Who Here Stands With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

some of their roads and some of their aqueducts, still work.

thank Goodness for a Corp of Engineers.

You haven't studied Roman History much, huh? Much of Rome's achievements came when it was a still a Republic. Some could argue that the fall of the Roman Republic is what led to its eventual demise. The numerous brutal Dictators that came later, were anything but 'kind generous' folks. They eventually bankrupted and destroyed Rome.
I believe the Russian historical version more than the right wing historical version.

Seriously, i have to ask, are you drunk or high already?
i smoke two joints, and then smoke two more; and the right wing still has nothing but fallacy.

Well, that explains your warped deluded thinking. In your Communist Economic 'Utopia', 2 + 2 = 5. Again, i blame your Government Schooling.
lol. see what I mean; you have only diversion which usually considered a fallacy, not any form of valid rebuttal to my economic argument.
 
An education and a good paying job is funny?? You must be a big government socialist.
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment, even if Everyone gets a Doctorate.
There is far more unemployment in a socialist state. Government doesn't make jobs. A free maket produces jobs.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Government can ensure full employment of resources by government fiat.
Now that's the dumbest post yet. What do they produce?
we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
Repeating an ignorant statement over and over again, makes you sound more dumb every time you do it.
 
It is funny that some newbie Congressional candidate has got the righties all in an uproar.

It is funny that leftists always want to insist that the right should just never notice them or talk about them.

On the other hand, if I said the kind of stupid shit AOC does, I'd be hoping no one would notice, too.
 
social democracy includes solving simple poverty; the left has solutions.
The left hardly has the solutions.
lol. just right wing gossip?

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
You are delusional if you think that is a solution.
i must be Right even though I am on the Left; since you have no argument for rebuttal.
 
No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.
People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?
Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.
Shed them where? The guy cooking the fries at Burger king hardly deserves $15 an hour. You wouldn't pay for the expensive services. Your little theory doesn't hold water.
We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

We need low wage jobs. For first time workers. For those with no/low skills.
Keeping them unemployed by boosting an arbitrary minimum wage does no one any favors.
No, management jobs for every high school grad/dropout!
 
Who Here Stands With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

Who here actually lives in the district and thus has a relevant opinion?

Let's see --- west coast 3000 miles away; Texas, 1500 miles away, Kansas City 1000 miles away. And oh yes a "Canadian" wink wink.

Good job there.

Who here is subject to the laws passed by Congress, for which she is running, and therefore has a relevant opinion?
 
social democracy includes solving simple poverty; the left has solutions.
The left hardly has the solutions.
lol. just right wing gossip?

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
You are delusional if you think that is a solution.
i must be Right even though I am on the Left; since you have no argument for rebuttal.

Your "idea" would greatly expand government spending and damage the economy.
 
No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.
People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?
Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.
Shed them where? The guy cooking the fries at Burger king hardly deserves $15 an hour. You wouldn't pay for the expensive services. Your little theory doesn't hold water.
We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

We need low wage jobs. For first time workers. For those with no/low skills.
Keeping them unemployed by boosting an arbitrary minimum wage does no one any favors.
Only in right wing fantasy, and only for the Bottom Line, not the People.

First World economies can Never compete on labor of the People, issues.

suck it up, right wingers.

for the People, not the Profit!
 
People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?
Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.
Shed them where? The guy cooking the fries at Burger king hardly deserves $15 an hour. You wouldn't pay for the expensive services. Your little theory doesn't hold water.
We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

We need low wage jobs. For first time workers. For those with no/low skills.
Keeping them unemployed by boosting an arbitrary minimum wage does no one any favors.
Only in right wing fantasy, and only for the Bottom Line, not the People.

First World economies can Never compete on labor of the People, issues.

suck it up, right wingers.

for the People, not the Profit!

Only in reality.
 
no we are not; capitalists, natural rate of inefficiency is not a social value we could accept.

one hundred percent, is full employment; not right wing rhetoric, for the capital bottom line.

Yeah, you really don't know anything about Economics. I blame your Government Schooling. You should stop posting now.
I must know it better than You, since I have an argument and You have nothing but fallacy.

Our current Unemployment Rate is very low. Lowest in 17yrs. Statistically, we're at or near Full Employment. If you're still unemployed in this Economy, it's all on you. There's plenty of jobs.
lol; full employment for the left is one hundred percent, not right wing fantasy, for the capital bottom line.

Again, you don't understand Economics. I recommend you put the bong down and stop worshipping dumb Communists like Cortez. Give it a shot, kid.
i understand that the right wing has to resort to "Bakers reality" not real world reality.
 
The concept of full employment is construct, not market based reality. There is no unemployment under Capitalism; Only underpayment.

Clearly, Economics isn't your forte. You illustrate perfectly why Communists can't run Countries. Our current Unemployment is very low. Statistically speaking, we're at or near Full Employment.
no we are not; capitalists, natural rate of inefficiency is not a social value we could accept.

one hundred percent, is full employment; not right wing rhetoric, for the capital bottom line.

Yeah, you really don't know anything about Economics. I blame your Government Schooling. You should stop posting now.
I must know it better than You, since I have an argument and You have nothing but fallacy.
You have no substantial argument. You have an ideology.
we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
 
Who Here Stands With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

Who here actually lives in the district and thus has a relevant opinion?

Let's see --- west coast 3000 miles away; Texas, 1500 miles away, Kansas City 1000 miles away. And oh yes a "Canadian" wink wink.

Good job there.

Nice dodge. I fully support Ted Cruz. I'm not in his state.

Now, can ANY of you do that? You know you support her ideas. Come down it and say so.

She's not running in my district, so there's nothing to "dodge"; hence I haven't even looked at her ideas.

Never has so much butthurt been floated by so many from so far away.

Well, we already knew you're a shortsighted moron, so that's not news.

Just because I can't vote for or against the silly twat doesn't mean her election doesn't affect me. She's running for the House of Representatives. Perhaps you've heard of them? Lower house of the US Congress, which is the legislative branch of the federal government? Helps to pass laws that affect the entire country? Am I ringing any bells in your belfry, or just stirring up bats?
 
social democracy includes solving simple poverty; the left has solutions.
The left hardly has the solutions.
lol. just right wing gossip?

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
You are delusional if you think that is a solution.
i must be Right even though I am on the Left; since you have no argument for rebuttal.
You are categorically incorrect. Your model cant sustain itself. What will the factories produce? Why is an at will policy wrong? Why pay A guy making fries $15? Your idea will raise the costs of products and services to the point the minimum wage you propose wont do anything. you cling to an ideology not facts of the economic system. That being said, it was just easier to call you delusional.
 
Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.
Shed them where? The guy cooking the fries at Burger king hardly deserves $15 an hour. You wouldn't pay for the expensive services. Your little theory doesn't hold water.
We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

We need low wage jobs. For first time workers. For those with no/low skills.
Keeping them unemployed by boosting an arbitrary minimum wage does no one any favors.
Only in right wing fantasy, and only for the Bottom Line, not the People.

First World economies can Never compete on labor of the People, issues.

suck it up, right wingers.

for the People, not the Profit!

Only in reality.
In the real world, one hundred percent is "full employment".
 
Shed them where? The guy cooking the fries at Burger king hardly deserves $15 an hour. You wouldn't pay for the expensive services. Your little theory doesn't hold water.
We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

We need low wage jobs. For first time workers. For those with no/low skills.
Keeping them unemployed by boosting an arbitrary minimum wage does no one any favors.
Only in right wing fantasy, and only for the Bottom Line, not the People.

First World economies can Never compete on labor of the People, issues.

suck it up, right wingers.

for the People, not the Profit!

Only in reality.
In the real world, one hundred percent is "full employment".

Where in the "real world" has your "idea" been successfully implemented?
 
social democracy includes solving simple poverty; the left has solutions.
The left hardly has the solutions.
lol. just right wing gossip?

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
You are delusional if you think that is a solution.
i must be Right even though I am on the Left; since you have no argument for rebuttal.
You are categorically incorrect. Your model cant sustain itself. What will the factories produce? Why is an at will policy wrong? Why pay A guy making fries $15? Your idea will raise the costs of products and services to the point the minimum wage you propose wont do anything. you cling to an ideology not facts of the economic system. That being said, it was just easier to call you delusional.
we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment.

Unemployment compensation for being unemployed in our at-will employment States solves for simple poverty.

and giga-recycling "factories" help with social costs by creating a market for repurposable goods.

Grow our economy, we Must.
 
We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

We need low wage jobs. For first time workers. For those with no/low skills.
Keeping them unemployed by boosting an arbitrary minimum wage does no one any favors.
Only in right wing fantasy, and only for the Bottom Line, not the People.

First World economies can Never compete on labor of the People, issues.

suck it up, right wingers.

for the People, not the Profit!

Only in reality.
In the real world, one hundred percent is "full employment".

Where in the "real world" has your "idea" been successfully implemented?
did you know, simply asking that question is a fallacy?

I am in the Eureka State and have the federal doctrine at our disposal.
 
Again, you don't understand Economics. I recommend you put the bong down and stop worshipping dumb Communists like Cortez. Give it a shot, kid.

Not really communist. National Socialist --


National Socialist Program - Wikipedia

We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens.
federalist; I subscribe to the federal doctrine. There is no provision for excuses, only results.
 
The left hardly has the solutions.
lol. just right wing gossip?

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.
You are delusional if you think that is a solution.
i must be Right even though I am on the Left; since you have no argument for rebuttal.
You are categorically incorrect. Your model cant sustain itself. What will the factories produce? Why is an at will policy wrong? Why pay A guy making fries $15? Your idea will raise the costs of products and services to the point the minimum wage you propose wont do anything. you cling to an ideology not facts of the economic system. That being said, it was just easier to call you delusional.
we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment.

Unemployment compensation for being unemployed in our at-will employment States solves for simple poverty.

and giga-recycling "factories" help with social costs by creating a market for repurposable goods.

Grow our economy, we Must.
Thank you for blathering on your original misinformed post. You are bowing to an ideology that cant be supported. Since this is your only thought, and an irrational one at best. I am done with you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top