Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.
 
I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.
Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

Nobody on the left is advocating Equal Protection of the Law; only you are because you don't understand what it means or why it was created.

Actually it appears more like those on the left are into elimination of laws.

Elimination of laws? Like what? Seems to me they love to create new laws all the time that make our life harder.

In case cities such as Baltimore and Oakland. Same as with Sanctuary Cities, conveniently decide which laws to enforce and which to ignore....hell wasn't that part of Obama's agenda?

Yes, but the elimination of laws and the ignoring of laws are two different things. I would agree with you that Democrats do ignore laws that they simply don't like; the Constitution is full of them.
 
I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

If prices were really going down, we would have deflation.

No, prices do go down on new products. My father bought me a VCR for Christmas back in the early 80's. He paid around $700.00 for it. When CD's and DVD's became the new thing, you could buy a VCR for around fifty bucks.

Speaking of fifty bucks, that's what the new calculators cost when they first came out. I remember as a kid when my parents took us to the Home and Garden show that we had here every year. Fifty bucks was a lot of money back in the 70's for a toy. It had those LED lights and only basic functions like plus, minus and divide. Today, banks give you calculators if you open up a free checking account. Most phones have a calculator on them. It doesn't cost anything.

Cordless phones. Are you old enough to remember when they first came out? They were like $150.00 or more. By the time cell phones became popular, you could buy a much better cordless phone for about twenty or thirty bucks.

The point is that those greedy manufacturers don't keep the money in their pockets. When their costs go down, so does the price of their products.

Have you noticed all your examples are electronics? If the prices of everything are going down as you say, why no deflation?

I've worked for several big companies, and yes they pocket the money more than they don't.

That's the idea of having a business; to create products or services for a profit.

This fallacy that if we had some law that stopped people on the top from earning big money, that will trickle down to the workers is nothing buy a pipe dream. It doesn't work that way.

People are not paid for a job according to the profits of a company. People are paid according to their worth to a company.

Can they take those profits and pay people a little more? Sure they can, but it wouldn't be anything of notice to the workers. Take a CEO who makes five million dollars a year. His company and subsidiaries have about 150,000 employees. Now lower his pay from five million to three million, and divide the savings by the amount of employees and see what you have.

As for smaller companies with no CEO, it wouldn't be worth an investors time to open a business to make the same as his employees. It wouldn't make sense to open up a business if he made twice, three times, or ten times his employees. He must make much more (if he can) as compensation for his financial risk, the hours he had to put in, and the operation of the business.

Corporations have plenty of profits to pay better. Profits have been increasing for many years.

So? What does that have to do with paying workers?

Nobody overpays workers including you or I. Why should corporations and companies be any different?
 
Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Slow that camel down, some of us prefer "Deplorable".
 
Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
 
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.
STUPID insult after stupid insult from the hater dupe 75% chance racist, the same ridiculous talking point reported ad nauseum....everything to help the poor and blacks to survive and be able to rise has been DEM for at LEAST 35 years- and mainly blocked by the racist bigot pander to the rich New BS GOP. You're a disgrace and insane at this point if you believe this crap. GO TRUMP, learn, blow off the hate bs propaganda and return to your roots and bring the dupes with you.

See Mario Cuomo and free tuition, just like the good old days before Raygunism and chumps/scum? like Papa.

Your hatred is showing dumb dumb. Your racism and that of the Democratic Party is on display in this thread. Can't defend the position so you also Franco, the coward that you are, are trying to derail the thread. Pretty sad Franco, you dumb dumb.
Idiot or a-hole? So what about ACA health care for 15 million poor and blacks? Cuomo? Try a fact or 2 , dupe.

The healthcare at the time was not wanted by 60% of the people and they can't afford the deductibles.
And now 55% are for it, more all the time as they figure out the GOP propaganda machine was FOS and what they want now is much worse DUHHHH. It needs a little time for competition and further regulation DUHHHH....
 
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..
 
Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..

Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake

Did socialism fail to make it a paradise?
 
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
dear, we have the Best form of Socialism in the Entire World; Venezuela should be more like us.
 
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..

Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake

Did socialism fail to make it a paradise?
Capitalism was not any better, or they would never have considered it, in the first place.

In the US, capitalism had to "die" in 1929 for the "diehards" to let go of capitalism, for the bailout of more socialism.
 
nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.


Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.


Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..

Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake

Did socialism fail to make it a paradise?
Capitalism was not any better, or they would never have considered it, in the first place.

In the US, capitalism had to "die" in 1929 for the "diehards" to let go of capitalism, for the bailout of more socialism.

Banking collapse is not capitalism failing.
 
Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.
Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.
Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

The left has proven that the are not for equal protection. Look how the hate poor black people.
 
Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.
Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.
So why do the blacks vote Democratic?

I have no reason for blacks to vote Democratic. Democrats say the right thing, rarely do the right thing.
 
Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.
STUPID insult after stupid insult from the hater dupe 75% chance racist, the same ridiculous talking point reported ad nauseum....everything to help the poor and blacks to survive and be able to rise has been DEM for at LEAST 35 years- and mainly blocked by the racist bigot pander to the rich New BS GOP. You're a disgrace and insane at this point if you believe this crap. GO TRUMP, learn, blow off the hate bs propaganda and return to your roots and bring the dupes with you.

See Mario Cuomo and free tuition, just like the good old days before Raygunism and chumps/scum? like Papa.

Your hatred is showing dumb dumb. Your racism and that of the Democratic Party is on display in this thread. Can't defend the position so you also Franco, the coward that you are, are trying to derail the thread. Pretty sad Franco, you dumb dumb.
Idiot or a-hole? So what about ACA health care for 15 million poor and blacks? Cuomo? Try a fact or 2 , dupe.

The healthcare at the time was not wanted by 60% of the people and they can't afford the deductibles.
And now 55% are for it, more all the time as they figure out the GOP propaganda machine was FOS and what they want now is much worse DUHHHH. It needs a little time for competition and further regulation DUHHHH....

It needs to be repealed and we go back to a system that was working, now the system is broke and Democrats aren't smart enough to figure it out.
 
In other words, nothing but repeal. I got, right winger.

Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..

Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake

Did socialism fail to make it a paradise?
Capitalism was not any better, or they would never have considered it, in the first place.

In the US, capitalism had to "die" in 1929 for the "diehards" to let go of capitalism, for the bailout of more socialism.

Banking collapse is not capitalism failing.
Just right wing fantasy? It was an economic "collapse" that resulted in FDR getting elected to three terms, not one term, like Hoover with his Hoovervilles.

Where is your laissez-fair in foreign policy?
 
Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.
Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.
Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

The left has proven that the are not for equal protection. Look how the hate poor black people.
The right has nothing but fantasy or repeal.

Some on the left are advancing the Cause, in the public domain.
 
Make us more like Venezuela, eh?
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..

Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake

Did socialism fail to make it a paradise?
Capitalism was not any better, or they would never have considered it, in the first place.

In the US, capitalism had to "die" in 1929 for the "diehards" to let go of capitalism, for the bailout of more socialism.

Banking collapse is not capitalism failing.
Just right wing fantasy? It was an economic "collapse" that resulted in FDR getting elected to three terms, not one term, like Hoover with his Hoovervilles.

Where is your laissez-fair in foreign policy?

Yup. Massive bank failures with the Federal Reserve allowing money supply to contract by 1/3rd.
 
Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake. It's a 3rd world oil collapse mess no matter what gov't. Socialism is also the gov't in the EU, Canada, OZ, NZ and even here now we have ACA- though a gd pander to the rich GOP mess..

Could you brainwashed morons get off Venezuela ferchrissake

Did socialism fail to make it a paradise?
Capitalism was not any better, or they would never have considered it, in the first place.

In the US, capitalism had to "die" in 1929 for the "diehards" to let go of capitalism, for the bailout of more socialism.

Banking collapse is not capitalism failing.
Just right wing fantasy? It was an economic "collapse" that resulted in FDR getting elected to three terms, not one term, like Hoover with his Hoovervilles.

Where is your laissez-fair in foreign policy?

Yup. Massive bank failures with the Federal Reserve allowing money supply to contract by 1/3rd.
It was a "learning experience and curve"; who knew fiat money could not emulate gold with a gold Standard.

Socialism is like Palmolive. It is why we avoid third world economic collapses, in modern first world economies and times.
 
Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.
Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.
Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

The left has proven that the are not for equal protection. Look how the hate poor black people.
The right has nothing but fantasy or repeal.

Some on the left are advancing the Cause, in the public domain.

The left has left the poor, the Democrats are the party of rich elitist.
 
To be fair he promised to close the gap, and he did not. To be fair he let all those bankers and other rich 1%ers off the hook for 2008. To be fair, Obama didn't do much of anything for the poor. to be fair, you lean left.
To be fair when your dumb ass gave the GOP back the house in 2010 you killed any hope of Obama doing anything for your dumb ass.

Remember how the gop blamed Obama for the bp oilspill? You bought it
so then why didn't Barry attempt to work with them? you don't get to just make that statement without repercussion, there Barry squared.

you don't know the word 'balance' or the word 'negotiate' eh?

Work with them? Impossible. Even Trump can't work with them. LOL
he's working on it. it's been 80+ days. How about we give him a bit of time. it isn't like he, trump, hasn't done anything. He's done quite a lot without them and corrected barry's play.
Just like you defended bush for 8 I expect you to worship trump no matter what
Based on what?
 

Forum List

Back
Top