Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[NYcarbineer]

Just for the record I'd like to point out that in another thread the author of this thread has stated that he believes the poor, the weak, the unfortunate, the sick, etc.,

should DIE, as a means to improve our species. So that's his formula for not keeping the poor poor. Kill them off.

Please show us all where that statement is located.

Please do what I did and read the forum.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The dupes have totally lost contact with reality, since all help for blacks, both to survive and rise, is due to Dems,

Why then are blacks in worse condition today than more than 50 years ago when President Lyndon Johnson initiated the War on Poverty and his Great Society.

They are not. The real poverty rate is 4%, contrary to the BS you read in the MSM.

 

[Markle]

It wouldn't hurt, but I seriously doubt any Republican can win over the black vote no matter what they do.

President Donald Trump won substantially more black votes than McCain or Romney. Many looked at what petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama did to them over the past eight years and agreed with Trump, what have we got to lose?

 

[Markle]

Defunding planned parenthood sure isn't going to help.

They claim that government funding is only a small portion of their budget so they won't miss the difference. Besides, they're nothing more than an abortion mill.

 

[Markle]

Please do what I did and read the forum.

So you don't know, you have nothing. As we all knew!

 

[NYcarbineer]

It wouldn't hurt, but I seriously doubt any Republican can win over the black vote no matter what they do.

President Donald Trump won substantially more black votes than McCain or Romney. Many looked at what petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama did to them over the past eight years and agreed with Trump, what have we got to lose?

Trump didn't run against Obama.

I'm not even surprised you don't know that.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Please do what I did and read the forum.

So you don't know, you have nothing. As we all knew!

Since you've read the thread I got the information from, that makes you the liar.

 

[Markle]

They are not. The real poverty rate is 4%, contrary to the BS you read in the MSM.

BY WALTER E. WILLIAMS
RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2005, AND THEREAFTER

AMMUNITION FOR POVERTY PIMPS

In the wake of Hurricane Katrina's destruction of New Orleans, President Bush gave America's poverty pimps and race hustlers new ammunition. The president said, "As all of us saw on television, there is also some deep, persistent poverty in this region as well. And that poverty has roots in a history of racial discrimination, which cut off generations from the opportunity of America. We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action."

The president's espousing such a vision not only supplies ammunition to poverty pimps and race hustlers, it focuses attention away from the true connection between race and poverty.

Though I grow weary of pointing it out, let's do it again. Let's examine some numbers readily available from the Census Bureau's 2004 Current Population Survey and ask some questions. There's one segment of the black population that suffers only a 9.9 percent poverty rate, and only 13.7 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. There's another segment that suffers a 39.5 percent poverty rate, and 58.1 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. Among whites, one segment suffers a 6 percent poverty rate, and only 9.9 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. The other segment suffers a 26.4 percent poverty rate, and 52 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. What do you think distinguishes the high and low poverty populations among blacks?

Would you buy an explanation that it's because white people practice discrimination against one segment of the black population and not the other or one segment had a history of slavery and not the other? You'd have to be a lunatic to buy such an explanation. The only distinction between both the black and white populations is marriage -- lower poverty in married-couple families.

In 1960, only 28 percent of black females ages 15 to 44 were never married and illegitimacy among blacks was 22 percent. Today, the never-married rate is 56 percent and illegitimacy stands at 70 percent. If today's black family structure were what it was in 1960, the overall black poverty rate would be in or near single digits. The weakening of the black family structure, and its devastating consequences, have nothing to do with the history of slavery or racial discrimination.

Dr. Charles Murray, an American Enterprise Institute scholar, argues in an article titled "Rediscovering the Underclass" in the Institute's On the Issues series (October 2005) that self-destructive behavior has become the hallmark of the underclass. He says that unemployment in the underclass is not caused by the lack of jobs but by the inability to get up every morning and go to work. In 1954, the percentage of black males, age 20 to 24, not looking for work was nine percent. In 1999, it rose to 30 percent, and that was at a time when employers were beating the bushes for employees. Murray adds that "the statistical reality is that people who get into the American job market and stay there seldom remain poor unless they do something self-destructive.

I share Murray's sentiment expressed at the beginning of his article where he says, "Watching the courage of ordinary low-income people as they deal with the aftermath of Katrina and Rita, it is hard to decide which politicians are more contemptible -- Democrats who are rediscovering poverty and blaming it on George W. Bush, or Republicans who are rediscovering poverty and claiming that the government can fix it." Since President Johnson's War on Poverty, controlling for inflation, the nation has spent $9 trillion on about 80 anti-poverty programs. To put that figure in perspective, last year's U.S. GDP was $11 trillion; $9 trillion exceeds the GDP of any nation except the U.S. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita uncovered the result of the War on Poverty -- dependency and self-destructive behavior.

Guess what the president [President George Walker Bush] and politicians from both parties are asking the American people to do? If you said, "Enact programs that will sustain and enhance dependency," go to the head of the class.

Ammunition For Poverty Pimps

 

[NYcarbineer]

They are not. The real poverty rate is 4%, contrary to the BS you read in the MSM.

BY WALTER E. WILLIAMS
RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2005, AND THEREAFTER

AMMUNITION FOR POVERTY PIMPS

In the wake of Hurricane Katrina's destruction of New Orleans, President Bush gave America's poverty pimps and race hustlers new ammunition. The president said, "As all of us saw on television, there is also some deep, persistent poverty in this region as well. And that poverty has roots in a history of racial discrimination, which cut off generations from the opportunity of America. We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action."

The president's espousing such a vision not only supplies ammunition to poverty pimps and race hustlers, it focuses attention away from the true connection between race and poverty.

Though I grow weary of pointing it out, let's do it again. Let's examine some numbers readily available from the Census Bureau's 2004 Current Population Survey and ask some questions. There's one segment of the black population that suffers only a 9.9 percent poverty rate, and only 13.7 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. There's another segment that suffers a 39.5 percent poverty rate, and 58.1 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. Among whites, one segment suffers a 6 percent poverty rate, and only 9.9 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. The other segment suffers a 26.4 percent poverty rate, and 52 percent of its under-5-year-olds are poor. What do you think distinguishes the high and low poverty populations among blacks?

Would you buy an explanation that it's because white people practice discrimination against one segment of the black population and not the other or one segment had a history of slavery and not the other? You'd have to be a lunatic to buy such an explanation. The only distinction between both the black and white populations is marriage -- lower poverty in married-couple families.

In 1960, only 28 percent of black females ages 15 to 44 were never married and illegitimacy among blacks was 22 percent. Today, the never-married rate is 56 percent and illegitimacy stands at 70 percent. If today's black family structure were what it was in 1960, the overall black poverty rate would be in or near single digits. The weakening of the black family structure, and its devastating consequences, have nothing to do with the history of slavery or racial discrimination.

Dr. Charles Murray, an American Enterprise Institute scholar, argues in an article titled "Rediscovering the Underclass" in the Institute's On the Issues series (October 2005) that self-destructive behavior has become the hallmark of the underclass. He says that unemployment in the underclass is not caused by the lack of jobs but by the inability to get up every morning and go to work. In 1954, the percentage of black males, age 20 to 24, not looking for work was nine percent. In 1999, it rose to 30 percent, and that was at a time when employers were beating the bushes for employees. Murray adds that "the statistical reality is that people who get into the American job market and stay there seldom remain poor unless they do something self-destructive.

I share Murray's sentiment expressed at the beginning of his article where he says, "Watching the courage of ordinary low-income people as they deal with the aftermath of Katrina and Rita, it is hard to decide which politicians are more contemptible -- Democrats who are rediscovering poverty and blaming it on George W. Bush, or Republicans who are rediscovering poverty and claiming that the government can fix it." Since President Johnson's War on Poverty, controlling for inflation, the nation has spent $9 trillion on about 80 anti-poverty programs. To put that figure in perspective, last year's U.S. GDP was $11 trillion; $9 trillion exceeds the GDP of any nation except the U.S. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita uncovered the result of the War on Poverty -- dependency and self-destructive behavior.

Guess what the president [President George Walker Bush] and politicians from both parties are asking the American people to do? If you said, "Enact programs that will sustain and enhance dependency," go to the head of the class.

Ammunition For Poverty Pimps

You give a poor person Medicaid, you make that person as much less poor as is the value of that healthcare insurance.

No?

 

[Markle]

Ask a black man how he votes, he will tell you Democrat.
Ask him why, and he will tell you Republicans are only for the rich white man.
Ask who told him that, and he will tell you that the Democrats did.

Far, far more truth in that statement than many here wish to realize.

 

[Markle]

You give a poor person Medicaid, you make that person as much less poor as is the value of that healthcare insurance.

No?

What? Is it impossible for you to complete a thought?

In 1960, only 28 percent of black females ages 15 to 44 were never married and illegitimacy among blacks was 22 percent. Today, the never-married rate is 56 percent and illegitimacy stands at 70 percent. If today's black family structure were what it was in 1960, the overall black poverty rate would be in or near single digits. The weakening of the black family structure, and its devastating consequences, have nothing to do with the history of slavery or racial discrimination.

Ammunition For Poverty Pimps

 

[danielpalos]

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

With the employment rate as low as it is, is there a valid reason for you not to be at will?

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them.

Seems the left wing has no way to answer this thread, unless it is diversion.

Only the right wing has a problem with equal protection of the law. How illegal of them, since it would solve simple poverty in our more perfect Union.

Again Daniel is stumped by the question and now is trying to divert the thread since he cannot defend the Democratic Party's hatred for poor blacks.

Nothing but diversion from the right wing, like usual.

 

[Markle]

More times than not the product cost goes down, but the price to customers stays same. That's why we still have inflation.

Precious little the past eight years. That's why Social Security recipients have not received any cost of living increases. Which is fine with me.

 

[danielpalos]

Equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will for unemployment compensation purposes, can solve simple poverty. The right wing, doesn't like it.

What is this supposed to mean? What does the right wing, not like?

Equal protection of the law regarding the concept of employment at will for unemployment compensation purposes, can solve simple poverty.

 

[danielpalos]

It is about unemployment compensation for Labor simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Might English be a second or third language?

Nothing but appeals to ignorance from the inferior, right wing?

 

[danielpalos]

The dupes have totally lost contact with reality, since all help for blacks, both to survive and rise, is due to Dems,

Why then are blacks in worse condition today than more than 50 years ago when President Lyndon Johnson initiated the War on Poverty and his Great Society.

They aren't. You just like to appeal to ignorance.

 

[Markle]

Trump didn't run against Obama.

I'm not even surprised you don't know that.

Yeah he did, I'm NOT surprised you didn't know. Crooked Hillary Clinton tried very hard to show you.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You give a poor person Medicaid, you make that person as much less poor as is the value of that healthcare insurance.

No?

What could they buy with Medicaid that they couldn't buy before?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It wouldn't hurt, but I seriously doubt any Republican can win over the black vote no matter what they do.

President Donald Trump won substantially more black votes than McCain or Romney. Many looked at what petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama did to them over the past eight years and agreed with Trump, what have we got to lose?

What I meant by that is we will never win over the black vote by a majority. I don't see that happening in our lifetime unless blacks suddenly get educated on politics and history. More black votes than in the past? Maybe, but even that's a struggle.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Just for the record I'd like to point out that in another thread the author of this thread has stated that he believes the poor, the weak, the unfortunate, the sick, etc.,

should DIE, as a means to improve our species. So that's his formula for not keeping the poor poor. Kill them off.

What you gonna do? Some people just think like that:

'Trump must hang': Fresno State vows to 'review' professor's violent comments