Asclepias
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
I already told you that I was not arguing. The Strawman mudwhistle made up was based on changing the definition of a word. My conclusions have more to do with the emotion displayed by the usage of the word "slut" and not any change to its meaning."Slut" was not prefixed with the word "Black" which is what he really wanted to say. I wasn't trying to make a case. I was pointing out my observance. Until its proven otherwise he is a racist."Slut" is a very harsh term which denotes extreme emotion. Since he doesnt know this 13 yr old personally and has no reason to be emotional about her one would have to question his choice of terminology and ask why that word? We know its because he is a racist. I wouldnt be surprised if this comes out later with concrete evidence to be honest.Yes we do. Words are more than just words.
Ummm... no, I don't think they are. I just got done spanking Mudwhistle for this, where he wanted to plug in words for Marian Robinson (Michelle O'bama's mom) that she never said. He couldn't quote it either.
Same thing here. You can't just plug in your own content to make things that aren't there.
NO, we do not "know" that at all. "Slut" is sexist -- not racist. You have no bridge to reach that conclusion.
Don't be surprised if it does come out later if you like, but as of now --- you got nothin'. We've all got to stop injecting "racist" every time a mosquito sneezes. You have no evidence, ergo you have no case.
NO, you just made that up as a Strawman. You do not get to do that. The argument "this is what he said but only I know what he really meant" is absolute fucking bullshit as argument.
mudwhistle check this out...
Try this test --
Take this exact same story and change the names of the kids. Two names you never heard of. Exact same tweets and comments, but you know nothing about the target, and you have no pictures of anybody. All the same words.
See racism now?
There you go.