What Should Children Be Told About Marriage Equality?

"The Homosexual Agenda is a self-centered set of beliefs and objectives designed to promote and even mandate approval of homosexuality and homosexual ideology, along with the strategies used to implement such. The goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association. Advocates of the homosexual agenda seek special rights for homosexuals that other people don't have, such as immunity from criticism (see hate speech, hate crimes). Such special rights will necessarily come at the expense of the rights of broader society. The homosexual agenda is the biggest threat to the right of free speech today."

Homosexual Agenda - Conservapedia
Just look at where you got your "news" from! Figures. But in effect, the courts, most of which are completely Conservative by the way, are vehemently disagreeing with you in their rulings in all of what you say here which is nothing more than Scare-Tactic Indoctrination from the Far Right Wing -- THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA. The courts have all ruled unanimously nearly 100% of the time that Same-Sex Marriage needs to be Protected and Allowed for Gays and Lesbians as those citizens are entitled to it under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. And many more courts will inevitably follow suit and rule the same way while you remain with your draconian points of view that can only serve to not get your Conservative candidates elected. Well, keep it up, as we sure need all of you Republicans Out Of Office PRONTO and Good Riddance!! And it's not 'special' rights Gays seek. It's *EQUAL* rights something your little mind and way of thinking and that of your followers would never be able to comprehend or understand. THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA OF FALSE INDOCTRINATIONS IS THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO THINKING CLEARLY, FREELY, AND RATIONALLY TODAY.
 
"The Homosexual Agenda is a self-centered set of beliefs and objectives designed to promote and even mandate approval of homosexuality and homosexual ideology, along with the strategies used to implement such. The goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association. Advocates of the homosexual agenda seek special rights for homosexuals that other people don't have, such as immunity from criticism (see hate speech, hate crimes). Such special rights will necessarily come at the expense of the rights of broader society. The homosexual agenda is the biggest threat to the right of free speech today."

Homosexual Agenda - Conservapedia
Just look at where you got your "news" from! Figures. But in effect, the courts, most of which are completely Conservative by the way, are vehemently disagreeing with you in their rulings in all of what you say here which is nothing more than Scare-Tactic Indoctrination from the Far Right Wing -- THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA. The courts have all ruled unanimously nearly 100% of the time that Same-Sex Marriage needs to be Protected and Allowed for Gays and Lesbians as those citizens are entitled to it under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. And many more courts will inevitably follow suit and rule the same way while you remain with your draconian points of view that can only serve to not get your Conservative candidates elected. Well, keep it up, as we sure need all of you Republicans Out Of Office PRONTO and Good Riddance!! And it's not 'special' rights Gays seek. It's *EQUAL* rights something your little mind and way of thinking and that of your followers would never be able to comprehend or understand. THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA OF FALSE INDOCTRINATIONS IS THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO THINKING CLEARLY, FREELY, AND RATIONALLY TODAY.

Human traits have no "agenda", bigots always do.
 
Behaviors have an agenda. And over 300+ researchers agree: homosexual orientation is certainly behavioral: http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...wins-gay-legal-challenges-simple-as-that.html
The courts have all ruled unanimously nearly 100% of the time that Same-Sex Marriage needs to be Protected and Allowed for Gays and Lesbians as those citizens are entitled to it under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. And many more courts will inevitably follow suit and rule the same way while you remain with your draconian points of view that can only serve to not get your Conservative candidates elected. Well, keep it up, as we sure need all of you Republicans Out Of Office PRONTO and Good Riddance!! And it's not 'special' rights Gays seek. It's *EQUAL* rights something your little mind and way of thinking and that of your followers would never be able to comprehend or understand. THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA OF FALSE INDOCTRINATIONS IS THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO THINKING CLEARLY, FREELY, AND RATIONALLY TODAY.

I'm a democrat and I am 100% against gay marriage. And I'm not alone. Not by a long shot. You may have heard of the Chic Fil-A protests? Catholics upset about what y'all did to their Pope last year?

Besides, not ALL the courts have decided the 14th applies. Utah just "decided" something like that but then put a stay on its own decision before the ink was dry. Why do you suppose?

The US Supreme Court wrote up a little ditty last year called "The United States v Windsor" Opinion. Read pages 14-22. United States v. Windsor Note their attitude and expressed demeanor about who should ratify gay marriage if at all. It determined and expressed, constitutionally no less, that the sovereign states by their broadest consensus will be the dominate decision makers and not judicial activists.

That the lower courts are not wanting to take the heat from gay blackmail or outright violence [there have been reports] doesn't say much. They all know where this is headed: to the US Supreme Court for a review against Windsor which is what Utah at least is citing as their state's right to define marriage for themselves.

This ain't over baby. Not by a longshot. And now you're going to witness the opposition rolling up their sleeves. You've been reeled out a bit of rope for sure, but you're nearly at the end of your tether.
 
Last edited:
Behaviors have an agenda. And over 300+ researchers agree: homosexual orientation is certainly behavioral: http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...wins-gay-legal-challenges-simple-as-that.html
The courts have all ruled unanimously nearly 100% of the time that Same-Sex Marriage needs to be Protected and Allowed for Gays and Lesbians as those citizens are entitled to it under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. And many more courts will inevitably follow suit and rule the same way while you remain with your draconian points of view that can only serve to not get your Conservative candidates elected. Well, keep it up, as we sure need all of you Republicans Out Of Office PRONTO and Good Riddance!! And it's not 'special' rights Gays seek. It's *EQUAL* rights something your little mind and way of thinking and that of your followers would never be able to comprehend or understand. THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA OF FALSE INDOCTRINATIONS IS THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO THINKING CLEARLY, FREELY, AND RATIONALLY TODAY.

I'm a democrat and I am 100% against gay marriage. And I'm not alone. Not by a long shot. You may have heard of the Chic Fil-A protests? Catholics upset about what y'all did to their Pope last year?

Besides, not ALL the courts have decided the 14th applies. Utah just "decided" something like that but then put a stay on its own decision before the ink was dry. Why do you suppose?

The US Supreme Court wrote up a little ditty last year called "The United States v Windsor" Opinion. Read pages 14-22. United States v. Windsor Note their attitude and expressed demeanor about who should ratify gay marriage if at all. It determined and expressed, constitutionally no less, that the sovereign states by their broadest consensus will be the dominate decision makers and not judicial activists.

That the lower courts are not wanting to take the heat from gay blackmail or outright violence [there have been reports] doesn't say much. They all know where this is headed: to the US Supreme Court for a review against Windsor which is what Utah at least is citing as their state's right to define marriage for themselves.

This ain't over baby. Not by a longshot. And now you're going to witness the opposition rolling up their sleeves. You've been reeled out a bit of rope for sure, but you're nearly at the end of your tether.

The hold is because the State announced an appeal, thus, the USSC MAY take up the issue.
 
Homosexuals have stated their agenda over and over again.

It's real. Stay out of the schools. It's simple.
 
Sil uses outdated and discarded research.

Sil mischaracterizes Windsor; the 10the characterizes correctly.

Sil is a member of a hetero-fascist cult.

Sil is on the losing end of history.

Tough to be Sil.
 
Sil wrote "The US Supreme Court wrote up a little ditty last year called "The United States v Windsor" Opinion. Read pages 14-22. United States v. Windsor Note their attitude and expressed demeanor about who should ratify gay marriage if at all. It determined and expressed, constitutionally no less, that the sovereign states by their broadest consensus will be the dominate decision makers and not judicial activists."

Somebody forgot to tell the 10th.
 
Sil wrote "The US Supreme Court wrote up a little ditty last year called "The United States v Windsor" Opinion. Read pages 14-22. United States v. Windsor Note their attitude and expressed demeanor about who should ratify gay marriage if at all. It determined and expressed, constitutionally no less, that the sovereign states by their broadest consensus will be the dominate decision makers and not judicial activists."

Somebody forgot to tell the 10th.

Those red "sovereign" states sure eat up tax money, from the UNITED STATES. "Sovereign" states:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Yes, because the blue elitist states have shut down the industry in those states, stolen the land and made it impossible for them to work.
 
Sil wrote "The US Supreme Court wrote up a little ditty last year called "The United States v Windsor" Opinion. Read pages 14-22. United States v. Windsor Note their attitude and expressed demeanor about who should ratify gay marriage if at all. It determined and expressed, constitutionally no less, that the sovereign states by their broadest consensus will be the dominate decision makers and not judicial activists."

Somebody forgot to tell the 10th.

Then why did the 10th IMMEDIATELY put a stay on their own decision? So far you don't want to discuss that vote of no confidence from the 10th. If they read Windsor and interpreted it the way you say, and they found that "gays cannot be denied marriage in Utah"....why put the stay on that very same conclusion and continue to disallow gay marriage in Utah?

C'mon Sherlock Holmes. Put on your tam cap, light your pipe and render that one down for us all. I can't wait...
 
If you're Republicans, you should tell them that God will punish this country for allowing gays to exist. That gays want to "turn" children because it's nasty behavior that could be "learned". That in the good old days gays were "stoned to death" which is what they deserve for daring to love the wrong person.
 
Ho hum.

I don't care what you do in your bedrooms.

Do it in your bedrooms. Stay away from the schools, or we'll have a problem.
 
koshergrl is a cultural fascist, period.

No one is grooming children sexually in our public schools.
Except maybe the male coaches.

Google Livingston High School, Livingston, Texas about the coaches and cheerleader parties at the motels ten years or so ago.

Well they are as a matter of LAW in California requiring school kids to celebrate the gay pedophile and LGBT cult messiah "Harvey Milk" for being the first "openly gay" [sexualized theme] politician in California. Even though he is documented to have been sodomizing a minor boy while officiating as the boy's "father/guardian".

For those who still aren't duly alarmed about that, the equivalent would be Pennsylvania passing a law mandating kids in public schools celebrate "Jerry Sandusky Day" where they celebrate "his contribution to youth sports"...

And don't forget gay education czar's recent lesson plan enacted in a public school where students there were taught "how to relax and enjoy fisting"...

And when the LGBT cult are not forcing kiddies to soften their minds to the eventual sex acts they want with a new and constant growing supply of fresh "chicken" [google gay vernacular] in public schools, they are engaged in inappropriate displays of sexual exhibitionism in a place and time where children are expected and known to be present: main street in broad daylight.

Should people who pass laws to indoctrinate sexually youngsters in school into their deviant sex cult, and who venerate a child sex predator as their sexual-messiah, and who display sex acts in front of children on main street be allowed access to the privelges of marriage, and thereby adoption of vulnerable kids?

Would you adopt to these people if you just saw them doing this on the street as a matter of intentful "pride" the day before?

gaymidwestparadejpg_zpse239f00e.jpg
 
Last edited:
You tell children that families have mommies and daddies. Even if mommy and daddy are not together they both love their children very much. Some men and women are deranged. They have two women or two men pretending to be the same as real families. These people are just pretending. They cannot be trusted. Never let yourself be alone with them. Run away.

What do you say about single parents?
 
You can tell your kids that some girls like boys and some girls like girls, but love is love, no matter what.
And if your kid tells you that they are gay, you love that child, you embrace them, and don't ever try to change them - because if you shun your gay child, you are a pathetic excuse for a parent.
 
The goals of the homosexual movement include:
  1. Ignoring Christian morals and discouraging religiously based laws.
  2. Reminding the world that marriage is a legal term and standing in the US, not a spiritual one as believed by Christians.


  1. These are not the goals of a homosexual movement. They are the expressed goals of, and requirements of, the US Constitution.
 
Homo agenda, fake.

I know you don't care about it. The people who care about it are the ones who actually care about children.

Not the people who see them as props and toys.

More horseshit. The people who care about the children are not worried about whether the molestation is by someone of the same or of the opposite gender. they only care that the children not be molested at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top