Why Conservatives are obsessed with Obama's grades

[HUGGY]

Where does his money come from? Where does he invest? What are his writeoffs? What is his effective tax rate? If he passes further tax cuts for the wealthy, whats in it for him?

Romney's response - None of your fucking business, pissant.

Ya REALLY think calling the prospective future employers AKA the American citizens "pissants" is a good idea?

Doesn't look good on the job app moron.

 

[Liability]

Where does his money come from? Where does he invest? What are his writeoffs? What is his effective tax rate? If he passes further tax cuts for the wealthy, whats in it for him?

Romney's response - None of your fucking business, pissant.

Ya REALLY think calling the prospective future employers AKA the American citizens "pissants" is a good idea?

Doesn't look good on the job app moron.

Except he wouldn't be talking to the people. He'd be talking to some partisan leftist "journalist."

 

[Article 15]

So the Dems weren't fiscally responsible, they could of had their way at the beginning of 2009 and they didn't, the reason is the same reason they didn't let them expire, they didn't want to and wanted a political football.

It was just as prudent then as today, he caved and was afraid of a backlash after getting drubbed in the elections of 2010.

"The Dems weren't fiscally responsible (by not raising taxes in early 2009 while the economy was in a free fall)"

"Just as prudent then as today"

You become more of a hack everytime I engage you. Your history revision is laughable.

You've been told why they didn't raise taxes right way and why the situation between the begging of 2009 and December 2010 were light years apart. When Obama took office in 2009 is back then we were losing three quarters of a million jobs a month and GDP was plummetting. In Dec 2010 were were adding jobs and GDP was growing.

To say they "didn't want to raise taxes/let the cuts lapse" is flat out wrong. They wanted to let the cuts lapse on income earned over 250k but Obama and the Dems "caved" because the GOP put struggling Americans on the traintracks to prevent the Bush tax cuts from lapsing on income earned over 250k. Were you in coma or just a drunken stupor when all that was going down?

Open your eyes, retard. The GOP was willing to take food off the table of Americans struggling the most to ensure that top income earners could save 3% on their income beyond 250k.

When it comes to fiscal responsibility the left is running circles around modern day republicans who are beholden to the wealthy elite and an idea that Grover Norquist wet dreamed up when he was 12.

Just because you believe in fairytales, doesn't mean I have to.
If they had done nothing in 2010 the cuts would have expired. Ever since the tax cuts went into effect the liberals have told us it was a tax cut ONLY for the rich. Now, you guys say it is not.

My idea is to cut spending, big time, repeal Obamacare, raise taxes for 5 years on everyone, and then reduce them once we get the budget under control cut out the loopholes, shut down the offshore accounts.

I also am for no corporate welfare, no subsidies, no funding silly research projects and so on.

It is time for government to tighten up and neither party will do it.

Reagan was the last President to cut loopholes in the tax code, since then, they have increased. It's time to cut out loopholes.

I know the Dems won't tackle any of those issues, so spare me how any one is more fiscally conservative than the other.

I like Romney just because he will spark the economy.

Nothing that I said was a fairy tale, you just can't deal with it.

And I dare you to find any post of mine where I said that the tax cuts were "only" for the wealthy. An uniformed American, I am not.

Reagan was no fiscal conservative either. He tripled the debt and kicked off the massive distribution of wealth to the wealthy elite.

And I don't care what your plan is but it sounds radical, the kind of thing that would put the economy in another tailspin.

Getting back to a deficit neutral budget has to be a slow landing. Herking and jerking the wheel like you suggest would wrap the country around a telephone pole.

 

[Moonglow]

Here's the real answeer to why Conservatives are "obsessed" as the OP calls them, over Obama's grades:

Because they are hidden from the public. It's the same reason that the left is obsessed with Romney's tax returns.

Bush hid his college transcripts, but they were leaked. Do you think all presidents release their transcripts? No, Only cause Oblama did it is it any issue.

 

[Moonglow]

"The Dems weren't fiscally responsible (by not raising taxes in early 2009 while the economy was in a free fall)"

"Just as prudent then as today"

You become more of a hack everytime I engage you. Your history revision is laughable.

You've been told why they didn't raise taxes right way and why the situation between the begging of 2009 and December 2010 were light years apart. When Obama took office in 2009 is back then we were losing three quarters of a million jobs a month and GDP was plummetting. In Dec 2010 were were adding jobs and GDP was growing.

To say they "didn't want to raise taxes/let the cuts lapse" is flat out wrong. They wanted to let the cuts lapse on income earned over 250k but Obama and the Dems "caved" because the GOP put struggling Americans on the traintracks to prevent the Bush tax cuts from lapsing on income earned over 250k. Were you in coma or just a drunken stupor when all that was going down?

Open your eyes, retard. The GOP was willing to take food off the table of Americans struggling the most to ensure that top income earners could save 3% on their income beyond 250k.

When it comes to fiscal responsibility the left is running circles around modern day republicans who are beholden to the wealthy elite and an idea that Grover Norquist wet dreamed up when he was 12.

Just because you believe in fairytales, doesn't mean I have to.
If they had done nothing in 2010 the cuts would have expired. Ever since the tax cuts went into effect the liberals have told us it was a tax cut ONLY for the rich. Now, you guys say it is not.

My idea is to cut spending, big time, repeal Obamacare, raise taxes for 5 years on everyone, and then reduce them once we get the budget under control cut out the loopholes, shut down the offshore accounts.

I also am for no corporate welfare, no subsidies, no funding silly research projects and so on.

It is time for government to tighten up and neither party will do it.

Reagan was the last President to cut loopholes in the tax code, since then, they have increased. It's time to cut out loopholes.

I know the Dems won't tackle any of those issues, so spare me how any one is more fiscally conservative than the other.

I like Romney just because he will spark the economy.

Nothing that I said was a fairy tale, you just can't deal with it.

And I dare you to find any post of mine where I said that the tax cuts were "only" for the wealthy. An uniformed American, I am not.

Reagan was no fiscal conservative either. He tripled the debt and kicked off the massive distribution of wealth to the wealthy elite.

And I don't care what your plan is but it sounds radical, the kind of thing that would put the economy in another tailspin.

Getting back to a deficit neutral budget has to be a slow landing. Herking and jerking the wheel like you suggest would wrap the country around a telephone pole.

Reagan also raised taxes 11 times during a recession

 

[HUGGY]

Romney's response - None of your fucking business, pissant.

Ya REALLY think calling the prospective future employers AKA the American citizens "pissants" is a good idea?

Doesn't look good on the job app moron.

Except he wouldn't be talking to the people. He'd be talking to some partisan leftist "journalist."

I'm pretty sure any reasonably curious and interested American following this election would like more transparancy from Mittens. Assuming Americans do not care ...meaning we are stupid and lack the sophistication to ask such questions could likely prove fatal to Willards chances.

 

[Liability]

Here's the real answeer to why Conservatives are "obsessed" as the OP calls them, over Obama's grades:

Because they are hidden from the public. It's the same reason that the left is obsessed with Romney's tax returns.

Bush hid his college transcripts, but they were leaked. Do you think all presidents release their transcripts? No, Only cause Oblama did it is it any issue.

No. W did not HIDE his transcripts. Like the incumbent piece of shit, W declined to release them. They are protected under some Fed law. But that didn't stop the fucking media from breaking the law and obtaining his records.

Funny that nobody in the objective media has any interest in doing as much for The ONE.

 

[Liability]

Ya REALLY think calling the prospective future employers AKA the American citizens "pissants" is a good idea?

Doesn't look good on the job app moron.

Except he wouldn't be talking to the people. He'd be talking to some partisan leftist "journalist."

I'm pretty sure any reasonably curious and interested American following this election would like more transparancy from Mittens. Assuming Americans do not care ...meaning we are stupid and lack the sophistication to ask such questions could likely prove fatal to Willards chances.

Doubtful. They already know he's rich. The orchestrated "reveal all your tax filings" campaign against Mitt is perceived by thinking people for what it is: bullshit cheap political theater from the left wing media on behalf of their favored left wing candidate. Nothing more.

But I BET ya lots of folks would like to know what Pres. Obama is actively hiding in HIS fucking academic records.

 

[Article 15]

Here's the real answeer to why Conservatives are "obsessed" as the OP calls them, over Obama's grades:

Because they are hidden from the public. It's the same reason that the left is obsessed with Romney's tax returns.

Bush hid his college transcripts, but they were leaked. Do you think all presidents release their transcripts? No, Only cause Oblama did it is it any issue.

No. W did not HIDE his transcripts. Like the incumbent piece of shit, W declined to release them. They are protected under some Fed law. But that didn't stop the fucking media from breaking the law and obtaining his records.

Funny that nobody in the objective media has any interest in doing as much for The ONE.

Al Gore's transcripts were leaked too.

And you are kidding yourself if you think that the media isn't trying get their hands on both Obama's and Romney's transcripts.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Just because you believe in fairytales, doesn't mean I have to.
If they had done nothing in 2010 the cuts would have expired. Ever since the tax cuts went into effect the liberals have told us it was a tax cut ONLY for the rich. Now, you guys say it is not.

My idea is to cut spending, big time, repeal Obamacare, raise taxes for 5 years on everyone, and then reduce them once we get the budget under control cut out the loopholes, shut down the offshore accounts.

I also am for no corporate welfare, no subsidies, no funding silly research projects and so on.

It is time for government to tighten up and neither party will do it.

Reagan was the last President to cut loopholes in the tax code, since then, they have increased. It's time to cut out loopholes.

I know the Dems won't tackle any of those issues, so spare me how any one is more fiscally conservative than the other.

I like Romney just because he will spark the economy.

Nothing that I said was a fairy tale, you just can't deal with it.

And I dare you to find any post of mine where I said that the tax cuts were "only" for the wealthy. An uniformed American, I am not.

Reagan was no fiscal conservative either. He tripled the debt and kicked off the massive distribution of wealth to the wealthy elite.

And I don't care what your plan is but it sounds radical, the kind of thing that would put the economy in another tailspin.

Getting back to a deficit neutral budget has to be a slow landing. Herking and jerking the wheel like you suggest would wrap the country around a telephone pole.

Reagan also raised taxes 11 times during a recession

Raised them all the way from 70% to 28%.

 

[Liability]

Nothing that I said was a fairy tale, you just can't deal with it.

And I dare you to find any post of mine where I said that the tax cuts were "only" for the wealthy. An uniformed American, I am not.

Reagan was no fiscal conservative either. He tripled the debt and kicked off the massive distribution of wealth to the wealthy elite.

And I don't care what your plan is but it sounds radical, the kind of thing that would put the economy in another tailspin.

Getting back to a deficit neutral budget has to be a slow landing. Herking and jerking the wheel like you suggest would wrap the country around a telephone pole.

Reagan also raised taxes 11 times during a recession

Raised them all the way from 70% to 28%.

If that's the case, raise 'em some more.

Otherwise, please have Pres. Obama just back the fuck up.

 

[HUGGY]

Except he wouldn't be talking to the people. He'd be talking to some partisan leftist "journalist."

I'm pretty sure any reasonably curious and interested American following this election would like more transparancy from Mittens. Assuming Americans do not care ...meaning we are stupid and lack the sophistication to ask such questions could likely prove fatal to Willards chances.

Doubtful. They already know he's rich. The orchestrated "reveal all your tax filings" campaign against Mitt is perceived by thinking people for what it is: bullshit cheap political theater from the left wing media on behalf of their favored left wing candidate. Nothing more.

But I BET ya lots of folks would like to know what Pres. Obama is actively hiding in HIS fucking academic records.

Seriously? I'd like to see the data on that supposition. And inspite of all this academic transcript treachery Obama is still maintaining a very high likeability in the public? Astonishing! How is it that you seem to think we are at square one in the vetting? Didn't you get the memo? Obama has already passed muster. He was elected. Mittens has not allowed the American public vetting. He will not be elected if he does not become a lot more open about how "he became rich". I know a lot of "rich" people. Some I would not want anywhere near a position of public power...some I would welcome. How we know who we would trust has EVERYTHING to do with how the candidate made and handles his fortune.

Ya I realize you are here to just fling poo but in your own miserable life if you are the attorney you claim to be you would vet the pool guy better than you have requested of your potential future president. I bet THAT.

 

[Liability]

Bush hid his college transcripts, but they were leaked. Do you think all presidents release their transcripts? No, Only cause Oblama did it is it any issue.

No. W did not HIDE his transcripts. Like the incumbent piece of shit, W declined to release them. They are protected under some Fed law. But that didn't stop the fucking media from breaking the law and obtaining his records.

Funny that nobody in the objective media has any interest in doing as much for The ONE.

Al Gore's transcripts were leaked too.

And you are kidding yourself if you think that the media isn't trying get their hands on both Obama's and Romney's transcripts.

I give you some credit for that thought. Maybe they are trying. But, evidently, it's a half heart-ed effort.

 

[Liability]

I'm pretty sure any reasonably curious and interested American following this election would like more transparancy from Mittens. Assuming Americans do not care ...meaning we are stupid and lack the sophistication to ask such questions could likely prove fatal to Willards chances.

Doubtful. They already know he's rich. The orchestrated "reveal all your tax filings" campaign against Mitt is perceived by thinking people for what it is: bullshit cheap political theater from the left wing media on behalf of their favored left wing candidate. Nothing more.

But I BET ya lots of folks would like to know what Pres. Obama is actively hiding in HIS fucking academic records.

Seriously? I'd like to see the data on that supposition. And inspite of all this academic transcript treachery Obama is still maintaining a very high likeability in the public? Astonishing! How is it that you seem to think we are at square one in the vetting? Didn't you get the memo? Obama has already passed muster. He was elected. Mittens has not allowed the American public vetting. He will not be elected if he does not become a lot more open about how "he became rich". I know a lot of "rich" people. Some I would not want anywhere near a position of public power...some I would welcome. How we know who we would trust has EVERYTHING to do with how the candidate made and handles his fortune.

Ya I realize you are here to just fling poo but in your own miserable life if you are the attorney you claim to be you would vet the pool guy better than you have requested of your potential future president. I bet THAT.

Don't know what you been smokin' there lad, but the Obama likeability quotient is falling: http://decodedscience.com/new-romney-vs-obama-poll/16522

That piece notes that while it is still high, it is clearly in the process of waning when you see how Romney fares in key areas of likeability.

 

[Papageorgio]

The cool part about taking note of the REFUSAL of The ONE to be transparent about his fucking academic records is: if any of the whining, obsequious lib Obamaphiles try to contend that the complaint makes any of us a closet "birfer," the ANSWER is withering.

IF it's true (and the son of a bitch won't answer us, so we don't know if it is true or not) but IF it's true that Pres. Obama is busy concealing his academic records because he claimed to be a foreign student (in order to get assistance to pay for school), WE don't have to be BIRFERS to make the suggestion!

It was (perhaps) HIS claim. And it doesn't even have to be TRUE!

If he was NOT born out of the country (and I presume to this moment that he was born in Hawaii), then he is eligible to be President as a natural born citizen. See? No birfer shit required. But if that's the case, and he GOT financial assistance on the basis of a CLAIM that he was a foreign student, then releasing the academic records might REVEAL that he lied.

If I were him, I wouldn't trip over myself to release such recorded confirmation of a criminal fraud I had perpetrated, either.

ON the other hand, perhaps he DIDN'T lie and commit a criminal fraud. But if he claimed entitlement to foreign aid as a student without lying, then -- well, now maybe we have some birfer shit to discuss. Of course, in THAT CASE if I were Pres. Obama, I STILL wouldn't trip over myself to release those records.

Why not release the records, Mr. President?

I really don't care if he releases his terrible grades, the fact is a foreign national, the fact he has dual citizenship, or that his thesis proves him to be a socialist.

It matters not about what he is covering up, the man ran on his changing Washington and transparency.

He has lied, he has ran some of the dirtiest campaign tactics. This is from the man that claims he was hope and change.

So I expect nothing from a man that is using dividing tactics to win his 2nd term, not one of his ads touts all he has done for America, he just want to divide America.

 

[peach174]

Conservatives are not obsessed with Obama grades.
We want to know what the hell he was learning, what he was being taught.
One thing for sure, was not economics.

 

[Moonglow]

Except he wouldn't be talking to the people. He'd be talking to some partisan leftist "journalist."

I'm pretty sure any reasonably curious and interested American following this election would like more transparancy from Mittens. Assuming Americans do not care ...meaning we are stupid and lack the sophistication to ask such questions could likely prove fatal to Willards chances.

Doubtful. They already know he's rich. The orchestrated "reveal all your tax filings" campaign against Mitt is perceived by thinking people for what it is: bullshit cheap political theater from the left wing media on behalf of their favored left wing candidate. Nothing more.

But I BET ya lots of folks would like to know what Pres. Obama is actively hiding in HIS fucking academic records.

the dems are trying to hold Mittens to the same thing his Dad did when he ran for office. It is really a dead issue now, but please continue.

 

[ConzHateUSA]

Conservatives are not obsessed with Obama grades.
We want to know what the hell he was learning, what he was being taught.
One thing for sure, was not economics.

No, you just hate him cuz he is Black...

give it a rest, if America is allowed to vote on election day, Obama in a landslide

 

[Moonglow]

Conservatives are not obsessed with Obama grades.
We want to know what the hell he was learning, what he was being taught.
One thing for sure, was not economics.

Is it really any of your business?

 

[rightwinger]

To be serious...who the hell cares about college grades thirty years after the fact?