What the science says

[jc456]

Yeah, right, the word is observed and you ain't got it. Thanks for the validation

When children ask a science question, I have to estimate the base of knowledge they possess, before I answer.
If I overestimate their base, I end up talking over their head, and they remain as ignorant of the topic as before.
I'm always happen to validate your ignorance.

Sure...when adults avoid answering direct questions, I win!..ssdd and billy, here it is, zippola with excuses

View attachment 88200

And there it is the charts. Hahahaha I rest my case

I know. Empirical evidence is wasted on an ignorant child. I rest my case.

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

 

[mamooth]

You're not very bright so I will help you here.

Hey, I'm not the one rejecting the law conservation of energy.

According to your theory, the IR energy hits the ocean, and then it simply vanishes.

However, for your groundbreaking new energy-vanishing theory to be accepted, you'll need to expand upon it a bit, and take it beyond the "because I say so!" stage.

Now, according to mainstream theory, the IR energy hits the ocean, and is absorbed by the ocean. That energy input doesn't warm the oceans, but it does slow down the rate of cooling, so it's potato-potahto. The point is that conservation of energy is satisfied, and it matches the observed data.

 

[mamooth]

No, you dumbshit, i state that in the very small amounts that CO2 exists in the EARTH's atmosphere, it is drowned out completely by the effect of water vapor. Learn to read you halfwit.

Again, you're ignoring the fact that the absorption spectrum of water vapor and CO2 cover different spectral windows.

If my house has 10 windows and 8 are shut, making the closed windows better insulators (adding more water vapor) won't affect temperature much. Shutting a ninth window (adding CO2) will.

And we're still waiting for your "empirical data" that proves the greenhouse effect is insignificant.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When children ask a science question, I have to estimate the base of knowledge they possess, before I answer.
If I overestimate their base, I end up talking over their head, and they remain as ignorant of the topic as before.
I'm always happen to validate your ignorance.

Sure...when adults avoid answering direct questions, I win!..ssdd and billy, here it is, zippola with excuses

View attachment 88200

And there it is the charts. Hahahaha I rest my case

I know. Empirical evidence is wasted on an ignorant child. I rest my case.

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

try listening for a change, instead of flapping your lips like an imbecilic know-it-all

Saving Science

The Future Of Scientific Discovery

Yeah, imbecilic know-it-alls are annoying, but enough about neo-luddite warmers.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste -- if you had one to begin with

I hope you're posting with windmill power, planet killer!!!!

 

[jc456]

Sure...when adults avoid answering direct questions, I win!..ssdd and billy, here it is, zippola with excuses

View attachment 88200

And there it is the charts. Hahahaha I rest my case

I know. Empirical evidence is wasted on an ignorant child. I rest my case.

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

 

[westwall]

No, you dumbshit, i state that in the very small amounts that CO2 exists in the EARTH's atmosphere, it is drowned out completely by the effect of water vapor. Learn to read you halfwit.

Again, you're ignoring the fact that the absorption spectrum of water vapor and CO2 cover different spectral windows.

If my house has 10 windows and 8 are shut, making the closed windows better insulators (adding more water vapor) won't affect temperature much. Shutting a ninth window (adding CO2) will.

And we're still waiting for your "empirical data" that proves the greenhouse effect is insignificant.

No, they don't. CO2 has a tiny bit of the spectrum where water vapor doesn't already take over, but a very small part of the emission spectrum.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

View attachment 88200

And there it is the charts. Hahahaha I rest my case

I know. Empirical evidence is wasted on an ignorant child. I rest my case.

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

 

[jc456]

And there it is the charts. Hahahaha I rest my case

I know. Empirical evidence is wasted on an ignorant child. I rest my case.

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I know. Empirical evidence is wasted on an ignorant child. I rest my case.

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

 

[jc456]

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

I asked a fairly simple question. Can you answer or not? ObservedCO2 to temperature. Got something or not batman?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

And something never validated. The atmosphere would be warm if there was heat there. Hmmmmm no observed empirical evidence exists. Hmmmmm squared

Conducting and convection. Why we have wind.

And why we have cool nights in a desert.

And something never validated.

We've never seen CO2 and methane absorb and emit energy?

The atmosphere would be warm if there was heat there.

The atmosphere is at 0K?

And why we have cool nights in a desert.

Did you forget water is also a greenhouse gas?
Do you have the same brain injury as Hillary?

I see my point is made. No observed empirical evidence as I stated will be posted

No observed empirical evidence as I stated will be posted

You need to see evidence of CO2 and methane absorption spectrums? Again?
What will you say after I post it?
Do you need to see it for water as well? Will you understand why that's a factor in desert temps at night?

Nope, pretty pictures. I'd like to see CO2 with temperatures

They will respond to your question like old rocks 1000s of scientist agree that to approve of man made global warming gets you funds.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Observed? I think not! Thanks for playing

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Right. They didn't observe the absorbed spectrum. DERP!
You're welcome. Always glad to highlight your idiocy.

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

 

[jc456]

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

Your position is challenged and you keep posting modeled shit not observed. Any millennium eh?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

Your position is challenged and you keep posting modeled shit not observed. Any millennium eh?

Your position is challenged

Which position of mine is being challenged?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Except like providing observed CO2 affects on temperatures, the only highlight is mine. Thanks for playing

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

Its a known fact.

 

[jc456]

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

Your position is challenged and you keep posting modeled shit not observed. Any millennium eh?

Your position is challenged

Which position of mine is being challenged?

Observed

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The question concerned empirical proof that CO2 and methane were greenhouse gases.
Again, glad to show your idiocy.

Wrong again batman. That's the question you wish I asked! Funny

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

Its a known fact.

You'll have to be more specific.
How does the fact that the atmosphere of Mars is almost 96% CO2 mean that I screwed up?
I screwed up what? Where did I screw it up?

Please explain further. Be specific.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you acctually saying co2 and methane are not greenhouse gases ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200469/

Of course they are.
Only idiots who believe in smart photons and don't understand the laws of thermodynamics say otherwise.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200389/

And something never validated.<~~~~~Ignorant child comment

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15200612/

View attachment 88295

^Here's the validation
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15204496/


Observed? I think not!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15209080/

It is observed. You don't think.
DERP!

Mars atmosphere has 95% C02

You screwed up.

Please explain further.

Your position is challenged and you keep posting modeled shit not observed. Any millennium eh?

Your position is challenged

Which position of mine is being challenged?

Observed

Observed what?