Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if someone heard the first shot and decided to start shooting Brown while the cop was shooting. This cop might have missed every one of those shots. Someone over at the grassy knoll might've done it.The cop did kill Brown. Officer gun went off, bullets from said gun went into Browns body. Heart stop beating from High blood pressure...just kidding...heart stopped from bullets
That usually means that the person with the gun killed the person his bullets went into
Usually... yes. But not necessarily.
What does that mean? lol
I forgot about that lol
How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
The cop did kill Brown. Officer gun went off, bullets from said gun went into Browns body. Heart stop beating from High blood pressure...just kidding...heart stopped from bullets
That usually means that the person with the gun killed the person his bullets went into
Usually... yes. But not necessarily.
What does that mean? lol
Let's see
Cop shoots suspect, suspect keeps running gets ran over by car and dies. Cop didn't kill suspect.
Just as one example of where something like that could happen.
Except thats not what happened. He shot Brown and Brown died. Not from the flu or ebola from bullets.
Cops bullets + Shot into Brown + dead = Brown was killed
Until the ballistics report is made public you simply don't know that as fact.
See, your criticizing me for thinking some things are facts has backfired on you here.
Is it likely that any other bullets killed Brown? No, but those facts are not in evidence yet.
Yep simplistic over the top comparing apples and pears explains everything to you people.This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
He never presented a danger which warranted the use of deadly force.A drunk guy with a gun in the middle of the street doesn't present a reasonable threat?he didn't threaten to kill people you lying fuckWell, Rabid is the definition of stupid, ignorant people. A white man with a gun threatoning to kill people is just someone having a bad day. But a black teenager jaywalking is a threat to society and should be gunned down.
Really?
How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
What if someone heard the first shot and decided to start shooting Brown while the cop was shooting. This cop might have missed every one of those shots. Someone over at the grassy knoll might've done it.The cop did kill Brown. Officer gun went off, bullets from said gun went into Browns body. Heart stop beating from High blood pressure...just kidding...heart stopped from bullets
That usually means that the person with the gun killed the person his bullets went into
Usually... yes. But not necessarily.
What does that mean? lol
I forgot about that lol
That would be a good story for a movie.
Guy takes advantage of a police shooting to murder someone LOL I mean you know ignoring the whole odds of the police firing at someone you wanted to kill while you were in near proximity with a gun thing.
He never presented a danger which warranted the use of deadly force.A drunk guy with a gun in the middle of the street doesn't present a reasonable threat?he didn't threaten to kill people you lying fuckWell, Rabid is the definition of stupid, ignorant people. A white man with a gun threatoning to kill people is just someone having a bad day. But a black teenager jaywalking is a threat to society and should be gunned down.
Really?
A drunk guy with a gun is always a threat.
What was he the enemy of? What group or militia did he belong to? Was his gun loaded? Was he prepared to shoot? Was he threatening in any way? Did he announce his intentions?Yep simplistic over the top comparing apples and pears explains everything to you people.This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
bullshit, you tell me how that guy didn't become an "enemy combatant" the moment he put a scope on any LEO? If I had been the government sniper watching that guy that day I would have drilled him deader than last night's fish dinner.
He never presented a danger which warranted the use of deadly force.A drunk guy with a gun in the middle of the street doesn't present a reasonable threat?he didn't threaten to kill people you lying fuckWell, Rabid is the definition of stupid, ignorant people. A white man with a gun threatoning to kill people is just someone having a bad day. But a black teenager jaywalking is a threat to society and should be gunned down.
Really?
A drunk guy with a gun is always a threat.
A threat to do what? He had is gun on his shoulder and was screaming. He was not a threat. If he had been black and been shot, you'd be up in here screaming about racist cops, so just shut the fuck up.
From what I heard about "that incident" the guy in that photo was the only guy on the good guy's side that had a weapon aimed. The hired guns working for the feds were the ones threatening people, killing that rancher's cows etc.How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
That PARTICULAR guy? I don't know, but there were clearly people there who were pointing rifles at police agents. Let's be careful here and not make this about politics or race. If you point a weapon at a police officer you get arrested or killed. PERIOD.
What if someone heard the first shot and decided to start shooting Brown while the cop was shooting. This cop might have missed every one of those shots. Someone over at the grassy knoll might've done it.The cop did kill Brown. Officer gun went off, bullets from said gun went into Browns body. Heart stop beating from High blood pressure...just kidding...heart stopped from bullets
That usually means that the person with the gun killed the person his bullets went into
Usually... yes. But not necessarily.
What does that mean? lol
I forgot about that lol
That would be a good story for a movie.
Guy takes advantage of a police shooting to murder someone LOL I mean you know ignoring the whole odds of the police firing at someone you wanted to kill while you were in near proximity with a gun thing.
We'll get Kevin Costner to star in it.
Hell maybe just the head shots were from someone else. Or maybe the head shot was a ricochet off the guys gold bracelet.
From what I heard about "that incident" the guy in that photo was the only guy on the good guy's side that had a weapon aimed. The hired guns working for the feds were the ones threatening people, killing that rancher's cows etc.How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
That PARTICULAR guy? I don't know, but there were clearly people there who were pointing rifles at police agents. Let's be careful here and not make this about politics or race. If you point a weapon at a police officer you get arrested or killed. PERIOD.
What was he the enemy of? What group or militia did he belong to? Was his gun loaded? Was he prepared to shoot? Was he threatening in any way? Did he announce his intentions?Yep simplistic over the top comparing apples and pears explains everything to you people.This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
bullshit, you tell me how that guy didn't become an "enemy combatant" the moment he put a scope on any LEO? If I had been the government sniper watching that guy that day I would have drilled him deader than last night's fish dinner.
granted pointng a gun at a LEO is a bad career move. But this was an exceptional circumstance. Unlike Brown which happens quite a bit. The two situations are not at all comparable and whoeve introduced this is a twit.
Fortunately they dont hire obese middle aged men without training.From what I heard about "that incident" the guy in that photo was the only guy on the good guy's side that had a weapon aimed. The hired guns working for the feds were the ones threatening people, killing that rancher's cows etc.How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
That PARTICULAR guy? I don't know, but there were clearly people there who were pointing rifles at police agents. Let's be careful here and not make this about politics or race. If you point a weapon at a police officer you get arrested or killed. PERIOD.
I'm telling you, If I'm on the scope on the other side, he's dead.
Yep simplistic over the top comparing apples and pears explains everything to you people.This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
bullshit, you tell me how that guy didn't become an "enemy combatant" the moment he put a scope on any LEO? If I had been the government sniper watching that guy that day I would have drilled him deader than last night's fish dinner.
Fortunately they dont hire obese middle aged men without training.From what I heard about "that incident" the guy in that photo was the only guy on the good guy's side that had a weapon aimed. The hired guns working for the feds were the ones threatening people, killing that rancher's cows etc.How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
That PARTICULAR guy? I don't know, but there were clearly people there who were pointing rifles at police agents. Let's be careful here and not make this about politics or race. If you point a weapon at a police officer you get arrested or killed. PERIOD.
I'm telling you, If I'm on the scope on the other side, he's dead.
Yeah and I'm Carlos Hathcock.Fortunately they dont hire obese middle aged men without training.From what I heard about "that incident" the guy in that photo was the only guy on the good guy's side that had a weapon aimed. The hired guns working for the feds were the ones threatening people, killing that rancher's cows etc.How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
That PARTICULAR guy? I don't know, but there were clearly people there who were pointing rifles at police agents. Let's be careful here and not make this about politics or race. If you point a weapon at a police officer you get arrested or killed. PERIOD.
I'm telling you, If I'm on the scope on the other side, he's dead.
LOL I'm retired US Army MP terminating rank of Colonel. I assure you son, I know my way around the old rifle.
Army training is not the same as LE training.
From what I heard about "that incident" the guy in that photo was the only guy on the good guy's side that had a weapon aimed. The hired guns working for the feds were the ones threatening people, killing that rancher's cows etc.How do you know that guy on the left deserved to be arrested? Because some guy from the press took his photo? Where you there? Was his rifle loaded? Was it pointed at anyone? Were the feds pointing guns at him or his wife and children?This is the problem with stupid ignorant people. They cannot see differences between two similar but different situations.
The man was not presenting an immediate threat. I cant even tell if the gun is loaded. Yeah he was drunk and obnoxious but he never pointed the gun at anyone. And as far as I can tell he never had his finger on the trigger. The jaywalking charge is just trumped up bullshit.
Yes, I see what you mean.
The guy on the left deserved to be arrested, including a bullet through his empty head if necessary.
That PARTICULAR guy? I don't know, but there were clearly people there who were pointing rifles at police agents. Let's be careful here and not make this about politics or race. If you point a weapon at a police officer you get arrested or killed. PERIOD.
I'm telling you, If I'm on the scope on the other side, he's dead.
