What legal standing does Barr have to NOT release Mueller's report to Congress?

[Faun]

That actually makes sense because of the source, Nat's goal just seems to be putting out any negative propaganda, truth be damned.

Just so you and the other Trump cult members get up to speed (besides what Hannity tells you,) know this:
The best indication of timing on the release of the report, has come from an ANONYMOUS DOJ official, who said the report will be out in “weeks, not months..” Stooge Barr told Lindsay Graham that the report will be released to Congress in April.....without a clear date of when it would be released to the public.

Not sure how you think this means anything.

With the appropriate caveat to members of Congress that names and methods of classified investigations NOT be revealed to the general public, what is the legal standing for Barr to not release the report? (of course, with the exception that Barr IS a Trump stooge appointed SPECIFICALLY to protect his cult leader.)

So, I ask again.....since Mueller's report was authorized by republicans and fully funded by all of us tax payers, what is the LEGAL PRECEDENT for the report to not be FULLY disclosed?

I agree. The American people have the right to know what's in the full report. We should never tolerate any government cloaked in secrecy.

Here's a KEY provision regarding the regulations governing the Special Counsel's report

At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel.

The purpose of this report......, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.

Nat is a nut, lol.

Back when Clinton was under investigation by Starr, it was the LAW that the whole report had to be given to certain members of congress. (it might have been them all, not quite sure on the count) Democrats did not like this, so they changed the law. Let me spell that for you...….. T-H-E-Y...……..changed the law to what it is today.

Sooooooooooo, just like everything else Democrats touch, they screwed it up, and here we are listening to them cry. It is bad enough when someone screws you, but it worse when you screw yourself.

We know the Leftists are screwed. Hell, even they know they are screwed, lol. All this whining is can be summed up as-------------->rallying their base to a new cause; and you would to after seeing the ratings for Leftist news networks after it was announced...……..NO COLLUSION. CNN dropped 50%! MSNBC dropped like a rock too! It seems many Leftists are embarrassed about drinking the Kool-Aid, and looking like fools now.

Not Nat! This person is a TRUE BELIEVER, that is why friends refer to him/her, as COMRADE-)

Oh? How did Democrats change a law in a Republican-controlled Congress?

 

[Aponi]

With the appropriate caveat to members of Congress that names and methods of classified investigations NOT be revealed to the general public, what is the legal standing for Barr to not release the report? (of course, with the exception that Barr IS a Trump stooge appointed SPECIFICALLY to protect his cult leader.)

So, I ask again.....since Mueller's report was authorized by republicans and fully funded by all of us tax payers, what is the LEGAL PRECEDENT for the report to not be FULLY disclosed?

Has he said he will not release it dumbass

 

[Aponi]

Only people who seem to want to claim it wont be released for some reason are the morons are the leberal lying again

 

[Olde Europe]

Here's a KEY provision regarding the regulations governing the Special Counsel's report

At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel.

The purpose of this report......, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.

Read as often as necessary to understand what the regulation is mandating.

There is, as far as the SC regulation goes, no requirement that the report by the SC be published, in whatever form, by the AG. There just is not. Without any such kind of legal obligation, the AG is legally free to proceed as he wishes.

 

[Muhammed]

Did Barr say that the report is not going to be be released (with the appropriate caveat to members of Congress that names and methods of classified investigations NOT be revealed to the general public)? It's my understanding that the plan is to release the report in weeks (not months) so that report can be redacted.

He should release it in October 2020.

 

[nat4900]

He should release it in October 2020.

Sure.....Trump fucked you over in 2016....and obviously you liked it and want for him to do it to you AGAIN.

 

[M14 Shooter]

He should release it in October 2020.

Sure.....Trump fucked you over in 2016....and obviously you liked it and want for him to do it to you AGAIN.

Have you figured out the the legal precedent for the report to not be FULLY disclosed?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

With the appropriate caveat to members of Congress that names and methods of classified investigations NOT be revealed to the general public, what is the legal standing for Barr to not release the report? (of course, with the exception that Barr IS a Trump stooge appointed SPECIFICALLY to protect his cult leader.)

So, I ask again.....since Mueller's report was authorized by republicans and fully funded by all of us tax payers, what is the LEGAL PRECEDENT for the report to not be FULLY disclosed?

The law doesn't require it, dumbass. It's as simple as that.

There is no law regarding it's release.
There's nothing stopping it from being released in it's entirety.

Except political cuntery, that is.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He should release it in October 2020.

Sure.....Trump fucked you over in 2016....and obviously you liked it and want for him to do it to you AGAIN.

Have you figured out the the legal precedent for the report to not be FULLY disclosed?

There isn't one, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Here's a KEY provision regarding the regulations governing the Special Counsel's report

At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel.

The purpose of this report......, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.

Read as often as necessary to understand what the regulation is mandating.

There is, as far as the SC regulation goes, no requirement that the report by the SC be published, in whatever form, by the AG. There just is not. Without any such kind of legal obligation, the AG is legally free to proceed as he wishes.

Sure. Including political cover up cuntery.

 

[Olde Europe]

Here's a KEY provision regarding the regulations governing the Special Counsel's report

At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel.

The purpose of this report......, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.

Read as often as necessary to understand what the regulation is mandating.

There is, as far as the SC regulation goes, no requirement that the report by the SC be published, in whatever form, by the AG. There just is not. Without any such kind of legal obligation, the AG is legally free to proceed as he wishes.

Sure. Including political cover up cuntery.

Yep, but why do it?

In a few weeks, Barr will release the report, and until then the country will be doused with "Mueller found nothing" messaging. A few thousand will actually read it from beginning to end, and the rest will follow whatever herd they had already chosen. So?

The House will get the report anyway. The only question will be whether or not Mueller had packed enough punch and further leads into the report to support - really, require - impeachment proceedings, while withholding judgment in order to avoid having to recommend an indictment that won't come anyway.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Here's a KEY provision regarding the regulations governing the Special Counsel's report

At the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, section 600.9(a)(3) requires the Attorney General to provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any)” in which the Attorney General overruled a proposed action by a special counsel.

The purpose of this report......, is “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.” 64 Fed. Reg. 37041.

Read as often as necessary to understand what the regulation is mandating.

There is, as far as the SC regulation goes, no requirement that the report by the SC be published, in whatever form, by the AG. There just is not. Without any such kind of legal obligation, the AG is legally free to proceed as he wishes.

Sure. Including political cover up cuntery.

Yep, but why do it?

In a few weeks, Barr will release the report, and until then the country will be doused with "Mueller found nothing" messaging. A few thousand will actually read it from beginning to end, and the rest will follow whatever herd they had already chosen. So?

The House will get the report anyway. The only question will be whether or not Mueller had packed enough punch and further leads into the report to support - really, require - impeachment proceedings, while withholding judgment in order to avoid having to recommend an indictment that won't come anyway.

You have no idea what is in that report.
Barr is buying time for Trump's narrative to take hold is all. He could release that report much sooner.

 

[Olde Europe]

You have no idea what is in that report.

Did I somehow claim I know what's in it?

Barr is buying time for Trump's narrative to take hold is all.

Yeah, that's the simplistic version of what I said before.

 

[NoVote]

Under the federal regulation that authorizes special counsels, Mueller is required only to submit his report to department leaders. There’s no mandate that any part of Mueller’s findings be provided to Congress or the public.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Mr. Barr is required only to provide lawmakers with very basic facts. He would be operating within the guidelines of the regulation if he were to give Congress a bare-bones notification that Mr. Mueller had concluded his work.

Will the Mueller Report Be Made Public? Answers to 6 Key Questions

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Under the federal regulation that authorizes special counsels, Mueller is required only to submit his report to department leaders. There’s no mandate that any part of Mueller’s findings be provided to Congress or the public.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Yes, a DOJ regulation. The AG sets the regulations. The AG can do what he wishes.
Apparently he wishes to play politics.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ey-general-can-should-release-mueller-report/

 

[nat4900]

Under the federal regulation that authorizes special counsels, Mueller is required only to submit his report to department leaders. There’s no mandate that any part of Mueller’s findings be provided to Congress or the public.

In a democracy, it is always "good" to keep uneducated, morons from learning the truth.......especially when these uneducated, morons would rather keep their heads up their asses than discover that they backed up a demagogue and cult leader......

 

[M14 Shooter]

Under the federal regulation that authorizes special counsels, Mueller is required only to submit his report to department leaders. There’s no mandate that any part of Mueller’s findings be provided to Congress or the public.

In a democracy, it is always "good" to keep uneducated, morons from learning the truth.......especially when these uneducated, morons would rather keep their heads up their asses than discover that they backed up a demagogue and cult leader......

We call these people liberals and Democrats.

 

[Oddball]

In a democracy, it is always "good" to keep uneducated, morons from learning the truth.......especially when these uneducated, morons would rather keep their heads up their asses than discover that they backed up a demagogue and cult leader......

It really worked great with you for the previous cult leader.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Mr. Barr is required only to provide lawmakers with very basic facts. He would be operating within the guidelines of the regulation if he were to give Congress a bare-bones notification that Mr. Mueller had concluded his work.

Will the Mueller Report Be Made Public? Answers to 6 Key Questions

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

Wrong.

See above post.