Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 95,888
- 70,836
- 3,645
Simple, nominate 4 judges and have Kamala confirm all 5 with the tiebreaker. Write nice checks to any GOPers on the fence.And how would you propose to do this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Simple, nominate 4 judges and have Kamala confirm all 5 with the tiebreaker. Write nice checks to any GOPers on the fence.And how would you propose to do this?
No it has not. That's literally why the SCOTUS just had to rule on it.
Maybe someone else will try to answer.
The idea of presidential immunity gained significant media attention in recent years, as former officials from the Trump administration were subpoenaed in investigations by Congress. But, this legal doctrine dates back to the 1860s.
Gently disagree. It's a constitutional issue that SCOTUS addressed. The constitution gives the elected representatives of the people the ONLY power to prosecute a President in his official duties. The House indicts; the Senate convicts and removes from office.
This ruling protects Bill Clinton from prosecution for Black Hawk down, protects George W. Bush from prosecution for invading Afghanistan and Iraq, protects Obama from prosecution for sending pallets of cash to Iran, protects Biden from prosecution for allowing an invasion into our country, etc. etc. etc.
It requires the lower courts to adjudicate whether a Presidential act is official or private. If they get it wrong it can still eventually be for the high court to decide but it should at face value stop most of this nonsense going on.
President Trump was quite happy with the ruling by the way.
The tenth amendment is at play hereGently disagree. It's a constitutional issue that SCOTUS addressed. The constitution gives the elected representatives of the people the ONLY power to prosecute a President in his official duties. The House indicts; the Senate convicts and removes from office.
This ruling protects Bill Clinton from prosecution for Black Hawk down, protects George W. Bush from prosecution for invading Afghanistan and Iraq, protects Obama from prosecution for sending pallets of cash to Iran, protects Biden from prosecution for allowing an invasion into our country, etc. etc. etc.
It requires the lower courts to adjudicate whether a Presidential act is official or private. If they get it wrong it can still eventually be for the high court to decide but it should at face value stop most of this nonsense going on.
President Trump was quite happy with the ruling by the way.
You're schooling the equivalent of diseased livestock.SCOTUS gives three tiers:
- Core constitutional acts (absolute immunity)
- Official acts (presumptive immunity)
- Unofficial acts (no immunity)
The lower courts can muddle through that mess over the course of months and in the meantime Trump becomes POTUS again.
And then the cries of "he is just getting even" will rain down...I can understand folks for wanting to stop trump at any cost but only as long as they don't understand or realize what "any cost" really means, and for the ones who do understand what it means, shame on you!Trump will be tried and convicted.
One would hope the democrats learn from this and close ranks behind Biden.That's life. The framers of the US Constitution argued about meanings during the drafting, and after the ratification.
Sky’s the limitI wonder why this was not a big deal until the Unified Reich showed up.
Oh well. If he wins, it'll be interesting to see how much more he gets away with.
Getting Trump was purely political. And the fact that the Supreme Court had to get involved tells us how corrupted politics is and especially the Progressive Socialists. It's now pure spin, lies and cover stories. The Progs were on a roll in near everything as they kept ratching up the pressure on our nation. All of the stealth destruction they have done that cause pain and suffering for so many with the riots alone is demonic. When they came into the sunlight with Joe and the charges against Trump, we found out that the people doing so or involved are not that good.Neither are the ghost of our founding fathers.
You brought up abortion now you're moving away. Your surrender is not accepted.The idea that a president has any sort of immunity exists nowhere. The justices just created it out of nothing.
Massive hypocrisy all around.
You didn't think shit through did you? It's not nice or a good thing to weaponized the justice system. It's going to bite you in the ass next year.Neither are the ghost of our founding fathers.
Singular? which county?The county has had a no good, really fucking aweful, bad week
WTF?
Are they not, part of the world?None of this has anything to do with Russia. Stay on topic.
The constitution grants the president powers the rest of us do not enjoy.... official duty is all the court said today... this ends Smith's case
or in the least it pushes it way past the election when we will have new leadership at the DOJ...
Its over....
Biden lovers should know all about that....
It's a great day for democracy! Thank God for Trump and his Supreme Court selections, not always perfect but we are a democracy because of trump. Biden and the demo fascists going down in flamesNeither are the ghost of our founding fathers.
The Constitution gives authority to Congress (Article I, Section 2) to discipline a President in the President's official duties or failure to do his official duty and nobody else. You can't get around that with the 10th Amendment.The tenth amendment is at play here
Tenth Amendment
Tenth Amendment Explained
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
WTF?
Al-Awlaki wasn't murdered, he was in a war zone and not part of any relief efforts in Yemen.
It is a criminal offense under this section for a U.S. national to murder another U.S. national outside the United States, if the murder occurred within the jurisdiction of a foreign country.
A foreign national is: An individual who is: (1) not a citizen of the United States and (2) not lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20)); or. A foreign principal, as defined in 22 U.S.C.
View attachment 969995
Politico
https://www.politico.com › under-the-radar › 2012/11
Nov 28, 2012 — About six months before alleged Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula leader Anwar Al-Awlaki was killed in a drone strike in Yemen last year, ...
Are they not, part of the world?
The Constitution gives authority to Congress to discipline a President and nobody else. You can't get around that with the 10th Amendment.