Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[francoHFW]

OP- STILL absolute balogna- After 35 years of the GOP blocking and cutting Dem programs to help the poor and middle class rise, and pandering in every way to the greedy idiot rich and giant corps, we have to listen to this conspiraceeee!!! BS, dupes? After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!! And you complain about the victims? Are you an idiot or an A-hole?

 

[Papageorgio]

Not 10, you are lying. Three jobs and all they have to do is pick up a phone, call a business and ask if they are hiring, make a note of the time and date they called. Do that three times and they are eligible.

That's the way it is here. Me lie? I don't think so. Maybe because it's a rural GOP area....

You have been caught lying several times and then you change the subject. 10 jobs they have to apply? Then they wouldn't be unemployed in this market for long, so I think you are way off.

Like most people, like you, I don't lie but may be mistaken, hater dupe. But I'm not. And you are usually baffled by New BS GOP BS. The little bits of misinformation add up to your hate of the poor. A lot have disqualifying history, crime, drug history, bad employment history not their fault. Dems have tried to make those less so. Blacks have been hurt the most. 1 out of 6 are disqualified though they've been punished and are reformed. HR computers don't care.

I interview everyone. I hate computers sifting through the apps, I want the communication with real people. Computers are terrible for sifting out potential candidates.

Good man. But an exception.

It should be the rule when you are hiring humans.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

OP- STILL absolute balogna- After 35 years of the GOP blocking and cutting Dem programs to help the poor and middle class rise, and pandering in every way to the greedy idiot rich and giant corps, we have to listen to this conspiraceeee!!! BS, dupes? After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!! And you complain about the victims? Are you an idiot or an A-hole?

China just switched to Republican capitalism
and instantly eliminated 40% of the entire planets poverty. East/West Germany?

 

[francoHFW]

That's the way it is here. Me lie? I don't think so. Maybe because it's a rural GOP area....

You have been caught lying several times and then you change the subject. 10 jobs they have to apply? Then they wouldn't be unemployed in this market for long, so I think you are way off.

Like most people, like you, I don't lie but may be mistaken, hater dupe. But I'm not. And you are usually baffled by New BS GOP BS. The little bits of misinformation add up to your hate of the poor. A lot have disqualifying history, crime, drug history, bad employment history not their fault. Dems have tried to make those less so. Blacks have been hurt the most. 1 out of 6 are disqualified though they've been punished and are reformed. HR computers don't care.

I interview everyone. I hate computers sifting through the apps, I want the communication with real people. Computers are terrible for sifting out potential candidates.

Good man. But an exception.

It should be the rule when you are hiring humans.

Dems are working on it...

 

[JQPublic1]

So the Hollywood elitist don't want to voluntarily give money to the poor, they want government to take money from them and go to all of government and not give it just to the poor. What a bunch of rich bastards! Why do the liberals hate the poor?

A conservative gets satisfaction by giving his or her money to the needy.

A liberal gets satisfaction by giving other peoples money to the needy.

Seems to me conservatives take more from the needy than they give. Even now congressional conservatives are plotting to take healthcare from millions of poor people.
Conservatives are also against raising the minimum wage and are dedicated to destroying the middle class.

bullshit. the ACA hurt the middle and lower classes much more than it hurt the rich. Higher premiums and deductibles are not a big deal for rich people, but they can devastate a middle class family.

Obamacare must go. The GOP missed an opportunity, they better get it done soon.

Have you ever stopped to consider why the GOP let the ACA stay intact? They control the government so what's up? Hint: Too many of their poor constituents like it. Repealing Obamacare is political suicide.

Yes, those getting it free like it. Those paying hate it. Who do you think represents the most GOP votes? Hint: not the ones getting it free.

You might want to rethink that.

 

[JQPublic1]

Seems to me conservatives take more from the needy than they give. Even now congressional conservatives are plotting to take healthcare from millions of poor people.
Conservatives are also against raising the minimum wage and are dedicated to destroying the middle class.

How do conservatives take from the needy when the needy doesn't have anything of their own?

Raise minimum wage, and you encourage more businesses to invest in automation. Raise minimum wage, employers cut jobs. Why do you suppose many jobs left the country or were replaced with automation? That's right, because American labor is too expensive. So how will making it more expensive help?

You don't know what the conservatives have in mind for healthcare, so until it comes out, your statement is ridiculous.

The needy have Obamacare for one thing and the GOP wants to take it away. The working poor do some of the most dangerous jobs but the GOP wants to tone down safety requirements. Most egregious of all is the exploitation of poor kids who see hope in joining the military for a better future...only to be used as canon fodder when capitalists deem it necessary to start a war somewhere to protect their investments. Moreover, war is profitable... war doubles annual profits at the expense of the poor soldier looking for a better life.

Key findings include:

• Increasing the federal minimum wage would raise the wages of about 28 million workers, who would receive nearly $40 billion in additional wages over the phase-in period.2
• Across the phase-in period of the minimum-wage increase, GDP would increase by roughly $25 billion, resulting in the creation of approximately 100,000 net new jobs over that period.
• Those who would see wage increases do not fit some of the stereotypes of minimum-wage workers.
  • Women would be disproportionately affected, comprising nearly 55 percent of those who would benefit.
  • Nearly 88 percent of workers who would benefit are at least 20 years old.
  • Although workers of all races and ethnicities would benefit from the increase, non-Hispanic white workers comprise the largest share (about 56 percent) of those who would be affected.
  • About 42 percent of affected workers have at least some college education.
  • Around 54 percent of affected workers work full time, over 70 percent are in families with incomes of less than $60,000, more than a quarter are parents, and over a third are married.
  • The average affected worker earns about half of his or her family’s total income.

How raising the federal minimum wage would help working families and give the economy a boost

You have to be completely brainwashed or completely stupid to believe that any politician gives a shit whether you (or the poor) have healthcare or not. This was not about getting everybody covered, it was about creating as many government dependents as they could. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.

As for minimum wage: those workers are only 3% of our workforce, hardly any percentage large enough to create any positive effect on the economy or poverty. Considering most of those workers are kids in school, stay at home moms working for extra money while their kids are in school, or senior citizens looking to get out of the house, raising minimum wage would only encourage employers to invest in automation to replace them as McDonald's and Wendy's are currently doing.

The politicians care about staying in office. I haven't suggested they are concerned about anything else. Threatening to fire them via the vote is the only leverage we have to get them to do what we want. Obviously that tactic worked... we still have Obamacare.

You seem to be completely delusional and selectively ignorant. Even when I put data right in front of you it is ignored and you ramble on.
I said:
"Across the phase-in period of the minimum-wage increase, GDP would increase by roughly $25 billion, resulting in the creation of approximately 100,000 net new jobs over that period."

You looked at that and wrote:

"As for minimum wage: those workers are only 3% of our workforce, hardly any percentage large enough to create any positive effect on the economy or poverty. "

There will be no repeal. Its political suicide to do so!

How do you figure?

According to the DumBama White House, they created 20 million more new government dependents. 20 million more in a country of 315 million people.

Many others (including myself) got screwed because DumBama gave reasonable healthcare to Democrat constituents at the expense of likely Republican voters.

I think there are more of us than more of them, and making us happy about the change outweighs the liberal losers even if it boiled down to them losing their healthcare.

If they do something so I can get my coverage back, guess what? I could care less if all of them lost theirs. After all, they had no concern about people like us when they got coverage paid by us.

DO you want to go back to the days of "pre-existing conditions"and "drop 'em when they get sick" no matter how much they paid for the premiums?

I would love to, because I've been an insulin dependent diabetic for the last 30 years, and until Commie Care became the law of the land, I was covered with my preexisting condition my entire adult life.

You were one of the lucky ones. But the world does not revolve around YOU. Other folks had horrific experiences before Obamacare.

your last sentence is a blatant lie. NO one was denied medical care before ACA. NO ONE, even those in our country illegally.

Note the date:

July 2, 2008 8:22:53 AM PDT
Eyewitness News
KINGS COUNTY --
New York City hospital officials promised reforms at a Brooklyn psychiatric ward where surveillance footage captured a woman falling from her chair, writhing on the floor and dying as workers watched without helping for an hour. Esmin Green, 49, had been waiting in the emergency room at the city-owned Kings County Hospital Center for nearly 24 hours when she toppled from her seat at 5:32 a.m. on June 19, falling face down on the floor.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If they are disabled, then they go on disability, not welfare.

If they want to work a real job, send them our way. We need tens of thousands of drivers that industry can't find. Some companies will not only provide free training, but pay you while you learn.

They can be disabled temporarily, or waiting for SS disability. You don't see those paid training programs anymore. Wonder why, dupe...35 years of pander to the rich Reaganism, maybe?

Sure they do, transportation companies offer free training all the time. Need me to go to Craigs List and pull a couple out to post here?

What's the catch? Always seem to be one...

Some make you sign a year contract to work with them, some two years, but hey, you're guaranteed a job, plus after your contract is up, you can work anywhere in the country, make your own schedule, and have a well paying job.

I never saw one in 3 years of looking 2006-9.

Maybe you should have looked harder:

* No CDL? No problem! Get CDL Training + Truck Driving Job Here *

C.R. England

Swift Transportation CDL School

Driver No CDL No Problem Will Train Jobs, Employment | Indeed.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I would love to, because I've been an insulin dependent diabetic for the last 30 years, and until Commie Care became the law of the land, I was covered with my preexisting condition my entire adult life.

Now you're covered for catastrophe, so you don't lose your real estate empire- the way insurance was going anyway. FIX THE COSTS. At last we have a way of doing so.

I'm not covered at all, that's the problem.

Without DumBama and the Democrats, I would still likely have coverage today. But this scheme was designed to give lowlifes insurance that they could afford at a cost to working middle-class people. Lowlifes vote Democrat--productive working people likely vote Republican.

It's your dupe boss to blame. And I'm sorry. Won't he have to do it soon under ACA? Or FIX IT. It was just a framework to use forever- The GOP plan. And needs a little time to work.

There is no difference in standing between white Dems and GOPers- Yes, blacks are feqed. And rural GOPers have been helped more than anyone by ACA.

Obama's Health Law: Who Was Helped Most - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/.../obamacare-who-was-helped-most.html
Oct 29, 2014 - Rural areas have fallen further behind larger metropolitan areas. Women are the one modest exception. They have benefited more from Obamacare than men, and they ... who was helped most by the passage of the Affordable Care Act. ... insurance gains does not mean that only Republicans signed up; ...
PressReader - Los Angeles Times: 2017-03-12 - Obamacare ...
PressReader.com - Connecting People Through News
Mar 12, 2017 - Obamacare replacement hits Trump voters hard ... in conservative, rural parts of the country — stand to lose the most in ... In nearly 1,500 counties nationwide, such a person stands to lose more than$6,000 a ... But many of the areas where Trump won big have been helped most by Obamacare's system of ...
Obamacare Repeal Threatens Rural Hospitals and the Trump Voters ...
www.newsweek.com/obamacare-repeal-threatens-rural-hospitals-and-trump-voters-w...
Jan 4, 2017 - Obamacare Repeal Threatens Rural Hospitals and the Trump ... “This hospital, all my life, has been here,” says Keller, now retired. ... In the past six years, more than 70 such facilities have closed, citing ... While the passage of Obamacare was described as historic, many here do not think it helped them.
Donald Trump's Betrayal of the White Working Class - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/trump-healthcare.../508325/
Nov 22, 2016 - Simply Repealing Obamacare Will Hurt the White Working Class ... its passage, Republicanswill have what they need to repeal the Affordable Care Act. ... Trump has been widely credited for tapping the economic anxiety of many white .... discovers is way more complicated than “anyone” ever imagined?
As Republicans And Democrats Argue Over Obamacare Repeal - NPR
www.npr.org/.../fact-check-once-again-lawmakers-are-stretching-the-facts-of-obamacare
Jan 4, 2017 - Lots of facts have been thrown around as the new GOP Congress takes steps ... Obamacareis also actually cheaper on average than the typical employer-provided plan. ... Most people buying insurance on the exchanges receive a ... Schumer also suggested that repealing Obamacare would hurtrural ...

Don't have time to go through all of them, so I selected your very own NYT article, and here is their conclusion which I'm sure you didn't read:

People with the lowest incomes tended to benefit the most from the law. That makes sense, given how the Affordable Care Act is designed. In states that expanded Medicaid, low-income people can get insurance without having to pay a premium. And for middle-income people who qualify for tax credits to help them buy insurance, the subsidies are most generous for those lowest on the income scale. Poorer people were always the least likely to have insurance because their jobs rarely offered it and private premiums were often unaffordable.

So my conclusions was correct: Commie Care was designed to help likely Democrat voters at the cost to middle-class voters like myself who either pay out the ass, or simply can't afford Commie Care plans.

 

[Papageorgio]

You have been caught lying several times and then you change the subject. 10 jobs they have to apply? Then they wouldn't be unemployed in this market for long, so I think you are way off.

Like most people, like you, I don't lie but may be mistaken, hater dupe. But I'm not. And you are usually baffled by New BS GOP BS. The little bits of misinformation add up to your hate of the poor. A lot have disqualifying history, crime, drug history, bad employment history not their fault. Dems have tried to make those less so. Blacks have been hurt the most. 1 out of 6 are disqualified though they've been punished and are reformed. HR computers don't care.

I interview everyone. I hate computers sifting through the apps, I want the communication with real people. Computers are terrible for sifting out potential candidates.

Good man. But an exception.

It should be the rule when you are hiring humans.

Dems are working on it...

No they aren't. Look at Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and other liberal companies, they are the worst. Starbucks has you take a personality test as part as of the hiring process, disgusting.

 

[danielpalos]

It is the People's money.

Yes, working peoples money. We are forced to give it to the non-working people. But that doesn't mean it's their money.

Irrelevant. Congress is delegated the Social Power to Tax, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.

Well let's hope this administration cuts the general welfare to the bone, and forces these people to take care of themselves, and let us working people keep more of our money instead of having to give it to lowlifes.

we don't have a common offense clause nor a general warfare clause; let's cut spending for the common defense, to "the bone".

The defense of this country is an obligation of our representatives; giving people free shit is not.

so is the General welfare. if it can be done for the Common defense it can be done for the General welfare.

 

[JQPublic1]

You were one of the lucky ones. But the world does not revolve around YOU. Other folks had horrific experiences before Obamacare.

What about the millions of folks having horrific experiences WITH Obamacare? No choice of companies, skyrocketing prices, and $5,000 to $10,000 deductibles making the insurance totally unusable?

Most middle class Americans get their insurance through group plans provided by their employers. They did not see such their premiums rise more than normal on an annual basis. If you are one of the 3% that saw astronomical rises in your premiums it was because of this: Just before the PPACA was activated in 2013 you weren't part of a group plan and you got caught up the race to raise premiums as high as possible before rules limiting how much could be charged under Obamacare could be enacted. Greedy bahs-turds like Trump are the culprits not the PPACA.

 

[francoHFW]

Now you're covered for catastrophe, so you don't lose your real estate empire- the way insurance was going anyway. FIX THE COSTS. At last we have a way of doing so.

I'm not covered at all, that's the problem.

Without DumBama and the Democrats, I would still likely have coverage today. But this scheme was designed to give lowlifes insurance that they could afford at a cost to working middle-class people. Lowlifes vote Democrat--productive working people likely vote Republican.

It's your dupe boss to blame. And I'm sorry. Won't he have to do it soon under ACA? Or FIX IT. It was just a framework to use forever- The GOP plan. And needs a little time to work.

There is no difference in standing between white Dems and GOPers- Yes, blacks are feqed. And rural GOPers have been helped more than anyone by ACA.

Obama's Health Law: Who Was Helped Most - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/.../obamacare-who-was-helped-most.html
Oct 29, 2014 - Rural areas have fallen further behind larger metropolitan areas. Women are the one modest exception. They have benefited more from Obamacare than men, and they ... who was helped most by the passage of the Affordable Care Act. ... insurance gains does not mean that only Republicans signed up; ...
PressReader - Los Angeles Times: 2017-03-12 - Obamacare ...
PressReader.com - Connecting People Through News
Mar 12, 2017 - Obamacare replacement hits Trump voters hard ... in conservative, rural parts of the country — stand to lose the most in ... In nearly 1,500 counties nationwide, such a person stands to lose more than$6,000 a ... But many of the areas where Trump won big have been helped most by Obamacare's system of ...
Obamacare Repeal Threatens Rural Hospitals and the Trump Voters ...
www.newsweek.com/obamacare-repeal-threatens-rural-hospitals-and-trump-voters-w...
Jan 4, 2017 - Obamacare Repeal Threatens Rural Hospitals and the Trump ... “This hospital, all my life, has been here,” says Keller, now retired. ... In the past six years, more than 70 such facilities have closed, citing ... While the passage of Obamacare was described as historic, many here do not think it helped them.
Donald Trump's Betrayal of the White Working Class - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/trump-healthcare.../508325/
Nov 22, 2016 - Simply Repealing Obamacare Will Hurt the White Working Class ... its passage, Republicanswill have what they need to repeal the Affordable Care Act. ... Trump has been widely credited for tapping the economic anxiety of many white .... discovers is way more complicated than “anyone” ever imagined?
As Republicans And Democrats Argue Over Obamacare Repeal - NPR
www.npr.org/.../fact-check-once-again-lawmakers-are-stretching-the-facts-of-obamacare
Jan 4, 2017 - Lots of facts have been thrown around as the new GOP Congress takes steps ... Obamacareis also actually cheaper on average than the typical employer-provided plan. ... Most people buying insurance on the exchanges receive a ... Schumer also suggested that repealing Obamacare would hurtrural ...

Don't have time to go through all of them, so I selected your very own NYT article, and here is their conclusion which I'm sure you didn't read:

People with the lowest incomes tended to benefit the most from the law. That makes sense, given how the Affordable Care Act is designed. In states that expanded Medicaid, low-income people can get insurance without having to pay a premium. And for middle-income people who qualify for tax credits to help them buy insurance, the subsidies are most generous for those lowest on the income scale. Poorer people were always the least likely to have insurance because their jobs rarely offered it and private premiums were often unaffordable.

So my conclusions was correct: Commie Care was designed to help likely Democrat voters at the cost to middle-class voters like myself who either pay out the ass, or simply can't afford Commie Care plans.

White GOP voters are just as poor as white Dem voters, dupe.Even poorer, actually. Ignorant racists are poor....

 

[francoHFW]

Like most people, like you, I don't lie but may be mistaken, hater dupe. But I'm not. And you are usually baffled by New BS GOP BS. The little bits of misinformation add up to your hate of the poor. A lot have disqualifying history, crime, drug history, bad employment history not their fault. Dems have tried to make those less so. Blacks have been hurt the most. 1 out of 6 are disqualified though they've been punished and are reformed. HR computers don't care.

I interview everyone. I hate computers sifting through the apps, I want the communication with real people. Computers are terrible for sifting out potential candidates.

Good man. But an exception.

It should be the rule when you are hiring humans.

Dems are working on it...

No they aren't. Look at Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and other liberal companies, they are the worst. Starbucks has you take a personality test as part as of the hiring process, disgusting.

Dem POLITICIANS. Liberal companies my ass- just because they pay and have day care or what? LOL

 

[Papageorgio]

I interview everyone. I hate computers sifting through the apps, I want the communication with real people. Computers are terrible for sifting out potential candidates.

Good man. But an exception.

It should be the rule when you are hiring humans.

Dems are working on it...

No they aren't. Look at Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and other liberal companies, they are the worst. Starbucks has you take a personality test as part as of the hiring process, disgusting.

Dem POLITICIANS. Liberal companies my ass- just because they pay and have day care or what? LOL

Liberal politicians will,do nothing! They didn't stop it from happening, you will see them give lip service to the problem but just as with other issues, they will do nothing, just as they have not helped the blacks get out of property.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I'm not covered at all, that's the problem.

Without DumBama and the Democrats, I would still likely have coverage today. But this scheme was designed to give lowlifes insurance that they could afford at a cost to working middle-class people. Lowlifes vote Democrat--productive working people likely vote Republican.

It's your dupe boss to blame. And I'm sorry. Won't he have to do it soon under ACA? Or FIX IT. It was just a framework to use forever- The GOP plan. And needs a little time to work.

There is no difference in standing between white Dems and GOPers- Yes, blacks are feqed. And rural GOPers have been helped more than anyone by ACA.

Obama's Health Law: Who Was Helped Most - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/.../obamacare-who-was-helped-most.html
Oct 29, 2014 - Rural areas have fallen further behind larger metropolitan areas. Women are the one modest exception. They have benefited more from Obamacare than men, and they ... who was helped most by the passage of the Affordable Care Act. ... insurance gains does not mean that only Republicans signed up; ...
PressReader - Los Angeles Times: 2017-03-12 - Obamacare ...
PressReader.com - Connecting People Through News
Mar 12, 2017 - Obamacare replacement hits Trump voters hard ... in conservative, rural parts of the country — stand to lose the most in ... In nearly 1,500 counties nationwide, such a person stands to lose more than$6,000 a ... But many of the areas where Trump won big have been helped most by Obamacare's system of ...
Obamacare Repeal Threatens Rural Hospitals and the Trump Voters ...
www.newsweek.com/obamacare-repeal-threatens-rural-hospitals-and-trump-voters-w...
Jan 4, 2017 - Obamacare Repeal Threatens Rural Hospitals and the Trump ... “This hospital, all my life, has been here,” says Keller, now retired. ... In the past six years, more than 70 such facilities have closed, citing ... While the passage of Obamacare was described as historic, many here do not think it helped them.
Donald Trump's Betrayal of the White Working Class - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/trump-healthcare.../508325/
Nov 22, 2016 - Simply Repealing Obamacare Will Hurt the White Working Class ... its passage, Republicanswill have what they need to repeal the Affordable Care Act. ... Trump has been widely credited for tapping the economic anxiety of many white .... discovers is way more complicated than “anyone” ever imagined?
As Republicans And Democrats Argue Over Obamacare Repeal - NPR
www.npr.org/.../fact-check-once-again-lawmakers-are-stretching-the-facts-of-obamacare
Jan 4, 2017 - Lots of facts have been thrown around as the new GOP Congress takes steps ... Obamacareis also actually cheaper on average than the typical employer-provided plan. ... Most people buying insurance on the exchanges receive a ... Schumer also suggested that repealing Obamacare would hurtrural ...

Don't have time to go through all of them, so I selected your very own NYT article, and here is their conclusion which I'm sure you didn't read:

People with the lowest incomes tended to benefit the most from the law. That makes sense, given how the Affordable Care Act is designed. In states that expanded Medicaid, low-income people can get insurance without having to pay a premium. And for middle-income people who qualify for tax credits to help them buy insurance, the subsidies are most generous for those lowest on the income scale. Poorer people were always the least likely to have insurance because their jobs rarely offered it and private premiums were often unaffordable.

So my conclusions was correct: Commie Care was designed to help likely Democrat voters at the cost to middle-class voters like myself who either pay out the ass, or simply can't afford Commie Care plans.

White GOP voters are just as poor as white Dem voters, dupe.Even poorer, actually. Ignorant racists are poor....

Really? Then why does every city with many low income areas vote almost exclusively Democrat?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes, working peoples money. We are forced to give it to the non-working people. But that doesn't mean it's their money.

Irrelevant. Congress is delegated the Social Power to Tax, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.

Well let's hope this administration cuts the general welfare to the bone, and forces these people to take care of themselves, and let us working people keep more of our money instead of having to give it to lowlifes.

we don't have a common offense clause nor a general warfare clause; let's cut spending for the common defense, to "the bone".

The defense of this country is an obligation of our representatives; giving people free shit is not.

so is the General welfare. if it can be done for the Common defense it can be done for the General welfare.

Again, welfare back then was not defined as giving people free stuff as it is today. Promoting the General Welfare and Funding the General Welfare are two totally different thing. Nowhere in the US Constitution will you find Funding the General Welfare.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Like most people, like you, I don't lie but may be mistaken, hater dupe. But I'm not. And you are usually baffled by New BS GOP BS. The little bits of misinformation add up to your hate of the poor. A lot have disqualifying history, crime, drug history, bad employment history not their fault. Dems have tried to make those less so. Blacks have been hurt the most. 1 out of 6 are disqualified though they've been punished and are reformed. HR computers don't care.

I interview everyone. I hate computers sifting through the apps, I want the communication with real people. Computers are terrible for sifting out potential candidates.

Good man. But an exception.

It should be the rule when you are hiring humans.

Dems are working on it...

No they aren't. Look at Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and other liberal companies, they are the worst. Starbucks has you take a personality test as part as of the hiring process, disgusting.

Liberals own the entire computer industry since Apple too is a liberal company.

I had to make a delivery to an industrial site at Progressive Insurance. I went all the way to the back to meet the foreman of the construction crew to see how he wanted to do it. They had a race track setup in the back surrounded by trees and flowers.

So I asked him what that track was all about? He said it was a "Stress Track" as he laughed. A stress track I asked, WTF is that?

Any employee that believes they are too stressed out from work simply goes to their supervisor and advises them they are going to the stress track. They allow family and friends of employees to meet them at the stress track, and some even bring their bicycles and roller blades.

Since he was out there everyday, I asked him how stressed these employees are. He said he never seen so many stressed out people in his life as we both burst out in laughter.

I'm willing to bet you don't have many conservative companies with a stress track.

 

[Mr Natural]

Really? Then why does every city with many low income areas vote almost exclusively Democrat?

Because they know that at least with the Dems they've got a shot at a decent life.

The republicans would just as soon they up and die.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Really? Then why does every city with many low income areas vote almost exclusively Democrat?

Because they know that at least with the Dems they've got a shot at a decent life.

The republicans would just as soon they up and die.

Do they have a decent life now?

Maybe it's because they know the Republicans might make them work for what they have instead of it being delivered to their mailbox every month.

 

[Mr Natural]

Really? Then why does every city with many low income areas vote almost exclusively Democrat?

Because they know that at least with the Dems they've got a shot at a decent life.

The republicans would just as soon they up and die.

Do they have a decent life now?

Maybe it's because they know the Republicans might make them work for what they have instead of it being delivered to their mailbox every month.

Yeah, nice theory.

Too bad real life doesn't work that way.