When Did Liberalism Become Fascism?

[NYcarbineer]

If Kirsten Powers was a real liberal, you wouldn't admire her.

I can admire some liberals, I don't sympathize with their views, but at least they're not dull, leftist shills such as yourself.

Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders, and....I believe even Elizabeth Warren....all condemned the Lefts assault on free speech.

Those who don't are simply the Liberal Fascists that Goldberg wrote of.

You can't call people who do illiberal things liberals. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

Anarchists, NOT Cal students, responsible for violence in protests

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

Now now, there is a big difference between true liberals and leftists that call themselves liberals.

I prefer true liberals. I don't agree with them on some things, but at least they think.

So you're finally admitting that the most extreme on the left only represent a tiny minority on the left?

 

[Marion Morrison]

I can admire some liberals, I don't sympathize with their views, but at least they're not dull, leftist shills such as yourself.

Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders, and....I believe even Elizabeth Warren....all condemned the Lefts assault on free speech.

Those who don't are simply the Liberal Fascists that Goldberg wrote of.

You can't call people who do illiberal things liberals. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

Anarchists, NOT Cal students, responsible for violence in protests

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

Now now, there is a big difference between true liberals and leftists that call themselves liberals.

I prefer true liberals. I don't agree with them on some things, but at least they think.

So you're finally admitting that the most extreme on the left only represent a tiny minority on the left?

The left is the left.

True liberals are not leftists.

Many leftists call themselves liberal when in fact they are leftist fascists.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders, and....I believe even Elizabeth Warren....all condemned the Lefts assault on free speech.

Those who don't are simply the Liberal Fascists that Goldberg wrote of.

You can't call people who do illiberal things liberals. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

Anarchists, NOT Cal students, responsible for violence in protests

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

Now now, there is a big difference between true liberals and leftists that call themselves liberals.

I prefer true liberals. I don't agree with them on some things, but at least they think.

So you're finally admitting that the most extreme on the left only represent a tiny minority on the left?

The left is the left.

True liberals are not leftists.

Many leftists call themselves liberal when in fact they are leftist fascists.

It's not the place of the far right to define what is or is not, who is or is not, a liberal.

 

[Marion Morrison]

You can't call people who do illiberal things liberals. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

Anarchists, NOT Cal students, responsible for violence in protests

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

Now now, there is a big difference between true liberals and leftists that call themselves liberals.

I prefer true liberals. I don't agree with them on some things, but at least they think.

So you're finally admitting that the most extreme on the left only represent a tiny minority on the left?

The left is the left.

True liberals are not leftists.

Many leftists call themselves liberal when in fact they are leftist fascists.

It's not the place of the far right to define what is or is not, who is or is not, a liberal.

It is what it is, tell it to the dictionary. You're not a liberal, you're a leftist shill.

lib•er•al (lĭbˈər-əl, lĭbˈrəl)

• adj.
  Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

^that does not describe you.

This does:

leftist
►

• n.
  A person who holds views associated with the political left.
• adj.
  Of or pertaining to the political left.

shill (shĭl)

• v.
  To act as a shill for (a deceitful enterprise).

 

[BlindBoo]

The OP points out the outrage from a real Liberal, Kirsten Powers, and a conservative, Kimberley Strassel.

What are left are comments from the Fascists in mufti......you can see several of them above.

If Kirsten Powers was a real liberal, you wouldn't admire her.

I can admire some liberals, I don't sympathize with their views, but at least they're not dull, leftist shills such as yourself.

Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders, and....I believe even Elizabeth Warren....all condemned the Lefts assault on free speech.

Those who don't are simply the Liberal Fascists that Goldberg wrote of.

You can't call people who do illiberal things liberals. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

Anarchists, NOT Cal students, responsible for violence in protests

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

It works for them too. You can't call yourself liberal and do illiberal things. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

 

[francoHFW]

Conservatives have used communists as the bad guys for years now, and it seems they recently changed the bad guys from communists to fascists, and I wonder if the change was based on Trump's Russian connections?

You clowns have attempted rebranding every 15 years or thereabouts. Stop rebranding. The jump from communists to fascists has been a long, but predictable road.

Are you RW dupes EVER going to try facts? Right, then you'd be actual morons, not functional ones...

"Are you RW dupes EVER going to try facts?"

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.


This is a fact:

Your ignorance is glaring....but, I'm here to help!


In this classroom, we begin by explaining terms.

a. Liberal and Progressive and Democrat are used interchangeably in general parlance...And a 2012 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Americans more generally had a positive reaction to the word socialism.
Democrats, Republicans Diverge on Capitalism, Federal Gov't

Liberals are admitted socialists....Leftwingers.


b. Even Marx admitted that true communism could not come about without revolution. So the statement -- "A communist is a socialist with a gun" can be accepted as a truism.
So....Liberals, Progressives, Socialists = Communists.

c. Nazis, falsely called Rightwing, are National Socialists....hence, Leftwing.
So....So....Liberals, Progressives, Communists, Socialists = Nazis.

d. Since Fascists and Nazis were allies,and basically the same....

...Liberals, Progressives, Communists, Socialists, Democrats.....and Fascists...peas in the same pod.


How ya' like them facts, boyyyyyeeeeeee?????

Linked to RW fascist garbage, dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

The most famous fascist in history denounced capitalism and had a fun slogan. "The common good before self interest."

Your rebranding is failing.

That slogan gets no quote when googled. Is that Marx? And he's a fascist now? Brainwashed GOP insanity in extremis...

 

[francoHFW]

I can admire some liberals, I don't sympathize with their views, but at least they're not dull, leftist shills such as yourself.

Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders, and....I believe even Elizabeth Warren....all condemned the Lefts assault on free speech.

Those who don't are simply the Liberal Fascists that Goldberg wrote of.

To speak out against someone else's speech is itself free speech.

To use violence to quash free speech is not.

In fact, it's terrorism.

"Define terrorism: the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal"

And there you have it.

By the way, that has been changed in the online definition. Good thing I have real dictionaries and a camera, huh?

The cached definition does not match the site definition, which means it been changed. Scary stuff.

I have never objected to holding protesters accountable to the law.

But what most people either don't know, or ignore, or deny, is that the violence at Berkeley was largely clashes between leftwing and rightwing extremists.

Up until the last 2 times, it was unmitigated leftwing riots.

Anarchist nutjobs hiding behind Dems. ARREST those a-holes.

 

[francoHFW]

I'm surprised they have time, much less the ability, to post here with their busy schedule of rioting over conservatives speaking at colleges and their hate Trump outrage.

Maybe they ran out of coloring books and lolly pops at the universities of 'supposedly' higher education.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Far RW bomb throwers you mean...hater dupe. You believe a pile RW crap/hate yourself. God will not be amused...

View attachment 125869

I don't remember any RW bomb throwers... You must mean those Molotov cocktails the poor, poor, progressives utilized. Like those who attend those universities of 'supposedly' higher education so they can live next to doctors, lawyers, and bankers, like you do as they scream in rancor over anything that doesn't fit their view of the world.

BTW... Implying that my God hates or loves is a abstract human value that people like you assign arbitrarily without any knowledge of myself or my beliefs.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Milos and Coulter are RW bomb throwers. With no possible educational value. And will someone PLEASE arrest the anarchists that give Dems a bad name...

At the least you support a party for screwing the poor and nature. Not christian.

Milos and Coulter are speakers and writers. You just don't like what they have to say because it doesn't fit your agenda.

As for the anarchists it would take a conservative to make that happen since they riot in progressive areas where LEO's are told to stand down. Which tells me their actions are approved by progressives and Democrats alike.

When did I ever state I was Christian? As with most progressives you attack and run your mouth into areas that you have no clue what you are talking about. Do you need a coloring book of something?

******CHUCKLE******

Milos? LOL

Christian ideals then.

 

[francoHFW]

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

Now now, there is a big difference between true liberals and leftists that call themselves liberals.

I prefer true liberals. I don't agree with them on some things, but at least they think.

So you're finally admitting that the most extreme on the left only represent a tiny minority on the left?

The left is the left.

True liberals are not leftists.

Many leftists call themselves liberal when in fact they are leftist fascists.

It's not the place of the far right to define what is or is not, who is or is not, a liberal.

It is what it is, tell it to the dictionary. You're not a liberal, you're a leftist shill.

lib•er•al (lĭbˈər-əl, lĭbˈrəl)

• adj.
  Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

^that does not describe you.

This does:

leftist
►

• n.
  A person who holds views associated with the political left.
• adj.
  Of or pertaining to the political left.

shill (shĭl)

• v.
  To act as a shill for (a deceitful enterprise).

Too bad GOP dupes aren't aware of the reforms Dems want, only bs propaganda, hate, and character assassination.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Conservatives have used communists as the bad guys for years now, and it seems they recently changed the bad guys from communists to fascists, and I wonder if the change was based on Trump's Russian connections?

You clowns have attempted rebranding every 15 years or thereabouts. Stop rebranding. The jump from communists to fascists has been a long, but predictable road.

Are you RW dupes EVER going to try facts? Right, then you'd be actual morons, not functional ones...

"Are you RW dupes EVER going to try facts?"

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.


This is a fact:

Your ignorance is glaring....but, I'm here to help!


In this classroom, we begin by explaining terms.

a. Liberal and Progressive and Democrat are used interchangeably in general parlance...And a 2012 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Americans more generally had a positive reaction to the word socialism.
Democrats, Republicans Diverge on Capitalism, Federal Gov't

Liberals are admitted socialists....Leftwingers.


b. Even Marx admitted that true communism could not come about without revolution. So the statement -- "A communist is a socialist with a gun" can be accepted as a truism.
So....Liberals, Progressives, Socialists = Communists.

c. Nazis, falsely called Rightwing, are National Socialists....hence, Leftwing.
So....So....Liberals, Progressives, Communists, Socialists = Nazis.

d. Since Fascists and Nazis were allies,and basically the same....

...Liberals, Progressives, Communists, Socialists, Democrats.....and Fascists...peas in the same pod.


How ya' like them facts, boyyyyyeeeeeee?????

Linked to RW fascist garbage, dupe.

You can't beat something with nothing.

And, let's face it....you're nothing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The most famous fascist in history denounced capitalism and had a fun slogan. "The common good before self interest."

Your rebranding is failing.

That slogan gets no quote when googled. Is that Marx? And he's a fascist now? Brainwashed GOP insanity in extremis...

Every one of these totalist views has the very same aim for the final stage of society:

Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

All demand submission to unrestricted centralized power.


How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If Kirsten Powers was a real liberal, you wouldn't admire her.

I can admire some liberals, I don't sympathize with their views, but at least they're not dull, leftist shills such as yourself.

Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders, and....I believe even Elizabeth Warren....all condemned the Lefts assault on free speech.

Those who don't are simply the Liberal Fascists that Goldberg wrote of.

You can't call people who do illiberal things liberals. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

Anarchists, NOT Cal students, responsible for violence in protests

Don't be a dunce: they call themselves Liberals or some iteration thereof.

It works for them too. You can't call yourself liberal and do illiberal things. Well you can but you'd be wrong.

"You can't call yourself liberal and do illiberal things."

Of course they can....and do.

So saith
Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."

And

The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech,"

 

[toobfreak]

Every one of these totalist views has the very same aim for the final stage of society:
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
All demand submission to unrestricted centralized power.

On a more basic level, PoliticalChic, they are something more. At the very heart of Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism, they all have one basic commonality--- a dislike for God, the very idea of a supreme being. Their basic tenet is that man is supreme, that the state rules all, and by that, that man controls his own destiny and determines his own ethics over him being part of a larger good, part and parcel of some supreme force which created him, guides him from a position of moral authority. That and that alone explains the vast number of progressive and socialist views from being anti-pro-live, to so many other things.

 

[BlindBoo]

"You can't call yourself liberal and do illiberal things."

Of course they can....and do.

Allow me to refresh your memory of what I actually posted.

"It works for them too. You can't call yourself liberal and do illiberal things. Well you can but you'd be wrong."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every one of these totalist views has the very same aim for the final stage of society:
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
All demand submission to unrestricted centralized power.

On a more basic level, PoliticalChic, they are something more. At the very heart of Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism, they all have one basic commonality--- a dislike for God, the very idea of a supreme being. Their basic tenet is that man is supreme, that the state rules all, and by that, that man controls his own destiny and determines his own ethics over him being part of a larger good, part and parcel of some supreme force which created him, guides him from a position of moral authority. That and that alone explains the vast number of progressive and socialist views from being anti-pro-live, to so many other things.

"...a dislike for God, the very idea of a supreme being."

A big AMEN to that, bro.

Here, in their own words:

1. There is no God:
"This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.

When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor."The Schwarz Report | Essays


2. As a result of Franklin Roosevelt's tireless efforts to make a home for communism in America, note the following and compare it to the Progressive/Liberal/Democrat view of religion in secular America:

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY

This is the basis, the explanation, for the anti-Religion view Liberals demand being taught in government schools, and by the secular media.


3. "Stalin remained a consistent advocate of the scientific and materialistic basis of all knowledge....Any manifestation of a challenge to the worldview of Soviet communism was met throughout with a relentless hostility."
"The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia," by Richard Overy, p. 277


4. September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," byDennis J. Dunn, p. 137

 

[BlindBoo]

a dislike for God

Which God? Who's God, is it that we supposedly dislike?

Does not believing in supernatural beings controlling our destiny count as a dislike for 'God'?

 

[toobfreak]

"...a dislike for God, the very idea of a supreme being."
A big AMEN to that, bro.
Here, in their own words:
1. There is no God

Yep. Pretty hard for monarchists like Kim-Jong-Un, Stalin or even milder socialists to dictate to their subjects when admitting there is a power higher than them they have to answer to. The State can have no authority higher than itself if it is to maintain control.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Christian ideals then.

Which Christian ideals are you attributing to me that you hate so.o..o... much?

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Damaged Eagle]

a dislike for God

Which God? Who's God, is it that we supposedly dislike?

Does not believing in supernatural beings controlling our destiny count as a dislike for 'God'?

So instead of the believing some supernatural being might be controlling your destiny in some way you'd prefer the mortal with all of it's MacBeth intrigues, deceit, and frailties.

******CHUCKLE*****