What qualifies Hillary Clinton to be president?

[Geaux4it]

Well Hil sure covered herself in glory at Benghazi..

Woman ain't worth that piss hole in the snow.

2008 was her year and the DNC threw her under the bus for the half black dude.

That's what I don't get. I've asked this question REPEATEDLY, OVER AND OVER, and not one liberal has EVER even ATTEMPTED to answer it.

Name one thing. JUST ONE THING that this broad accomplished over at State that would lead ANYONE to believe that she is qualified to be President (not counting getting those men killed at Benghazi). JUST ONE.

Now, granted, in liberals jaded view of geo-political awareness, all a "true liberal" needs as credentials is a hatred for America - thus Barry Obama.

But you're correct, the DNC cast her out like yesterday's Huffington Post when the Half-breed awoke from his nap and decided HE could be president and they have fawned over him like girls at a Bobby Sherman concert ever since.

Hell, if I were Hillary "the wide" Clinton, I would have jumped ship, became a republican and ran against the poseur from Chicago......

I suppose women would probably vote for her because of her kewl pantsuits..

She dresses like that loser from North Korea

They must have the same seamstress

-Geaux

 

[RandallFlagg]

Well Hil sure covered herself in glory at Benghazi..

Woman ain't worth that piss hole in the snow.

2008 was her year and the DNC threw her under the bus for the half black dude.

That's what I don't get. I've asked this question REPEATEDLY, OVER AND OVER, and not one liberal has EVER even ATTEMPTED to answer it.

Name one thing. JUST ONE THING that this broad accomplished over at State that would lead ANYONE to believe that she is qualified to be President (not counting getting those men killed at Benghazi). JUST ONE.

Now, granted, in liberals jaded view of geo-political awareness, all a "true liberal" needs as credentials is a hatred for America - thus Barry Obama.

But you're correct, the DNC cast her out like yesterday's Huffington Post when the Half-breed awoke from his nap and decided HE could be president and they have fawned over him like girls at a Bobby Sherman concert ever since.

Hell, if I were Hillary "the wide" Clinton, I would have jumped ship, became a republican and ran against the poseur from Chicago......

I suppose women would probably vote for her because of her kewl pantsuits..

Basically, you are correct. Democrats voted en masse for that idiot from Chicago. No experience, shaded in suspicion. Came from nowhere, never accomplished anything in his life. They DIDN'T CARE - and they don't care now.

Democrat women probably feel that the broad somehow "deserves it" because of that rat she is "married" to.

 

[Geaux4it]

That's what I don't get. I've asked this question REPEATEDLY, OVER AND OVER, and not one liberal has EVER even ATTEMPTED to answer it.

Name one thing. JUST ONE THING that this broad accomplished over at State that would lead ANYONE to believe that she is qualified to be President (not counting getting those men killed at Benghazi). JUST ONE.

Now, granted, in liberals jaded view of geo-political awareness, all a "true liberal" needs as credentials is a hatred for America - thus Barry Obama.

But you're correct, the DNC cast her out like yesterday's Huffington Post when the Half-breed awoke from his nap and decided HE could be president and they have fawned over him like girls at a Bobby Sherman concert ever since.

Hell, if I were Hillary "the wide" Clinton, I would have jumped ship, became a republican and ran against the poseur from Chicago......

I suppose women would probably vote for her because of her kewl pantsuits..

Basically, you are correct. Democrats voted en masse for that idiot from Chicago. No experience, shaded in suspicion. Came from nowhere, never accomplished anything in his life. They DIDN'T CARE - and they don't care now.

Democrat women probably feel that the broad somehow "deserves it" because of that rat she is "married" to.

And despite that terrible resume, he was elected because he was is black. Well, when he want's to be, and white most other times

-Geaux

 

[rightwinger]

Like it or not

Hillary is eminently more qualified than any available GOP candidate

 

[Lumpy 1]

Like it or not

Hillary is eminently more qualified than any available GOP candidate

As what..she has zero credibility to any reasonable American patriot.

 

[Katzndogz]

She stood by her man and must be rewarded. Weiner's wife can be her VP for the ultimate government of wronged women.

 

[rightwinger]

Like it or not

Hillary is eminently more qualified than any available GOP candidate

As what..she has zero credibility to any reasonable American patriot.

Patriot?

What the fuck makes you a patriot?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Like it or not

Hillary is eminently more qualified than any available GOP candidate

Oh whatever... she's a clueless fucktard. Just look at her abysmal performance as SoS. She's as useless as Bill.... two clueless numbnuts.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Like it or not

Hillary is eminently more qualified than any available GOP candidate

As what..she has zero credibility to any reasonable American patriot.

Patriot?

What the fuck makes you a patriot?

If you don't know already, it's a waste of time explaining it..

 

[Anitabeme]

That's what I don't get. I've asked this question REPEATEDLY, OVER AND OVER, and not one liberal has EVER even ATTEMPTED to answer it.

Name one thing. JUST ONE THING that this broad accomplished over at State that would lead ANYONE to believe that she is qualified to be President (not counting getting those men killed at Benghazi). JUST ONE.

Now, granted, in liberals jaded view of geo-political awareness, all a "true liberal" needs as credentials is a hatred for America - thus Barry Obama.

But you're correct, the DNC cast her out like yesterday's Huffington Post when the Half-breed awoke from his nap and decided HE could be president and they have fawned over him like girls at a Bobby Sherman concert ever since.

Hell, if I were Hillary "the wide" Clinton, I would have jumped ship, became a republican and ran against the poseur from Chicago......

I suppose women would probably vote for her because of her kewl pantsuits..

Basically, you are correct. Democrats voted en masse for that idiot from Chicago. No experience, shaded in suspicion. Came from nowhere, never accomplished anything in his life. They DIDN'T CARE - and they don't care now.

Democrat women probably feel that the broad somehow "deserves it" because of that rat she is "married" to.

People want to "make history". Gotta have the first (half) black president. Again, they will want to make history with the first woman president. They don't give a shit about lack of experience or even being a stinking war criminal. The Low Information Voters will cast their vote for this piece of shit ONLY because she's a woman.

And even with all of that...

It's not your vote that counts; it's who counts the votes.

Remember what they did to Ron Paul, the ONLY one that could have won over Obomber.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.

She is, and was, far more qualified than our current president just by the exposure she had to the office and all it's machinations during her husband's tenure...

Just saying...

I probably wouldn't vote for her...

By that line of thinking my wife is a network specialist and I'm a mortgage expert. F*cking doesn't translate expertise of the partners chosen field. Hillary wasn't even qualified to be the blow job provider in the Clinton admin what makes you think she would be qualified for any other portion?

 

[hjmick]

Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.

She is, and was, far more qualified than our current president just by the exposure she had to the office and all it's machinations during her husband's tenure...

Just saying...

I probably wouldn't vote for her...

By that line of thinking my wife is a network specialist and I'm a mortgage expert. F*cking doesn't translate expertise of the partners chosen field. Hillary wasn't even qualified to be the blow job provider in the Clinton admin what makes you think she would be qualified for any other portion?

Dude, I was comparing her qualifications to Obama's at the time of the race for the Democrat nomination...

 

[thereisnospoon]

What qualifies Hillary is her ability to throw Republicans into a childish rage......

Benghazi, Benghazi, Whitewater......BLOWJOBS!

Yeah. Real presidential stuff there.
The only reason why you people would support Clinton is because she is a stick it to the establishment liberal.
In reality, she is a self entitled materialistic climber who was elected to a Senate seat on the coat tails of her philandering husband and was appointed Sec'y of State as part of a quid pro quo.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Damn you guys are worried about her and yes, she will kick your asses. Just like obama did....twice.

Suck it.

"Suck it"...
Thanks for so brilliantly representing the liberal ideology.
Save for her last and name and the "D" after it, you don't even know what you would be voting for.

 

[thereisnospoon]

The Clintons need to retire from political elections and office and try to do a better job of managing their Clinton Foundation. Apparently it has gone awry. We do not need anymore Clintons in our government.

The problem with that, unfortunately, is that the Clintons (not unlike MOST politicians) carry with them this sense of "entitlement". They are the "CLINTONS!!" they SHOULD be in power. They have been ANNOINTED for power.

They are the redneck version of the Kennedy family.

So what if their "donors" are convicted felons? So what if there is murder and mayhem and rape and misogyny associated with the name "Clinton"? Who cares?

And that is the crux of the matter these days when it concerns the left - who cares??

And this is what we have made of OUR country today.

One step closer to ruin.

Liberalism is the ideology of "So what?"..

 

[thereisnospoon]

Define qualified.

If by qualified, you mean adept at big government cronyism and living large on taxpayer money, then Hillary is a practitioner par excellence.

If by qualified, you mean someone who understands the Constitution, has respect for the responsibilities of public office, and is not a self-dealing grifter, then there are a number of Republicans who come to mind (but as you have a hater agenda, it's not worth listing them).

I don't have an agenda.

I'm the most non-partisan poster at this website.

Yer kidding, right?

 

[hjmick]

Define qualified.

If by qualified, you mean adept at big government cronyism and living large on taxpayer money, then Hillary is a practitioner par excellence.

If by qualified, you mean someone who understands the Constitution, has respect for the responsibilities of public office, and is not a self-dealing grifter, then there are a number of Republicans who come to mind (but as you have a hater agenda, it's not worth listing them).

I don't have an agenda.

I'm the most non-partisan poster at this website.

Yeah, right...

 

[thereisnospoon]

Name one republican more qualified than Hillary?

All of them.

This is remarkable.
Your platform of support for Hillary Clinton is through trotting out Sarah Palin?
That's your plan to get Clinton elected?
When do you start drug rehab?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

She is, and was, far more qualified than our current president just by the exposure she had to the office and all it's machinations during her husband's tenure...

Just saying...

I probably wouldn't vote for her...

By that line of thinking my wife is a network specialist and I'm a mortgage expert. F*cking doesn't translate expertise of the partners chosen field. Hillary wasn't even qualified to be the blow job provider in the Clinton admin what makes you think she would be qualified for any other portion?

Dude, I was comparing her qualifications to Obama's at the time of the race for the Democrat nomination...

Well since both are complete morons I guess the only difference came down to one was a woman and the other was black.

Qualifications never really entered the equasion now did they?

 

[thereisnospoon]

Wasn't Hillary supposed to win in 2008?

Wasn't Palin as well?

It turns out, the better man beat both of them.

Yeah. And look at the fucked up condition of the country.