Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam

And I hate radicals and murderers of all stripes....particularly those who hide behind the auspices of religion.

But I don't hate religions. Someone else said it better than I did.

I don't hate Islam. But I'd never ever become a Muslim. I'd rather be a Baptist. But I'd rather jump off a cliff than be a Baptist.

Religions don't kill people....people kill people.

Show me ALL Muslims killing people and I'll show you an empty world.


Not all southerners were slave owners, but southern society as a whole allowed the practice of keeping slaves, not only to exist, but to prosper. As a result, southern society as a whole felt the wrath of reconstruction for it's failure to reign in those that couldn't see the wrong in one person owning another. In my opinion you're dealing with a parallel in Islam. The Islamic society as a group allows the terroristic and barbaric elements of it's religion to thrive and as such is responsible for it's atrocities.

25% of Southerns owned slaves and it was considered a mark of wealth and status.

Less that 1% of Muslims are terrorists/radicals. Is it considered a mark of wealth and status?

Are you TRUELY comparing Southerners with slaves to Islamic terrorists?

It is estimated that less than 6% of southerners owned slaves, but before you get yourself fixated on a numbers game, realize that you missed the point of my earlier post.
My point was that if a society at large condones or even just turns a blind eye to certain behaviors, then that overall society becomes culpable in the misdeeds committed. As the south as a whole was held accountable for the actions of some, then it should come as no surprise that Islam will eventually be held accountable for the actions of the terrorists protected by that society. If "peaceful" Muslims don't want to be tarred by the same brush, they need to do more than say, "Well, he did a bad thing but they shouldn't have dishonored the prophet".
 
When the south refused to concede to the global opinion that they should step away from slavery, the world stepped in and ground them into the dirt.

Let's hope we do the same thing to Islam.
 
Here is more action from the islamic savage beasts.A quran is burned and those muzzie
barbarians go on a killing and beheading riot.What filthy evil beasts muslims are.Iam proud to HATE islam.

At Least 12 Killed During Koran-Burning Protest at UN Office in Afghanistan - FoxNews.com

What fucking animals.

Islam has no more place in a civilized world than Nazism - it's Siamese twin does.

Radical Fucking animals no doubt.

Intollerant assholes who demonize an entire religion based on the actions of a few I was going to say "have no place in the civilized world either", but they're just assholes.

Fuck off and have a great weekend bitches.

:doubt: Wrong... if "moderate" muslims would stand with us against the whackos that supposedly pervert their faith, they will be accepted with open arms. The problem is too many say nothing or simply get offended, they should be with us against the radicals like this man...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpRgqDMrD4M]YouTube - Dr. Zuhdi Jasser's testimony before the Committee on Homeland Security[/ame]
 
Milton Friedman promoted a free market. This market is called corporatism. An essential part of a free market is the "right for all participators to fail." In corporatism some are to big to fail.
What does this have to do with democrats trivializing the threat from radical Islam?

Mussolini defined his Fascism as Corporatism. I guess he and Milton Friedman thought a lot alike.
Salvador Allende and Augusto Pinochet would probably agree.

"The Chilean experiment originated in an exchange program of economists (including Milton Friedman) between the University of Chicago and Chile's Catholic University in Santiago.

"In August 1972, more than a year before the military coup, the CIA funded a 300-page economic blueprint which it supplied to the country's military and some of the most ambitious business families in an effort to hasten the overthrow of Salvador Allende's socialist government, which had been elected by a small plurality in 1970."

Standard Schaefer: an Interview with Michael Hudson on Chile
 
Not all southerners were slave owners, but southern society as a whole allowed the practice of keeping slaves, not only to exist, but to prosper. As a result, southern society as a whole felt the wrath of reconstruction for it's failure to reign in those that couldn't see the wrong in one person owning another. In my opinion you're dealing with a parallel in Islam. The Islamic society as a group allows the terroristic and barbaric elements of it's religion to thrive and as such is responsible for it's atrocities.

25% of Southerns owned slaves and it was considered a mark of wealth and status.

Less that 1% of Muslims are terrorists/radicals. Is it considered a mark of wealth and status?

Are you TRUELY comparing Southerners with slaves to Islamic terrorists?

It is estimated that less than 6% of southerners owned slaves, but before you get yourself fixated on a numbers game, realize that you missed the point of my earlier post.
My point was that if a society at large condones or even just turns a blind eye to certain behaviors, then that overall society becomes culpable in the misdeeds committed. As the south as a whole was held accountable for the actions of some, then it should come as no surprise that Islam will eventually be held accountable for the actions of the terrorists protected by that society. If "peaceful" Muslims don't want to be tarred by the same brush, they need to do more than say, "Well, he did a bad thing but they shouldn't have dishonored the prophet".

About 25% of Southern whites owned slaves...the number you quoted is those who owned more than just a few slaves.

And I got your point just fine.
 
Do you blame Mao or Stalin?

"Food prices have risen 61 percent globally since December 2008, according to the International Monetary Fund. The price of wheat has exploded, more than doubling in the last eight months to $8.56 a bushel."

What does the corporate state have to offer?

"The corporate state has nothing to offer the left or the right but fear.

"It uses fear—fear of secular humanism or fear of Christian fascists—to turn the population into passive accomplices.

"As long as we remain afraid nothing will change.

"Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman, two of the major architects for unregulated capitalism, should never have been taken seriously. But the wonders of corporate propaganda and corporate funding turned these fringe figures into revered prophets in our universities, think tanks, the press, legislative bodies, courts and corporate boardrooms.

"We still endure the cant of their discredited economic theories even as Wall Street sucks the U.S. Treasury dry and engages once again in the speculation that has to date evaporated some $40 trillion in global wealth.

"We are taught by all systems of information to chant the mantra that the market knows best."

Does the market know best?

Milton Friedman promoted a free market. This market is called corporatism. An essential part of a free market is the "right for all participators to fail." In corporatism some are to big to fail.
What does this have to do with democrats trivializing the threat from radical Islam?
Democrats and Republicans trivialize the threat from globalization. This was a point I made several pages back while trying to contrast threat levels from radical Islam and the US transnational corporate warfare state.

Radical Islam is not a threat to the US in the same sense that global corporatism is, imho. Radical Islam makes a convenient enemy for those who get rich from arms sales and oil sales in the same way the USSR did during the Cold War.

If radical Islam vanished tomorrow in the same way the Soviet Union did 20 years ago, the corporatists would simply conjure a new "enemy" in order to continue their blood for oil "free market" plunder.
9/11 WOULD NOT OF HAPPENED if the evil deathcult of islam was not allowed
here muzz lover!
 
Milton Friedman promoted a free market. This market is called corporatism. An essential part of a free market is the "right for all participators to fail." In corporatism some are to big to fail.
What does this have to do with democrats trivializing the threat from radical Islam?
Democrats and Republicans trivialize the threat from globalization. This was a point I made several pages back while trying to contrast threat levels from radical Islam and the US transnational corporate warfare state.

Radical Islam is not a threat to the US in the same sense that global corporatism is, imho. Radical Islam makes a convenient enemy for those who get rich from arms sales and oil sales in the same way the USSR did during the Cold War.

If radical Islam vanished tomorrow in the same way the Soviet Union did 20 years ago, the corporatists would simply conjure a new "enemy" in order to continue their blood for oil "free market" plunder.
9/11 WOULD NOT OF HAPPENED if the evil deathcult of islam was not allowed
here muzz lover!

Who is going to "not allow" a 1300 year old religion practiced by almost a billion? :lol::lol::lol:
 
Democrats and Republicans trivialize the threat from globalization. This was a point I made several pages back while trying to contrast threat levels from radical Islam and the US transnational corporate warfare state.

Radical Islam is not a threat to the US in the same sense that global corporatism is, imho. Radical Islam makes a convenient enemy for those who get rich from arms sales and oil sales in the same way the USSR did during the Cold War.

If radical Islam vanished tomorrow in the same way the Soviet Union did 20 years ago, the corporatists would simply conjure a new "enemy" in order to continue their blood for oil "free market" plunder.
9/11 WOULD NOT OF HAPPENED if the evil deathcult of islam was not allowed
here muzz lover!

Who is going to "not allow" a 1300 year old religion practiced by almost a billion? :lol::lol::lol:

Simple ,You F ing idiot,outlaw islam in USA as a subversive murderous deathcult that it is.
Export all the muslim savage animals.The ones that dont want to leave should be put in concentration camps and srerilized
 
Milton Friedman promoted a free market. This market is called corporatism. An essential part of a free market is the "right for all participators to fail." In corporatism some are to big to fail.
What does this have to do with democrats trivializing the threat from radical Islam?
Democrats and Republicans trivialize the threat from globalization. This was a point I made several pages back while trying to contrast threat levels from radical Islam and the US transnational corporate warfare state.

Radical Islam is not a threat to the US in the same sense that global corporatism is, imho. Radical Islam makes a convenient enemy for those who get rich from arms sales and oil sales in the same way the USSR did during the Cold War.

If radical Islam vanished tomorrow in the same way the Soviet Union did 20 years ago, the corporatists would simply conjure a new "enemy" in order to continue their blood for oil "free market" plunder.
9/11 WOULD NOT OF HAPPENED if the evil deathcult of islam was not allowed
here muzz lover!
Why do they hate us?

A careful reading of the 9/11 Commission's 567-page final report reveals a single sentence on page 147 that sheds light on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's ("the mastermind of 9/11 attacks") motivation:

"KSM's animus toward the United States stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel."

Ray McGovern: How the 9/11 Report Soft-Pedaled Root Causes
 
9/11 WOULD NOT OF HAPPENED if the evil deathcult of islam was not allowed
here muzz lover!

Who is going to "not allow" a 1300 year old religion practiced by almost a billion? :lol::lol::lol:

Simple ,You F ing idiot,outlaw islam in USA as a subversive murderous deathcult that it is.
Export all the muslim savage animals.The ones that dont want to leave should be put in concentration camps and srerilized

Naw, can't outlaw a religion.

But we have to prosecute them ferociously for breaking the law and for inciting riot. They've been careful not to do that here much. Our law enforcement just needs to ride the shit out of them. And people who live in areas where they've set up camp need to make it hard for them to get by. I believe their training camps do get busted up fairly regularly here, but it NEVER makes the news. I don't know if that's because the press won't cover it, or because law enforcement and the agencies involved in breaking up cells just don't want it reported. It's a shame, though, because when it doesn't get reported idiots like Bod and ther pro-terrrorist assholes can get away with pretending it's not happening.
 
Ok, what do you think is a legit potential risk of what radical islam can do to the US?

(I'm not a democrat, just curious)

Obviously it is our COMFORT and our great investment toward it here within America. We represent a horrid level of unacceptable idiocy to the world, perhaps, and those that choose to acknowledge jihad for whatever it could be for themselves individually recognize that.
 
I would love to see the burka outlawed, though.
Why?? :confused:

Because it's a symbol of the barbarity of Islam; because it's the primary outward symbol of their oppression of women. Because it can hide a lot of pain and suffering.

But mostly because I think if we outlawed the burka, the shitheels wouldn't be able to send women all over the world...they hide behind those women. Make it more difficult and they're a little more exposed.

And it's psychological. We can't outlaw the religion, but we can sure as shit bring pressure to bear when it comes to the practice of it.

Private empoyers can also put into place policies that tightens screws. No skull caps, no prayer.

Little things like that. It is exactly how the south and Mormons were brought to heel. So I guess the analogy of the South was apt to a degree.
 
Why do they hate us?

"KSM's animus toward the United States stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel."

Ray McGovern: How the 9/11 Report Soft-Pedaled Root Causes

America's backing of the terrorist state of Israel is 99% of our problem with the Islamic world. :evil:
"Hats off to (the 9/11) commission staff for shoehorning that information in and to the commissioners who let it stay. This is highly unusual prose for a Washington establishment usually allergic to any hint at the cruel reality that Israel is the tail wagging the dog--the dogs of war let slip on Iraq by those in the Bush administration who draw no distinction between U.S. strategic interests and those of Israel."

Ray McGovern: How the 9/11 Report Soft-Pedaled Root Causes

If it's true Harry Truman accepted a suitcase containing $2 million from an American Zionist in 1948, the interest on that bribe has nearly destroyed the American Republic.
 
Who is going to "not allow" a 1300 year old religion practiced by almost a billion? :lol::lol::lol:

Simple ,You F ing idiot,outlaw islam in USA as a subversive murderous deathcult that it is.
Export all the muslim savage animals.The ones that dont want to leave should be put in concentration camps and srerilized

Naw, can't outlaw a religion.

But we have to prosecute them ferociously for breaking the law and for inciting riot. They've been careful not to do that here much. Our law enforcement just needs to ride the shit out of them. And people who live in areas where they've set up camp need to make it hard for them to get by. I believe their training camps do get busted up fairly regularly here, but it NEVER makes the news. I don't know if that's because the press won't cover it, or because law enforcement and the agencies involved in breaking up cells just don't want it reported. It's a shame, though, because when it doesn't get reported idiots like Bod and ther pro-terrrorist assholes can get away with pretending it's not happening.
What if the shoe was on the other foot?

If an Arab Superpower had killed thousands of US civilians in this country since 1991, would you resist or collaborate with your oppressors?
 
That's not putting the shoe on the other foot. That's a fantasy that justifies terrorism against the US.
 
I love seeing ironic christians cry about muslim encroachment. They don't like it when muslims influence society but scream bloody fucking murder every christmas if the door greeter at wal mart doesn't implore baby jesus while handing out shopping carts.

Bring the muslims. They are no worse than rabid christian fundies who have their own reasons to enact the same bullshit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top