Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember the bombing of Serbia by NATO aggressors?
The truth is always predictable. It is the lie that needs tricks. Did the Serbs want to keep a unified state? So did the North of the United States when the southern states seceded. And you'd better shut up about the tribunals. The German Nazis had tribunals too.If nothing else, you certainly are predictable.
Did the Serbs want to keep a unified state?
Of course, the Serbs, like the Russians, are always attacking their innocent neighbors who are sniffing flowers... Arguing with an american about international affairs is like explaining higher mathematics to a megalomaniacal retard.Yes, they did. They attacked all of their neighbors (mostly ethnic and religious minorities) and tried to wipe them out and annex their lands.
Google "genocide of Serbs" and you will learn a lot of interesting things.
The NSDRP in Serbia simply guarded while Serb neighbors destroyed them.Did you miss at that time it was occupied and controlled by the Germans? One of the things the NSDAP is most well known for is their multiple genocides, and this is yet another one that actually pales when compared to many others.
The NSDRP in Serbia simply guarded while Serb neighbors destroyed them.
Serbs, Jews and Romani were arrested and sent to concentration camps such as Jasenovac, Stara Gradiška, Gospić and Jadovno.
The Ciglana (brickyards, Jasenovac III) camp, the main killing ground and essentially a death camp, had 88% mortality rate, higher than Auschwitz's 84.6%.[97] A former brickyard, a furnace was engineered into a crematorium, with witness testimony of some, including children, being burnt alive and stench of human flesh spreading in the camp.[98] Luburić had a gas chamber built at Jasenovac V, where a considerable number of inmates were killed during a three-month experiment with sulfur dioxide and Zyklon B, but this method was abandoned due to poor construction.
Much of the ideology of the Ustaše was based on Nazi racial theory. Like the Nazis, the Ustaše deemed Jews, Romani, and Slavs to be sub-humans (Untermensch). They endorsed the claims from German racial theorists that Croats were not Slavs but a Germanic race. Their genocides against Serbs, Jews, and Romani were thus expressions of Nazi racial ideology.
Andrija Artuković, the Minister of Interior of the Independent State of Croatia, signed into law a number of racial laws.[82] On 30 April 1941, the government adopted “the legal order of races” and “the legal order of the protection of Atyan blood and the honor of Croatian people”.
The Ustaše movement received limited support from ordinary Croats.[69][70] In May 1941, the Ustaše had about 100,000 members who took the oath.
The number of victims who perished in the Jasenovac concentration camp remains a matter of debate, but current estimates put the total number at around 100,000, about half of whom were Serbs.
In its judgment in the Hostages Trial, the Nuremberg Military Tribunal concluded that the Independent State of Croatia was not a sovereign entity capable of acting independently of the German military, despite recognition as an independent state by the Axis powers.[243] According to the Tribunal, "Croatia was at all times here involved an occupied country".
In April 1941, Yugoslavia was occupied by the forces of the Third Reich. Croatia declared independence with the support of Germany.
Not at all like what Abraham Lincoln's government did to the seceding Southern states. It did not use tanks! So it was democratic. Not at all like the USSR.But we all know what happened whenever any of those tried to show even the slightest hint of dissention from the beliefs or orders of the Soviet Union.
The Soviets stormed in with tanks and enforced their iron fisted rule at the end of guns (or more likely tank barrels).
Not at all like what Abraham Lincoln's government did to the seceding Southern states.
If only we could eliminate our military as it exists today. Great statement here from the great libertarian Murray Rothbard.Other than Poland, Czechoslovakia, and a great many others they sent tanks into were not actually part of the Soviet Union! They were fully independent nations, with their own governments. Yet, the soviets treated them as if they were still occupied enemy countries even decades later.
And most of the "states" in the Soviet Union were not there by choice either, they were forced into it at the barrel of a gun. Unlike the Civil War which you brought up, where each and every one of the states had joined the Union by their own choice.
Wow, the degree of failure is strong in your claims.
The new federal government formed by the Articles of Confederation was not permitted to levy any taxes upon the public; and any fundamental extension of its powers required unanimous consent by every state government.
A weak central government with no power to wage war is exactly what we need.You are aware that was a document to create a temporary wartime government, right? And it barely lasted 5 years and was thrown out because in the end it was a horribly inefficient government that left the country both weak and broke.
So why you are even bringing that up is beyond me. It created a weak central government, and it was known within a year after the war ended that it was not working and they tried multiple times to fix it. Two years after the war ended the government was already on the verge of collapse, in addition to the currency becoming worthless causing an economic collapse.
In reality, the only part of that document that remains is the Perpetual Union.