Saigon
Gold Member
- May 4, 2012
- 11,434
- 882
- Thread starter
- #781
If you follow this logic it would be illegal for Israel to contruct anything in the West Bank including roads, public utilities, schools, hospitals, etc. Basically they would have had to let the West Bank undeveloped and without infrastructure for the past 45 years. Sorry, but this doesn't fly.
It is also entirely true, from a legal perspective.
No nation, under any circumstances, has the right to construct anything at all on land for which it does not enjoy legal recognition.
Israel should not have built a single building on the West Bank unless they were prepared to either abandon it in the event of a final settlement, or unless they were doing so with the agreement of the Palestinian Authority.
(Given they have done, I think any final settlement should allow Israel to annex 20% of the West Bank and trade land south of Jericho, or perhaps arond Shin Beit in return for it)