Why do conservatives think reducing government would fix our nation's problems?

You know, a constructive debate could be had about limiting some govt agencies from what they are or removing some bad regulations. But no, far right retards like Bi Pat and Toasterpatriot will have nothing of it.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Or reform a needed govt agency, even lessening their power? No! They were never needed! No rules! All govt bad!

These childish morons are like adults that are pissed they had to follow a rule on the playground when they were kids and carried their resentment into their adulthood.

When have leftwing douche nozzles ever considered limiting government agencies? They're constantly screaming that Republicans are destroying America by deregulating when regulations increase every year.

I've said many times that the phrase "limited government" is an oxymoron.
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.
 
You know, a constructive debate could be had about limiting some govt agencies from what they are or removing some bad regulations. But no, far right retards like Bi Pat and Toasterpatriot will have nothing of it.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Or reform a needed govt agency, even lessening their power? No! They were never needed! No rules! All govt bad!

These childish morons are like adults that are pissed they had to follow a rule on the playground when they were kids and carried their resentment into their adulthood.

When have leftwing douche nozzles ever considered limiting government agencies? They're constantly screaming that Republicans are destroying America by deregulating when regulations increase every year.

I've said many times that the phrase "limited government" is an oxymoron.
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.

Working to improve government is like working to improve small pox.
 
You know, a constructive debate could be had about limiting some govt agencies from what they are or removing some bad regulations. But no, far right retards like Bi Pat and Toasterpatriot will have nothing of it.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Or reform a needed govt agency, even lessening their power? No! They were never needed! No rules! All govt bad!

These childish morons are like adults that are pissed they had to follow a rule on the playground when they were kids and carried their resentment into their adulthood.

When have leftwing douche nozzles ever considered limiting government agencies? They're constantly screaming that Republicans are destroying America by deregulating when regulations increase every year.

I've said many times that the phrase "limited government" is an oxymoron.
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.

Working to improve government is like working to improve small pox.

So when are you leaving for Somalia?
 
You know, a constructive debate could be had about limiting some govt agencies from what they are or removing some bad regulations. But no, far right retards like Bi Pat and Toasterpatriot will have nothing of it.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Or reform a needed govt agency, even lessening their power? No! They were never needed! No rules! All govt bad!

These childish morons are like adults that are pissed they had to follow a rule on the playground when they were kids and carried their resentment into their adulthood.

When have leftwing douche nozzles ever considered limiting government agencies? They're constantly screaming that Republicans are destroying America by deregulating when regulations increase every year.

I've said many times that the phrase "limited government" is an oxymoron.
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.

Working to improve government is like working to improve small pox.

So when are you leaving for Somalia?

Somalia has an abundance of government.
 
You know, a constructive debate could be had about limiting some govt agencies from what they are or removing some bad regulations. But no, far right retards like Bi Pat and Toasterpatriot will have nothing of it.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Or reform a needed govt agency, even lessening their power? No! They were never needed! No rules! All govt bad!

These childish morons are like adults that are pissed they had to follow a rule on the playground when they were kids and carried their resentment into their adulthood.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Who said that? Where?
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?


Easy Peasy. The Bigger The Government, the more opportunity for GRAFT. GRAFT is a HUGE TAX on producers and consumers.

The smaller the government, the less distortions to the economy and the lower the cost of doing business.
You aren't addressing the points in my OP.
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?


Easy Peasy. The Bigger The Government, the more opportunity for GRAFT. GRAFT is a HUGE TAX on producers and consumers.

The smaller the government, the less distortions to the economy and the lower the cost of doing business.
You aren't addressing the points in my OP.

Still looking for loopholes?
 
Because the debt is an even bigger problem than most of those. The debt can cause the government and economy to collapse. Remember when our credit rating was reduced? That was just a warning that the US government is not too big to fail, and that if we don't get serious about this debt, very bad things are coming.

Our credit rating dropped because a few republicans sabotaged the government and had it shut down.

That move ironically increased the debt .
Which was truly stupid, because we have always had plenty of revenue to service the debt. There was never a need to default on anything. Of course, other spending would have to be reduced, but that's what normal people do when they face a budget shortfall.
 
"Why do conservatives think reducing government would fix our nation's problems?"
Because MORE government has only worked to F* things up and make things WORSE. This nation, where we are right now, is proof of that.

One of the most frightening things to hear: "Hi, I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."
 
You know, a constructive debate could be had about limiting some govt agencies from what they are or removing some bad regulations. But no, far right retards like Bi Pat and Toasterpatriot will have nothing of it.

Eliminate some regulations that don't work, or replace them with ones that do? No! All bad! No rules! Eliminate them all period!

Or reform a needed govt agency, even lessening their power? No! They were never needed! No rules! All govt bad!

These childish morons are like adults that are pissed they had to follow a rule on the playground when they were kids and carried their resentment into their adulthood.

When have leftwing douche nozzles ever considered limiting government agencies? They're constantly screaming that Republicans are destroying America by deregulating when regulations increase every year.

I've said many times that the phrase "limited government" is an oxymoron.
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.

Working to improve government is like working to improve small pox.

So when are you leaving for Somalia?

Somalia has an abundance of government.
So basically you agree that no libertarian system can function to exist anywhere in the world?
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

My state has a surplus in its road fund yet wants to place a higher fuel tax in order to fix something they already have the money to fix.

My prescriptions costs me $4/month. That's pretty low.

The best way to raise wages is to raise skills. The greater incomes go to those with higher skills.

To fix the public school system, get you fucking Liberals out of it on the national and local levels.

Quit electing Democrats to the local government in Flint and they won't fuck things up

You mean the Wall Street people who support Hillary Clinton, a Democrat?
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world? Beyond the economic toll this has on our country, scientists warn that natural disasters could severely cripple our unstable power grid.

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

It's simple: government has caused all our nation's problems that are humanly solvable. Solution: get rid of the problem.
You're not addressing the points I made. How would reducing government help those issues? Explain HOW.

Quit electing Liberals and see how quickly things get better.
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

You first.. how would increasing government fix these things? Shit, we've been increasing it every year and by your own admission, it's worse than ever. Are you psychotic?
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

Ah, Billy? The infrastructure you refer to was allowed to "crumble" while our incredibly wasteful and inefficient government wasted billions of the dollars that hard working Americans in the Private Sector were forced to provide.

We spend more than any other nation per student on education yet our public schools keep getting worse.

Flint happened because free spending liberals bankrupted the city to the point where they couldn't pay for water.
 
When have leftwing douche nozzles ever considered limiting government agencies? They're constantly screaming that Republicans are destroying America by deregulating when regulations increase every year.

I've said many times that the phrase "limited government" is an oxymoron.
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.

Working to improve government is like working to improve small pox.

So when are you leaving for Somalia?

Somalia has an abundance of government.
So basically you agree that no libertarian system can function to exist anywhere in the world?

Still looking for loopholes?
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

My state has a surplus in its road fund yet wants to place a higher fuel tax in order to fix something they already have the money to fix.

My prescriptions costs me $4/month. That's pretty low.

The best way to raise wages is to raise skills. The greater incomes go to those with higher skills.

To fix the public school system, get you fucking Liberals out of it on the national and local levels.

Quit electing Democrats to the local government in Flint and they won't fuck things up

You mean the Wall Street people who support Hillary Clinton, a Democrat?
Obviously that barely says anything about the overall problem that would take 4 trillion to repair in total.

Your anecdotal story means jack shit. Some people have it good depending on their income and job benefits. Overall it's shit. For all the ones not insured, many more are underinsured and they pay high prices for services. WHO ranks our national healthcare system at 27. That's embarrassing.

Even increasing skills (which alone is costly to a poor person) does little to significantly boost wages from entry level. You're lucky to find a skilled job that pays 15 per hour.

Stupid and vague solution. Typical.

Snyder is one the one being held responsible. He failed to allocate the funds needed for the repairs. He seeked no federal help.

I want Bernie. Not Hillary.
 
Then work to improve govt. and reduce the bad parts instead of eliminating things wholesale like a reactionary moron.

Working to improve government is like working to improve small pox.

So when are you leaving for Somalia?

Somalia has an abundance of government.
So basically you agree that no libertarian system can function to exist anywhere in the world?

Still looking for loopholes?
I definitely don't need to and you know it. You're kind of desperate aren't you? You don't like my source, prove me wrong.
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

You first.. how would increasing government fix these things? Shit, we've been increasing it every year and by your own admission, it's worse than ever. Are you psychotic?
Well when lawmakers ignore these issues, obviously not much can be done.
 
How would reducing government fix our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government lower medical costs such as prescription drug costs?

How would reducing government raise wages in the lower classes and keep all income gains from going to the top earners?

How would reducing government fix our public school system which for decades is one of the worst in the developed world?

How would reducing government keep environmental crises like Flint crisis from happening elsewhere?

How would reducing government stop Wall Street corruption?

My state has a surplus in its road fund yet wants to place a higher fuel tax in order to fix something they already have the money to fix.

My prescriptions costs me $4/month. That's pretty low.

The best way to raise wages is to raise skills. The greater incomes go to those with higher skills.

To fix the public school system, get you fucking Liberals out of it on the national and local levels.

Quit electing Democrats to the local government in Flint and they won't fuck things up

You mean the Wall Street people who support Hillary Clinton, a Democrat?
Obviously that barely says anything about the overall problem that would take 4 trillion to repair in total.

Your anecdotal story means jack shit. Some people have it good depending on their income and job benefits. Overall it's shit. For all the ones not insured, many more are underinsured and they pay high prices for services. WHO ranks our national healthcare system at 27. That's embarrassing.

Even increasing skills (which alone is costly to a poor person) does little to significantly boost wages from entry level. You're lucky to find a skilled job that pays 15 per hour.

Stupid and vague solution. Typical.

Snyder is one the one being held responsible. He failed to allocate the funds needed for the repairs. He seeked no federal help.

I want Bernie. Not Hillary.

Those people that have it good on their income and benefits do so for a reason.

What's embarrassing is that so many think one person that happens to have more than you think they should have should be forced to fund it for someone else.

I work for a salary but if you put a dollar amount on it for a 2080 work year, it's well more than $15/hour.

As for education, I specifically said Liberals out. That's clear as a bell.

No, the local morons running the government are at fault. They couldn't teach a fish to swim as stupid as some of them are.

You want socialism. Not a shock.
 

Forum List

Back
Top