What The Hell Does A Normal American Need An Army Assault Weapon For.....Target Practice?

I guess we can still tell you what kind you can have since it doesn't specify. Back to the muzzleloaders for citizens since you think that amendment is attributable for today.

Back to only having freedom of verbal speech and that written with a quill and ink pen since you think the First Amendment is attributable to today.

Do you people ever realize how stupid you sound when you try to make that claim?
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a military style killing machine?

If you think a .223 is an assault rifle, you're as loony as the rest of the anti gun left. You'll let us know when we can own real military assault rifles such as the SAW.

Sure kills a lot of people fast.

Looks like you missed the substance. Planes flying into buildings, fertilizer parked next to buildings kills a lot of people too. We're there guns involved in those two incidents?
 
[


:offtopic: this is not about Mormons or the internet , its about the right to bear arms, and a muzzleloader is a arm, Carry that.

That is absolutely the dumbest response to a post that I have have ever seen posted on an internet discussion forum.

Technology does not limit the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court has already made that determination. You lose that argument.

Florida was not even a state when the 2nd amendment was wrote, neither was Texas. Times have changed, and we need a new amendment.
 
They're not 'Army Assault Weapons.' They're Military-looking Semi-Automatic rifles. They are not Army weapons. The Gun Grabbers will continue falsely demonizing them, but they're either uninformed or just liars.
 
They should not be able to. Look at the carnage at Orlando, nobody should be able to own one.

There are over a 100 million riffles in circulation. If there was a real problem, you would know it.

Silly little chicken shit libs want to ban guns yet refuse to address the real problem. Typical leftist crap.
 
Last edited:
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a military style killing machine?


You forgot Switzerland genius.......they have select fire, military, fully automatic weapons, by law, in their homes..........and they were not invaded by the Germans in World War 2...they had 435,000 rifle armed civilians ready to fight a resistance movement if they were invaded......
 
The real question is why shouldn't a lawful american citizen be able to own a semi automatic rifle, which is the proper name for an "Assault weapon".



The real answer is; they can. Millions of AR 15s have been sold. Try again.


There are about 5,000,000 AR-15s in private hands thanks to obama.......and only 1 or 2 a year is used to commit murder...

5,000,000 to 2....and that seems to be a problem for you nutters....
 
the real question is

why are libtards so ignorant about firearms

Why are Progressive Left Liberals so ignorant about firearms?

The majority of them have never owned one nor have they ever fired one. My pump shotgun would be consider as assault weapon to the Progressive left.
 
Does the OP realize an AR-15 sold in the U.S to civilians functions in the same way a semi-auto deer rifle does ?
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a killing machine?

They should not be able to. Look at the carnage at Orlando, nobody should be able to own one.


34 years....deaths by Rifles with detachable magazines... 149

one year, death by knives..... 1,567

they are not a problem.
 
Define "Assault Weapon" in a way that can be clearly understood, and explain how banning such would "save lives." Unless you can do that - and no one in Congress can - then WTF is your point? Do you know what an "automatic" firearm is?

Do you believe that banning "assault weapons" will render terrorists incapable of murdering large numbers of people? Or will they just have to resort to other available means?

Why does any "normal" American need a street-legal car that will go 200mph? Why does any "normal" American need a 6,000 pound 4WD pickup truck to go to the grocery store? Why does any "normal" American need to eat a 1,000 calorie banana split? Why does any "normal" American need an 8,000 sq ft house? Why does any "normal" American need a PhD in music theory?

I'll try. An assault weapon is a much more effective weapon for killing a large number of human beings in a hurry: It has less recoil than a standard deer rifle (30-30 for example), a larger capacity magazine compared to the clip used in the M1 Garand and much lighter and easier to conceal than the BAR.
Any gun fired at anyone is technically an assault weapon

as is a baseball bat swung at another person

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

Then someone will just fill their pockets with clips ready to go.
 
Define "Assault Weapon" in a way that can be clearly understood, and explain how banning such would "save lives." Unless you can do that - and no one in Congress can - then WTF is your point? Do you know what an "automatic" firearm is?

Do you believe that banning "assault weapons" will render terrorists incapable of murdering large numbers of people? Or will they just have to resort to other available means?

Why does any "normal" American need a street-legal car that will go 200mph? Why does any "normal" American need a 6,000 pound 4WD pickup truck to go to the grocery store? Why does any "normal" American need to eat a 1,000 calorie banana split? Why does any "normal" American need an 8,000 sq ft house? Why does any "normal" American need a PhD in music theory?

I'll try. An assault weapon is a much more effective weapon for killing a large number of human beings in a hurry: It has less recoil than a standard deer rifle (30-30 for example), a larger capacity magazine compared to the clip used in the M1 Garand and much lighter and easier to conceal than the BAR.
Any gun fired at anyone is technically an assault weapon

as is a baseball bat swung at another person

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

Then someone will just fill their pockets with clips ready to go.


You can't reach brain.....he is a troll.

I have shown him actual research on magazine capacity having no effect on mass shootings....he doesn't care...he is a gun banner through and through...
 
Define "Assault Weapon" in a way that can be clearly understood, and explain how banning such would "save lives." Unless you can do that - and no one in Congress can - then WTF is your point? Do you know what an "automatic" firearm is?

Do you believe that banning "assault weapons" will render terrorists incapable of murdering large numbers of people? Or will they just have to resort to other available means?

Why does any "normal" American need a street-legal car that will go 200mph? Why does any "normal" American need a 6,000 pound 4WD pickup truck to go to the grocery store? Why does any "normal" American need to eat a 1,000 calorie banana split? Why does any "normal" American need an 8,000 sq ft house? Why does any "normal" American need a PhD in music theory?

I'll try. An assault weapon is a much more effective weapon for killing a large number of human beings in a hurry: It has less recoil than a standard deer rifle (30-30 for example), a larger capacity magazine compared to the clip used in the M1 Garand and much lighter and easier to conceal than the BAR.
Any gun fired at anyone is technically an assault weapon

as is a baseball bat swung at another person

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

Then someone will just fill their pockets with clips ready to go.

That is the problem with some They do not understand that you limit the rounds the person will to find a way around it. My Pump Action would meet their requirement and yet they do not know the damage I can do with a pump action shotgun.

Sometimes people need to take a course in guns to discover the answer is not as simple as banning a weapon...
 
It's your opinion that the gun is dangerous. The person doing the shooting was dangerous not the gun

No it is a dangerous gun. Just bought it like 2 weeks ago and killed and injured so many with a cop there trying to stop him.

Sorry the gun didn't do anything the person did.

People are violent. People are dangerous. Always have been always will be

And a dangerous asshole with a gun can kill way more than one with a knife.

Like I said I could have taken out 50 people with a truck and a snow plow

It is much easier to dodge a truck than a bullet.

Ok Adolf.
 
[Q

Florida was not even a state when the 2nd amendment was wrote, neither was Texas. Times have changed, and we need a new amendment.

Thanks for your brilliant observation about the states, Moon Bat.

Your stupid opinion that we need to do away with the right to keep and bear arms may be a typical Libtard Moon Bat opinion but you are going to have to get both houses of Congress, the President and whole bunch of states to go along with you before that happens so don't hold your breath.
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a military style killing machine?
There is NO FUNCTIONAL difference between a supposed "assault" weapon and ANY other semi automatic rifle.
 
No it is a dangerous gun. Just bought it like 2 weeks ago and killed and injured so many with a cop there trying to stop him.

Sorry the gun didn't do anything the person did.

People are violent. People are dangerous. Always have been always will be

And a dangerous asshole with a gun can kill way more than one with a knife.

Like I said I could have taken out 50 people with a truck and a snow plow

It is much easier to dodge a truck than a bullet.

Ok Adolf.

That person is incorrect... The Truck has explosives like the one in OKC will be harder to dodge or as hard to dodge than a bullet if the said truck is detonated near the person dodging the truck...
 
They're not 'Army Assault Weapons.' They're Military-looking Semi-Automatic rifles. They are not Army weapons. The Gun Grabbers will continue falsely demonizing them, but they're either uninformed or just liars.


These filthy ass Moon Bats are bitching about AR-15s. Obama's little Muslim boy didn't even use an AR-15 the other day.
 
They're not 'Army Assault Weapons.' They're Military-looking Semi-Automatic rifles. They are not Army weapons. The Gun Grabbers will continue falsely demonizing them, but they're either uninformed or just liars.


These filthy ass Moon Bats are bitching about AR-15s. Obama's little Muslim boy didn't even use an AR-15 the other day.

"Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Democrat scum of the earth Rahm Emanuel
 

Forum List

Back
Top