Why all the panic on the Left?

[Wyatt earp]

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Why on Earth would anyone believe a current-day Democrat, or anyone connected with them?

No kidding..they make shit up all the time, like that new wapo story with no pictures

 

[Ame®icano]

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

What early news? The article you linked to is from September this year, and it was revised few times already.

Shokin simply saying that he was asked to resign without knowledge that was on Biden's request. When he find out what's the real reason he was asked to resign, he gave his statement.

Tell me, what Shokin has to gain by giving his statement?

 

[Ame®icano]

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Why on Earth would anyone believe a current-day Democrat, or anyone connected with them?

Just wait for more news about sweetheart deals with Ukraine. Like Pelosi's son Paul dealing with Ukrainian clean energy companies. Back in 2017 he traveled to Ukraine in his capacity as executive director of the Corporate Governance Initiative, a position was given few months earlier. When asked about it, he said that "he was in Ukraine to discuss a youth soccer partnership with the government".

 

[Faun]

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Why on Earth would anyone believe a current-day Democrat, or anyone connected with them?

 

[Rustic]

Serious question to Impeachment supporters:

Are you more, or less convinced of this current accusation than you were of Mueller proving Russian Collusion?

I was never convinced Trump colluded with Russia. I am convinced he is being rightfully impeached for soliciting a foreign national to help with his campaign.

First of all there should be at least a two-year investigation on Biden and his Spawns corruption... That being said trumps actions obviously are not impeachable. L9l

Who's stopping the Republican Senate from investigating Biden?

Lol
There are no conservatives left in the GOP

 

[MAGAman]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

 

[Faun]

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

What early news? The article you linked to is from September this year, and it was revised few times already.

Shokin simply saying that he was asked to resign without knowledge that was on Biden's request. When he find out what's the real reason he was asked to resign, he gave his statement.

Tell me, what Shokin has to gain by giving his statement?

From 2016, reporting about December, 2015...

Ukraine Day 776: With Prosecutor General Out Of The Way, Has Poroshenko Turned A Corner On Corruption?

In a last September, the United States ambassador, Geoffrey Pyatt, said corruption was as dangerous for Ukraine as was the Russian support for a military insurgency in eastern Ukraine. And on a visit last December, Vice President Joseph Biden Jr. said corruption was eating Ukraine "like a cancer." Among the examples Mr. Pyatt cited was the seizure in Britain of $23 million in illicit assets from the former Ukrainian ecology minister, Mykola Zlochevsky; Mr. Shokin's office, however, declared that there was no case against the minister, and the money was released.​

It was reported then that Shokin wasn't investigating Burisma.

 

[BULLDOG]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

 

[MAGAman]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

It wasn't taken from a recording. Presidents havent had their conversations recorded for decades. It was transcribed live.

Nobody disputes its accuracy. The Ukes confirm Trump did not pressure them.

You're being used as a tool, and you don't seem to care.

 

[BULLDOG]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

It wasn't taken from a recording. Presidents havent had their conversations recorded for decades. It was transcribed live.

Nobody disputes its accuracy. The Ukes confirm Trump did not pressure them.

You're being used as a tool, and you don't seem to care.

View attachment 288039

A transcription is a word for word record of a conversation. That's not what the white house released.

 

[MAGAman]

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

Again... You've got nobody that disputes its accuracy.

The impeachment is based on 2nd hand information of someone that didn't "feel" it was proper.

Like all Fascists, you've got an investigation looking for a crime.

 

[BULLDOG]

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

Again... You've got nobody that disputes its accuracy.

The impeachment is based on 2nd hand information of someone that didn't "feel" it was proper.

Like all Fascists, you've got an investigation looking for a crime.

Vindman was present at the conversation, and he testified that key points of the conversation were left out of what the white house released. A first hand witness disputes it's accuracy.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

Again... You've got nobody that disputes its accuracy.

The impeachment is based on 2nd hand information of someone that didn't "feel" it was proper.

Like all Fascists, you've got an investigation looking for a crime.

Vindman was present at the conversation, and he testified that key points of the conversation were left out of what the white house released. A first hand witness disputes it's accuracy.

So he says.

 

[Faun]

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

Again... You've got nobody that disputes its accuracy.

The impeachment is based on 2nd hand information of someone that didn't "feel" it was proper.

Like all Fascists, you've got an investigation looking for a crime.

Liar. Vindman disputed its accuracy.

White House disputes Vindman account of transcript edits

 

[MAGAman]

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

Keep digging.

 

[harmonica]

those ''allies'' [ hahahah= idiotic choice of word to use ] are fking us over
allies---hahahahhahahahah
they are NOT allies

They fought with us in wars. They are trading partners. Mexico, Canada, UK, Germany, France. People like the Kurds who fought with us side by side.

Your fat assed orange POS buddy calls therm childish names.

Trtump calls trade deficits loses. That is how stupid he is.

..they are doing their best to take care of THEIR countries --they couldn't care LESS about the US--when are you going to wake up???
..it's a ''fk your buddy world'''--DUH

Spewing Trump talk really makes you look dumber than shit.

Every country looks out for themselves but they rely on other countries in trade & security among other things like joining together to create abetter world.

So. Why has it not resulted in a better world? Why is it getting worse?

(Billy hands you a mirror.)

Trump has made it worse.

It was going much better under Obama.

We had the TPP & the Paris Accord.

..Paris Accord is the typical ''agreement'' that is worthless..and screwed over the US
..you're a real genius if you want to screw yourself over --Real Smart Real Dave

 

[rightwinger]

They fought with us in wars. They are trading partners. Mexico, Canada, UK, Germany, France. People like the Kurds who fought with us side by side.

Your fat assed orange POS buddy calls therm childish names.

Trtump calls trade deficits loses. That is how stupid he is.

..they are doing their best to take care of THEIR countries --they couldn't care LESS about the US--when are you going to wake up???
..it's a ''fk your buddy world'''--DUH

Spewing Trump talk really makes you look dumber than shit.

Every country looks out for themselves but they rely on other countries in trade & security among other things like joining together to create abetter world.

So. Why has it not resulted in a better world? Why is it getting worse?

(Billy hands you a mirror.)

Trump has made it worse.

It was going much better under Obama.

We had the TPP & the Paris Accord.

..Paris Accord is the typical ''agreement'' that is worthless..and screwed over the US
..you're a real genius if you want to screw yourself over --Real Smart Real Dave

More victimhood from Conservatives

 

[Nostra]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

It is a transcript. It says it may not be verbatim because it is taken from notes, not a recording. You have nothing.

Your impeachment NOTHINGBURGER will turn out like your COLLUSION NOTHINGBURGER........it will blow up in your face.

 

[BULLDOG]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

It is a transcript. It says it may not be verbatim because it is taken from notes, not a recording. You have nothing.

Your impeachment NOTHINGBURGER will turn out like your COLLUSION NOTHINGBURGER........it will blow up in your face.

Trump's Ukraine call transcript: Read the document

 

[Nostra]

Biden "I'm leaving here in 6 hours. If the prosecutor isn't fired you're not getting the Billion Dollars".

False equivalence.

Not in the way you wish.

There is video evidence of Biden's quid pro quo.

The transcript exonerates Trump.

Again, that is not a transcript. It says on the document that it is not a transcript.

It is a transcript. It says it may not be verbatim because it is taken from notes, not a recording. You have nothing.

Your impeachment NOTHINGBURGER will turn out like your COLLUSION NOTHINGBURGER........it will blow up in your face.

Trump's Ukraine call transcript: Read the document
View attachment 288125

Thanks for doing all that legwork to confirm my post.