Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here you go again. Being so stupid to think running to the ER is healthcare. It is not. It is a treatment. for a condition.Here is a suggestion to answer the question.
"The 14194 clinics in this database offer medical services (some may also offer dental services) and are free, low-cost, low-cost with a sliding scale based on income, or offer some type of financial assistance. If you're under or uninsured, and looking for a nearby free clinic, sliding scale clinic, or low-cost clinic, where you and/or your family can go for lost cost medical care, NeedyMeds can help. Please note that the clinics listed are not necessarily free.
For additional information and appointments contact the clinic directly.
For a description of which clinics we include on our website and what type of information we provide on each clinic, visit our Free/Low-Cost/Sliding Scale Clinics page."
Free/Low-Cost/Sliding Scale Clinics | NeedyMeds
Can we point out that every individual in America, whether legal or otherwise, has had healthcare- by federal law- since it was mandated by the most successful President in the last hundred years.
"The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)[1] is an act of the United States Congress, passed in 1986 as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). It requires hospital Emergency Departments that accept payments from Medicare to provide an appropriate medical screening examination (MSE) to individuals seeking treatment for a medical condition, regardless of citizenship, legal status, or ability to pay."
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act - Wikipedia
What if you make $30K with a family? Would you quality for free csare at the ER.
Do you think anyone can stop it & say " I ain't paying" & get a colonoscopy?
The folks who want the "freedom" to pay "their own way" don't realize that, in that system, they're also paying for those who can't, in the form of taxes, higher premiums and higher costs.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
.
Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
They will get sick, they will die, and the Alt Right will yell "yay".
The folks who want the "freedom" to pay "their own way" don't realize that, in that system, they're also paying for those who can't, in the form of taxes, higher premiums and higher costs.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
.
Everyone understands it.
What you don't understand is this
"The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo"
The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo -- The Motley Fool
"...the exchanges are on the brink of collapse. Major insurers are quitting, premiums are skyrocketing, enrollment is below expectations, and the administration is taking increasingly desperate measures to paper over the problems. By this time next year, the exchanges could be out of business."
Read more at: More Duct Tape Won’t Save Obamacare’s Collapsing Exchanges
I found it to be quite true.They will get sick, they will die, and the Alt Right will yell "yay".
Don't you feel stupid making a post like this?
Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
Funny Chit. We are supposed to be an advanced society where we take care of the old, poor, & sick people.
You selfish fucks should pack up your shit & move to some third world country where people starve & die in the streets while you PRETEND that you are soooooo far above them.
Funny how I hear your crock from people pretending to be Christian.
You right whiners keep telling me this is a Christian country. Well then act like it. Quit your constant ewhining.
I bet you have received some government benefits yourself.
There are options on the exchanges. If you were so stupid to choose a plan with 7500 deductible, then that is your stupidity.Pretty much the way it is with obamacare, $7500 deductible. Pretty much a death sentence for most.They will get sick, they will die, and the Alt Right will yell "yay".
So, you trash your Christian values if you think it means socialism?Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
Funny Chit. We are supposed to be an advanced society where we take care of the old, poor, & sick people.
You selfish fucks should pack up your shit & move to some third world country where people starve & die in the streets while you PRETEND that you are soooooo far above them.
Funny how I hear your crock from people pretending to be Christian.
You right whiners keep telling me this is a Christian country. Well then act like it. Quit your constant ewhining.
I bet you have received some government benefits yourself.
Let's take that huge leap of imagination and picture you with an actual education.
You might comprehend the choices, and not the comic book version of life.
Here's a treatise you haven't read: Tocqueville.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.”
As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.”
It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Imbeciles like you mirror the view of Franklin Roosevelt and his condottieri....
The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor:
“[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
There is nothing Christian about socialism.
So, you trash your Christian values if you think it means socialism?Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
Funny Chit. We are supposed to be an advanced society where we take care of the old, poor, & sick people.
You selfish fucks should pack up your shit & move to some third world country where people starve & die in the streets while you PRETEND that you are soooooo far above them.
Funny how I hear your crock from people pretending to be Christian.
You right whiners keep telling me this is a Christian country. Well then act like it. Quit your constant ewhining.
I bet you have received some government benefits yourself.
Let's take that huge leap of imagination and picture you with an actual education.
You might comprehend the choices, and not the comic book version of life.
Here's a treatise you haven't read: Tocqueville.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.”
As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.”
It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Imbeciles like you mirror the view of Franklin Roosevelt and his condottieri....
The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor:
“[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
There is nothing Christian about socialism.
Pretty much the way it is with obamacare, $7500 deductible. Pretty much a death sentence for most.They will get sick, they will die, and the Alt Right will yell "yay".
Yes....obamacare.....healthcare on paper....you have health insurance, you just can't afford to get actual medical treatment...and the left acts as if getting rid of that is horrible....
Why not, because your state has not expanded Medicaid?
Medicaid is the worst delivery system for healthcare...the government tells doctors they won't pay the whole bill....and then doctors stop taking those patients....government in action again....
Replacing a lousy law with another lousy law has nothing to do with my point.The folks who want the "freedom" to pay "their own way" don't realize that, in that system, they're also paying for those who can't, in the form of taxes, higher premiums and higher costs.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
.
Everyone understands it.
What you don't understand is this
"The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo"
The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo -- The Motley Fool
"...the exchanges are on the brink of collapse. Major insurers are quitting, premiums are skyrocketing, enrollment is below expectations, and the administration is taking increasingly desperate measures to paper over the problems. By this time next year, the exchanges could be out of business."
Read more at: More Duct Tape Won’t Save Obamacare’s Collapsing Exchanges
Jesus said if you see a person who needs help, help them without any question.So, you trash your Christian values if you think it means socialism?Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
Funny Chit. We are supposed to be an advanced society where we take care of the old, poor, & sick people.
You selfish fucks should pack up your shit & move to some third world country where people starve & die in the streets while you PRETEND that you are soooooo far above them.
Funny how I hear your crock from people pretending to be Christian.
You right whiners keep telling me this is a Christian country. Well then act like it. Quit your constant ewhining.
I bet you have received some government benefits yourself.
Let's take that huge leap of imagination and picture you with an actual education.
You might comprehend the choices, and not the comic book version of life.
Here's a treatise you haven't read: Tocqueville.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.”
As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.”
It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Imbeciles like you mirror the view of Franklin Roosevelt and his condottieri....
The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor:
“[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
There is nothing Christian about socialism.
The Bible does not endorse socialism.
It is a fabrication used to persuade the most stupid among us to turn over their free will to big government.
Raise your paw.
Replacing a lousy law with another lousy law has nothing to do with my point.The folks who want the "freedom" to pay "their own way" don't realize that, in that system, they're also paying for those who can't, in the form of taxes, higher premiums and higher costs.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
.
Everyone understands it.
What you don't understand is this
"The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo"
The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo -- The Motley Fool
"...the exchanges are on the brink of collapse. Major insurers are quitting, premiums are skyrocketing, enrollment is below expectations, and the administration is taking increasingly desperate measures to paper over the problems. By this time next year, the exchanges could be out of business."
Read more at: More Duct Tape Won’t Save Obamacare’s Collapsing Exchanges
.
So fix it with single payer.Replacing a lousy law with another lousy law has nothing to do with my point.The folks who want the "freedom" to pay "their own way" don't realize that, in that system, they're also paying for those who can't, in the form of taxes, higher premiums and higher costs.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
.
Everyone understands it.
What you don't understand is this
"The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo"
The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo -- The Motley Fool
"...the exchanges are on the brink of collapse. Major insurers are quitting, premiums are skyrocketing, enrollment is below expectations, and the administration is taking increasingly desperate measures to paper over the problems. By this time next year, the exchanges could be out of business."
Read more at: More Duct Tape Won’t Save Obamacare’s Collapsing Exchanges
.
I just proved the costs associated with ObamaCare are dramatic. Get it?
Not at all, because so many of the far right think the poor are lazy or whatever or deserve what they get or whatever. I have no problem posting the truth.Don't you feel stupid making a post like this?They will get sick, they will die, and the Alt Right will yell "yay".
Jesus said if you see a person who needs help, help them without any question.So, you trash your Christian values if you think it means socialism?Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
Funny Chit. We are supposed to be an advanced society where we take care of the old, poor, & sick people.
You selfish fucks should pack up your shit & move to some third world country where people starve & die in the streets while you PRETEND that you are soooooo far above them.
Funny how I hear your crock from people pretending to be Christian.
You right whiners keep telling me this is a Christian country. Well then act like it. Quit your constant ewhining.
I bet you have received some government benefits yourself.
Let's take that huge leap of imagination and picture you with an actual education.
You might comprehend the choices, and not the comic book version of life.
Here's a treatise you haven't read: Tocqueville.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.”
As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.”
It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Imbeciles like you mirror the view of Franklin Roosevelt and his condottieri....
The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor:
“[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
There is nothing Christian about socialism.
The Bible does not endorse socialism.
It is a fabrication used to persuade the most stupid among us to turn over their free will to big government.
Raise your paw.
You & your anti-Christian ilk judge poor people. You call them lazy. You say they do not deserve help.
I have news, you will spend eternity in Hell like most of your "Oh I am so Christian" Republicans.
The folks who want the "freedom" to pay "their own way" don't realize that, in that system, they're also paying for those who can't, in the form of taxes, higher premiums and higher costs.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
.
Here you go again. Being so stupid to think running to the ER is healthcare. It is not. It is a treatment. for a condition.Here is a suggestion to answer the question.
"The 14194 clinics in this database offer medical services (some may also offer dental services) and are free, low-cost, low-cost with a sliding scale based on income, or offer some type of financial assistance. If you're under or uninsured, and looking for a nearby free clinic, sliding scale clinic, or low-cost clinic, where you and/or your family can go for lost cost medical care, NeedyMeds can help. Please note that the clinics listed are not necessarily free.
For additional information and appointments contact the clinic directly.
For a description of which clinics we include on our website and what type of information we provide on each clinic, visit our Free/Low-Cost/Sliding Scale Clinics page."
Free/Low-Cost/Sliding Scale Clinics | NeedyMeds
Can we point out that every individual in America, whether legal or otherwise, has had healthcare- by federal law- since it was mandated by the most successful President in the last hundred years.
"The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)[1] is an act of the United States Congress, passed in 1986 as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). It requires hospital Emergency Departments that accept payments from Medicare to provide an appropriate medical screening examination (MSE) to individuals seeking treatment for a medical condition, regardless of citizenship, legal status, or ability to pay."
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act - Wikipedia
What if you make $30K with a family? Would you quality for free csare at the ER.
Do you think anyone can stop it & say " I ain't paying" & get a colonoscopy?
"Being so stupid to think running to the ER is healthcare. It is not. It is a treatment. for a condition."
Drum roll!!!!
We have a winner in the category of "Most Confused Farrago and/or Word Salad!!!"
A note to the winner.....in the future, try to keep your posts to the English language.
Every aspect of healthcare is based on the amelioration of medical conditions.
Unfortunately
, there is no known amelioration for your condition....outside of reincarnation.
So, you trash your Christian values if you think it means socialism?Unless I've missed something, we do not live in a socialist country. Nor have we amended our Constitution to permit Government (the taxpayers) to pay for healthcare for all.
Hence, we have the observable phenomena that :
People with money tend to eat better than people without money;
They tend to have nicer clothes;
They tend to live in safer, more posh places;
They tend to send their kids to better schools (all the way through college), whether public or private;
They get better healthcare.
To the extent that healthcare is a high priority, people who are "poor" have to seek out whatever resources are available and exploit them to the extent necessary.
But on the whole, people with resources will always get better healthcare than people without resources. AND THAT EVEN HAPPENS IN COUNTRIES WHERE THEY HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
So if you don't mind, stop telling me that I am financially responsible to see to it that every poor bastard in this country has "adequate" health care. If you think the Constitution needs changing, and if enough people agree with you to get it done, then I will happily pay my share. But until that happens STFU. Ain't my problem.
Funny Chit. We are supposed to be an advanced society where we take care of the old, poor, & sick people.
You selfish fucks should pack up your shit & move to some third world country where people starve & die in the streets while you PRETEND that you are soooooo far above them.
Funny how I hear your crock from people pretending to be Christian.
You right whiners keep telling me this is a Christian country. Well then act like it. Quit your constant ewhining.
I bet you have received some government benefits yourself.
Let's take that huge leap of imagination and picture you with an actual education.
You might comprehend the choices, and not the comic book version of life.
Here's a treatise you haven't read: Tocqueville.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.”
As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.”
It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Imbeciles like you mirror the view of Franklin Roosevelt and his condottieri....
The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor:
“[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
There is nothing Christian about socialism.
The Bible does not endorse socialism.
It is a fabrication used to persuade the most stupid among us to turn over their free will to big government.
Raise your paw.
