Who Turned America Into A Banana Republic?

[Frank'sRules]

The Globalist Elites who control both major US political parties. Americans need to start accepting the current reality. It's not a 'Republican vs. Democrat/Left vs. Right war being fought today. We're in a 'NWO Globalist Elite vs. The People' war now. And it's a world war.

Marxist much?

I'm not a 'Marxist.' However, the current US current President is a Marxist-leaning Globalist. So is his Master, George Soros.

You are so busy being paranoid you are missing the obvious - there is no plan only planners. Wake up. It's one planet. You can't take a shit in Japan without effecting Kansas now. Your fear of Big Brother controlling you is nonsense, they're just archiving all your email in case they need it someday. Get off the paranoia and go watch a ball game. Your mind will thank you and even if you were totally correct, there is nothing you can do about it. Cease and Desist.

 

[LaDexter]

1. the biggest traitor in US history George W Bush, whose record includes Obama since Obama won because of what a total disaster W was

 

[Frank'sRules]

It's the progressive elites of both parties and more than a hundred years of gradual creeping of complete control,
Hillary would complete the total control and good bye constitution, along with our absolute freedom for the elitist to control us all and continued corruption.

Why do you even say this dumb shit? Hillary is Bill, and lacy briefs. Relax, chicken littles. Madam President will not be the end of the nation or your little world of paranoia.

I almost want to see Hillary win in a landslide now just to show you how wrong you will be.

Well, she will win (not in a landslide) and why would she be any worse than Bush or Obama? They are all trying to keep the same house of nutty cards together a while longer. That's the job, that she's very qualified for.

She is campaigning to kick over that house of cards and leave us with nothing.

That is what "progressivism" is.

Why do you believe this total garbage? Did you just make it up? She's no Castro for God's sake, she's Bill in pretty underpants. The entire goal of this thing is to keep it together. That's why Trump has only the support of those with nothing to lose. Everyone with real skin in the game wants Clinton because they know exactly what she will do. more of the same that made them very rich.

 

[Frank'sRules]

1. This is what America was:
"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.



2. No longer.
Now, it depends on who you are, not what you are.

Long-time Liberal...and law scholar, Johnathan Turley...
"Jonathan Turley (born May 6, 1961) is an American lawyer, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. He is currently a professor of law at The George Washington University Law School."
Jonathan Turley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Has given the only possible description of the Hillary email episone:
Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks")


3. "....expressing grave concern over the "bizarre" way in which the FBI handled the Clinton email investigation.
Respected legal scholar Jonathan Turley had previously opined that "FBI Director James Comey was within accepted lines of prosecutorial discretion in declining criminal charges," even though he believed that charges could have been brought. Now, due to recent revelations that the Department of Justice handed out at least five immunity deals, Turley believes the matter is a "legitimate matter of congressional concern and investigation."

4. Turley writes at his blog, "the news of the immunity deals (and particularly the deal given top ranking Clinton aide Cheryl Mills) was baffling and those deals seriously undermined the ability to bring criminal charges in my view."
Jonathan Turley: FBI's Tanked Clinton Email Probe 'A Legitimate Matter of Congressional Concern and Investigation'




5. "FBI Allowed 2 Hillary Aides To "Destroy" Their Laptops In Newly Exposed "Side Agreements"
FBI Allowed 2 Hillary Aides To "Destroy" Their Laptops In Newly Exposed "Side Agreements" | Zero Hedge






So.....who turned America into banana republic....where the law only applies to the little people?

The Democrats and Liberals.....

Corruption is essential to their success.

And of course libertarians made it much easier for the libtards to do this by dividing the conservative opposition and letting the Neocons take over the GOP.

Note: Ron Paul is voting for Stein this election. I am ashamed I ever respected that man.

If one, entirely legal, action can make you not respect a man then you ever had respect for him in the first place.

 

[paulitician]

The Globalist Elites who control both major US political parties. Americans need to start accepting the current reality. It's not a 'Republican vs. Democrat/Left vs. Right war being fought today. We're in a 'NWO Globalist Elite vs. The People' war now. And it's a world war.

Marxist much?

I'm not a 'Marxist.' However, the current US current President is a Marxist-leaning Globalist. So is his Master, George Soros.

You are so busy being paranoid you are missing the obvious - there is no plan only planners. Wake up. It's one planet. You can't take a shit in Japan without effecting Kansas now. Your fear of Big Brother controlling you is nonsense, they're just archiving all your email in case they need it someday. Get off the paranoia and go watch a ball game. Your mind will thank you and even if you were totally correct, there is nothing you can do about it. Cease and Desist.

The NWO Globalists are out of control. They're committing awful atrocities all around the world in our name. The US Government especially, is bombing & killing in countries most Americans have never even heard of. It's time to take on the Globalist Elites, and reign em in. They've gone too far.

 

[G.T.]

minions like banana

 

[Frank'sRules]

The Globalist Elites who control both major US political parties. Americans need to start accepting the current reality. It's not a 'Republican vs. Democrat/Left vs. Right war being fought today. We're in a 'NWO Globalist Elite vs. The People' war now. And it's a world war.

Marxist much?

I'm not a 'Marxist.' However, the current US current President is a Marxist-leaning Globalist. So is his Master, George Soros.

You are so busy being paranoid you are missing the obvious - there is no plan only planners. Wake up. It's one planet. You can't take a shit in Japan without effecting Kansas now. Your fear of Big Brother controlling you is nonsense, they're just archiving all your email in case they need it someday. Get off the paranoia and go watch a ball game. Your mind will thank you and even if you were totally correct, there is nothing you can do about it. Cease and Desist.

The NWO Globalists are out of control. They're committing awful atrocities all around the world in our name. The US Government especially, is bombing & killing in countries most Americans have never even heard of. It's time to take on the Globalist Elites, and reign em in. They've gone too far.

Godspeed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. This is what America was:
"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.



2. No longer.
Now, it depends on who you are, not what you are.

Long-time Liberal...and law scholar, Johnathan Turley...
"Jonathan Turley (born May 6, 1961) is an American lawyer, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. He is currently a professor of law at The George Washington University Law School."
Jonathan Turley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Has given the only possible description of the Hillary email episone:
Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks")


3. "....expressing grave concern over the "bizarre" way in which the FBI handled the Clinton email investigation.
Respected legal scholar Jonathan Turley had previously opined that "FBI Director James Comey was within accepted lines of prosecutorial discretion in declining criminal charges," even though he believed that charges could have been brought. Now, due to recent revelations that the Department of Justice handed out at least five immunity deals, Turley believes the matter is a "legitimate matter of congressional concern and investigation."

4. Turley writes at his blog, "the news of the immunity deals (and particularly the deal given top ranking Clinton aide Cheryl Mills) was baffling and those deals seriously undermined the ability to bring criminal charges in my view."
Jonathan Turley: FBI's Tanked Clinton Email Probe 'A Legitimate Matter of Congressional Concern and Investigation'




5. "FBI Allowed 2 Hillary Aides To "Destroy" Their Laptops In Newly Exposed "Side Agreements"
FBI Allowed 2 Hillary Aides To "Destroy" Their Laptops In Newly Exposed "Side Agreements" | Zero Hedge






So.....who turned America into banana republic....where the law only applies to the little people?

The Democrats and Liberals.....

Corruption is essential to their success.

Nixon was pardoned, Reagan got away with it as well. Time to grow up now, kiddos. This email thing is mostly just stupid, starting the State Dept. enforcing the rules which would have made this a non-issue.

If you don't like the rich and the powerful getting a better deal in court you're going to have to find another place to live. The game is rigged and that can't be helped.

Weird analysis. Nixon was tossed out of office in shame. Reagan got away with what?

Hillary putting national security at risk so she had sole control over her correspondence and deleted many when notified of an investigation is just par for the course to you?

"Reagan got away with what?"

Jesus son, really? Partisanshitheads.

Please...respond to his question.
'
See if you can do so sans the Liberal vulgarity.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So.....who turned America into banana republic....where the law only applies to the little people?

Your system was designed that way, intentionally, from the beginning. You, as the owner/operator of a vagina, were left out altogether hon; no voice at all, property in effect. You have progressive women to thank for not being in that station today.

In 1789 the OP would have been goods, damaged goods sold at a discount. "People" like her were never meant to have a voice here, never. Even Ann Coulter, who she loves, said it was a mistake to give women the vote.

Based on what? The Constitution was written so it could be modified with enough support. Difficult but doable. Technology changed the role of women in the world.

The founder's vision was what it was; for titled property holding white males only.

As usual, your posts rife with lacunae (better look that up).


Usually, the ‘Founders’ refers to these six: Madison, Jefferson and Washington, Adams, Hamilton, and Franklin.

1. The three non-Southerners worked tirelessly against slavery.
2. While reading Ron Chernow’s book Alexander Hamilton, though, I found out that Hamilton was a strong advocate for the abolition of slavery. During the 1780s, Hamilton was one of the founders of the New York Society for Promoting the Manumission of Slaves, which was instrumental in the abolition of slavery in the state of New York. After reading about Alexander Hamilton’s work for the New York Manumission Society, I gained a greater appreciation of Alexander Hamiltonhttp://angelolopez.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/alexander-hamilton-and-the-new-york-manumission-society/
3. Many of the other Founding Fathers were activists like Alexander Hamilton. In 1787Benjamin Franklin agree to serve as president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, which set out to abolish slavery and set up programs to help freed slaves to become good citizens and improve the conditions of free African Americans. On February 12, 1790, Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society presented a petition to the House of Representatives calling for the federal government to take steps for the gradual abolition of slavery and end the slave trade. As a young lawyer, Thomas Jefferson represented a slave in court attempting to be set free and during the 1770s and 1780s, Jefferson had many several attempts to pass legislation to gradually abolish slavery and end the slave trade. John Jay was the first president of the New York Manumission Society and was active in Society’s efforts to abolish slavery. Ibid.

2. An excellent read on the matter is a brilliant book called Miracle in Philadelphia, by Catherine Drinker Bowen, which recounts the actual history and debates around the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Slavery was a huge issue during that convention, and many of the Founding Fathers wanted it outlawed, but ran into an impasse after many hours of debate with the southern colonies whose agricultural productivity depended on it.

The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with a compromise involving the issue of apportionment.

The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.

The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.

The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war.
Big Journalism Articles - Breitbart


Work hard to undo your indoctrination.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nixon resigned before he was impeached. Reagan got away with selling arms, illegally, to Iran and using the money to fund a war, illegally, in Central America.

And national security is at risk all over the place. Clinton, and Powell, not following the rules on their email accounts very well is honestly not a big deal. The Snowden NSA leak makes it look like Clinton dropper her grocery list.

Nixon resigned like an exec resigns before getting fired. You need to back up your claims against Reagan, he took responsibility being the president, unlike some folks we know ...

Powells email situation was not the same thing or nearly as dangerous. He had no private server and there was no mass purging of evidence once under suspicion. You didn't get anything right.

Saying Nixon was forced out was incorrect, I corrected you. And trying to say that Reagan didn't get away with Iran-Contra is just as dumb. Go play, partisan.

You were being stupid so I corrected you. Nixon resigned so he would get tossed out. You also failed to support you allegations against Reagan, which I knew from many years experience would happen. New to the game huh?

You are a moron and we're done. Nixon wasn't forced out, he resigned (under pressure to but it was his call still). And Iran-Contra is well known to those of us who lived through it. Reagan was Teflon then.

As long as the impeachment resolution stayed bottled up in committee Nixon would not resign. Once it passed and was on the way to the Full House, he resigned. He also got a full pardon from Ford. RayGun is still Teflon. He just didn't know(remember?) what his men were doing.

 

[Fenton Lum]

So.....who turned America into banana republic....where the law only applies to the little people?

Your system was designed that way, intentionally, from the beginning. You, as the owner/operator of a vagina, were left out altogether hon; no voice at all, property in effect. You have progressive women to thank for not being in that station today.

In 1789 the OP would have been goods, damaged goods sold at a discount. "People" like her were never meant to have a voice here, never. Even Ann Coulter, who she loves, said it was a mistake to give women the vote.

Based on what? The Constitution was written so it could be modified with enough support. Difficult but doable. Technology changed the role of women in the world.

The founder's vision was what it was; for titled property holding white males only.

As usual, your posts rife with lacunae (better look that up).


Usually, the ‘Founders’ refers to these six: Madison, Jefferson and Washington, Adams, Hamilton, and Franklin.

1. The three non-Southerners worked tirelessly against slavery.
2. While reading Ron Chernow’s book Alexander Hamilton, though, I found out that Hamilton was a strong advocate for the abolition of slavery. During the 1780s, Hamilton was one of the founders of the New York Society for Promoting the Manumission of Slaves, which was instrumental in the abolition of slavery in the state of New York. After reading about Alexander Hamilton’s work for the New York Manumission Society, I gained a greater appreciation of Alexander Hamiltonhttp://angelolopez.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/alexander-hamilton-and-the-new-york-manumission-society/
3. Many of the other Founding Fathers were activists like Alexander Hamilton. In 1787Benjamin Franklin agree to serve as president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, which set out to abolish slavery and set up programs to help freed slaves to become good citizens and improve the conditions of free African Americans. On February 12, 1790, Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society presented a petition to the House of Representatives calling for the federal government to take steps for the gradual abolition of slavery and end the slave trade. As a young lawyer, Thomas Jefferson represented a slave in court attempting to be set free and during the 1770s and 1780s, Jefferson had many several attempts to pass legislation to gradually abolish slavery and end the slave trade. John Jay was the first president of the New York Manumission Society and was active in Society’s efforts to abolish slavery. Ibid.

2. An excellent read on the matter is a brilliant book called Miracle in Philadelphia, by Catherine Drinker Bowen, which recounts the actual history and debates around the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Slavery was a huge issue during that convention, and many of the Founding Fathers wanted it outlawed, but ran into an impasse after many hours of debate with the southern colonies whose agricultural productivity depended on it.

The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with a compromise involving the issue of apportionment.

The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.

The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.

The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war.
Big Journalism Articles - Breitbart


Work hard to undo your indoctrination.

Hon, Breitbart versus indoctrination? Please.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Globalist Elites who control both major US political parties. Americans need to start accepting the current reality. It's not a 'Republican vs. Democrat/Left vs. Right war being fought today. We're in a 'NWO Globalist Elite vs. The People' war now. And it's a world war.

"Americans need to start accepting the current reality."

Exactly what Talmon said....

1. The latest variation of totalitarianism is neither religious, nor even political: it is cultural. “Totalitarian democracy” is a term made famous by J. L. Talmon to refer to a system ofgovernment in which lawfully elected representatives maintain the integrity of a nation state whose citizens, while granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of the government.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Nixon resigned before he was impeached. Reagan got away with selling arms, illegally, to Iran and using the money to fund a war, illegally, in Central America.

And national security is at risk all over the place. Clinton, and Powell, not following the rules on their email accounts very well is honestly not a big deal. The Snowden NSA leak makes it look like Clinton dropper her grocery list.

Nixon resigned like an exec resigns before getting fired. You need to back up your claims against Reagan, he took responsibility being the president, unlike some folks we know ...

Powells email situation was not the same thing or nearly as dangerous. He had no private server and there was no mass purging of evidence once under suspicion. You didn't get anything right.

Saying Nixon was forced out was incorrect, I corrected you. And trying to say that Reagan didn't get away with Iran-Contra is just as dumb. Go play, partisan.

You were being stupid so I corrected you. Nixon resigned so he would get tossed out. You also failed to support you allegations against Reagan, which I knew from many years experience would happen. New to the game huh?

You are a moron and we're done. Nixon wasn't forced out, he resigned (under pressure to but it was his call still). And Iran-Contra is well known to those of us who lived through it. Reagan was Teflon then.

As long as the impeachment resolution stayed bottled up in committee Nixon would not resign. Once it passed and was on the way to the Full House, he resigned. He also got a full pardon from Ford. RayGun is still Teflon. He just didn't know(remember?) what his men were doing.

Not familiar with burni. But I notice there was no refutation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

minions like banana

This advice may change your life...for the better:

Never make eye contact when eating a banana.

 

[Fenton Lum]

The Globalist Elites who control both major US political parties. Americans need to start accepting the current reality. It's not a 'Republican vs. Democrat/Left vs. Right war being fought today. We're in a 'NWO Globalist Elite vs. The People' war now. And it's a world war.

"Americans need to start accepting the current reality."

Exactly what Talmon said....

1. The latest variation of totalitarianism is neither religious, nor even political: it is cultural. “Totalitarian democracy” is a term made famous by J. L. Talmon to refer to a system ofgovernment in which lawfully elected representatives maintain the integrity of a nation state whose citizens, while granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of the government.

Many voices have been trying to tell you this for quite some time dolt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nixon resigned before he was impeached. Reagan got away with selling arms, illegally, to Iran and using the money to fund a war, illegally, in Central America.

And national security is at risk all over the place. Clinton, and Powell, not following the rules on their email accounts very well is honestly not a big deal. The Snowden NSA leak makes it look like Clinton dropper her grocery list.

Nixon resigned like an exec resigns before getting fired. You need to back up your claims against Reagan, he took responsibility being the president, unlike some folks we know ...

Powells email situation was not the same thing or nearly as dangerous. He had no private server and there was no mass purging of evidence once under suspicion. You didn't get anything right.

Saying Nixon was forced out was incorrect, I corrected you. And trying to say that Reagan didn't get away with Iran-Contra is just as dumb. Go play, partisan.

You were being stupid so I corrected you. Nixon resigned so he would get tossed out. You also failed to support you allegations against Reagan, which I knew from many years experience would happen. New to the game huh?

You are a moron and we're done. Nixon wasn't forced out, he resigned (under pressure to but it was his call still). And Iran-Contra is well known to those of us who lived through it. Reagan was Teflon then.

As long as the impeachment resolution stayed bottled up in committee Nixon would not resign. Once it passed and was on the way to the Full House, he resigned. He also got a full pardon from Ford. RayGun is still Teflon. He just didn't know(remember?) what his men were doing.

I understand the necessity for you Liberals to attempt the slander of the finest and most competent President in the last 100 years...so as to mitigate you votes for rapists, and anti-Americans.....

....but what is the 'guilt' you imagine of Ronaldus Maximus?

 

[G.T.]

minions like banana

This advice may change your life...for the better:

Never make eye contact when eating a banana.

Thats just funny

 

[ptbw forever]

It's the progressive elites of both parties and more than a hundred years of gradual creeping of complete control,
Hillary would complete the total control and good bye constitution, along with our absolute freedom for the elitist to control us all and continued corruption.

Why do you even say this dumb shit? Hillary is Bill, and lacy briefs. Relax, chicken littles. Madam President will not be the end of the nation or your little world of paranoia.

I almost want to see Hillary win in a landslide now just to show you how wrong you will be.

Well, she will win (not in a landslide) and why would she be any worse than Bush or Obama? They are all trying to keep the same house of nutty cards together a while longer. That's the job, that she's very qualified for.

She is campaigning to kick over that house of cards and leave us with nothing.

That is what "progressivism" is.

Why do you believe this total garbage? Did you just make it up? She's no Castro for God's sake, she's Bill in pretty underpants. The entire goal of this thing is to keep it together. That's why Trump has only the support of those with nothing to lose. Everyone with real skin in the game wants Clinton because they know exactly what she will do. more of the same that made them very rich.

Because that is what her nutterbutter tumblr base wants her to do. The same pieces of shit who masqueraded as Bernie supporters and violently disrupted political rallies.

Conservatives preserve the status quo. "Progressives" destroy it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So.....who turned America into banana republic....where the law only applies to the little people?

Your system was designed that way, intentionally, from the beginning. You, as the owner/operator of a vagina, were left out altogether hon; no voice at all, property in effect. You have progressive women to thank for not being in that station today.

In 1789 the OP would have been goods, damaged goods sold at a discount. "People" like her were never meant to have a voice here, never. Even Ann Coulter, who she loves, said it was a mistake to give women the vote.

Based on what? The Constitution was written so it could be modified with enough support. Difficult but doable. Technology changed the role of women in the world.

The founder's vision was what it was; for titled property holding white males only.

As usual, your posts rife with lacunae (better look that up).


Usually, the ‘Founders’ refers to these six: Madison, Jefferson and Washington, Adams, Hamilton, and Franklin.

1. The three non-Southerners worked tirelessly against slavery.
2. While reading Ron Chernow’s book Alexander Hamilton, though, I found out that Hamilton was a strong advocate for the abolition of slavery. During the 1780s, Hamilton was one of the founders of the New York Society for Promoting the Manumission of Slaves, which was instrumental in the abolition of slavery in the state of New York. After reading about Alexander Hamilton’s work for the New York Manumission Society, I gained a greater appreciation of Alexander Hamiltonhttp://angelolopez.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/alexander-hamilton-and-the-new-york-manumission-society/
3. Many of the other Founding Fathers were activists like Alexander Hamilton. In 1787Benjamin Franklin agree to serve as president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, which set out to abolish slavery and set up programs to help freed slaves to become good citizens and improve the conditions of free African Americans. On February 12, 1790, Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society presented a petition to the House of Representatives calling for the federal government to take steps for the gradual abolition of slavery and end the slave trade. As a young lawyer, Thomas Jefferson represented a slave in court attempting to be set free and during the 1770s and 1780s, Jefferson had many several attempts to pass legislation to gradually abolish slavery and end the slave trade. John Jay was the first president of the New York Manumission Society and was active in Society’s efforts to abolish slavery. Ibid.

2. An excellent read on the matter is a brilliant book called Miracle in Philadelphia, by Catherine Drinker Bowen, which recounts the actual history and debates around the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Slavery was a huge issue during that convention, and many of the Founding Fathers wanted it outlawed, but ran into an impasse after many hours of debate with the southern colonies whose agricultural productivity depended on it.

The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with a compromise involving the issue of apportionment.

The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.

The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.

The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war.
Big Journalism Articles - Breitbart


Work hard to undo your indoctrination.

Hon, Breitbart versus indoctrination? Please.

"....Breitbart...."

Let's see if I can explain the difference between you and scholarship.

1. Short of outright banning free speech.....certainly on the Left's agenda.....there are several attempts their Janissaries (better look that up, you dunce) use with metronomic regularity, to disqualify and delegitimize....as in your attempt of Breitbart.



2. First step in their playbook of 'delegitimization' is to refuse to accept any statements of fact, or even strongly supported opinion, unless they come from a Leftist source....the NYTimes, HuffPost, the DNC, MSNBC or the like.

Get that?
Only accept an admission from your side.
Is that insane????



3. Frequently a post on the message board includes either a link, quote, or reference to Breitbart, World Net Daily, or Rupert Murdoch, or Ann Coulter, or some other right-thinker, and rather than admit that the item is dispositive (look it up, dope) for the thread or question under discussion, often the Leftist,totalitarians, with the alternate view:

a. refuse to address the issue, because the citation is on the opposite side (e.g., your post)

b. resort to an emoticon of laughter, or some sort of sign of disrespect, or the use of ‘lol.’

c. feel that some sort of “there you go again” response, rather than an actual refutation.

d. Attack the referred item with an Ad Hominem jab, pointing to an imagined physical or mental defect, or alter the name in some absurd manner.

In short....anything but an actual response.



4. What we have here is the kind of defense against opposing ideas that is indolent at best, and intellectually cowardly at worst.


5. As an example, FrontPage, the online Internet magazine has received more than one billion ‘hits.’ It has interviewed leading intellectuals, politicians and human rights activists such as Bat Ye’or, Vladimir Bukovsky, Christopher Hitchens, Khaleel Mohammed, Daniel Pipes, Natan Sharanky and Andrew Sullivan. It has therefore had both left, liberal voices (Stanley Aronowitz, Susan Estrich, Michael Lerner) and right-wing voices (Tammy Bruce, Ann Coulter, James Woolsey).



6. To dismiss a source or author because they promulgate an alternative or even a hated perspective, without consideration of the truth of their premise lacks integrity....intellectual and moral.


I'm not optimistic of you learning from this.....but you'll be unable to deny it.

 

[Fenton Lum]

In 1789 the OP would have been goods, damaged goods sold at a discount. "People" like her were never meant to have a voice here, never. Even Ann Coulter, who she loves, said it was a mistake to give women the vote.

Based on what? The Constitution was written so it could be modified with enough support. Difficult but doable. Technology changed the role of women in the world.

The founder's vision was what it was; for titled property holding white males only.

As usual, your posts rife with lacunae (better look that up).


Usually, the ‘Founders’ refers to these six: Madison, Jefferson and Washington, Adams, Hamilton, and Franklin.

1. The three non-Southerners worked tirelessly against slavery.
2. While reading Ron Chernow’s book Alexander Hamilton, though, I found out that Hamilton was a strong advocate for the abolition of slavery. During the 1780s, Hamilton was one of the founders of the New York Society for Promoting the Manumission of Slaves, which was instrumental in the abolition of slavery in the state of New York. After reading about Alexander Hamilton’s work for the New York Manumission Society, I gained a greater appreciation of Alexander Hamiltonhttp://angelolopez.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/alexander-hamilton-and-the-new-york-manumission-society/
3. Many of the other Founding Fathers were activists like Alexander Hamilton. In 1787Benjamin Franklin agree to serve as president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, which set out to abolish slavery and set up programs to help freed slaves to become good citizens and improve the conditions of free African Americans. On February 12, 1790, Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society presented a petition to the House of Representatives calling for the federal government to take steps for the gradual abolition of slavery and end the slave trade. As a young lawyer, Thomas Jefferson represented a slave in court attempting to be set free and during the 1770s and 1780s, Jefferson had many several attempts to pass legislation to gradually abolish slavery and end the slave trade. John Jay was the first president of the New York Manumission Society and was active in Society’s efforts to abolish slavery. Ibid.

2. An excellent read on the matter is a brilliant book called Miracle in Philadelphia, by Catherine Drinker Bowen, which recounts the actual history and debates around the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Slavery was a huge issue during that convention, and many of the Founding Fathers wanted it outlawed, but ran into an impasse after many hours of debate with the southern colonies whose agricultural productivity depended on it.

The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with a compromise involving the issue of apportionment.

The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.

The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.

The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war.
Big Journalism Articles - Breitbart


Work hard to undo your indoctrination.

Hon, Breitbart versus indoctrination? Please.

"....Breitbart...."

Let's see if I can explain the difference between you and scholarship.

1. Short of outright banning free speech.....certainly on the Left's agenda.....there are several attempts their Janissaries (better look that up, you dunce) use with metronomic regularity, to disqualify and delegitimize....as in your attempt of Breitbart.



2. First step in their playbook of 'delegitimization' is to refuse to accept any statements of fact, or even strongly supported opinion, unless they come from a Leftist source....the NYTimes, HuffPost, the DNC, MSNBC or the like.

Get that?
Only accept an admission from your side.
Is that insane????



3. Frequently a post on the message board includes either a link, quote, or reference to Breitbart, World Net Daily, or Rupert Murdoch, or Ann Coulter, or some other right-thinker, and rather than admit that the item is dispositive (look it up, dope) for the thread or question under discussion, often the Leftist,totalitarians, with the alternate view:

a. refuse to address the issue, because the citation is on the opposite side (e.g., your post)

b. resort to an emoticon of laughter, or some sort of sign of disrespect, or the use of ‘lol.’

c. feel that some sort of “there you go again” response, rather than an actual refutation.

d. Attack the referred item with an Ad Hominem jab, pointing to an imagined physical or mental defect, or alter the name in some absurd manner.

In short....anything but an actual response.



4. What we have here is the kind of defense against opposing ideas that is indolent at best, and intellectually cowardly at worst.


5. As an example, FrontPage, the online Internet magazine has received more than one billion ‘hits.’ It has interviewed leading intellectuals, politicians and human rights activists such as Bat Ye’or, Vladimir Bukovsky, Christopher Hitchens, Khaleel Mohammed, Daniel Pipes, Natan Sharanky and Andrew Sullivan. It has therefore had both left, liberal voices (Stanley Aronowitz, Susan Estrich, Michael Lerner) and right-wing voices (Tammy Bruce, Ann Coulter, James Woolsey).



6. To dismiss a source or author because they promulgate an alternative or even a hated perspective, without consideration of the truth of their premise lacks integrity....intellectual and moral.


I'm not optimistic of you learning from this.....but you'll be unable to deny it.

Everyone knows what Breitbart is love, even you.