BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,602
- 2,180
There will never be enough proof to Reagan supporters and there was never a serious investigation.
Meaning you don't have Jack but you dislike Reagan so much you'll believe a completely unsubstantiated story, we get it.
No it means we could have Reagan on tape(which we do) admitting he traded weapons for hostages and dupes will tell us he meant mythical hostages in Lebanon by mythical pro Iranian groups that Reagan felt compelled to send billions in weapons to get released.
I remember it well. There were hostages in Lebanon. Iran did help secure their release. Then the terrorist in Lebanon captured more hostages. The Reagan Administration sold the weapons and diverted the profits covertly to fund the militants besieging Nicaragua. That had nothing to do with the 1979 hostage crisis which was in fact resolved by the time Reagan took office.