Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[Ray From Cleveland]

How are they able to price it competitively when their competition makes the same product for half the price because they manufacture overseas?

They accept less profit. Believe me, it can be done and they are still rich.

Wonderful idea. They make less profit and lose their stockholders. Does that sound like success to you?

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So you want hiring for the sake of hiring. That seems pretty archaic.

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.

 

[Papageorgio]

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

STUPID insult after stupid insult from the hater dupe 75% chance racist, the same ridiculous talking point reported ad nauseum....everything to help the poor and blacks to survive and be able to rise has been DEM for at LEAST 35 years- and mainly blocked by the racist bigot pander to the rich New BS GOP. You're a disgrace and insane at this point if you believe this crap. GO TRUMP, learn, blow off the hate bs propaganda and return to your roots and bring the dupes with you.

See Mario Cuomo and free tuition, just like the good old days before Raygunism and chumps/scum? like Papa.

Your hatred is showing dumb dumb. Your racism and that of the Democratic Party is on display in this thread. Can't defend the position so you also Franco, the coward that you are, are trying to derail the thread. Pretty sad Franco, you dumb dumb.

Idiot or a-hole? So what about ACA health care for 15 million poor and blacks? Cuomo? Try a fact or 2 , dupe.

The healthcare at the time was not wanted by 60% of the people and they can't afford the deductibles.

 

[Papageorgio]

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

 

[Brain357]

They accept less profit. Believe me, it can be done and they are still rich.

Wonderful idea. They make less profit and lose their stockholders. Does that sound like success to you?

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

If prices were really going down, we would have deflation.

 

[danielpalos]

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

 

[danielpalos]

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

 

[regent]

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

So why do the blacks vote Democratic?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Wonderful idea. They make less profit and lose their stockholders. Does that sound like success to you?

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

If prices were really going down, we would have deflation.

No, prices do go down on new products. My father bought me a VCR for Christmas back in the early 80's. He paid around $700.00 for it. When CD's and DVD's became the new thing, you could buy a VCR for around fifty bucks.

Speaking of fifty bucks, that's what the new calculators cost when they first came out. I remember as a kid when my parents took us to the Home and Garden show that we had here every year. Fifty bucks was a lot of money back in the 70's for a toy. It had those LED lights and only basic functions like plus, minus and divide. Today, banks give you calculators if you open up a free checking account. Most phones have a calculator on them. It doesn't cost anything.

Cordless phones. Are you old enough to remember when they first came out? They were like $150.00 or more. By the time cell phones became popular, you could buy a much better cordless phone for about twenty or thirty bucks.

The point is that those greedy manufacturers don't keep the money in their pockets. When their costs go down, so does the price of their products.

 

[danielpalos]

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

So why do the blacks vote Democratic?

because the right wing is not offering better solutions at lower cost; the right wing has nothing but repeal.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

Nobody on the left is advocating Equal Protection of the Law; only you are because you don't understand what it means or why it was created.

 

[danielpalos]

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

Nobody on the left is advocating Equal Protection of the Law; only you are because you don't understand what it means or why it was created.

Projecting much, right winger? The right has nothing but repeal, for a reason.

 

[Brain357]

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

If prices were really going down, we would have deflation.

No, prices do go down on new products. My father bought me a VCR for Christmas back in the early 80's. He paid around $700.00 for it. When CD's and DVD's became the new thing, you could buy a VCR for around fifty bucks.

Speaking of fifty bucks, that's what the new calculators cost when they first came out. I remember as a kid when my parents took us to the Home and Garden show that we had here every year. Fifty bucks was a lot of money back in the 70's for a toy. It had those LED lights and only basic functions like plus, minus and divide. Today, banks give you calculators if you open up a free checking account. Most phones have a calculator on them. It doesn't cost anything.

Cordless phones. Are you old enough to remember when they first came out? They were like $150.00 or more. By the time cell phones became popular, you could buy a much better cordless phone for about twenty or thirty bucks.

The point is that those greedy manufacturers don't keep the money in their pockets. When their costs go down, so does the price of their products.

Have you noticed all your examples are electronics? If the prices of everything are going down as you say, why no deflation?

I've worked for several big companies, and yes they pocket the money more than they don't.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Handing money to quitters and never workers will harm the economy and create more poverty.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do. only the right wing, never gets it.

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

nobody should take an idiot like you seriously about economics or the law.

capitalism doesn't care, only socialists do.

Explains the nirvana that is Venezuela, eh comrade?

capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Capital circulates and multiplies better without handouts to the likes of you.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

If prices were really going down, we would have deflation.

No, prices do go down on new products. My father bought me a VCR for Christmas back in the early 80's. He paid around $700.00 for it. When CD's and DVD's became the new thing, you could buy a VCR for around fifty bucks.

Speaking of fifty bucks, that's what the new calculators cost when they first came out. I remember as a kid when my parents took us to the Home and Garden show that we had here every year. Fifty bucks was a lot of money back in the 70's for a toy. It had those LED lights and only basic functions like plus, minus and divide. Today, banks give you calculators if you open up a free checking account. Most phones have a calculator on them. It doesn't cost anything.

Cordless phones. Are you old enough to remember when they first came out? They were like $150.00 or more. By the time cell phones became popular, you could buy a much better cordless phone for about twenty or thirty bucks.

The point is that those greedy manufacturers don't keep the money in their pockets. When their costs go down, so does the price of their products.

Have you noticed all your examples are electronics? If the prices of everything are going down as you say, why no deflation?

I've worked for several big companies, and yes they pocket the money more than they don't.

That's the idea of having a business; to create products or services for a profit.

This fallacy that if we had some law that stopped people on the top from earning big money, that will trickle down to the workers is nothing buy a pipe dream. It doesn't work that way.

People are not paid for a job according to the profits of a company. People are paid according to their worth to a company.

Can they take those profits and pay people a little more? Sure they can, but it wouldn't be anything of notice to the workers. Take a CEO who makes five million dollars a year. His company and subsidiaries have about 150,000 employees. Now lower his pay from five million to three million, and divide the savings by the amount of employees and see what you have.

As for smaller companies with no CEO, it wouldn't be worth an investors time to open a business to make the same as his employees. It wouldn't make sense to open up a business if he made twice, three times, or ten times his employees. He must make much more (if he can) as compensation for his financial risk, the hours he had to put in, and the operation of the business.

 

[Thinker101]

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

Nobody on the left is advocating Equal Protection of the Law; only you are because you don't understand what it means or why it was created.

Actually it appears more like those on the left are into elimination of laws.

 

[sealybobo]

To be fair, Obama had a recession, 2 wars, housing bubble, and high unemployment to deal with.

To be fair he promised to close the gap, and he did not. To be fair he let all those bankers and other rich 1%ers off the hook for 2008. To be fair, Obama didn't do much of anything for the poor. to be fair, you lean left.

To be fair when your dumb ass gave the GOP back the house in 2010 you killed any hope of Obama doing anything for your dumb ass.

Remember how the gop blamed Obama for the bp oilspill? You bought it

so then why didn't Barry attempt to work with them? you don't get to just make that statement without repercussion, there Barry squared.

you don't know the word 'balance' or the word 'negotiate' eh?

Work with them? Impossible. Even Trump can't work with them. LOL

he's working on it. it's been 80+ days. How about we give him a bit of time. it isn't like he, trump, hasn't done anything. He's done quite a lot without them and corrected barry's play.

Just like you defended bush for 8 I expect you to worship trump no matter what

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

Nobody on the left is advocating Equal Protection of the Law; only you are because you don't understand what it means or why it was created.

Actually it appears more like those on the left are into elimination of laws.

Elimination of laws? Like what? Seems to me they love to create new laws all the time that make our life harder.

 

[Thinker101]

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

I stayed on topic, you can't because you realize that the left has done nothing for poor black Americans.

Some on the left are advocating for equal protection of the law; the right wing, doesn't like it.

Nobody on the left is advocating Equal Protection of the Law; only you are because you don't understand what it means or why it was created.

Actually it appears more like those on the left are into elimination of laws.

Elimination of laws? Like what? Seems to me they love to create new laws all the time that make our life harder.

In case cities such as Baltimore and Oakland. Same as with Sanctuary Cities, conveniently decide which laws to enforce and which to ignore....hell wasn't that part of Obama's agenda?

 

[Brain357]

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

I seriously doubt that. When the cost of something goes down, usually so does the price. After all, businesses compete against each other.

A few years ago I bought a new big screen to replace my old broken one that couldn't be repaired any longer. I paid a little over 3K for it. About a year later, a coworker of mine bought one of the new super HD televisions for about $1,500, but it was only a 40 inch screen.

While talking about his purchase with the salesman, he mentioned my 80" television. The salesman said they do have super HD that big, but they cost about 30K.

Today you can buy a super HD television like mine for about what I paid for my regular HD three years ago.

If prices were really going down, we would have deflation.

No, prices do go down on new products. My father bought me a VCR for Christmas back in the early 80's. He paid around $700.00 for it. When CD's and DVD's became the new thing, you could buy a VCR for around fifty bucks.

Speaking of fifty bucks, that's what the new calculators cost when they first came out. I remember as a kid when my parents took us to the Home and Garden show that we had here every year. Fifty bucks was a lot of money back in the 70's for a toy. It had those LED lights and only basic functions like plus, minus and divide. Today, banks give you calculators if you open up a free checking account. Most phones have a calculator on them. It doesn't cost anything.

Cordless phones. Are you old enough to remember when they first came out? They were like $150.00 or more. By the time cell phones became popular, you could buy a much better cordless phone for about twenty or thirty bucks.

The point is that those greedy manufacturers don't keep the money in their pockets. When their costs go down, so does the price of their products.

Have you noticed all your examples are electronics? If the prices of everything are going down as you say, why no deflation?

I've worked for several big companies, and yes they pocket the money more than they don't.

That's the idea of having a business; to create products or services for a profit.

This fallacy that if we had some law that stopped people on the top from earning big money, that will trickle down to the workers is nothing buy a pipe dream. It doesn't work that way.

People are not paid for a job according to the profits of a company. People are paid according to their worth to a company.

Can they take those profits and pay people a little more? Sure they can, but it wouldn't be anything of notice to the workers. Take a CEO who makes five million dollars a year. His company and subsidiaries have about 150,000 employees. Now lower his pay from five million to three million, and divide the savings by the amount of employees and see what you have.

As for smaller companies with no CEO, it wouldn't be worth an investors time to open a business to make the same as his employees. It wouldn't make sense to open up a business if he made twice, three times, or ten times his employees. He must make much more (if he can) as compensation for his financial risk, the hours he had to put in, and the operation of the business.

Corporations have plenty of profits to pay better. Profits have been increasing for many years.