What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[kaz]

Listen at you - "RID HER BODY OF AN UNWANTED BABY". OTHERWISE TO DENY THAT BABY A LIFE OR a CHANCE AS WAS ONCE UPON A TIME GRANTED UNTO YOU BY GOD HIMSELF, AND THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF BIRTH ??

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!

Show us?

Who is "us?" Why are you feeling insecure?


So is abortion protected in the constitution?

 

[Asclepias]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

True. If you only meant that consistently

I do mean it consistently. You will never find me saying a woman doesnt have the right to control of her own body.

Of course you do. She can't work w/o govt ok for wages and a bunch of other things. What about drugs and prostitution? Is it still her body? What about her selling body parts or organs?

Youre babbling I made out the drugs and prostitution and it should be legal. Same with selling her body parts.

 

[Asclepias]

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!

Show us?

Who is "us?" Why are you feeling insecure?


So is abortion protected in the constitution?

Us is the board.

Show us in the constitution where abortion is illegal like you claimed.

 

[Cecilie1200]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Ice dream, but it wouldn’t matter a bit. Roe isn’t a law, it’s legislation from the bench. So all that really could be done is send it back to the states. It would be nothing but a snazzy bumper sticker for election 2020. Abortion ain’t going anywhere.

You didn't actually read his post before responding at all, did you?

And I quote:

"What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue".

But I guess responding to the actual words takes longer than cutting and pasting a boilerplate talking point.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yeah, what could be better than having government legislate the most intimate details of our lives? What could be better than a rise in crime, homelessness, child abuse, birth defects, and childbirth deaths? What would be better than straining our overburdened social services even further? What could be more wonderful than stripping away a person's right to privacy? Great idea! Keep them coming.

Let me see:

"Intimate details"
"Abortion improves society"
"I suddenly care about government spending"
"Right to privacy"

I hope you made a checkmark next to each of these on your list of talking points. I'd hate for you not to get full credit.

 

[Cecilie1200]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Mike, I'm currently in a thread with a mess of conservatives who feel ANY welfare programs are "robbing" them of their hard earned cash. What would be so awful with overturning Roe v. Wade is that no one is going to want to spend the $ to care for these unwanted children. Financial reasons are high on the list of why women choose to terminate a pregnancy--they can't afford another baby. So what happens when the baby is born to a parent who can't afford to raise it? Then some on the right will blame the parents for not caring for it or asking for benefits.
THAT is part of what is so wrong with overturning Roe v. Wade.

"If the government doesn't do it, it DOESN'T EXIST!!!"

 

[Cecilie1200]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

I think it would be better to start taking care of the born first. Then worry about the unborn.

It really seems as if Republicans only see little kids as target practice. They may want to change that perception first if they want to achieve the moral high ground. Don't you think?

I think it would be better for no leftist fraud to talk about "taking care of the born" without ever having done anything more for another human being in their entire self-righteous lives than vote money out of someone else's pocket to pay a bunch of bureaucrats to handle things.

Your "compassionate government charity" does NOT qualify you to sit in judgement on anyone else, contrary to your obvious opinion.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Look at all the justifiers for abortion coming out of the woodworks in America now.

Justifying abortion (the murdering of life out of convience), won't go over to good come judgement day.. Just saying, but for the reprobates it don't matter in life, because their souls are waxed cold, and their souls are without meaning any longer to them. It is how one justifies murder today.

If you believe in that sort of thing, aren't you doing the fetus a favor by aborting it since the soul would go straight to heaven?

Wouldn't I be doing YOU a favor by shooting you and sending your soul - generously assuming you have one - to its eternal reward? God knows, I'd be doing everyone else who ever has to listen to your tiresome attempts to present evil as morality a favor.

 

[Cecilie1200]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Most abortions are black children, that's why the left say we must keep abortion mills in operation.

Go out and adopt a couple then.

You've done what, exactly, for needy children? What's that? Look at all the ballots you've "arduously" cast, at great personal difficulty, to have the government write checks? That's it?

Shove your sanctimony in the same place you shoved your humanity.

 

[mudwhistle]

Are you prepared to allow the government to help the mothers that can't afford those babies? I doubt it. "Lol fuck you. Shoulda kept your legs closed, slut."

Yes......kill those little crumb crunchers. Don't let them punish them with a baby.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Those against abortion don't know these many woman who want one and never will. they don't know their circumstances and don't care to know. they only want to control what they do. This decision should be between the woman and her doctor and NO ONE ELSE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PERIOD!!!

You men out there, would you be okay with the government telling you what medical procedure you could have, or what medication you could take? This is what many of you are advocating for the women of this country, and don't give me this shit about the sanctity of life, especially when your only concern for that "precious life" is until it clears the birth canal.

I have seen many of you telling her to keep her legs closed. Do you whack off every night instead of wanting to have sex with a woman because she chose to do what you told her to do? Or, do you try to have sex with every woman you've ever dated and to hell with that closed legs bullshit?

finally, men can buy condoms at every drug store and grocery store in this country, so why don't you put on one to prevent her from getting pregnant? Oh I know, because it just doesn't feel good! Birth control is a woman's responsibility. Well boys, if you force women to have babies they don't want, then dig deep into your wallets because you will be paying for those "precious babies" for the next 18 years!

"I don't know anyone who's pro-life, but let me tell you EXACTLY about every single one of them and what they're thinking."

Would I be the first person you've encountered who's actually pointed out that you're a hypocrite, or is this already old news to you?

Don't even get me started on "Infanticide should be okay for me because men would want to do it too if they were 'cursed' with babies just for fucking around."

 

[Cecilie1200]

Those against abortion don't know these many woman who want one and never will. they don't know their circumstances and don't care to know. they only want to control what they do. This decision should be between the woman and her doctor and NO ONE ELSE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PERIOD!!!

You men out there, would you be okay with the government telling you what medical procedure you could have, or what medication you could take? This is what many of you are advocating for the women of this country, and don't give me this shit about the sanctity of life, especially when your only concern for that "precious life" is until it clears the birth canal.

I have seen many of you telling her to keep her legs closed. Do you whack off every night instead of wanting to have sex with a woman because she chose to do what you told her to do? Or, do you try to have sex with every woman you've ever dated and to hell with that closed legs bullshit?

finally, men can buy condoms at every drug store and grocery store in this country, so why don't you put on one to prevent her from getting pregnant? Oh I know, because it just doesn't feel good! Birth control is a woman's responsibility. Well boys, if you force women to have babies they don't want, then dig deep into your wallets because you will be paying for those "precious babies" for the next 18 years!

You assholes didn’t believe in choice when you rammed Obamacare down our throats did you? That was a fucking mandate!

Leftists have never been in favor of ACTUAL choice in their whole, misbegotten lives.

 

[kaz]

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!

Show us?

Who is "us?" Why are you feeling insecure?


So is abortion protected in the constitution?

Us is the board.

Show us in the constitution where abortion is illegal like you claimed.

So "the board" needs to be behind you? Why? Why do you need that?

As for the rest, wow, you're a terrible reader. Im pro choice as i indicated twice here, and that wasn't the question. If you still don't understand our conversation, I'll explain when im on my computer instead of phone

 

[Cecilie1200]

The GOP is always about smaller, less intrusive govt. but not of the uterus..

Every time I read your posts, I wonder what it would be like to be unable to think except in tortured, disingenuous slogans and memes. No wonder you always choose avatars who look like they're constipated.

 

[dblack]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

True. If you only meant that consistently

I do mean it consistently. You will never find me saying a woman doesnt have the right to control of her own body.

Of course you do. She can't work w/o govt ok for wages and a bunch of other things. What about drugs and prostitution? Is it still her body? What about her selling body parts or organs?

Hypocrisy Party!

 

[Asclepias]

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!

Show us?

Who is "us?" Why are you feeling insecure?


So is abortion protected in the constitution?

Us is the board.

Show us in the constitution where abortion is illegal like you claimed.

So "the board" needs to be behind you? Why? Why do you need that?

As for the rest, wow, you're a terrible reader. Im pro choice as i indicated twice here, and that wasn't the question. If you still don't understand our conversation, I'll explain when im on my computer instead of phone

No. I just want you to show the board as well as me so they can share in the laughter.

Well whats your question then? Sounds to me like you were saying its in the constitution that we were to stop abortion.

"What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!"

 

[kaz]

What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!

Show us?

Who is "us?" Why are you feeling insecure?


So is abortion protected in the constitution?

Us is the board.

Show us in the constitution where abortion is illegal like you claimed.

So "the board" needs to be behind you? Why? Why do you need that?

As for the rest, wow, you're a terrible reader. Im pro choice as i indicated twice here, and that wasn't the question. If you still don't understand our conversation, I'll explain when im on my computer instead of phone

No. I just want you to show the board as well as me so they can share in the laughter.

Well whats your question then? Sounds to me like you were saying its in the constitution that we were to stop abortion.

"What's funny is you're right, but if we switch to the constitution ... you find it !!!"

You're not very smart. And you're lazy

 

[kaz]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

True. If you only meant that consistently

I do mean it consistently. You will never find me saying a woman doesnt have the right to control of her own body.

Of course you do. She can't work w/o govt ok for wages and a bunch of other things. What about drugs and prostitution? Is it still her body? What about her selling body parts or organs?

Hypocrisy Party!

Not clear who youre talking to

 

[deanrd]

Can you imagine how much better the lives of American children would be if Republicans cared about the baby and not just the fetus?

Lame tired empty leftist talking point

I know. To your kind, wanting to help American children is a lame and tired empty leftist talking point.

That's why we have a heart and your kind has a lump of coal.

Funny, you don't even know what I'm talking about. Talk about helping children or keeping mothers and breastfeeding babies together and your kind rolls their eyes and sarcastically asks why?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Can you imagine how much better the lives of American children would be if Republicans cared about the baby and not just the fetus?

Oh, I agree that is a HUGE hypocrisy issue for them.

Fortunately for me, I have been consistent.

Don't stop women from aborting. Stop paying welfare queens.