Who is fighting for limited govt in the Middle East?

Plus one more. This one caught my attention and I search through the chemist names, etc. last night. Where are the chemicals coming from? Iraq was chemically attack too but not many talking about that.
Ayman Zidane: Chemist of the homeland, the most merciful of Parvan alienation ... When CNN refused to offer an interview with Bashar al-Assad ... and Saudi women: the piano before driving the car

Rashed Issa

CNN has rejected the offer of an interview with Bashar al-Assad after Chemawi Khan Sheikhan, conducted by the AFP, considering it part of «propaganda blatant system to deny the acquisition of the chemical massacre».

(AFP) in turn confirmed that the interview was filmed under the supervision of government officials, and that a few questions and answers were approved before the broadcast to the world. The interview was not fully presented until the approval of the Syrian regime, which he wanted to broadcast on state television.

The position of the channel, as much as it condemns the propaganda of the regime, involves no less harsh criticism of the performance of the French Press Agency, the interviewer, what media achievement when the agency is subject to the conditions of the regime? To obey them means one thing: a substance made by local standards, an official speaking on behalf of the regime, but with a foreign team. In other words, this means that the system has hired a professional foreign team that has a high tradition and professionalism to send a message with wooden contents, a propaganda for killing, forgery and denial.

To put it more precisely: the interview crew was a hired team.

Chemist Ayman Zidane

"A chemist at home and not a paraffin with a stranger." The latest writings of Syrian actor and director Ayman Zidan on his Facebook page. Zidane wrote this phrase from 323 km, where sarin gas can not cut all this distance. He is quite sure that he will not be among the injured, not fearing that the sarin will touch any of his sons (God protect them from all evil), he will be able to brag as he pleases as long as he will not pay the price.

Zidane's words can sum up the theory of steadfastness that belongs to some residents of Damascus, who live under the Republican Guard, the Fourth Brigade, the National Defense Bloc, and other Afghan, Iraqi, Lebanese and Iranian militias. Sheikun killed 84 civilians, including 27 children and 19 women.

Ayman Zidane does not know anything about the massacre, or perhaps he has to tell his story about it and its news. His writings do not suggest that he was influenced by the sensual sensitivity of Damascus' corners, crows and jasmine, so he can write as much as he wants to survive. With a bunch of grapes, a loud laugh, and cheers. Badness of steadfastness, and the misery of the homeland if the chemist Khan Sheikhan is the homeland.

Monsters

I have always been described by the Lebanese announcer Zahi Wahbi as the right of the Arab Spring, whose name has not been uttered correctly. It is sometimes referred to as "the Arab hell" and sometimes to "the great Arab desolation." He suffers from "the exposure of the despicable of hatred, hatred and hatred" , To the words that he launched in a dialogue session of "the bottom line" with the Lebanese novelist Najwa Barakat.

What draws attention is this transcendence, which tries to capture reality with a tissue, with the fingertips. It also draws attention to Wahbi's calls on the Arab reality of the rooms of the channel «fields», without considering the role of the media fraud by the launch of the monsters of reality, and justify the culture of blood and beheadings, without noticing that the war began in particular from those fields.

Women's Leadership of the Piano

If you search the online search engines for the words "piano" and "Saudi Arabia", you will find a large number of questions about the search for players to be able to do the training, this may explain why the celebration of the channel «Arab» young singer gift of the prostration and presented as the first Saudi trainer to learn to play On the piano in Jeddah.

The program talked about the opposition and attack of the Saudi trained singer. Of course we should expect that, even if the program, as well as his guest, avoid talking about the reasons for the opposition, but hint.

The program "Sabah Al Arabiya" to show the singer, and it seems that he considers his fight ends at this point, without going into the roughness of the details. Here we can only recall the thorny theme, the Saudi women driving the car. It seems that the subject of leadership is only a broad title to freedom, which serves as a gateway to social and political solutions, and above all opens the way for women to lead the piano.

Author of the «Jerusalem Arab» family


الهجوم على الإمام الأكبر شيخ الأزهر بأوامر عليا وجمرة الطوارئ ستحرق أيدي الجميع
so you agree that no one is fighting for limited govt in the Middle East? that there are no Thomas Jefferson's in the Middle East because American liberals have in effect killed them all?
They don't have a constitution like ours, a George Washington or any of the others that we have already had here either.
Read the articles and find out who those people are and which ones are doing what. They have issues that answering one question you have poised won't cover because they are not a Christian or Judaic based people. The criminals are killing off both decent people and innocent people too. Their problems are not any one item you can pinpoint. If you include drug runners, human traffickers and such I'd say no they aren't killing those people off. Instead they are using people in the mosques and cults to assist them in the name of their god. Their religion and government are not separate.

I have been pretty impressed with the way Iraq has bounced back against all odds.
 
Plus one more. This one caught my attention and I search through the chemist names, etc. last night. Where are the chemicals coming from? Iraq was chemically attack too but not many talking about that.
Ayman Zidane: Chemist of the homeland, the most merciful of Parvan alienation ... When CNN refused to offer an interview with Bashar al-Assad ... and Saudi women: the piano before driving the car

Rashed Issa

CNN has rejected the offer of an interview with Bashar al-Assad after Chemawi Khan Sheikhan, conducted by the AFP, considering it part of «propaganda blatant system to deny the acquisition of the chemical massacre».

(AFP) in turn confirmed that the interview was filmed under the supervision of government officials, and that a few questions and answers were approved before the broadcast to the world. The interview was not fully presented until the approval of the Syrian regime, which he wanted to broadcast on state television.

The position of the channel, as much as it condemns the propaganda of the regime, involves no less harsh criticism of the performance of the French Press Agency, the interviewer, what media achievement when the agency is subject to the conditions of the regime? To obey them means one thing: a substance made by local standards, an official speaking on behalf of the regime, but with a foreign team. In other words, this means that the system has hired a professional foreign team that has a high tradition and professionalism to send a message with wooden contents, a propaganda for killing, forgery and denial.

To put it more precisely: the interview crew was a hired team.

Chemist Ayman Zidane

"A chemist at home and not a paraffin with a stranger." The latest writings of Syrian actor and director Ayman Zidan on his Facebook page. Zidane wrote this phrase from 323 km, where sarin gas can not cut all this distance. He is quite sure that he will not be among the injured, not fearing that the sarin will touch any of his sons (God protect them from all evil), he will be able to brag as he pleases as long as he will not pay the price.

Zidane's words can sum up the theory of steadfastness that belongs to some residents of Damascus, who live under the Republican Guard, the Fourth Brigade, the National Defense Bloc, and other Afghan, Iraqi, Lebanese and Iranian militias. Sheikun killed 84 civilians, including 27 children and 19 women.

Ayman Zidane does not know anything about the massacre, or perhaps he has to tell his story about it and its news. His writings do not suggest that he was influenced by the sensual sensitivity of Damascus' corners, crows and jasmine, so he can write as much as he wants to survive. With a bunch of grapes, a loud laugh, and cheers. Badness of steadfastness, and the misery of the homeland if the chemist Khan Sheikhan is the homeland.

Monsters

I have always been described by the Lebanese announcer Zahi Wahbi as the right of the Arab Spring, whose name has not been uttered correctly. It is sometimes referred to as "the Arab hell" and sometimes to "the great Arab desolation." He suffers from "the exposure of the despicable of hatred, hatred and hatred" , To the words that he launched in a dialogue session of "the bottom line" with the Lebanese novelist Najwa Barakat.

What draws attention is this transcendence, which tries to capture reality with a tissue, with the fingertips. It also draws attention to Wahbi's calls on the Arab reality of the rooms of the channel «fields», without considering the role of the media fraud by the launch of the monsters of reality, and justify the culture of blood and beheadings, without noticing that the war began in particular from those fields.

Women's Leadership of the Piano

If you search the online search engines for the words "piano" and "Saudi Arabia", you will find a large number of questions about the search for players to be able to do the training, this may explain why the celebration of the channel «Arab» young singer gift of the prostration and presented as the first Saudi trainer to learn to play On the piano in Jeddah.

The program talked about the opposition and attack of the Saudi trained singer. Of course we should expect that, even if the program, as well as his guest, avoid talking about the reasons for the opposition, but hint.

The program "Sabah Al Arabiya" to show the singer, and it seems that he considers his fight ends at this point, without going into the roughness of the details. Here we can only recall the thorny theme, the Saudi women driving the car. It seems that the subject of leadership is only a broad title to freedom, which serves as a gateway to social and political solutions, and above all opens the way for women to lead the piano.

Author of the «Jerusalem Arab» family


الهجوم على الإمام الأكبر شيخ الأزهر بأوامر عليا وجمرة الطوارئ ستحرق أيدي الجميع
so you agree that no one is fighting for limited govt in the Middle East? that there are no Thomas Jefferson's in the Middle East because American liberals have in effect killed them all?
They don't have a constitution like ours, a George Washington or any of the others that we have already had here either.
Read the articles and find out who those people are and which ones are doing what. They have issues that answering one question you have poised won't cover because they are not a Christian or Judaic based people. The criminals are killing off both decent people and innocent people too. Their problems are not any one item you can pinpoint. If you include drug runners, human traffickers and such I'd say no they aren't killing those people off. Instead they are using people in the mosques and cults to assist them in the name of their god. Their religion and government are not separate.

I have been pretty impressed with the way Iraq has bounced back against all odds.
They had another chemical attack recently. It does sound like some are really trying hard.
 
'Who is fighting for limited govt in the Middle East?'

Why do we care? It's not our neighborhood and not our country. Our history of trying to control who is the leader of what country and what those countries look like and how they run have not been extremely successful.

Perhaps we should stop sticking our noses into everyone's business all the time...
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

A large number of leaders in the middle east from small to big use religion as a tool to control the masses.
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

A large number of leaders in the middle east from small to big use religion as a tool to control the masses.
That's one of the things organized religion is most useful for.
 
You are not very smart are you? Isis wants to replace the authoritarian government of Syria with its own totalitarian central Liberal government Now do you understand
ISIS isn't exactly an official govt - they are terrorists. They want to replace Assad much like Al Qaeda 'replaced' Gaddafi and his govt.

You may choose to recognize ISIS as a 'govt'. I don't.
Insane!!!!!!!!! They set up a huge all powerful liberal govt the instant they control a tiny patch of ground!!

They are encouraged by American liberals who want the same thing although they are greatly impeded by Republicans who want the opposite.
Agree mostly, some republicans and democrats want continual war. It good for their bottom line. Pelosi and McCain are peas in a pod.
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

A large number of leaders in the middle east from small to big use religion as a tool to control the masses.

no doubt
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.
 
who in the middle east is fighting for "religious freedom"?
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.

the statement "they are fighting for religious freedom" in the as per the middle east is ABSURD
 
It was meant to be a joke. To some people, fighting for "religious freedom" means fighting for the right to impose your magical religious beliefs on people living in the real world. Which is what ISIL is trying to do.

oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.

the statement "they are fighting for religious freedom" in the as per the middle east is ABSURD
They are fighting for their religious freedoms. And that includes preferential treatment for themselves and the right to discriminate against and punish others at their leisure, according to their religious beliefs. Same as fighting for religious freedoms means here in the U.S.
 
oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.

the statement "they are fighting for religious freedom" in the as per the middle east is ABSURD
They are fighting for their religious freedoms. And that includes preferential treatment for themselves and the right to discriminate against and punish others at their leisure, according to their religious beliefs. Same as fighting for religious freedoms means here in the U.S.

OH------not my concept of religious freedom
 
They are too busy fighting for religious freedom to worry about fighting for limited government.

They aren't fighting for religious freedom. If anyone is doing that, it's Assad. The so-called "rebels" are fighting to impose their version of Islam on the rest of their countrymen. I couldn't care less if Assad gases these cockroaches.
 
oh-----somehow your "JOKE" did not tickle my funny bone
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.

the statement "they are fighting for religious freedom" in the as per the middle east is ABSURD
They are fighting for their religious freedoms. And that includes preferential treatment for themselves and the right to discriminate against and punish others at their leisure, according to their religious beliefs. Same as fighting for religious freedoms means here in the U.S.

That isn't religious freedom. It's religious hegemony.
 
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.

the statement "they are fighting for religious freedom" in the as per the middle east is ABSURD
They are fighting for their religious freedoms. And that includes preferential treatment for themselves and the right to discriminate against and punish others at their leisure, according to their religious beliefs. Same as fighting for religious freedoms means here in the U.S.

That isn't religious freedom. It's religious hegemony.
Oh then I hope you stop supporting such things :rofl:

But I won't hold my breath you fascist fuck
 
It shouldn't tickle anybody's funny bone

in fact-----the silly comment was not worth posting
Speaking out against religious madness is always worth posting.

the statement "they are fighting for religious freedom" in the as per the middle east is ABSURD
They are fighting for their religious freedoms. And that includes preferential treatment for themselves and the right to discriminate against and punish others at their leisure, according to their religious beliefs. Same as fighting for religious freedoms means here in the U.S.

OH------not my concept of religious freedom
You are obviously correct when we talk about religious freedom we talk about the freedom to worship any religion you choose. Obviously those who fight in the Middle East are liberals fighting to impose their religion on all the people of any country they conquer.

The concept is 100% liberal in America we are free to give to charity in anyway and in any amount we choose but that is not good enough for a liberals they want the government to dictate to all of us what we give and to whom
 

Forum List

Back
Top