Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I repeatYou fucking idiots pretend not to understand how serious suicide is and how pertinent to the gun discussion it is
A bullet to the head is final. There is no pumping the stomach. There is no help. One twitch of the finger and it's over.
So yes...guns are an important element in suicide discussions.
Not to mention the fact that most mass shootings are in fact suicides that include untold numbers of innocents
And I repeatI repeatYou fucking idiots pretend not to understand how serious suicide is and how pertinent to the gun discussion it is
A bullet to the head is final. There is no pumping the stomach. There is no help. One twitch of the finger and it's over.
So yes...guns are an important element in suicide discussions.
Not to mention the fact that most mass shootings are in fact suicides that include untold numbers of innocents
How exactly am I wrong?Repeat as much as you like you are wrong.
again so what?Guns are used in only 6% of suicide attempts but account for HALF of successful suicides
10 Essential Facts About Guns and Suicide
Chew on that for a while and tell me that guns aren't an important part of the suicide discussion or vice versa
You clearly haven't thought your way through any of this. The existing gun laws are, for the most part, being enforced and locking people up, as you are suggesting, because you think they might do something would be repugnant to almost all Americans and certainly a dangerous violation of our civil rights.That would do nothing to address most of the gun violence and giving the government the power to lock people up because of what they might do is very dangerous.It is not astounding at all, since there is no solution to gun violence in the US. As the recent mass shooting in Ca. showed, tougher gun control laws don't prevent mass shootings, and such laws will not keep guns out of the hands of gangs, drug dealers and other criminals. As things stand now, if you say, no, to every bad idea about ending gun violence, you've said, no, to all ideas about how to end gun violence since ther are no good ideas on the subject.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
Perhaps we need to enforce the laws on the books and get the mentally ill into hospitals where they can be treated and prevented from having a firearm.
Bull. Enforcing the laws we have now and getting help for the mentally ill would address gun violence in the MOST effective way. If you have to lie, you have nothing to say.
California's homicide rate is just below the national average.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
California has some of the most strict gun control laws in the country. How would additional laws have prevented this catastrophe?
Whereas most of the states above the national average are red states with lax gun laws
Wow are you ever WRONGCalifornia's homicide rate is just below the national average.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
California has some of the most strict gun control laws in the country. How would additional laws have prevented this catastrophe?
Whereas most of the states above the national average are red states with lax gun laws.
You clearly haven't thought your way through any of this. The existing gun laws are, for the most part, being enforced and locking people up, as you are suggesting, because you think they might do something would be repugnant to almost all Americans and certainly a dangerous violation of our civil rights.That would do nothing to address most of the gun violence and giving the government the power to lock people up because of what they might do is very dangerous.It is not astounding at all, since there is no solution to gun violence in the US. As the recent mass shooting in Ca. showed, tougher gun control laws don't prevent mass shootings, and such laws will not keep guns out of the hands of gangs, drug dealers and other criminals. As things stand now, if you say, no, to every bad idea about ending gun violence, you've said, no, to all ideas about how to end gun violence since ther are no good ideas on the subject.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
Perhaps we need to enforce the laws on the books and get the mentally ill into hospitals where they can be treated and prevented from having a firearm.
Bull. Enforcing the laws we have now and getting help for the mentally ill would address gun violence in the MOST effective way. If you have to lie, you have nothing to say.
Then why are you a gun grabber?Of course it isAnd if someone make the choices to be dead it's none of your business----------------------- i don't agree with you but boy , you worry alot . And the way it is now , heck there are armed people both criminal and law abiders all over the place and the criminals are your enemies RWinger .
33,000 gun deaths a year
That is a lot of armed assholes
2/3 of those are suicides
Suicide is a choice not a crime
2/3 of suicides choose guns
Dead is dead
I don't like to see people die unnecessarily
Dead is deadSuicide is not relevant in a discussion about gun control. You need to get your facts about suicide correct, not all suicides attempts by gun are fatal. A lot are with 22s and are survived and recovered from completely. I can tell you one you can use that is 100 percent effective lay down across a railroad track. Should we ban trains? Same argument!
Dead is deadSuicide is not relevant in a discussion about gun control. You need to get your facts about suicide correct, not all suicides attempts by gun are fatal. A lot are with 22s and are survived and recovered from completely. I can tell you one you can use that is 100 percent effective lay down across a railroad track. Should we ban trains? Same argument!
The chance of changing your mind in a gun suicide is much lower when your brain is spattered all over the wall
Huh?Wow are you ever WRONGCalifornia's homicide rate is just below the national average.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
California has some of the most strict gun control laws in the country. How would additional laws have prevented this catastrophe?
Whereas most of the states above the national average are red states with lax gun laws.
UT is considered to have the most lax gun laws in the country and what's the murder rate in UT?
in 2017 the murder rate of CA was 4.6 per 100000
The murder rate in UT was 2.4 per 100000
NH has had the lowest murder rate in the country at 1 per 100000 in 2017
NH gun laws are far less restrictive than those of CA
You might want to actually do some research before you say shit so you won't sound like such a fucking idiot.
The top ten homicides states are all red. You have to get to the 15th state before you find a blue one (Nevada), and then the 20th state before you find another one (Colorado).Wow are you ever WRONGCalifornia's homicide rate is just below the national average.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
California has some of the most strict gun control laws in the country. How would additional laws have prevented this catastrophe?
Whereas most of the states above the national average are red states with lax gun laws.
UT is considered to have the most lax gun laws in the country and what's the murder rate in UT?
in 2017 the murder rate of CA was 4.6 per 100000
The murder rate in UT was 2.4 per 100000
NH has had the lowest murder rate in the country at 1 per 100000 in 2017
NH gun laws are far less restrictive than those of CA
You might want to actually do some research before you say shit so you won't sound like such a fucking idiot.
The top ten homicides states are all red. You have to get to the 15th state before you find a blue one (Nevada), and then the 20th state before you find another one (Colorado).Wow are you ever WRONGCalifornia's homicide rate is just below the national average.Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.
California has some of the most strict gun control laws in the country. How would additional laws have prevented this catastrophe?
Whereas most of the states above the national average are red states with lax gun laws.
UT is considered to have the most lax gun laws in the country and what's the murder rate in UT?
in 2017 the murder rate of CA was 4.6 per 100000
The murder rate in UT was 2.4 per 100000
NH has had the lowest murder rate in the country at 1 per 100000 in 2017
NH gun laws are far less restrictive than those of CA
You might want to actually do some research before you say shit so you won't sound like such a fucking idiot.
You are the one who has not done his research.