Who Here Stands With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

[jc456]

Who’s got both courage and insanity to stand by her side?

She seems nice . And she’s easy on the eyes.

And stupid as a box of rocks

 

[Weatherman2020]

she should be able to raise plenty of cash, then.

we routinely have to bailout the rich.

the right wing Only complain about the Poor, simply Because, the Poor are not capitally Worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Her supporter-base is made up of mostly Entitlement douchebags. Typical Democrats.

the left claims to be moral enough to be socialist and care about the poor, not just the profit.

The best thing for the poor is an education and a good paying job. Government can't provide that. That's why socialism fails.

Only in right wing fantasy can the private sector do better than the public sector.

The Romans already Proved, Government solves all problems; a few millennia ago.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

Oh, yeah, the Romans are doing just great, huh. Better read a history book.

Maybe he’s saying Trump should crucify all his enemies along our freeways for all to see.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. just your right wing, codependence insecurity acting up.

even the dollar menu won't double.

Uh huh. The money has to come from somewhere. The good fairy? I live in Washington State, highest minimum wage in the nation. I've seen what happens. Seniors on Social Security can't afford to go out and eat. Prices go up when wages go up, but their Social Security doesn't keep up, it stays the same. Who gets hurt the most? The poor. Nice work. Hurting the very people you claim to want to help.

Yes, it does; we will be shedding low wage jobs, to do it.

Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

We need low wage jobs. Where do high school kids go to find work in the summer time? Minimum wage was never meant to be a "living wage". That term was never around until recently. It's total propaganda. You also haven't addressed the senior citizen on social security that can't afford to eat out. That means less business, which means fewer jobs. It's all co-dependent.

No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.

People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?

Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

t appears Joe Crowley may not be ready to give up his spot atop the Queen's machine just yet—or maybe he is, and the state's election rules were just designed to be as confusing as possible. It's not really clear.

Despite Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's stunning victory in last month's congressional primary, Crowley has reportedly refused to vacate the Working Families Party line, which means he could still appear on the general election ballot in November. His unexpected defiance has flummoxed leaders of the political party, who had assumed Crowley would immediately remove himself from the ballot, according to the Times.

Joe Crowley Is Either Still Running Against Ocasio-Cortez Or A Victim Of NY's Bewildering Election Laws

This is interesting. It appears that Joe Crowley is still on the ballot. It would be funny if they split the Dem vote and Pappas won.

Interesting, but Alexandria won 57 - 42 as she was being outspent 10 to 1. I don't see how he could flip that.

Of course that might split the vote giving the win to the Repubs. I don't think the democrats would worry about that. They have already shown that they would rather lose with Hillary than win with Bernie.

The voter turn out was only 16%. If Crowley voters still vote Crowley, Cortez may well lose in a general election.

 

[danielpalos]

The best thing for the poor is an education and a good paying job. Government can't provide that. That's why socialism fails.

An education and a good paying job is funny?? You must be a big government socialist.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment, even if Everyone gets a Doctorate.

There is far more unemployment in a socialist state. Government doesn't make jobs. A free maket produces jobs.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Government can ensure full employment of resources by government fiat.

The Country is currently at Full Employment. And shockingly, we didn't have to become a Communist Nation to achieve it. Go figure?

The concept of full employment is construct, not market based reality. There is no unemployment under Capitalism; Only underpayment.

 

[danielpalos]

Who’s got both courage and insanity to stand by her side?

View attachment 209811

What free shit is she offering today? It's fucking Monday, and I'd give a lot for a triple shot of absolut right now.

simply re-inventing a social wheel in any given district introduces too much anarchy to the Establishment and chaos to the markets in our economy.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.

 

[danielpalos]

she should be able to raise plenty of cash, then.

we routinely have to bailout the rich.

the right wing Only complain about the Poor, simply Because, the Poor are not capitally Worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Her supporter-base is made up of mostly Entitlement douchebags. Typical Democrats.

the left claims to be moral enough to be socialist and care about the poor, not just the profit.

The best thing for the poor is an education and a good paying job. Government can't provide that. That's why socialism fails.

Only in right wing fantasy can the private sector do better than the public sector.

The Romans already Proved, Government solves all problems; a few millennia ago.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

Oh, yeah, the Romans are doing just great, huh. Better read a history book.

some of their roads and some of their aqueducts, still work.

thank Goodness for a Corp of Engineers.

 

[danielpalos]

any purely Private institutions still as functional in modern times?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

An education and a good paying job is funny?? You must be a big government socialist.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment, even if Everyone gets a Doctorate.

There is far more unemployment in a socialist state. Government doesn't make jobs. A free maket produces jobs.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Government can ensure full employment of resources by government fiat.

The Country is currently at Full Employment. And shockingly, we didn't have to become a Communist Nation to achieve it. Go figure?

The concept of full employment is construct, not market based reality. There is no unemployment under Capitalism; Only underpayment.

Yeah, when you're unemployed, you're not getting paid.

 

[Dschrute3]

An education and a good paying job is funny?? You must be a big government socialist.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment, even if Everyone gets a Doctorate.

There is far more unemployment in a socialist state. Government doesn't make jobs. A free maket produces jobs.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Government can ensure full employment of resources by government fiat.

The Country is currently at Full Employment. And shockingly, we didn't have to become a Communist Nation to achieve it. Go figure?

The concept of full employment is construct, not market based reality. There is no unemployment under Capitalism; Only underpayment.

Clearly, Economics isn't your forte. You illustrate perfectly why Communists can't run Countries. Our current Unemployment is very low. Statistically speaking, we're at or near Full Employment.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Uh huh. The money has to come from somewhere. The good fairy? I live in Washington State, highest minimum wage in the nation. I've seen what happens. Seniors on Social Security can't afford to go out and eat. Prices go up when wages go up, but their Social Security doesn't keep up, it stays the same. Who gets hurt the most? The poor. Nice work. Hurting the very people you claim to want to help.

Yes, it does; we will be shedding low wage jobs, to do it.

Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

We need low wage jobs. Where do high school kids go to find work in the summer time? Minimum wage was never meant to be a "living wage". That term was never around until recently. It's total propaganda. You also haven't addressed the senior citizen on social security that can't afford to eat out. That means less business, which means fewer jobs. It's all co-dependent.

No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.

People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?

Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

If someone doesn’t like making $15 they figure out how to get a job that pays more. See how that works?

Hilarious that after just a few months after screaming for $15 the Left is screaming for more already.

Let’s just make it $10,000/hr to shut you up for a year.

 

[dave p]

social democracy includes solving simple poverty; the left has solutions.

The left hardly has the solutions.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Uh huh. The money has to come from somewhere. The good fairy? I live in Washington State, highest minimum wage in the nation. I've seen what happens. Seniors on Social Security can't afford to go out and eat. Prices go up when wages go up, but their Social Security doesn't keep up, it stays the same. Who gets hurt the most? The poor. Nice work. Hurting the very people you claim to want to help.

Yes, it does; we will be shedding low wage jobs, to do it.

Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

We need low wage jobs. Where do high school kids go to find work in the summer time? Minimum wage was never meant to be a "living wage". That term was never around until recently. It's total propaganda. You also haven't addressed the senior citizen on social security that can't afford to eat out. That means less business, which means fewer jobs. It's all co-dependent.

No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.

People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?

Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

The real Minimum Wage is $0.

Why Are So Many Seattle Restaurants Closing Lately?

Thanks To The Fight For $15 Minimum Wage, Small Businesses Close And Employees Are Laid Off

 

[dave p]

Uh huh. The money has to come from somewhere. The good fairy? I live in Washington State, highest minimum wage in the nation. I've seen what happens. Seniors on Social Security can't afford to go out and eat. Prices go up when wages go up, but their Social Security doesn't keep up, it stays the same. Who gets hurt the most? The poor. Nice work. Hurting the very people you claim to want to help.

Yes, it does; we will be shedding low wage jobs, to do it.

Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

We need low wage jobs. Where do high school kids go to find work in the summer time? Minimum wage was never meant to be a "living wage". That term was never around until recently. It's total propaganda. You also haven't addressed the senior citizen on social security that can't afford to eat out. That means less business, which means fewer jobs. It's all co-dependent.

No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.

People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?

Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

Shed them where? The guy cooking the fries at Burger king hardly deserves $15 an hour. You wouldn't pay for the expensive services. Your little theory doesn't hold water.

 

[JBond]

Who’s got both courage and insanity to stand by her side?

View attachment 209811

I suggest we all get behind her. One at a time.

 

[Dschrute3]

Her supporter-base is made up of mostly Entitlement douchebags. Typical Democrats.

the left claims to be moral enough to be socialist and care about the poor, not just the profit.

The best thing for the poor is an education and a good paying job. Government can't provide that. That's why socialism fails.

Only in right wing fantasy can the private sector do better than the public sector.

The Romans already Proved, Government solves all problems; a few millennia ago.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

Oh, yeah, the Romans are doing just great, huh. Better read a history book.

some of their roads and some of their aqueducts, still work.

thank Goodness for a Corp of Engineers.

You haven't studied Roman History much, huh? Much of Rome's achievements came when it was a still a Republic. Some could argue that the fall of the Roman Republic is what led to its eventual demise. The numerous brutal Dictators that came later, were anything but 'kind generous' folks. They eventually bankrupted and destroyed Rome.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment, even if Everyone gets a Doctorate.

There is far more unemployment in a socialist state. Government doesn't make jobs. A free maket produces jobs.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Government can ensure full employment of resources by government fiat.

The Country is currently at Full Employment. And shockingly, we didn't have to become a Communist Nation to achieve it. Go figure?

The concept of full employment is construct, not market based reality. There is no unemployment under Capitalism; Only underpayment.

Yeah, when you're unemployed, you're not getting paid.

I used to try to have an excellent credit rating, being from the Golden State and all; even on unemployment.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment, even if Everyone gets a Doctorate.

There is far more unemployment in a socialist state. Government doesn't make jobs. A free maket produces jobs.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

Government can ensure full employment of resources by government fiat.

The Country is currently at Full Employment. And shockingly, we didn't have to become a Communist Nation to achieve it. Go figure?

The concept of full employment is construct, not market based reality. There is no unemployment under Capitalism; Only underpayment.

Clearly, Economics isn't your forte. You illustrate perfectly why Communists can't run Countries. Our current Unemployment is very low. Statistically speaking, we're at or near Full Employment.

no we are not; capitalists, natural rate of inefficiency is not a social value we could accept.

one hundred percent, is full employment; not right wing rhetoric, for the capital bottom line.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it does; we will be shedding low wage jobs, to do it.

Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

We need low wage jobs. Where do high school kids go to find work in the summer time? Minimum wage was never meant to be a "living wage". That term was never around until recently. It's total propaganda. You also haven't addressed the senior citizen on social security that can't afford to eat out. That means less business, which means fewer jobs. It's all co-dependent.

No, we don't. We have a First World economy not a Third World economy.

People who want more work for it.
People who are happy with their current status keep working at their current level.
See how it works?

Your version only works in right wing fantasy.

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum is merely a cost of living adjustment for Labor to help pay more in taxes and create more in demand as a "sustainable business practice".

We need to shed, low wage jobs; they are not productive enough and are a drag on our First World economy.

If someone doesn’t like making $15 they figure out how to get a job that pays more. See how that works?

Hilarious that after just a few months after screaming for $15 the Left is screaming for more already.

Let’s just make it $10,000/hr to shut you up for a year.

just clueless and Causeless? your opinion is noted.

Grow our economy, we Must.

 

[danielpalos]

social democracy includes solving simple poverty; the left has solutions.

The left hardly has the solutions.

lol. just right wing gossip?

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and giga-recycling factories to help with social costs.