Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
didn't clinton ban them, semi automatic rifles, once before for 10 yrs.... and under bush2 let it expire?We made it a law you can't drive over 70mph and we're gonna make it a law you can't own an AR-15.why? cause you say so? LOL. why do they make a motor car that can go 160 miles and hour and the speed limits are all under 80? Oh, and some can go two hundred miles an hour if you spend the money.
Maybe. There are already Court rulings that make that unlikely however. We shall see.
didn't clinton ban them, semi automatic rifles, once before for 10 yrs.... and under bush2 let it expire?We made it a law you can't drive over 70mph and we're gonna make it a law you can't own an AR-15.why? cause you say so? LOL. why do they make a motor car that can go 160 miles and hour and the speed limits are all under 80? Oh, and some can go two hundred miles an hour if you spend the money.
Maybe. There are already Court rulings that make that unlikely however. We shall see.
Corporations are the biggest reason we can't get any legislation passed on behalf of the majority of Americans. One in particular, the NRA, has a lot to do with something.Corporations have nothing to do with anything.
Okay, have it your way. We need to ban all assault rifles. Period.Most of those "assault rifles" I listed were made in other countries, as far back as the 1940's. All easily available and for the same price as a high-end AR-15.
We've been importing them into this country for decades, and you can find any of them at most gun shows or gun shops. You can even buy them online from the gunbroker or other online auction sites, provided that you do the legal BATFE transfer, which costs about 20-30 bucks.
The left seems to be morbidly-fixated on the AR-15 for some strange reason, but there are far more other semi-auto rifles out there. Millions and millions and millions of them
Country's with gun control have lower homicide rates.Yep. They were banned but had a sunset clause. The crime rate stayed the same whether they were legal or not, and the whole original argument for their control was found to be false. That's why the ban was allowed to expire.
Corporations are the biggest reason we can't get any legislation passed on behalf of the majority of Americans. One in particular, the NRA, has a lot to do with something.Corporations have nothing to do with anything.
Okay, have it your way. We need to ban all assault rifles. Period.Most of those "assault rifles" I listed were made in other countries, as far back as the 1940's. All easily available and for the same price as a high-end AR-15.
We've been importing them into this country for decades, and you can find any of them at most gun shows or gun shops. You can even buy them online from the gunbroker or other online auction sites, provided that you do the legal BATFE transfer, which costs about 20-30 bucks.
The left seems to be morbidly-fixated on the AR-15 for some strange reason, but there are far more other semi-auto rifles out there. Millions and millions and millions of them
I going to venture a guess that you don't have the foggiest idea how much (illegal alien) voter fraud occurs.
I'll also guess that it occurs enough to swing electoral votes in some states (including California, with 55 electoral votes)
That being said, don't look for any serious firearms legislation to happen soon. Anything that does get passed will only be a "feel-good" measure. There are more than 10 million AR-15s in this country right now. Even a higher number of AK-47s, M1 Garands and carbines, Ruger Mini-14s, Russian Dragunovs, SKS's, FN FAL's, Egyptian Hakim rifles, H&K G3's, MAS 49's, M-14s, Norinco SVD's, Tokarev SVT-38's, German Gewehr 43's, and about 20 other semi-automatic rifles I can't think or right now, that take high-capacity magazines. Millions and millions of them in this country and most all owned by legal gun owners.
You seriously have no clue of how your idiotic idea of a "ban" sounds.
That's a fair question. When I watched parts of the rallies on Saturday, I never heard one word about Nikolas Cruz, about the repeated failures of the local police, about the several failures of the FBI, about the cowardice of the policeman at the school, about the local program that discouraged the police from arresting Cruz for his numerous infractions, about the failure of the legal guardian. Nope. It was just guns, guns, and guns.
the mass shootings were reduced from the 10 years before the ban and the 10 years after the ban was pulled back, vs the ban period....didn't clinton ban them, semi automatic rifles, once before for 10 yrs.... and under bush2 let it expire?We made it a law you can't drive over 70mph and we're gonna make it a law you can't own an AR-15.why? cause you say so? LOL. why do they make a motor car that can go 160 miles and hour and the speed limits are all under 80? Oh, and some can go two hundred miles an hour if you spend the money.
Maybe. There are already Court rulings that make that unlikely however. We shall see.
Yep. They were banned but had a sunset clause. The crime rate stayed the same whether they were legal or not, and the whole original argument for their control was found to be false. That's why the ban was allowed to expire.
so are you saying people don't go over 70 miles and hour? everyone drives at or under that speed. Really, you're gonna tell the class how no one does now right?We made it a law you can't drive over 70mph and we're gonna make it a law you can't own an AR-15.why? cause you say so? LOL. why do they make a motor car that can go 160 miles and hour and the speed limits are all under 80? Oh, and some can go two hundred miles an hour if you spend the money.
so you have none I see. thanks.Several. Start a thread and I'll post a few of them.it does? based on what statistic?
but they don't have a 2nd amendment. go live there and exercise your idiocy there.Country's with gun control have lower homicide rates.Yep. They were banned but had a sunset clause. The crime rate stayed the same whether they were legal or not, and the whole original argument for their control was found to be false. That's why the ban was allowed to expire.
nor did you hear from someone not attached to the planned parenthood agenda. Meadow's brother was denied the opportunity to talk. They wanted him to provide his speech first. hahahaahahahahaaha one sided propaganda event that failed. Nice Cuban flag on the one parkland kid. where was the american flag? if you don't see the agenda, then you're about to lose your rights, your first amendment right. They will control the flow of information. just remember this is about control, not save the schools. Why was no teacher or representative from any school there? why Miley Cyrus stupid ass? the same old same old barking pukes barking and barking and saying absolutely nothing.That's a fair question. When I watched parts of the rallies on Saturday, I never heard one word about Nikolas Cruz, about the repeated failures of the local police, about the several failures of the FBI, about the cowardice of the policeman at the school, about the local program that discouraged the police from arresting Cruz for his numerous infractions, about the failure of the legal guardian. Nope. It was just guns, guns, and guns.
I asked you a question. You going to answer it? Yes or no?There is no conversation. Are you serious? You think there is a conversation about rsheridiot saying anything he disagrees with is an NRA talking point? What sort of discussion is possible there
well I wrote that because basically I don't get responses. I will update that from now on and state if he responds it will be nonsense and not directed at the question asked. Either way, you still didn't answer my question. maybe you can extend this thread with more nonsense with avoidance.I answered the question in a response to another poster. You know what is stupid? Making comments that are not based on anything, like "...bet he won't respond..."you didn't answer my question. all you did was say something stupid. It is a response however, so you got me. it was nonsense and made no sense, but hey. you responded. ouch.
Because if it was based on something, like my prior history on this board, you'd see I don't dodge jack shit. You ask me a direct question and I give you a direct answer.
look at the fool demanding an answer and doesn't do it himself. are you a hypocrite? yes you are.I asked you a question. You going to answer it? Yes or no?There is no conversation. Are you serious? You think there is a conversation about rsheridiot saying anything he disagrees with is an NRA talking point? What sort of discussion is possible there
huh? more nonsense I see. wtf was that rant about?Because they were sick of us bombing the shit out of their neighborhoods and giving unconditional support to Israel. You need to start the clock in the right spot.so curious, because it hasn't happened at your house, it hasn't happened? is that what you're going with?
LOL. can't make this shit up. Shit dude, a guy took a box knife onto a plane and flew the plane into a building. in fact, that happened three times in the same day!.
tell the dems to stay away then.I'd rather have them on my lawn than the KKK.Did they ride in on motorcycles? Should I have been there with my assault weapon?
Did you have a point at all?
Well, soon you're not going to own them, or be in violation of the law.I have several of them. Do I need a "reason"?
No I don't need a reason. I own them because I can and well, because fuck you.
