emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
- Thread starter
- #21
To answer your question:What is it about the Danish and French humor that illicited death threats and outrage, is it really the focus on images of Mohammad, or is it if the humor is mean spirited or good natured, or what?
There are even muslin comedians who poke fun at terrorists and fundamentalist members of the religion. Most muslims have no problem with satire and humor against public figures and the government.
But the Danish and French cartoons and videos were direct attacks on Prophet Muhammad, the Quran, and Islam.
And is beyond offensive to the average muslin and will not be tolerated. .......![]()
Thank you, Sunni Man.
I would like your help on this point.
Given that we are bound to follow civil laws,
what would you recommend as the best way to RESOLVE when this breach occurs?
The response by death threats, bombings and killings does not respect due process of laws.
Some people may or may not feel it is the fault of the triggers for inciting such response.
How can leaders of all faiths come together
and agree what is the process if a violation occurs, and people want to redress the grievances?
If the Muslims for example do set up a central network and agreed system of
petitioning when any such violation occurs, could all followers even these extreme Jihadist
groups AGREE to use that if they want to protest and have an offense corrected?
And if they don't believe in going through a due process civilly
can we still set up an agreement among those who do,
so we can weed out the ones who believe otherwise.
Could we possible set up places where people who DON'T believe in following
due process, but WANT to live under totalitarian regimes of the govt (or anyone) acting
as judge/jury/executioner without check, carrying out executions without due process or defense,
CAN agree to stay within those zones.
And if we, the others, find such people within our tribes, we can refer them there.
So if some Christians live by totalitarian Zionist whatever
they have a place to go live that way. We aren't trying to dictate or take
away their religion, but just saying we don't agree to give up our due process.
but here's a place that you can bypass that, so you can practice freely over there.
How could we work toward SEPARATING the Jihadists from the Muslims who do respect the civil laws
and equal religious freedom of others, and the Zionists and Armaggedonist types from the Christians who follow civil laws.
And for grievances, such as not mocking images of Mohammad,
how can we spell out an agreement what is the civil procedure for addressing and correcting when that happens?
What would you suggest or believe should happen?