To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
who is "banning a religion"?
Ok, banning the people from practicing their religion unless closing Mosques means opening Mosques
closing mosques which have been implicated in the support of terrorism is----
ENTIRELY LEGAL ------- in fact the property can be confiscated
He didnt say "implicated in the support" of anything. But go ahead...this, like the Patriot Act will come back to bite your scared asses. Gave it all up because you want govt to protect you.
protection of the population is the prime function of the government. The Patriot Act does not sare me-------