What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[buttercup]

Your unwillingness inability to refute anything I (or others here) said shows the weakness in your position.

Also, please answer my question in post #164. I’ve asked you twice now. If you don't want to, then just say so.

Again there is no need to refute your misguided opinion. Its not relevant in the least. If you really felt it showed a weakness you wouldnt be pleading with me to refute it. You just have to accept my thoughts as is and deal with the facts as they are.

It's not an opinion, I asked you a question. Go to post #164. Come on, have at least a modicum of courage to answer a question.

Yes it was an opinion. Stop begging me to refute your opinion when your opinion is irrelevant. You just have to learn you cant control womens bodies. Sucks but those are the facts.

I asked you a question in post 164. Evidently you don't have the cojones to answer it.

Your opinion is not a question. Its simply a misguided opinion I have already shown you was wrong.

It absolutely was a question in post 164, liar. You just don't want to answer it because you know you'll get caught in your BS.

 

[P@triot]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Why do any of you give a rat fuck about some else's unborn kids?

WHY?

WHAT THE FUCK?

That's competition for your kids.

FUCK THEM.

It makes ZERO sense.

 

[Asclepias]

Again there is no need to refute your misguided opinion. Its not relevant in the least. If you really felt it showed a weakness you wouldnt be pleading with me to refute it. You just have to accept my thoughts as is and deal with the facts as they are.

It's not an opinion, I asked you a question. Go to post #164. Come on, have at least a modicum of courage to answer a question.

Yes it was an opinion. Stop begging me to refute your opinion when your opinion is irrelevant. You just have to learn you cant control womens bodies. Sucks but those are the facts.

I asked you a question in post 164. Evidently you don't have the cojones to answer it.

Your opinion is not a question. Its simply a misguided opinion I have already shown you was wrong.

It absolutely was a question in post 164, liar. You just don't want to answer it because you know you'll get caught in your BS.

Go back to sleep or get a better point. Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

 

[P@triot]

What would be better than straining our overburdened social services even further?

There is nothing funnier than listening to socialists whine about the problems their idiotic ideology - and subsequent policies - created.

 

[Asclepias]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

View attachment 204429

I know youre trying to say something so I'll bite. Whats ironic?

 

[P@triot]

Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

God that post is priceless. Assclap is literally too stupid to understand what he’s even arguing. In more than 50% of current pregnancies right now - there is a woman in that womb. And when she gets aborted, she had absolutely no “control over her own fucking body”.

You’re right, assclap. That is a “pretty stupid” argument to make.

 

[P@triot]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

View attachment 204429

I know youre trying to say something so I'll bite. Whats ironic?

Because the woman in the womb has to have a problem with someone sucking out her body limb by limb in a slow and agonizing death because you and the mom were completely and totally committed to telling her what to do with her body.

 

[Asclepias]

Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

God that post is priceless. Assclap is literally too stupid to understand what he’s even arguing. In more than 50% of current pregnancies right now - there is a woman in that womb. And when she gets aborted, she had absolutely no “control over her own fucking body”.

You’re right, assclap. That is a “pretty stupid” argument to make.

Youre an idiot and thanks for the laugh at your expense. No stupid there is no woman in that womb. Its amazing that you are claiming a fetus or a baby is a adult female. How fucking stupid can you be?

wom·an
ˈwo͝omən/
noun

1. an adult human female.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Go back to sleep or get a better point. Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

What's next? No jacking off? That's killing off potential babies, right?

All humans must be vital on their own, without the body of another human, to have the right to life.

 

[buttercup]

It's not an opinion, I asked you a question. Go to post #164. Come on, have at least a modicum of courage to answer a question.

Yes it was an opinion. Stop begging me to refute your opinion when your opinion is irrelevant. You just have to learn you cant control womens bodies. Sucks but those are the facts.

I asked you a question in post 164. Evidently you don't have the cojones to answer it.

Your opinion is not a question. Its simply a misguided opinion I have already shown you was wrong.

It absolutely was a question in post 164, liar. You just don't want to answer it because you know you'll get caught in your BS.

Go back to sleep or get a better point. Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

For the umpteenth time, there are TWO bodies, Einstein. Repeating your lies doesn't make them any more true.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

I have a big problem with the whole thing. I think the profit and assembly line of the operation should be taken out of the system. I am for the most part not very
liberal would just like the matter be slightly changed. Otherwise it is the womans body so you can look at from the womans view.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes it was an opinion. Stop begging me to refute your opinion when your opinion is irrelevant. You just have to learn you cant control womens bodies. Sucks but those are the facts.

I asked you a question in post 164. Evidently you don't have the cojones to answer it.

Your opinion is not a question. Its simply a misguided opinion I have already shown you was wrong.

It absolutely was a question in post 164, liar. You just don't want to answer it because you know you'll get caught in your BS.

Go back to sleep or get a better point. Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own fucking body is pretty stupid.

For the umpteenth time, there are TWO bodies, Einstein. Repeating your lies doesn't make them any more true.

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

 

[buttercup]

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

Answer the question in post 164 and you'll see how easy that is to disprove. (which is probably why you refuse to answer that question.)

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The liberty-first philosophy demands that one's liberty has no greater value than another's. One's life has no greater value than the other.

If one's life absolutely depends on another, the dependent one has no right to life! The dependent one lives at the pleasure and mercy of the one on whom he/she depends.

An argument otherwise is an argument for a statist ruling class with greater protections than the unwashed masses.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

Just like I have the right to get those unwanted potential babies out of my body....

...preferably with the help of a woman, but a firm grip and a movie will do.

 

[Asclepias]

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

Answer the question in post 164 and you'll see how easy that is to disprove. (which is probably why you refuse to answer that question.)

I dont have to. I already know that having an abortion is a right american women have.

 

[buttercup]

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

Answer the question in post 164 and you'll see how easy that is to disprove. (which is probably why you refuse to answer that question.)

I dont have to. I already know that having an abortion is a right american women have.

lol.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Because the woman in the womb has to have a problem with someone sucking out her body limb by limb in a slow and agonizing death because you and the mom were completely and totally committed to telling her what to do with her body.

Nobody has the right to live inside another person.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I dont have to. I already know that having an abortion is a right american women have.

I would say, stopping a woman from getting rid of a baby inside her body is a power a government should not have, but yes. It's almost 6 of 1, half-dozen of another.