When (if ever) will R-W'ers admit to Trump's approval ratings?

[Redfish]

Which one elects the president?

Well, obviously the electoral college does....and YES, your last TWO "victories" have been won NOT by the popular vote, but by an outdated system.....

BUT, if you could read without outside help, this thread is about Trump's approval ratings....Care to comment about that?

So, you would have the president elected by a few counties in Cal and NY?

You waste your time on these liars.

I know. If the hildebeast had won the EC, they would be ranting about how wonderful it is.

 

[rightwinger]

is it going up or down?

DOWN by 8 percentage points.....

Guess it depends which one you're looking at.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

and, of course, you will be looking at the one that best suits your opinion

Regardless of whic poll you look at, he is still at record low approval numbers at a time when he should be enjoying his "honeymoon"

Does not bode well for when he actually faces a real crisis

 

[nat4900]

I know. If the hildebeast had won the EC, they would be ranting about how wonderful it is.

So far, in GWB and the Trumpster, its been the EC to bail your asses out to win the oval office, but NOT the popular vote....Interesting,isn't it?

 

[rightwinger]

So, you would have the president elected by a few counties in Cal and NY?

NO......popular vote majority would be nice, don't you think?
Here's a question for ALL you right wing nitwits"

How come you morons, believe in MAJORITY rule in congress, but not in presidential elections?

Republicans do not have a majority rule in Congress either
More people voted for Democrats in both the Senate and the House

 

[Redfish]

So, you would have the president elected by a few counties in Cal and NY?

NO......popular vote majority would be nice, don't you think?
Here's a question for ALL you right wing nitwits"

How come you morons, believe in MAJORITY rule in congress, but not in presidential elections?

'

Been explained to you and your fellow dems many times. The electoral college gives a proportional voice to the people of every state. National PV would give the big population centers complete control over presidential elections. We understand why you want that, because the big city ghettos are full of democrats, we understand your motives.

But until you get a constitutional amendment through congress and ratified by 38 states, we will elect presidents via the EC.

So rant on and on, nothing is going to change. YOU LOST.

What I find funny is that if Hilly had won you would be praising the EC and celebrating how great it is. Its called hypocrisy and you dems are very good at it.

 

[mudwhistle]

How long will it take for liberals to admit that Trump won the election?

It's quite a feat considering the trashing he's subjected to daily.

When are conservatives going to get over their "Trump won so STFU"?

Trump is now the President of ALL the people, not just those who voted for him. As such, he is answerable to all the people

Yes......but he is answerable more to the Constitution than a mob.

 

[Redfish]

So, you would have the president elected by a few counties in Cal and NY?

NO......popular vote majority would be nice, don't you think?
Here's a question for ALL you right wing nitwits"

How come you morons, believe in MAJORITY rule in congress, but not in presidential elections?

Republicans do not have a majority rule in Congress either
More people voted for Democrats in both the Senate and the House

So you think people in Cal should be able to vote for senators in Alabama? WTF is wrong with you?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Why bother? Think it's gonna slow him down?

Probably not......Trump is not too sane anyway and his delusions would not allow reality to sink in....
However, right wingers in congress are fully aware of their reelection chances.

Which are only getting better each day.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

When (if ever) will R-W'ers admit to Trump's approval ratings?

He'll never beat Hillary if this keeps up. DERP!

Yes, when does nat4900 admit that the left screwed this one up big time.

This was better than the Bill and the Oilers.

 

[Redfish]

I know. If the hildebeast had won the EC, they would be ranting about how wonderful it is.

So far, in GWB and the Trumpster, its been the EC to bail your asses out to win the oval office, but NOT the popular vote....Interesting,isn't it?

Interesting? nope, constitutional.

 

[nat4900]

What I find funny is that if Hilly had won you would be praising the EC and celebrating how great it is. Its called hypocrisy and you dems are very good at it.

Never liked Hillary and she would have had a very difficult time (as Trump is experiencing) had she NOT won the popular vote.......

Again, why is majority in congress sacrosanct, but not in presidential elections?

 

[Papageorgio]

So, you would have the president elected by a few counties in Cal and NY?

NO......popular vote majority would be nice, don't you think?
Here's a question for ALL you right wing nitwits"

How come you morons, believe in MAJORITY rule in congress, but not in presidential elections?

Get them to change the law and I'll back you up, until then, this is the system and we must abide by the Constitution. Now get off your ass and get out there and change it!

 

[Redfish]

When (if ever) will R-W'ers admit to Trump's approval ratings?

He'll never beat Hillary if this keeps up. DERP!

Yes, when does nat4900 admit that the left screwed this one up big time.

This was better than the Bill and the Oilers.

he will never admit it. Liberal brains do not work that way. Its always someone else's fault.

 

[Auld Phart]

So, you would have the president elected by a few counties in Cal and NY?

NO......popular vote majority would be nice, don't you think?
Here's a question for ALL you right wing nitwits"

How come you morons, believe in MAJORITY rule in congress, but not in presidential elections?

Because majority rule in congress only involves a representative in one state

Presidency involves a representative of ALL states, and the most populous states shouldn't be allowed to dictate who wins the position.

 

[Redfish]

What I find funny is that if Hilly had won you would be praising the EC and celebrating how great it is. Its called hypocrisy and you dems are very good at it.

Never liked Hillary and she would have had a very difficult time (as Trump is experiencing) had she NOT won the popular vote.......

Again, why is majority in congress sacrosanct, but not in presidential elections?

because congressmen are elected by the people of ONE state, not the entire country.

 

[nat4900]

Interesting? nope, constitutional.

So, following that logic, you APPROVE of a federal judge placing a block on the Trumpster's ban on Muslim based on its UN-constitutionality, correct?

 

[Auld Phart]

I know. If the hildebeast had won the EC, they would be ranting about how wonderful it is.

So far, in GWB and the Trumpster, its been the EC to bail your asses out to win the oval office, but NOT the popular vote....Interesting,isn't it?

the country spoke, not the most populous states

 

[Sun Devil 92]

What I find funny is that if Hilly had won you would be praising the EC and celebrating how great it is. Its called hypocrisy and you dems are very good at it.

Never liked Hillary and she would have had a very difficult time (as Trump is experiencing) had she NOT won the popular vote.......

Again, why is majority in congress sacrosanct, but not in presidential elections?

You accuse people of not graduating middle school and yet you continue to show your ignorance on how and why the constitution was structured the way it was (and is).

 

[Redfish]

Interesting? nope, constitutional.

So, following that logic, you APPROVE of a federal judge placing a block on the Trumpster's ban on Muslim based on its UN-constitutionality, correct?

If your premise was valid, yes. But its not. Nothing in the EO is unconstitutional. That ruling will be overturned.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I know. If the hildebeast had won the EC, they would be ranting about how wonderful it is.

So far, in GWB and the Trumpster, its been the EC to bail your asses out to win the oval office, but NOT the popular vote....Interesting,isn't it?

Not at all.

GBW also had a majority in congress.....

Which he increased in 2002 going against history.

And together they threw away great opportunities to do some really good things and instead chose to involve this country is some very stupid wars.

Obama wins in 2008, big time.

In 2010, the country (in a massive blowout) takes the house away from hm and weakens the senate which they eventually take from him in 2014.

So, how is it that you somehow think the popular vote is the only reflection of what this country wants ?