Dana7360
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2014
- 15,147
- 13,596
- 2,405
![]()
How many people remember when NYC cops fired 41 rounds at Amadou Diallo?
A man who fired NO ROUNDS.
They hit him 19 times, less that a 50% hit rate because they were scared of a black guy with a wallet.
Now tell me if you are ever in a gunfight while police are just minutes away that 100 rounds is enough when you're faced with one or more armed thugs that don't limit their magazines or ammo because of some law.
You libturds really need to just SHUT THE FUCK UP when it comes to issues you KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.....
Which is just about every issue....
.
Please tell all of us the last time any civilian was in a gun fight with someone.
It happens all the time, but your MSM doesn't cover such stories on a national level. They are all local and you need to find them. But here is one from my city that took place a couple of months ago.
Pizza shop employee shoots suspect after being shot in robbery
So you're saying that this happens all the time? I don't buy it. One instance doesn't mean it's a regular occurrence.
Plus, being in a small area doesn't need 100 bullets to stop the person. The person is usually right in front of the cashier. No need for 100 rounds.
Finally, when there is an active shooter, like in El Paso, those who do have weapons, don't run toward the shooter with their weapon firing. In fact, all those who did have a weapon in El Paso didn't use their weapon at all.
If you need 100 bullets to shoot someone, then you need to go the practice range to learn how to use that weapon accurately.
Trying to justify having 100 bullets or more is just pathetic. And the rationalization you're using is very lame.