Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not add their agenda, commentary.. not to mention not editing the video, only having partial quotes out of context, etc... Those sites and many more are not reliable nor are they legit news... it's that simple
The ONLY reason they are cited is because of a hyper-partisan agenda
A fact is a fact no matter who speaks it.
And a fact can be twisted by added commentary and when taken out of context.. which is status quo for sites like Huffy Puffy...
Sorry Carby... those sites are not legit nor credible
See... I am one who does not accept commentary or blogs from any side... while you are one to accept it if it fits your agenda
Think Progress retracts McCain plagiarism charge - - POLITICO.comThink progress?? Epic fail... about as winger as you can get... what next? reaganbushdebt.org?
If you can give me one instance where ThinkProgress had lied about anything, I will never visit the site again.
TP isn't Brietbart. Yes they're opinion, but they don't lie and make shit up.
A fact is a fact no matter who speaks it.
And a fact can be twisted by added commentary and when taken out of context.. which is status quo for sites like Huffy Puffy...
Sorry Carby... those sites are not legit nor credible
See... I am one who does not accept commentary or blogs from any side... while you are one to accept it if it fits your agenda
But people here are often not disputing any opinion associated with the facts presented; they simply say, DailyKos! Fail! or the like.
That is not a refutation. That is a classic logical fallacy of attacking the messenger instead of the message, aka,
ad hominem.
A fact is a fact no matter who speaks it.
And a fact can be twisted by added commentary and when taken out of context.. which is status quo for sites like Huffy Puffy...
Sorry Carby... those sites are not legit nor credible
See... I am one who does not accept commentary or blogs from any side... while you are one to accept it if it fits your agenda
No you can't reject a fact. You can reject the spin attached to it. But you can't reject the fact.
The reason people like you want to dismiss 'unfriendly' sources as evidence is because you know the friendly ones won't do your agenda any harm. It's a very transparent scheme.
Think Progress retracts McCain plagiarism charge - - POLITICO.comThink progress?? Epic fail... about as winger as you can get... what next? reaganbushdebt.org?
If you can give me one instance where ThinkProgress had lied about anything, I will never visit the site again.
TP isn't Brietbart. Yes they're opinion, but they don't lie and make shit up.
Think Progress Manufactures Another Fake Tea Party Racism Story - Big Government
Screen cap from a libelous ThinkProgress video before the "we... on Twitpic
Right Klik: ThinkProgress Smears The Tea Party
(This one is just one of the sites that has the compilation of lying videos from TP.... just one of the first place Google brought up and the only reason I used it)
Think Progress Ripped Content From Tea Party Video To Create Fraudulent Racism Claim - Big Government
Don't let the door hit you, where the good door split you
Good bye and good riddance
And a fact can be twisted by added commentary and when taken out of context.. which is status quo for sites like Huffy Puffy...
Sorry Carby... those sites are not legit nor credible
See... I am one who does not accept commentary or blogs from any side... while you are one to accept it if it fits your agenda
But people here are often not disputing any opinion associated with the facts presented; they simply say, DailyKos! Fail! or the like.
That is not a refutation. That is a classic logical fallacy of attacking the messenger instead of the message, aka,
ad hominem.
If your brother constantly lies and the pattern is well documented and known, you tend to not consider him credible any more..
All of those blogs and winger sites have a pattern of out of context quotes, articles infused with agenda, etc...
They are not credible, period
And as stated, you instantly accept these while dismissing RW sources in the same mold... hence showing your hyper-partisanship and lack of credibility yourself...
And what are your sources, for the 1000th time?
Specifically.
Here's the thing.... maybe, if it didn't drive a few posters here totally crazy that I don't say... I may have told you. But, since not knowing clearly pisses you off, I am inclined to decline to answer.
Because they don't exist. You're trying to use a forum tactic that was worn out 10 years ago...
...oh I know this is wrong because I have special secret knowledge that proves it wrong.
jeezus.
Plus you rarely if ever contribute anything of substance that would demonstrate any existence of any superior secret imaginary sources.
Grow up. You're not fooling anyone.
Free Republic
Drudge
Breitbart
Fox
Rush Limbaugh
Hannity
Glenn Beck
Levin
World Nut Daily..
Stuff like that.
Free Republic
Drudge
Breitbart
Fox
Rush Limbaugh
Hannity
Glenn Beck
Levin
World Nut Daily..
Stuff like that.
Fox... yes for news..
The others.. nope
But nice try
Think Progress retracts McCain plagiarism charge - - POLITICO.comIf you can give me one instance where ThinkProgress had lied about anything, I will never visit the site again.
TP isn't Brietbart. Yes they're opinion, but they don't lie and make shit up.
Think Progress Manufactures Another Fake Tea Party Racism Story - Big Government
Screen cap from a libelous ThinkProgress video before the "we... on Twitpic
Right Klik: ThinkProgress Smears The Tea Party
(This one is just one of the sites that has the compilation of lying videos from TP.... just one of the first place Google brought up and the only reason I used it)
Think Progress Ripped Content From Tea Party Video To Create Fraudulent Racism Claim - Big Government
Don't let the door hit you, where the good door split you
Good bye and good riddance
WOW...what fucking pea brain...you use Andrew Breitbart (Big Government) as a source?
Breitbart lied about Shirley Sherrod. Now he's lying about the NAACP
Andrew Breitbart Ally James OKeefe Arrested By FBI For Possibly Trying To Wiretap Sen. Mary Landrieu
Think Progress retracts McCain plagiarism charge - - POLITICO.com
Think Progress Manufactures Another Fake Tea Party Racism Story - Big Government
Screen cap from a libelous ThinkProgress video before the "we... on Twitpic
Right Klik: ThinkProgress Smears The Tea Party
(This one is just one of the sites that has the compilation of lying videos from TP.... just one of the first place Google brought up and the only reason I used it)
Think Progress Ripped Content From Tea Party Video To Create Fraudulent Racism Claim - Big Government
Don't let the door hit you, where the good door split you
Good bye and good riddance
WOW...what fucking pea brain...you use Andrew Breitbart (Big Government) as a source?
Breitbart lied about Shirley Sherrod. Now he's lying about the NAACP
Andrew Breitbart Ally James OKeefe Arrested By FBI For Possibly Trying To Wiretap Sen. Mary Landrieu
You call him a peabrain for his source . . . AND LOOK AT THE "SOURCES" YOU CITE AS PROOF!
You're such a pitiful excuse for a biped.
Think Progress retracts McCain plagiarism charge - - POLITICO.com
Think Progress Manufactures Another Fake Tea Party Racism Story - Big Government
Screen cap from a libelous ThinkProgress video before the "we... on Twitpic
Right Klik: ThinkProgress Smears The Tea Party
(This one is just one of the sites that has the compilation of lying videos from TP.... just one of the first place Google brought up and the only reason I used it)
Think Progress Ripped Content From Tea Party Video To Create Fraudulent Racism Claim - Big Government
Don't let the door hit you, where the good door split you
Good bye and good riddance
WOW...what fucking pea brain...you use Andrew Breitbart (Big Government) as a source?
Breitbart lied about Shirley Sherrod. Now he's lying about the NAACP
Andrew Breitbart Ally James OKeefe Arrested By FBI For Possibly Trying To Wiretap Sen. Mary Landrieu
You call him a peabrain for his source . . . AND LOOK AT THE "SOURCES" YOU CITE AS PROOF!
You're such a pitiful excuse for a biped.
But people here are often not disputing any opinion associated with the facts presented; they simply say, DailyKos! Fail! or the like.
That is not a refutation. That is a classic logical fallacy of attacking the messenger instead of the message, aka,
ad hominem.
If your brother constantly lies and the pattern is well documented and known, you tend to not consider him credible any more..
All of those blogs and winger sites have a pattern of out of context quotes, articles infused with agenda, etc...
They are not credible, period
And as stated, you instantly accept these while dismissing RW sources in the same mold... hence showing your hyper-partisanship and lack of credibility yourself...
I do no such thing. So now you're lying. Now that you're known to be a liar, by your logic I can dismiss anything you post as not credible. Fair enough?
All major news outlets are looking for ratings.
For instance CNN revived a 1 year old story about a controversial video game.
It was one of those 'look at this awful video game/movie/book someone made' stories with no real substance.
It's a video game that's only available in Japan and in Japanese (unless you pirate it) and is a couple years old.
Why did they bring it up? There seemed to be no real reason.
All major news outlets are looking for ratings.
For instance CNN revived a 1 year old story about a controversial video game.
It was one of those 'look at this awful video game/movie/book someone made' stories with no real substance.
It's a video game that's only available in Japan and in Japanese (unless you pirate it) and is a couple years old.
Why did they bring it up? There seemed to be no real reason.
Ratings = advertising dollars. Controversy, dirt and innuendo = ratings. They're giving the public what it wants which says more about us then them.
FOXNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News
