made up his embryo drawings which fooled an entire generation.
http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Was Hitler a Darwinian.pdf
From Quora (which leans left):
Instead of the typical biased research and answers:
What would Darwin think about Hitler?
Gwydion Madawc Williams, Read a lot about them
"Unknown. He believed in racial inequality, and was comfortable about the notion of inferior peoples being replaced:
“Competition was not between individuals, but the groups themselves. The hardiest races with the greatest ingenuity and cooperation would prevail, while the struggle ‘leads to the inevitable extinction of all those low and mentally undeveloped with which the European come into contract’. This Darwin could agree with; he marked the passage heavily. Imperial expansion from the north was wiping out the indigenous tribes. The Beagle voyage had shown him as much. He scribbled at the top of the page: ‘natural selection is now acting on the inferior races when put into competition with the New Zealanders – high New Zealanders (sic)
say the [Maori] race dying out like their own native rat’.” (Desmond, Adrian & Moore, James. Darwin. Michael Joseph (Penguin Group) 1991. Page 521. Emphasis added.)
He didn’t approve of slavery: that was seen as cruelty to inferior humans, and I think he also disapproved of cruelty to animals.
A lot of the British ruling class approved of Hitler until he broke the Munich Agreement by taking the Czech half of Czechoslovakia. The degree of approval gets covered up. Unless you are on the Hard Left, you will probably not know that the Daily Mail was pro-Hitler for many years.
Mainstream British attitudes even in the 1930s were closer to Hitler than they are to what most Britons believe now. See The Left Redefined ‘The Normal’
https://www.quora.com/What-would-Darwin-think-about-Hitler
I'm afraid you're simply reiterating a lot of slurs that are a staple of the really angry, fundamentalist Christian ministries.Darwin had nothing to do with it
Hatred and persecution of Jews dates back to early Christianity
I doubt your last sentence.
Darwin had everything to do with giving Hitler justification. He and his cousin became Hitler's heroes.
It's really shameful that angry, fundamentalist Christians still promote such falsehoods.
I'm not angry. These are some hard truths that Darwinin's racism influenced socialDarwinism, Herbert Spencer, his cousin Francis Galton and eugenics, Aryan supremacy, and Hitler.
Hitler wrote about evolution in Mein Kampf -- Did Hitler Use the Term "Evolution" in Mein Kampf? | Evolution News.
The Darwin connections to Hitler are serious -- - Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust -
Even the evolution apologists admit racist Darwin influenced Hitler via Ernst Haeckel, another serious racist. Haeckel's the one who read Darwin's book and made up his embryo drawings which fooled an entire generation.
http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Was Hitler a Darwinian.pdf
From Quora (which leans left):
Instead of the typical biased research and answers:
What would Darwin think about Hitler?
Gwydion Madawc Williams, Read a lot about them
"Unknown. He believed in racial inequality, and was comfortable about the notion of inferior peoples being replaced:
“Competition was not between individuals, but the groups themselves. The hardiest races with the greatest ingenuity and cooperation would prevail, while the struggle ‘leads to the inevitable extinction of all those low and mentally undeveloped with which the European come into contract’. This Darwin could agree with; he marked the passage heavily. Imperial expansion from the north was wiping out the indigenous tribes. The Beagle voyage had shown him as much. He scribbled at the top of the page: ‘natural selection is now acting on the inferior races when put into competition with the New Zealanders – high New Zealanders (sic)
say the [Maori] race dying out like their own native rat’.” (Desmond, Adrian & Moore, James. Darwin. Michael Joseph (Penguin Group) 1991. Page 521. Emphasis added.)
He didn’t approve of slavery: that was seen as cruelty to inferior humans, and I think he also disapproved of cruelty to animals.
A lot of the British ruling class approved of Hitler until he broke the Munich Agreement by taking the Czech half of Czechoslovakia. The degree of approval gets covered up. Unless you are on the Hard Left, you will probably not know that the Daily Mail was pro-Hitler for many years.
Mainstream British attitudes even in the 1930s were closer to Hitler than they are to what most Britons believe now. See The Left Redefined ‘The Normal’
https://www.quora.com/What-would-Darwin-think-about-Hitler
compared to a valid secular humanism
Evolution is a FACT....it occurs
Atheists are usually wrong. This is about faith in evolution. How many times have I said real science backs up the Bible while you haven't shown one scrap of evidence for it using the scientific method.
God did not have his best day when he made the Ten Commandments
I could have done better and I am not even a deity
Lol theyre actually pretty terribly thought outGod did not have his best day when he made the Ten CommandmentsTen Commandments have little to do with our laws
Our laws do a better job at protecting human rights than the Ten Commandments
Atheists are usually wrong.
"Over the last two decades, monuments to the Ten Commandments have been removed, often via court orders – and often under protest – from state capitols, parks, and even public schools in Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, New Mexico, Maryland, and Kentucky."
The Ten Commandments and Natural Law - The Catholic Thing
I could have done better and I am not even a deity
My commandments that are better than the ones God screwed upGod did not have his best day when he made the Ten Commandments
Why is that?
I could have done better and I am not even a deity
Dang. Another 1st commandment violation and blatant ignorance of US history.
"Our laws and our institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent our civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian." - United States Supreme Court, 1892.
"The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." --John Adams wrote this on June 28, 1813, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson.
Why don't you be like Benjamin Franklin? He's on the $100 bill.
"Even Benjamin Franklin, the lone member of the group of founders that claimed to be anything but religious, attended every kind of Christian worship, called for public prayer, and contributed to all denominations. In fact, when the Constitutional Convention was finding itself stalling, and the members of the convention were arguing to the point that it was nearly coming to blows, Ben Franklin was the one that proposed that the delegation pray before each session of the Constitutional Convention.
In his request, Franklin stated, "I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth - that God Governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?"
U.S. Constitution and Biblical Principles — Kirk Cameron
View attachment 282044
Do you think we cannot observe negative effects of doing nothing? That was a horrid example man, challenge yourself.
As far as your "observations" being better than mine, that was a useless snide. We can measure whether action A is more or less harmful to Humans ~ and its not arbitrary so youre still stuck with fucking up your conception of objective vs. subjective. It works like this, both logically as well as scientifically...
Goal: Least suffering.
Suffering: physical/emotional pain.
Pain: Nerves sending harmful stimuli to the brain.
Action: Placing hand on stove, rest of life being controlled for/equal.
Result: Touching stove is not conducive toward goal.
Morality requires no magical thinking, it requires a goal and we can objectively measure our actions against it.
Why is less suffering the goal? Kantian ethics states that no act can be moral unless it was unpleasant.
Kant was wrong.
A thriving Germany that has had their ass kicked twice and still recovered might beg to differ.
I doubt it. But I could be wrong. When you hugged your child (assuming you have one) was it unpleasant or immoral? If neither, then Kant was wrong.
It was neutral and natural. Doing what you like is going to happen anyways. You like it. Doing what you enjoy for the greater good is a neutral act done for your own pleasure and your own benefit. Doing what you hate for the greater good is a moral act. There are ethical codes that require altruism.
Evolution is a FACT....it occurs
God is a THEORY
I would expand the honor your father and mother to honor your family. Parents should honor their kids, make sure they are fed and clothed and protected. You should work hard to take care of your family
None of the gods are "fact". The invention of something you call "bible theory" seems to be a term you can't even define.Evolution is a FACT....it occurs
God is a THEORY
God is fact, but we have the Bible theory. Evolution is theory, too, but only has circumstantial evidence. It isn't backed up by the scientific method while the Bible theory is.
That's one of those things. You said that perfectly.I am an atheist and I do not fear death. I'd rather put it off for as long as I am healthy and happy. But I know that it is inevitable.
What comes after death? I don't know. Mostly I believe nothing comes after. But if there is something after, I am not afraid. I have lived a good life. I have helped others, loved, been loved, raised great kids into remarkable adults, rescued and saved numerous animals, and I think the world is better for my having been here. If I am wrong, and there is a God(dess), I cannot imagine my after life being punishment because if their ego.
I suppose you believe drowning your children, putting them to the sword, destroying them in horrible ways is acceptable when they are a disappointment to you.I would expand the honor your father and mother to honor your family. Parents should honor their kids, make sure they are fed and clothed and protected. You should work hard to take care of your family
Do you have any kids? If you have kids, then do they call you by your first name or rightwinger instead of "Dad?" Such as "rightwinger, gimme some money?"
ETA: The difference is you can punish your kids (assuming you have some) for dishonoring you and your family. God can punish those who do not obey his 10 commandments after they die. You consider yourself a deity, but can't do squat. Your facts are feces.
I think they are quite apparent. We would lose sight of them were they not.Do you think, aside from the "worship me" sort of stuff...that any Moral ways within your system are not apparent by a mere day to day observation of cause and effect? Which ones, if so...just kicking some ideas around...
I am an atheist and I do not fear death. I'd rather put it off for as long as I am healthy and happy. But I know that it is inevitable.
What comes after death? I don't know. Mostly I believe nothing comes after. But if there is something after, I am not afraid. I have lived a good life. I have helped others, loved, been loved, raised great kids into remarkable adults, rescued and saved numerous animals, and I think the world is better for my having been here. If I am wrong, and there is a God(dess), I cannot imagine my after life being punishment because if their ego.