Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[Ray From Cleveland]

Boy, now is the time for Republicans to gain the black vote. Instead of creating the usual economic crisis, and then Amerlca has to elect a Democrat for the usual recovery. This time if Trump creates jobs and income for all the poor, not just blacks he will be rated near-
great.

It wouldn't hurt, but I seriously doubt any Republican can win over the black vote no matter what they do.

Well Republicans supposedly freed them and now they vote Democratic, sounds like a monumental goof.

It's generational. Most blacks know little to nothing about politics.

Ask a black man how he votes, he will tell you Democrat.
Ask him why, and he will tell you Republicans are only for the rich white man.
Ask who told him that, and he will tell you that the Democrats did.

 

[Brain357]

Poverty is growing because too much wealth is going to the top and not being used to create good jobs.

Wealth going to the top has nothing to do with good jobs. Good jobs are the product of the American consumer buying American made products. Americans don't want to support unions or good job, Americans want to support low prices no matter who makes their products. It has nothing to do with the wealthy.

The wealthy could make more here and price it competitive. Instead they prefer to make more money and import.

How are they able to price it competitively when their competition makes the same product for half the price because they manufacture overseas?

They accept less profit. Believe me, it can be done and they are still rich.

Wonderful idea. They make less profit and lose their stockholders. Does that sound like success to you?

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Wealth going to the top has nothing to do with good jobs. Good jobs are the product of the American consumer buying American made products. Americans don't want to support unions or good job, Americans want to support low prices no matter who makes their products. It has nothing to do with the wealthy.

The wealthy could make more here and price it competitive. Instead they prefer to make more money and import.

How are they able to price it competitively when their competition makes the same product for half the price because they manufacture overseas?

They accept less profit. Believe me, it can be done and they are still rich.

Wonderful idea. They make less profit and lose their stockholders. Does that sound like success to you?

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

 

[danielpalos]

So your answer to poverty doesn't actually lower poverty. Funny.

the object is to break the family cycle of living in poverty. Let's see your solution that you have avoided posting?

BTW, throwing money at it doesn't solve it.

Come back when you are sincere about it.

It clearly isn't doing that. Poverty is growing. Admit it is a failure already.

Poverty is growing because the government promotes it. How can you ever end poverty when you pay poor people to create more poor people?

because the private sector is not making them wealthy, by hiring them.

The private sector never has. How long have you been living in this country?

recanting your story?

Poverty is growing because the government promotes it. How can you ever end poverty when you pay poor people to create more poor people?

 

[Wyatt earp]

When did those things happen? One was 1911? Wow, having to jump back over 100 years to find anything to defend an outmoded system.

Let's see, in 1912 we learned that we needed to make sure that ships had enough life boats too. That would be the Titanic.

What have unions done to the benefit of everyone in modern history?

Jeebus what a brainwashed functional a-hole....Not much lately? Maybe because Reaganists and you dupes wrecked them DUHHHH....

Lol! Reagan really screwed up your life! Very laughable!

I'm fine, dumbass, it's the country he ruined DUHHH. See sig.

Poor kid, just reading Reagan must send you over the edge. I never understood the power of Reagan until I saw the unhinged left. Thanks for all the laughs Franco.

I never understood why righties like you worship him still. Back then I understand but you have the internet now. It's easy to see Reagan sucked

21 Reasons Why Ronald Reagan Was a Terrible President

You were not paying attention back then during the Carter years... And anyone can play arm chair quarter back and second guess after it happened.


.

 

[francoHFW]

The long standing policy of democrats is to create a permanent dependent underclass. Is being in power the only thing that matters to democrats?

Fish kiss my white jewish ass

the truth makes you angry------------------tough shit.

Truth my butt, super hater dupe.

 

[edward37]

The long standing policy of democrats is to create a permanent dependent underclass. Is being in power the only thing that matters to democrats?

Fish kiss my white jewish ass

the truth makes you angry------------------tough shit.

TRUTH?? republicans wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass

 

[Papageorgio]

So you want hiring for the sake of hiring. That seems pretty archaic.

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

 

[edward37]

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

How brilliant of you How about you defending how republicans have been screwing people of color from way back?

 

[francoHFW]

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

STUPID insult after stupid insult from the hater dupe 75% chance racist, the same ridiculous talking point reported ad nauseum....everything to help the poor and blacks to survive and be able to rise has been DEM for at LEAST 35 years- and mainly blocked by the racist bigot pander to the rich New BS GOP. You're a disgrace and insane at this point if you believe this crap. GO TRUMP, learn, blow off the hate bs propaganda and return to your roots and bring the dupes with you.

See Mario Cuomo and free tuition, just like the good old days before Raygunism and chumps/scum? like Papa.

 

[Papageorgio]

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

How brilliant of you How about you defending how republicans have been screwing people of color from way back?

Start the thread, it seems you just want this thread derailed.

 

[Papageorgio]

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

STUPID insult after stupid insult from the hater dupe 75% chance racist, the same ridiculous talking point reported ad nauseum....everything to help the poor and blacks to survive and be able to rise has been DEM for at LEAST 35 years- and mainly blocked by the racist bigot pander to the rich New BS GOP. You're a disgrace and insane at this point if you believe this crap. GO TRUMP, learn, blow off the hate bs propaganda and return to your roots and bring the dupes with you.

See Mario Cuomo and free tuition, just like the good old days before Raygunism and chumps/scum? like Papa.

Your hatred is showing dumb dumb. Your racism and that of the Democratic Party is on display in this thread. Can't defend the position so you also Franco, the coward that you are, are trying to derail the thread. Pretty sad Franco, you dumb dumb.

 

[Brain357]

The wealthy could make more here and price it competitive. Instead they prefer to make more money and import.

How are they able to price it competitively when their competition makes the same product for half the price because they manufacture overseas?

They accept less profit. Believe me, it can be done and they are still rich.

Wonderful idea. They make less profit and lose their stockholders. Does that sound like success to you?

Or they do that and our economy grows and they profit more.

No, they profit more by selling lower priced products that people will buy. You do realize that the only way a company grows IS BY stockholders, don't you?

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

 

[francoHFW]

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

STUPID insult after stupid insult from the hater dupe 75% chance racist, the same ridiculous talking point reported ad nauseum....everything to help the poor and blacks to survive and be able to rise has been DEM for at LEAST 35 years- and mainly blocked by the racist bigot pander to the rich New BS GOP. You're a disgrace and insane at this point if you believe this crap. GO TRUMP, learn, blow off the hate bs propaganda and return to your roots and bring the dupes with you.

See Mario Cuomo and free tuition, just like the good old days before Raygunism and chumps/scum? like Papa.

Your hatred is showing dumb dumb. Your racism and that of the Democratic Party is on display in this thread. Can't defend the position so you also Franco, the coward that you are, are trying to derail the thread. Pretty sad Franco, you dumb dumb.

Idiot or a-hole? So what about ACA health care for 15 million poor and blacks? Cuomo? Try a fact or 2 , dupe.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Just for the record I'd like to point out that in another thread the author of this thread has stated that he believes the poor, the weak, the unfortunate, the sick, etc.,

should DIE, as a means to improve our species. So that's his formula for not keeping the poor poor. Kill them off.

 

[Markle]

Equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will for unemployment compensation purposes, can solve simple poverty. The right wing, doesn't like it.

What is this supposed to mean? What does the right wing, not like?

 

[Markle]

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Might English be a second or third language?

 

[Markle]

So, again, no answer, just throwing excuses. It seems the regressive left has no real answers other than they hate poor blacks.

Equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will for unemployment compensation purposes, can solve simple poverty. The right wing, doesn't like it.

So you want hiring for the sake of hiring. That seems pretty archaic.

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

President Donald Trump has reversed himself on at least six major issues this week, pulling back on long-held promises supported by his base.

Four of these reversals alone came in an interview with The Wall Street Journal published Wednesday:

• Trump said the Chinese are “not currency manipulators.” Just last week, he said they were “world champions” of currency manipulation, and he pledged throughout his campaign to label China a currency manipulator on his first day in office. He tweeted in 2012 that President Barack Obama’s failure to call China a currency manipulator “helped China steal even more jobs and money from us.”
  
  
• Trump said, “I do like a low interest-rate policy.” During his campaign, he excoriated the Federal Reserve for keeping rates low, and said in 2011 that the policy would lead to hyperinflation.
  
  
• Trump said he was open to the idea of reappointing Janet Yellen to head the Federal Reserve. On the campaign trail, he said he would “most likely” replace her. “I like her, I respect her,” Trump told the Journal at the time.
  
  
• Trump said he supported the Export-Import Bank, noting that small companies are “really helped” by the institution. During the campaign, he said the bank was unnecessary.

On each of these issues, Trump’s turnabout puts him in lockstep with the Washington economic policy consensus. And in each case, Trump is walking away ― at least for now ― from the heterodox views he expressed during the campaign. This week’s reversals follow his shift on Syria last week, when Trump fired cruise missiles at an airbase after repeatedly saying he opposed U.S. involvement in the country’s civil war.

Also on Wednesday, Trump reversed his position on NATO, telling reporters, “They made a change and now they do fight terrorism. I said it was obsolete. It’s no longer obsolete.”

It is rare for Trump to admit he is changing positions. During the campaign, for example, he insisted he had opposed the Iraq War before the 2003 U.S. invasion, even though he supported it during a radio interview at the time.

In an interview with Fox Business Network that was taped on Tuesday, Trump blasted Obama for not striking Syria in 2013 ― even though Trump repeatedly tweeted at the time that Obama should not do so.

In The Wall Street Journal interview, Trump also waded back into the debate over the relative value of the U.S. dollar, saying, “I think our dollar is getting too strong, and partially that’s my fault because people have confidence in me. But that’s hurting—that will hurt ultimately.”

I'm thrilled by his changes. The ultimate sign of someone willing to listen to experts and not afraid to admit he was wrong and make a change in course. This shows someone of great intellect and, at the same time, humility. Something we have not seen in the previous eight failed years.

 

[Markle]

The dupes have totally lost contact with reality, since all help for blacks, both to survive and rise, is due to Dems,

Why then are blacks in worse condition today than more than 50 years ago when President Lyndon Johnson initiated the War on Poverty and his Great Society.

 

[Markle]

Just for the record I'd like to point out that in another thread the author of this thread has stated that he believes the poor, the weak, the unfortunate, the sick, etc.,

should DIE, as a means to improve our species. So that's his formula for not keeping the poor poor. Kill them off.

Please show us all where that statement is located.