Which of Your Rights Will They Go After....

[PoliticalChic]

"It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content

Getting the picture?

It’s a free speech killer.

This is what the Democratic Party has become — intolerant fascists.


It all goes back to what actor James Woods said months ago.
“Scratch a liberal, find a fascist.”
It Begins: California Senator Introduces Bill to Kill Free Speech, Requires State-Sanctioned Fact Checkers to Approve Online Content

 

[PoliticalChic]

"The dean of the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law is defending protesters who disrupted a speaking event by aggressively heckling a conservative professor.

As previously reported by Campus Reform, Josh Blackman, a law professor from the South Texas College of Law Houston, was invited to speak on “the importance of free speech” by the CUNY Federalist Society.

"I was not able to give the presentation I wanted—both in terms of duration and content—because of the hecklers. The Dean is simply incorrect when said the protest was only ‘limited.’" Tweet This



When Blackman arrived, however, he was met with protesters who prevented him from speaking for the first eight minutes of his speech, shouting things like “legal objectivity is a myth” and “he’s a white supremacist.”

[RELATED: Black conservative shouted down for speaking ‘against own people’]

While an administrator told the protesters at the time that the the university’s rules state that “you may not keep anyone from speaking,” CUNY Law Dean Mary Lu Bilek took a much laxer tone in an email to Inside Higher Ed, saying that the relatively short duration of the protest made it acceptable."
Law school dean: Disrupting free speech event was free speech

 

[Some Guy]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

 

[Humorme]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

 

[Humorme]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

How can you ask for a link when you're one of those who does it? BTW, I just now responded to a PM telling me that you were good people and to look over the things you said to me.

That much I will do, but the problem exists; and your strategies are still wrong.

 

[Pop23]

.....first.

1. Based on the recent massacre, and the full-court press by the Left, ....
"Over a Third of Democrats Would Repeal Second Amendment
More than a third of the Democratic party would do away with the Second Amendment, a survey by The Economist and YouGov revealed."
Repeal the Second Amendment? Almost Half of Democrats Say Yes | National Review

....one might think that your right to bear arms is first on their list.


Nay, nay......not so.




2. First on the list for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


3. With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech





Again???

"it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."


Here....Fredo Cuomo:



Fredo….I’m not stupid like everybody says….I’m smart.





For the Founders, for Conservatives, for classical liberals.....and for Americans....there is no such thing as
"hate speech."

There is only speech.

And the Liberals are about chipping away at what you can say.

/----/ Chris Cuomo is just trying to be relevant and earn street creds with the DNC.
View attachment 185813

LOL, as if any of them could. Most would have a hard time taking candy from a baby.

What the signs should read is, "I'm a gutless wonder, I want someone else to take away your guns because Mommy wants me to clean up my room or no supper."

 

[Pop23]

Right now, Conservatives are attacking

A free press
The right to vote
The 14th amendment

Wrong.
Wrong.
And wrong.

Conservatives spit on our Constitution

You ARE NOT THE CONSTITUTION! And besides, even Libertarians spit on you and some of them are quite liberal

 

[PoliticalChic]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

How can you ask for a link when you're one of those who does it? BTW, I just now responded to a PM telling me that you were good people and to look over the things you said to me.

That much I will do, but the problem exists; and your strategies are still wrong.

I sent no PM


Examples of your claim?

 

[Humorme]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

How can you ask for a link when you're one of those who does it? BTW, I just now responded to a PM telling me that you were good people and to look over the things you said to me.

That much I will do, but the problem exists; and your strategies are still wrong.

I sent no PM


Examples of your claim?

I did not say you sent a PM. I said I responded to a PM telling me you were good people. This is some constructive criticism: Pay attention to what you're reading.

I cannot believe that you wasted all those walls of text attacking me when I said, I agree that we have an immigration issue, but the strategies and talking points you signed on to are NOT viable. Because I rejected the solutions, you've attacked me and said I was everything except a child of God.

The basic issue with jeopardizing someone else Rights is that you put your own in jeopardy.

 

[Some Guy]

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

Considering that every reasonable person that's paying attention knows that the political parties exist to serve themselves and not the public, i'm moreso referring to ordinary citizens or activists with those particular leanings. Generally, you see people on the left advocating for removal of rights as solutions. Too much money in politics? Campaign finance reform laws. Horrible person commits horrible act with a gun? Remove people's right to self preservation by taking away their guns completely agnostic of their own personal situation via gun control laws. Too many people saying stupid shit? Government shut-down of particular speech via hate speech laws. Not enough of a certain color people in a particular field? Government enforced hiring practices via affirmative action laws. People not making a lot of money? Government enforced compensation via minimum wage laws. Every "solution" is one that should instituted by force, punishable by fine or imprisonment by a powerful governning body. It's hilarious they call themselves "liberals" if you know where the word "liberal" is derived from.

People on the right have their problems and authoritarian leanings as well, but in general, you see less "you shouldn't be allowed to do that or else you go to jail" from regular people on the right than the left.

 

[Humorme]

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

Considering that every reasonable person that's paying attention knows that the political parties exist to serve themselves and not the public, i'm moreso referring to ordinary citizens or activists with those particular leanings. Generally, you see people on the left advocating for removal of rights as solutions. Too much money in politics? Campaign finance reform laws. Horrible person commits horrible act with a gun? Remove people's right to self preservation by taking away their guns completely agnostic of their own personal situation. Too many people saying stupid shit? Government shut-down of particular speech via hate speech laws. Not enough of a certain color people in a particular field? Government enforced hiring practices via affirmative action laws. People not making a lot of money? Government enforced compensation via minimum wage laws. Every "solution" is one that should instituted by force, punishable by fine or imprisonment. It's hilarious they call themselves "liberals" if you know where the word "liberal" is derived from.

People on the right have their problems and authoritarian leanings as well, but in general, you see less "you shouldn't be allowed to do that or else you go to jail" from people on the right than the left.

So, I agree with you for the most part. But, there is an issue that causes the right to do the same things you accuse the left of doing.

The left is more dangerous. I don't vote for Democrats. Their entire philosophy that more taxes, more government intervention and fewer Rights solves anything has been, historically, disproved so many times and on so many levels that only a dolt could not understand the idiocy of having a big government.

For that reason, I do not allow the right to get away with it. There are people, on the right that will accept a bigger and more intrusive government; a government so big it cannot ever be resisted; socialism, National Socialism... No Right is sacred if the government would do something for the right. But I will continue to call them on it.

 

[Some Guy]

So, I agree with you for the most part. But, there is an issue that causes the right to do the same things you accuse the left of doing.

The left is more dangerous. I don't vote for Democrats. Their entire philosophy that more taxes, more government intervention and fewer Rights solves anything has been, historically, disproved so many times and on so many levels that only a dolt could not understand the idiocy of having a big government.

For that reason, I do not allow the right to get away with it. There are people, on the right that will accept a bigger and more intrusive government; a government so big it cannot ever be resisted; socialism, National Socialism... No Right is sacred if the government would do something for the right. But I will continue to call them on it.

Yea, we're saying the same thing. I don't really believe in the single axis political spectrum so allow me to try to simply summarize what you're saying: authoritarianism in most any form is bad, whether it's coming from the "left" or the "right."

 

[Humorme]

Perfect summation

 

[PoliticalChic]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

How can you ask for a link when you're one of those who does it? BTW, I just now responded to a PM telling me that you were good people and to look over the things you said to me.

That much I will do, but the problem exists; and your strategies are still wrong.

I sent no PM


Examples of your claim?

I did not say you sent a PM. I said I responded to a PM telling me you were good people. This is some constructive criticism: Pay attention to what you're reading.

I cannot believe that you wasted all those walls of text attacking me when I said, I agree that we have an immigration issue, but the strategies and talking points you signed on to are NOT viable. Because I rejected the solutions, you've attacked me and said I was everything except a child of God.

The basic issue with jeopardizing someone else Rights is that you put your own in jeopardy.

"...you've attacked me and said I was everything except a child of God."


Link?

 

[Cecilie1200]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

Well, considering that people HAVING rights is the only problem there is, from the left's perspective, that would make sense.

 

[Cecilie1200]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

How can you ask for a link when you're one of those who does it? BTW, I just now responded to a PM telling me that you were good people and to look over the things you said to me.

That much I will do, but the problem exists; and your strategies are still wrong.

Did she "shout you down", or did she respond to you?

 

[Cecilie1200]

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

Considering that every reasonable person that's paying attention knows that the political parties exist to serve themselves and not the public, i'm moreso referring to ordinary citizens or activists with those particular leanings. Generally, you see people on the left advocating for removal of rights as solutions. Too much money in politics? Campaign finance reform laws. Horrible person commits horrible act with a gun? Remove people's right to self preservation by taking away their guns completely agnostic of their own personal situation. Too many people saying stupid shit? Government shut-down of particular speech via hate speech laws. Not enough of a certain color people in a particular field? Government enforced hiring practices via affirmative action laws. People not making a lot of money? Government enforced compensation via minimum wage laws. Every "solution" is one that should instituted by force, punishable by fine or imprisonment. It's hilarious they call themselves "liberals" if you know where the word "liberal" is derived from.

People on the right have their problems and authoritarian leanings as well, but in general, you see less "you shouldn't be allowed to do that or else you go to jail" from people on the right than the left.

So, I agree with you for the most part. But, there is an issue that causes the right to do the same things you accuse the left of doing.

The left is more dangerous. I don't vote for Democrats. Their entire philosophy that more taxes, more government intervention and fewer Rights solves anything has been, historically, disproved so many times and on so many levels that only a dolt could not understand the idiocy of having a big government.

For that reason, I do not allow the right to get away with it. There are people, on the right that will accept a bigger and more intrusive government; a government so big it cannot ever be resisted; socialism, National Socialism... No Right is sacred if the government would do something for the right. But I will continue to call them on it.

I'm curious as to specific examples of the right being willing to abrogate civil rights for a pet issue. Could you elaborate?

 

[Humorme]

There's no problem that the left can't solve by eliminating rights.

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

"...the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda."

Link?

How can you ask for a link when you're one of those who does it? BTW, I just now responded to a PM telling me that you were good people and to look over the things you said to me.

That much I will do, but the problem exists; and your strategies are still wrong.

Did she "shout you down", or did she respond to you?

I don't know that there is a difference, but the strategies she signed on to have a bad habit of making victims out of the people they promised to protect.

She was definitely wrong. Either of you can run a search on the immigration threads we participated in recently and clear it up.

 

[Humorme]

While I agree with you 100 percent, the problem is, the right will shout down anyone who says the least thing that contradicts their agenda.

For YEARS I told the right that I agree with them that we have an issue with immigration, but the policies they were supporting and the strategies they were using are counterproductive. You'd think somebody raped their ten year old daughter they way they go on and on. Adding insult to injury, I've never had even ONE of them to ask me what path they should be pursuing.

Eventually one side of the other will figure out what I'm talking about and appeal to those who do not get that opportunity to express themselves.

Considering that every reasonable person that's paying attention knows that the political parties exist to serve themselves and not the public, i'm moreso referring to ordinary citizens or activists with those particular leanings. Generally, you see people on the left advocating for removal of rights as solutions. Too much money in politics? Campaign finance reform laws. Horrible person commits horrible act with a gun? Remove people's right to self preservation by taking away their guns completely agnostic of their own personal situation. Too many people saying stupid shit? Government shut-down of particular speech via hate speech laws. Not enough of a certain color people in a particular field? Government enforced hiring practices via affirmative action laws. People not making a lot of money? Government enforced compensation via minimum wage laws. Every "solution" is one that should instituted by force, punishable by fine or imprisonment. It's hilarious they call themselves "liberals" if you know where the word "liberal" is derived from.

People on the right have their problems and authoritarian leanings as well, but in general, you see less "you shouldn't be allowed to do that or else you go to jail" from people on the right than the left.

So, I agree with you for the most part. But, there is an issue that causes the right to do the same things you accuse the left of doing.

The left is more dangerous. I don't vote for Democrats. Their entire philosophy that more taxes, more government intervention and fewer Rights solves anything has been, historically, disproved so many times and on so many levels that only a dolt could not understand the idiocy of having a big government.

For that reason, I do not allow the right to get away with it. There are people, on the right that will accept a bigger and more intrusive government; a government so big it cannot ever be resisted; socialism, National Socialism... No Right is sacred if the government would do something for the right. But I will continue to call them on it.

I'm curious as to specific examples of the right being willing to abrogate civil rights for a pet issue. Could you elaborate?

The so-called "Patriot Act," was introduced by the same anti-immigrant Tea Party Republican that introduced the National ID / REAL ID Act (under the pretext of identifying so - called "illegal aliens.") Those same half wits allowed the implementation of the Constitution Free Zone on the pretext it was needed in order to enforce border control. The anti-immigrant lobby supported SB 1070 that tried to nullify the presumption of innocence / innocent until proven guilty.

BEFORE the National ID / REAL ID Act was passed, getting a Socialist Surveillance Number ...ooops "Social Security Number" was a voluntary act. So many people were rescinding their numbers, it inspired my own Congressman to introduce legislation that would have repealed the 16th Amendment and got rid of the income tax AND the IRS.

The forced use of the SSN as National ID gave the left a pretext for keeping the IRS intact - and so the anti-immigrant lobby propped up a plank out of the Communist Manifesto while setting the constitutionalists so far back that such a term is no longer used in America.

I have a feeling, however, that you will never require those people to own the mistakes they made.