When The Public is Disarmed, This is What They Get Instead

[Rustic]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

I'm not certain but you seem to me to be not very bright, obsessed with guns and rowing with one oar in the water. It's no wonder someone like you (I very much hope there are not many like you this side of ISIS) is opposed to background checks.

What do you mean by background checks?

 

[Brain357]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

 

[Rustic]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

Criminals do not need permission from their guns to commit to criminal activity… to think so that's just silly.

 

[Brain357]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

Criminals do not need permission from their guns to commit to criminal activity… to think so that's just silly.

We have the most guns. According to your claim we should have the least crime. We do not. Many countries with few guns have much less crime. Many states with fewer guns have less crime. Stop spreading lies.

 

[Rustic]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

Criminals do not need permission from their guns to commit to criminal activity… to think so that's just silly.

We have the most guns. According to your claim we should have the least crime. We do not. Many countries with few guns have much less crime. Many states with fewer guns have less crime. Stop spreading lies.

Most of the crime in this country is done without the aid of guns… Dumbass

 

[Mr Natural]

And you really think that if it comes to that, you're going to able to hold off government forces with whatever arms and ammo you have stashed away in your gun locker?

Dream on.

 

[Rustic]

And you really think that if it comes to that, you're going to able to hold off government forces with whatever arms and ammo you have stashed away in your gun locker?

Dream on.

The military/police will always back the second amendment before and over a Tyrannical federal government. Shit for brains

 

[Brain357]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

Criminals do not need permission from their guns to commit to criminal activity… to think so that's just silly.

We have the most guns. According to your claim we should have the least crime. We do not. Many countries with few guns have much less crime. Many states with fewer guns have less crime. Stop spreading lies.

Most of the crime in this country is done without the aid of guns… Dumbass

You said more guns in lawful hands less crime. We have the most guns in lawful hands in the world and yet not the lowest crime rates. Your claim is false.

 

[Brain357]

And you really think that if it comes to that, you're going to able to hold off government forces with whatever arms and ammo you have stashed away in your gun locker?

Dream on.

The military/police will always back the second amendment before and over a Tyrannical federal government. Shit for brains

Then we don't need to worry about the military killing civilians.

 

[Rustic]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

Criminals do not need permission from their guns to commit to criminal activity… to think so that's just silly.

We have the most guns. According to your claim we should have the least crime. We do not. Many countries with few guns have much less crime. Many states with fewer guns have less crime. Stop spreading lies.

Most of the crime in this country is done without the aid of guns… Dumbass

You said more guns in lawful hands less crime. We have the most guns in lawful hands in the world and yet not the lowest crime rates. Your claim is false.

Far more criminal behavior/violence is done without the aid of firearms here and abroad. Dumbass

 

[Rustic]

And you really think that if it comes to that, you're going to able to hold off government forces with whatever arms and ammo you have stashed away in your gun locker?

Dream on.

The military/police will always back the second amendment before and over a Tyrannical federal government. Shit for brains

Then we don't need to worry about the military killing civilians.

No, they will never back the career politicians in Washington. That's not their job.

 

[Mr Natural]

The military/police will always back the second amendment before and over a Tyrannical federal government. Shit for brains

They'll do whatever they're ordered to do.

Asshole.

 

[Rustic]

The military/police will always back the second amendment before and over a Tyrannical federal government. Shit for brains

They'll do whatever they're ordered to do.

Asshole.

Turn against their own population? I don't think so... fuck face
Lol

 

[Wry Catcher]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

I'm not certain but you seem to me to be not very bright, obsessed with guns and rowing with one oar in the water. It's no wonder someone like you (I very much hope there are not many like you this side of ISIS) is opposed to background checks.

What do you mean by background checks?

In your case, the MMPI. For most others, an FBI and all State/local jurisdiction check of all criminal and civil records, all arrests and detentions (civil or criminal), all court injunctions, a credit check and confidential reports from a current and past spouse(s) or SO's. Disclosure of all sealed records as to the nature of the sealed record, when and where that action took place and the nature of the event which was sealed. The address of all places the person seeking a gun has lived and a list of all foreign travel. All of which to be provided under oath and penalty of perjury.

Any omission of material facts would be flagged in a national data base and make any sale, loan or other method of providing a gun to said individual a felony.

 

[Brain357]

That is funny. The US has by far the most guns. Why do so many unarmed countries have lower crime rates?

Criminals do not need permission from their guns to commit to criminal activity… to think so that's just silly.

We have the most guns. According to your claim we should have the least crime. We do not. Many countries with few guns have much less crime. Many states with fewer guns have less crime. Stop spreading lies.

Most of the crime in this country is done without the aid of guns… Dumbass

You said more guns in lawful hands less crime. We have the most guns in lawful hands in the world and yet not the lowest crime rates. Your claim is false.

Far more criminal behavior/violence is done without the aid of firearms here and abroad. Dumbass

So you continue to babble nonsense.

 

[Brain357]

The military/police will always back the second amendment before and over a Tyrannical federal government. Shit for brains

They'll do whatever they're ordered to do.

Asshole.

Turn against their own population? I don't think so... fuck face
Lol

Well turning against the population is the point of the OP. I'm glad you agree with us they would never do that.

 

[Mr Natural]

Well turning against the population is the point of the OP. I'm glad you agree with us they would never do that.

He seems just a bit too stupid to figure that one out.

 

[2aguy]

---------------------------------------------- yeah , but that was years earlier . My example still applies . A disarmed people are easy to make mincemeat of Brian . See 'pol pot' in cmbodia or cannibal 'idid amin' in Uganda . [think that it was Uganda]

Not very many years. Losing a world war is kind of a big deal.

The disarmed are going way more years without guns...

You are insulting our military and suggesting they would kill civilians?

Lol, idiot, some of them have ALREADY killed civilians; collateral damage, and most of the terrorists are not in a regular military force hence are civilians.

You're a typical self-proclaimed 'brain'; more full of irony than descriptive.

Please share examples of the US military killing US civilians.

Wounded knee, Mai Lai.......and I actually support the U.S. mIlitary.........Waco.....but that was the police..the other group you want to have weapons....

At wounded knee they were not US citizens. Waco was police and criminals.

Waco.....they were suspects and not convicted....and the children......they were criminals?

 

[2aguy]

They have found a tunnel dug by hand at Ponar.

When you are disarmed by the government, digging your way out of death camps is your final state before they kill you, at least this is the result of such gun grabbing fascism in the 20th century.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/science/holocaust-ponar-tunnel-lithuania.html?_r=0

A team of archaeologists and mapmakers say they have uncovered a forgotten tunnel that 80 Jews dug largely by hand as they tried to escape from a Nazi extermination site in Lithuania about 70 years ago.

The Lithuanian site, Ponar, holds mass burial pits and graves where up to 100,000 people were killed and their bodies dumped or burned during the Holocaust.

Using radar and radio waves to scan beneath the ground, the researchers found the tunnel, a 100-foot passageway between five and nine feet below the surface, the team announced on Wednesday.

A previous attempt made by a different team in 2004 to find the underground structure had only located its mouth, which was subsequently left unmarked. The new finding traces the tunnel from entrance to exit and provides evidence to support survivor accounts of the harrowing effort to escape the holding pit.

Who, besides you and others similar to you, are seeking to disarm the public?

You and I are on the opposite sides in the debate, you can find no post I've made which even suggests I support such an extreme action.

Your side wants more guns, and more guns in the hands of more people, and only after a person commits an atrocious act, are they to be relieved of their gun.

No.....moron.....we want normal, law abiding people to be able to own and carry guns for their own self defense.....and only after someone commits an actual crime....then they should be arrested, not before......yes...you loved stalin and the police state...but this is the United States where you are presumed innocent until proven guilty...you authoritarian ass.....

 

[Brain357]

Not very many years. Losing a world war is kind of a big deal.

The disarmed are going way more years without guns...

You are insulting our military and suggesting they would kill civilians?

Lol, idiot, some of them have ALREADY killed civilians; collateral damage, and most of the terrorists are not in a regular military force hence are civilians.

You're a typical self-proclaimed 'brain'; more full of irony than descriptive.

Please share examples of the US military killing US civilians.

Wounded knee, Mai Lai.......and I actually support the U.S. mIlitary.........Waco.....but that was the police..the other group you want to have weapons....

At wounded knee they were not US citizens. Waco was police and criminals.

Waco.....they were suspects and not convicted....and the children......they were criminals?

It wasn't the military. They were given a heck of a long time to surrender. Had they surrendered nobody would have been hurt. Completely different than the nazis. You are weak on crime now?