When is the time to talk about gun violence?

[jc456]

no it hasn't. You haven't provided one place that has eliminated guns. you tried with Japan, but that ain't so, so take 2.

Japan is a good as it gets. If the US was that good there would be five gun deaths a year here. Perfectly acceptable, if you aren't some unreasonable asshole in love with deadly toys like you that is.

well then you haven't proven your statement. Again. The OP information remember? So your plan fails, so back to the drawing board for you.

Two deaths per year for 127 million people and dumbfuck here says gun control doesn't work. Fuck I hate Americans, dumb as dog shit.

If it worked there'd be zero. So, you fail again in yet another attempt to prove that two deaths are less than zero. LOL.

You are a total fucking moron. Should we not fly in planes because on crashes here or there? How about no laws limiting the speed cars travel at because people still disobey? What a useless fucking idiot you are. Get out of my damn country.

oh, oh, oh, hell man yes, there are speed limit laws. How many people you supposed on the road actually follow the legal speed limit? Let's take a small sample size say 100. How many of 100 cars go faster than the speed limit per hour? My guess from my own experience 100%. Including me. So 100% of people disobey speed limit laws daily. friggn daily. BTW, the OP was about gun legislation, you still haven't given any.

Oh, oh, I almost forgot remember 911, those weren't guns and the bad guys used box cutters. No gun at all, how many perished friend? your argument stands flat on its face.

 

[BULLDOG]

Like I said, I have guns.

Even if true, it doesn't change the fact that you only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

That is a pretty broad statement. What do you base it on?

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.
#27 Again, The discussion is about Gun Violence. The NRA supported the ban on studying gun violence.
#31. Again, the thread is about discussing gun violence. Gun nuts want some sort of gift to even discuss it. Well before any plans are put forward.
#46 again, inherently relevant.
#57 see 31
All those posts were not within in two pages
Just because rush told you to use that phrase doesn't mean it's appropriate.

 

[jc456]

Want to stop 99.9999% of gun murders?
Very simple.
Assemble ten thousand NG and do a house by house sweep of every inner city shithole in the country. Literally no stone left unturned.
Tens of thousands of illegal handguns will be confiscated.
Pass a Federal law stating anyone found in possession of an illegal handgun will be sentenced to twenty years in Federal prison. The prisons to be located in Death Valley Nevada. No excuses. No 'appeal'. Just a one way trip to your fucking tent in the desert. Temp. averaging 130 F.
Don't worry. The inner city murder rate won't go down.
The Tree Dwellers will just murder each other with hatchets.

Hey,,Now here you go, this could work!!!!!!!!! Still ain't going to get the nut job crazies though.

True. There will always be crazies.
But at least the inner city negro shit holes run by fucking LIBs won't be kept awake all night listening gun fire and wondering if their 'young negro' grandson has just been shot.

I'm in complete agreement. And if those libs, the ones who own control of the inner cities, actually wanted to stop violence your ideas would be enforced. I've said it I don't know how many times. I live the suburbs of Chicago, and the nightly news there is always someone shot in the inner city. NIGHTLY!!

 

[Dan Daly]

I'm afraid of nothing, but I sometimes have to kill living things.

I'm sorry you stepped on that ant. Tissue?

Nobody is buying your bullshit, Walter Mitty...cept maybe you.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Even if true, it doesn't change the fact that you only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

That is a pretty broad statement. What do you base it on?

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.

Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

 

[Dan Daly]

No, they were as dumb as you, with your faith in God and Guns.

Which made them smarter than you then, Walter Mitty.

Yeah, they died so smartly. Dumbfucks here, total dumbfucks.

and your fate will be the same...only faster. If I could I would slow it down so I could enjoy it, but oh well, I probably won't have time to get over there before some MZB makes you his bitch and goes all necrophiliac on you.

Once dead I couldn't care less. Dead is dead, little Christian, even for you until Jesus returns, and he's almost 2,000 years overdue.

I'm not exactly holding my breath waiting for him cupcake. Whatever little Walter Mitty vision of me that you have in your mind, you best rethink it. You do make me laugh though...but little Walter Mittys usually do.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Japan is a good as it gets. If the US was that good there would be five gun deaths a year here. Perfectly acceptable, if you aren't some unreasonable asshole in love with deadly toys like you that is.

well then you haven't proven your statement. Again. The OP information remember? So your plan fails, so back to the drawing board for you.

Two deaths per year for 127 million people and dumbfuck here says gun control doesn't work. Fuck I hate Americans, dumb as dog shit.

If it worked there'd be zero. So, you fail again in yet another attempt to prove that two deaths are less than zero. LOL.

You are a total fucking moron. Should we not fly in planes because on crashes here or there? How about no laws limiting the speed cars travel at because people still disobey? What a useless fucking idiot you are. Get out of my damn country.

oh, oh, oh, hell man yes, there are speed limit laws. I how many people you supposed on the road actually follow the legal speed limit. Let's take a small sample size say 100. How many of 100 cars go faster than the speed limit per hour? My guess from my own experience 100%. Including me. So 100% of people disobey speed limit laws daily. friggn daily. BTW< the OP was about gun legislation, you still haven't given any.

Oh, oh, I almost forgot remember 911, those weren't guns and the bad guys used box cutters. No gun at all, how many perished friend? your argument stands flat on its face.

I'm done your childish bullshit. Two die a year by a gun violence in a nation of 127 million and you say gun control doesn't work. You're a moron on the level of that drooler Palin gave birth to, the one any reasonable woman would have aborted.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No, they were as dumb as you, with your faith in God and Guns.

Which made them smarter than you then, Walter Mitty.

Yeah, they died so smartly. Dumbfucks here, total dumbfucks.

and your fate will be the same...only faster. If I could I would slow it down so I could enjoy it, but oh well, I probably won't have time to get over there before some MZB makes you his bitch and goes all necrophiliac on you.

Once dead I couldn't care less. Dead is dead, little Christian, even for you until Jesus returns, and he's almost 2,000 years overdue.

I'm not exactly holding my breath waiting for him cupcake. Whatever little Walter Mitty vision of me that you have in your mind, you best rethink it. You do make me laugh though...but little Walter Mittys usually do.

If you don't believe in God then that's the first reasonable and mature thing I've seen you post.

 

[Dan Daly]

Which made them smarter than you then, Walter Mitty.

Yeah, they died so smartly. Dumbfucks here, total dumbfucks.

and your fate will be the same...only faster. If I could I would slow it down so I could enjoy it, but oh well, I probably won't have time to get over there before some MZB makes you his bitch and goes all necrophiliac on you.

Once dead I couldn't care less. Dead is dead, little Christian, even for you until Jesus returns, and he's almost 2,000 years overdue.

I'm not exactly holding my breath waiting for him cupcake. Whatever little Walter Mitty vision of me that you have in your mind, you best rethink it. You do make me laugh though...but little Walter Mittys usually do.

If you don't believe in God then that's the first reasonable and mature thing I've seen you post.

The entire world is either black or white to you it seems, cupcake. Boy are you gonna have a rude surprise when you get the nerve to come up out of your mom's basement.

 

[jc456]

Even if true, it doesn't change the fact that you only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

That is a pretty broad statement. What do you base it on?

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.

accident due to texting while driving. Got that stat? Who do you supposed is more likely to die by that? young drivers. So outlaw cell phones. See how the crazy can go? i say put chips in cars that disable the phone while the engine is on. Crazy?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yeah, they died so smartly. Dumbfucks here, total dumbfucks.

and your fate will be the same...only faster. If I could I would slow it down so I could enjoy it, but oh well, I probably won't have time to get over there before some MZB makes you his bitch and goes all necrophiliac on you.

Once dead I couldn't care less. Dead is dead, little Christian, even for you until Jesus returns, and he's almost 2,000 years overdue.

I'm not exactly holding my breath waiting for him cupcake. Whatever little Walter Mitty vision of me that you have in your mind, you best rethink it. You do make me laugh though...but little Walter Mittys usually do.

If you don't believe in God then that's the first reasonable and mature thing I've seen you post.

The entire world is either black or white to you it seems, cupcake. Boy are you gonna have a rude surprise when you get the nerve to come up out of your mom's basement.

Nope, the entire would is gray, and a fucking mess due to people like you. As for mom, she was dead decades ago, asswipe.

 

[jc456]

well then you haven't proven your statement. Again. The OP information remember? So your plan fails, so back to the drawing board for you.

Two deaths per year for 127 million people and dumbfuck here says gun control doesn't work. Fuck I hate Americans, dumb as dog shit.

If it worked there'd be zero. So, you fail again in yet another attempt to prove that two deaths are less than zero. LOL.

You are a total fucking moron. Should we not fly in planes because on crashes here or there? How about no laws limiting the speed cars travel at because people still disobey? What a useless fucking idiot you are. Get out of my damn country.

oh, oh, oh, hell man yes, there are speed limit laws. I how many people you supposed on the road actually follow the legal speed limit. Let's take a small sample size say 100. How many of 100 cars go faster than the speed limit per hour? My guess from my own experience 100%. Including me. So 100% of people disobey speed limit laws daily. friggn daily. BTW< the OP was about gun legislation, you still haven't given any.

Oh, oh, I almost forgot remember 911, those weren't guns and the bad guys used box cutters. No gun at all, how many perished friend? your argument stands flat on its face.

I'm done your childish bullshit. Two die a year by a gun violence in a nation of 127 million and you say gun control doesn't work. You're a moron on the level of that drooler Palin gave birth to, the one any reasonable woman would have aborted.

ask anyone, if one person dies it's one too many. well it's two. You fail!!!! I'm sorry your feelings are hurt at that reality, but it is in complete line with what I've said to the OP's question.

 

[jc456]

and your fate will be the same...only faster. If I could I would slow it down so I could enjoy it, but oh well, I probably won't have time to get over there before some MZB makes you his bitch and goes all necrophiliac on you.

Once dead I couldn't care less. Dead is dead, little Christian, even for you until Jesus returns, and he's almost 2,000 years overdue.

I'm not exactly holding my breath waiting for him cupcake. Whatever little Walter Mitty vision of me that you have in your mind, you best rethink it. You do make me laugh though...but little Walter Mittys usually do.

If you don't believe in God then that's the first reasonable and mature thing I've seen you post.

The entire world is either black or white to you it seems, cupcake. Boy are you gonna have a rude surprise when you get the nerve to come up out of your mom's basement.

Nope, the entire would is gray, and a fucking mess due to people like you. As for mom, she was dead decades ago, asswipe.

OP statement, guns. You looking in the mirror there are ya? Funny stuff my man. want some crackers for your whine?

 

[jc456]

Even if true, it doesn't change the fact that you only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

That is a pretty broad statement. What do you base it on?

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.
#27 Again, The discussion is about Gun Violence. The NRA supported the ban on studying gun violence.
#31. Again, the thread is about discussing gun violence. Gun nuts want some sort of gift to even discuss it. Well before any plans are put forward.
#46 again, inherently relevant.
#57 see 31
All those posts were not within in two pages
Just because rush told you to use that phrase doesn't mean it's appropriate.

and again s0n gun violence will never be stopped as long as a gun exists. And, I highly doubt no country or person will ever be gun free. The OPs questions are unrealistic to debate who should have a gun. And I've explained quite a lot in this thread why. Now you have anything that you have that can overturn any of what I've posted I'm listening. So far I've debunked everything you've thrown out.

 

[BULLDOG]

That is a pretty broad statement. What do you base it on?

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.

accident due to texting while driving. Got that stat? Who do you supposed is more likely to die by that? young drivers. So outlaw cell phones. See how the crazy can go? i say put chips in cars that disable the phone while the engine is on. Crazy?

Texting is certainly one of the ways, but I'm talking about all deaths in cars by people under 26 years. All of them weren't texting.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

You fucking jackass, you do not punish innocent people for a crime they had nothing to do with by stripping them of a constitutional right. All of you on the left can go suck it!

 

[BULLDOG]

That is a pretty broad statement. What do you base it on?

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.
#27 Again, The discussion is about Gun Violence. The NRA supported the ban on studying gun violence.
#31. Again, the thread is about discussing gun violence. Gun nuts want some sort of gift to even discuss it. Well before any plans are put forward.
#46 again, inherently relevant.
#57 see 31
All those posts were not within in two pages
Just because rush told you to use that phrase doesn't mean it's appropriate.

and again s0n gun violence will never be stopped as long as a gun exists. And, I highly doubt no country or person will ever be gun free. The OPs questions are unrealistic to debate who should have a gun. And I've explained quite a lot in this thread why. Now you have anything that you have that can overturn any of what I've posted I'm listening. So far I've debunked everything you've thrown out.

You've debunked nothing. All you've done is repeat standard gun nut claims.

 

[westwall]

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.
#27 Again, The discussion is about Gun Violence. The NRA supported the ban on studying gun violence.
#31. Again, the thread is about discussing gun violence. Gun nuts want some sort of gift to even discuss it. Well before any plans are put forward.
#46 again, inherently relevant.
#57 see 31
All those posts were not within in two pages
Just because rush told you to use that phrase doesn't mean it's appropriate.

and again s0n gun violence will never be stopped as long as a gun exists. And, I highly doubt no country or person will ever be gun free. The OPs questions are unrealistic to debate who should have a gun. And I've explained quite a lot in this thread why. Now you have anything that you have that can overturn any of what I've posted I'm listening. So far I've debunked everything you've thrown out.

You've debunked nothing. All you've done is repeat standard gun nut claims.

And all you spout are irrational, anti gun talking points.

 

[BULLDOG]

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.
#27 Again, The discussion is about Gun Violence. The NRA supported the ban on studying gun violence.
#31. Again, the thread is about discussing gun violence. Gun nuts want some sort of gift to even discuss it. Well before any plans are put forward.
#46 again, inherently relevant.
#57 see 31
All those posts were not within in two pages
Just because rush told you to use that phrase doesn't mean it's appropriate.

and again s0n gun violence will never be stopped as long as a gun exists. And, I highly doubt no country or person will ever be gun free. The OPs questions are unrealistic to debate who should have a gun. And I've explained quite a lot in this thread why. Now you have anything that you have that can overturn any of what I've posted I'm listening. So far I've debunked everything you've thrown out.

You've debunked nothing. All you've done is repeat standard gun nut claims.

And all you spout are irrational, anti gun talking points.

That's interesting.

 

[jc456]

I can prove it just from your posts in this thread.

Oh please amaze me.

Easily. both in terms of simplicity in proving my claim and the level of effort required to amaze you.

Post # 21:
More young people die from guns than die from cars. What other type of violence kills as many of our young people as gun violence?
Appeal to emotion, begging the question. Red herring

Post # 27
I avoided nothing. Why is the NRA afraid to even study what might or might not work to prevent so many deaths?
Argument form dishonesty, red herring

Post #31
Why would anybody need to be given anything before they even consider trying to reduce senseless deaths?
Begging the question, red herring

Post #46
You happy with this chart?
Avoidance of the question, red herring.

Post #57
What kind of scum demands a gift before they agree to reduce senseless deaths?
Appeal to emotion, red herring

All this in just the first 2 pages.

#21
Concern about gun deaths which are more common for young people than car deaths is a perfectly valid point, especially since the subject is gun violence.

accident due to texting while driving. Got that stat? Who do you supposed is more likely to die by that? young drivers. So outlaw cell phones. See how the crazy can go? i say put chips in cars that disable the phone while the engine is on. Crazy?

Texting is certainly one of the ways, but I'm talking about all deaths in cars by people under 26 years. All of them weren't texting.

I know, some are illegal drinking with friends in the car and they all died. Distractions with looking for things in glove boxes believe it or not. weather conditions like fog, happened near my house kids from Aurora, IL football night. hit a semi. Happens almost weekly around me. Please don't minimize the fatalities of these poor young people. Hell even the last two to three weeks three high school football players died after a hit on the field. Crazy people will always exist, and if they wish death to someone, they will do their damnedest to fullfill their rage.